rrtyui wrote:

_(:3 」∠)_

http://puu.sh/2nCRp

awesome

Natteke wrote:

zhuihui

1. 00:12:286 (2) - You could try to avoid that tiny overlap which looks kinda bad (especially if they are the only ones, like in this case). Just move it a little bit upwards (00:14:998 (2) - as well)
2. 00:27:201 (1,2) - What about stacking 00:27:201 (1) - on 00:28:557 (1) - (x:216 y:280) and ctrl+g on 00:27:540 (2) - ?
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:44:828 (1) - I think ctrl+g-ing this will flow better and it's more readable for new players.
4. 01:10:591 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,1,1,2,3,4) - Awesome! I have nothing against this but you could make this pattern just a little bit wider, so that the circle pattern will be more noticeable

1. 00:21:269 (5,6) - Why do these doubles have whistles and others before doesn't?
2. 00:47:540 (8) - This shape looks a bit awful :z

1. 00:14:998 (4) - What about flipping this slider horizzontaly? It plays better on my side, but probably it's just me.
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:41:608 (3,4,5) - You could start un-stacking those triplets/stream from this one, since you started doing this from 00:50:421 (2,3,4) - and it was kinda sudden.
3. 00:59:066 (4,5,6) - Doesn't play well on this one, though. You could make this and 00:59:574 (7,8,1) - stacked, like you did with every note over/under slider.

1. 01:24:998 (3,4,5) - You might apply the same pattern you did previously (this three beats should be a little curved like 01:22:286 (2,3,4) - and 01:23:642 (2,3,4) -)
2. 01:52:625 (1) - You know... ;_;

1. 00:12:286 (1) - I don't remember if it's rankable or not but you could try moving it so that it's under 00:11:947 (5) -'s path. You can see the ending of the slider so it shouldn't be that hard to read. However, you can always overlap them in that way:
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:33:981 (1) - Having this slider placed with the same spacing of the stream would be better in my opinion
3. 01:55:252 (5) - Why isn't it in the same line of 01:54:998 (4,1) - ? It's kinda awful to see ;_;