1. GLZ (-1 stars, 707 notes)
2. Hard (3,27 stars, 570 notes)

1. You need a Normal/Easy diff if you want it to be ranked. The map is too short for approval.

1. 00:22:900 (1) - Remove NC.
2. 00:27:605 - Add a note? The silence is not here but right after.
3. 00:46:037 (1,2) - Try stacking 1 with the end of 00:46:821 (3) or 2 with the beggining of 00:45:449 (4).
4. 00:21:527 - Add a note?
5. 00:59:566 (2,4) - Small overlapping.
6. 01:07:801 (5) - Move it one grid left for a better parallelogram with 01:06:821 (1,2,3,4).
7. 01:13:488 (5) - CTRL+G?
8. 01:23:684 - Add a note?
9. 01:45:449 (6,2) - Small overlap.
10. 02:32:703 (2) - CTRL+G? As well as 02:33:096 (3)?
11. 02:33:684 (4) - Move it one or two grid up in order to be at the center of the triangle.
12. 02:34:076 (1,2,3,4) - These overlapping really don't look good.
13. 02:50:547 (4,1) - Move it to x=344 y=224 for a perfect parallelogram with 02:49:958 (1,2,3).
14. 02:50:154 (2,5) - This oerlapping doesn't look good.
15. 03:39:174 (1,2,3,1) - ^
16. 03:52:507 (2,5) - Try to stack them.
17. 04:00:350 (4,3) - Overlap.

1. Don't you mean "strong"?
2. 00:37:017 (4,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - Too many NC here.
3. 00:47:998 - Add a note?
4. 01:15:252 (4,5) - This is the kind of jump i talked about. A 3x jump here seems useless. "Soften" the jump a little.
5. 01:42:311 (1) - This jump is even worse.....
6. 01:51:135 (2,5) - Overlap.
7. 02:07:998 (4,5) - Nearly symmetrical.
8. 02:32:115 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - All these straight lines (and the NC) doesn't look good.
9. 03:34:664 (1,3) - Not symmetrical.
10. 03:52:115 (4,6) - Overlap.
11. 03:49:958 (1,2,3,4) - If 2 and 4 are at the same abscissa, shouldn't ut be the same for 1 and 3.

rezoons wrote:

Hi ,

Mod from my queue:

Feeling when i played the diff:
Weak: Very good. I really liked it. ^^
Stronk: Coorect. But the placement really looks random a lot of times and there are a lot of exagerated jump that doesn't match the song.

Mod:
[General]

1. You need a Normal/Easy diff if you want it to be ranked. The map is too short for approval.
   Crap.. i'll ask for some guest diff, i don't want to make anymore diff for this.

[Weak]

1. 00:22:900 (1) - Remove NC.Done
2. 00:27:605 - Add a note? The silence is not here but right after.Done
3. 00:46:037 (1,2) - Try stacking 1 with the end of 00:46:821 (3) or 2 with the beggining of 00:45:449 (4).Done
4. 00:21:527 - Add a note?There's already a note
5. 00:59:566 (2,4) - Small overlapping.Fixed
6. 01:07:801 (5) - Move it one grid left for a better parallelogram with 01:06:821 (1,2,3,4).Fixed
7. 01:13:488 (5) - CTRL+G?Yes
8. 01:23:684 - Add a note?Done
9. 01:45:449 (6,2) - Small overlap.Fixed
10. 02:32:703 (2) - CTRL+G? As well as 02:33:096 (3)?Yes
11. 02:33:684 (4) - Move it one or two grid up in order to be at the center of the triangle.Done
12. 02:34:076 (1,2,3,4) - These overlapping really don't look good.Fixed
13. 02:50:547 (4,1) - Move it to x=344 y=224 for a perfect parallelogram with 02:49:958 (1,2,3).Fixed
14. 02:50:154 (2,5) - This oerlapping doesn't look good.Fixed
15. 03:39:174 (1,2,3,1) - ^Fixed
16. 03:52:507 (2,5) - Try to stack them.Done
17. 04:00:350 (4,3) - Overlap.Fixed

[Stronk]

1. Don't you mean "strong"? "Stronk" it's more powerfull
2. 00:37:017 (4,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - Too many NC here.Fixed
3. 00:47:998 - Add a note?No
4. 01:15:252 (4,5) - This is the kind of jump i talked about. A 3x jump here seems useless. "Soften" the jump a little.Fixed, a bit..
5. 01:42:311 (1) - This jump is even worse.....That's ok
6. 01:51:135 (2,5) - Overlap.Fixed
7. 02:07:998 (4,5) - Nearly symmetrical.Fixed
8. 02:32:115 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - All these straight lines (and the NC) doesn't look good.It looks fine for me, just removed some NCs
9. 03:34:664 (1,3) - Not symmetrical.Fixed, a bit
10. 03:52:115 (4,6) - Overlap.Fixed
11. 03:49:958 (1,2,3,4) - If 2 and 4 are at the same abscissa, shouldn't ut be the same for 1 and 3.Fixed

~Good Luck~