21:41 *Lach is editing [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/229321 Kairikibear - Runaway Lolita Holic [loli]]
21:41 RLC: dlin
21:41 Lach: it sucks
21:41 Lach: also no hitsounds done just normal sets on some white ticks for consistency
21:41 RLC: o ok
21:42 RLC: oh i hear it
21:42 Lach: it starts of 1/4
21:42 Lach: but it's 1/6
21:42 RLC: nah
21:42 RLC: it's entirely 1/8
21:42 RLC: LOL
21:42 Lach: O
21:43 Lach: its confusing
21:43 Lach: i kinda wanna leave it but at the same time it's just there
21:43 RLC: yeah stuff like that is hard to discern by ear
21:43 RLC: yeah
21:43 RLC: looool
21:44 Lach: 00:20:890 (1,2,3,4) - do you think these fit?
21:44 RLC: i would reverse 00:21:048 (2,4) - 
21:44 RLC: individually
21:44 RLC: and then do something about 00:21:521 (1) - 
21:45 RLC: so that it's not awkward with (4)
21:45 Lach: yeah, i kinda drove myself into a corner there
21:47 Lach: also can you take a look at those red timing points down the end
21:47 RLC: i can try
21:47 RLC: but i'll probably be wrong
21:47 RLC: is it a slowdown
21:47 Lach: it speeds up there, it has 3 or 4 changes, only got 2 of them, though
21:47 RLC: oh
21:47 RLC: ic
22:05 RLC: fuck this is hard to time
22:05 RLC: sec
22:05 RLC: augh
22:05 RLC: i guess i'll do this the hardcore math way
22:05 RLC: brb
22:06 Lach: O
22:16 Lach: just how are you using math to work this out
22:24 RLC: i
22:24 RLC: put the mp3 in audacity
22:24 RLC: measured the distance in milliseconds
22:24 RLC: between
22:24 RLC: specific wave peaks
22:24 Lach: oh
22:25 RLC: and I STILL DON'T KNOW IF THIS TIMING IS RIGHT
22:25 RLC: ok
22:25 RLC: so
22:25 Lach: can i have your brain
22:25 RLC: 1. Offset: 6,364ms	BPM: 190.00
22:25 RLC: eh
22:25 RLC: wtf
22:25 RLC: not that
22:25 RLC: sec
22:26 RLC: 03:32:258 - 196bpm
22:26 RLC: four measures later, i think it goes to
22:26 RLC: 201
22:26 RLC: (not eight measures, but four)
22:26 RLC: and then, four measures after that, it goes to 206 i think
22:26 RLC: and four measures after that, 211
22:27 RLC: and then four measures after that, 216 for just one measure
22:27 Lach: what the the fuck is this sorcery
22:27 RLC: and after that one measure, it reverts to 190
22:27 RLC: i think this is accurate... ish...
22:27 Lach: a measure being this distance correct? http://puu.sh/2hmKn
22:27 RLC:  yea
22:28 RLC: there's also a slowdown at the very end for like one measure, but i have no idea how to measure that
22:29 RLC: anyhow, try applying that timing and see how it sounds
22:29 Lach: it sounds very early
22:29 Lach: like all of it is slightly before the beat
22:29 RLC: strange
22:29 Lach: or is that just correct timing
22:29 RLC: i have no idea
22:30 Lach: nvm
22:30 Lach: it was me
22:30 Lach: i still had that first point at 198
22:30 RLC: ah
22:30 RLC: fix that and then see how it sounds
22:32 RLC: what really bothers me is how
22:32 RLC: the bpms i have all are all increments of 5
22:32 RLC: EXCEPT
22:32 RLC: for the first one
22:32 RLC: which is 190->196
22:34 Lach: that sounds perfect now
22:34 RLC: cool
22:35 RLC: i'm still unsure why i got those numbers instead of like, 195, 200, 205, 210, 215
22:35 RLC: shrug
22:35 RLC: whatever works, i guess
22:35 Lach: well
22:35 Lach: it's not professional composition i suppose
22:35 RLC: well i'm sure the creator used some sequencer or something
22:36 RLC: and input the bpm increases by hand
22:36 Lach: update and check
22:36 RLC: ok
22:36 Lach: it sounds perfect to me
22:36 RLC: yeah this is exactly what i said, great
22:36 RLC: yay
22:37 Lach: judging by how the first offset matches the second one perfectly, you either judged using my offset, or mine was pretty spot on
22:37 RLC: i judged using yours
22:37 RLC: lololol
22:37 Lach: ah
22:37 Lach: well, can just shift them all now
22:37 RLC: oh so if you
22:37 Lach: if it needs changing
22:37 RLC: ah
22:37 RLC: yeah
22:40 Lach: ell
22:40 Lach: well*
22:40 RLC: i'm calling in charles
22:40 RLC: to take a look
22:40 Lach: thanks a heap, i would never have thought of that
22:40 RLC: ready your anus
22:40 Lach: o shit
22:41 RLC: idk if he has time, actually
22:41 RLC: but we'll see
22:42 RLC: wait shit i just thought of something...
22:42 RLC: brb i'm going to try a new timing
22:42 Lach: ok
22:50 RLC: ok charles took a look; the timing i gave you is accurate
22:50 RLC: yay
22:50 Lach: sweet
22:50 Lach: also reversing those 1/4 sliders makes it harder for me to play it, anyway
22:50 Lach: although the current state of everything so far isn't exactly playable anyway
22:50 Lach: hahahuehuaeaheu
22:50 RLC: hue
22:50 RLC: uhhuaeuheahueeauh
22:51 RLC: anyway, the piano thing you were talking about
22:51 RLC: sec
22:51 RLC: 00:22:785 - here it's 1/4
22:51 RLC: 00:23:416 - 1/8
22:51 RLC: lol
22:52 Lach: i'm thinking just ignore it, honestly
22:52 RLC: you can barely even hear it when it's 1/4
22:52 RLC: yeah that's a wise choice
22:52 RLC: it'd be too weird to incorporate
22:52 RLC: and you're following the vocals anyway
22:52 Lach: yeah, for 1 and 2
22:52 Lach: would be weird to suddenly 1/8 stream
22:52 Lach: or even 1/8 slider
22:52 RLC: yea
22:52 RLC: hue
22:53 RLC: 380 bpm npnp
22:53 Lach: ye ezpz
22:53 Lach: WELL
22:53 Lach: the video has like shaking or some shit there
22:53 Lach: anyone who uses video will notice it matching the song
22:53 *Lach shrugs
22:53 RLC: haha
22:53 RLC: cool