Come[Back]Home wrote:

Insane

00:04:542 (2,3,4,5,6) Das würde um einiges besser aussehen wenn sie sich nicht berühren würden, oder wenn die Overlaps immer gleich sind, was sie hier aber nicht sind. Sieht nicht toll aus stimmt
00:18:538 (4,5) Ein Tick mehr Distanz würde hier echt nice aussehen, ansonsten sieht es so zerquetscht aus das ist eigentlich genau so beabsichtigt (die sollen parallel zu (2,3) sein)
00:45:364 (5,6,7) Ein Stack hier würde sich angenehmer spielen, so triplets nach 1/1 objects spielen sich immer etwas weird, daher lieber nen Stack. hm, find das ein bisschen langweiliger aber okay
01:08:524 (2,3,4,5) Würde das so nicht besser aussehen? ist schon mit Absicht so "nicht-standard" ^^
01:36:183 (5) Der Slider sieht ziemlich random und blöd aus imo hab ihn ein bisschen runder gemacht
01:59:510 Ab hieran währe doch sowas viel geiler (playtechnisch her) gute Idee
02:32:834 (8,1) Das sieht nicht wirklich schön aus, und spielerisch macht sowas auch nicht wirklich Spaß, ich würde es woanders platzieren mit ctrl+j oder so ich mag es D:
03:01:159 Ab hieran währe doch so ein Pattern cool geändert
03:05:325 (1) Der Slider endet falsch, wahrscheinlich aber nicht absichtlich jo, war nicht ganz gesnapped
03:08:241 Es gibt viel schönere Streams als den, der sieht einfach nur random platziert aus. Mal nur als Beispiel die Ecken sind schon absichtlich so, hab's jetzt aber trotzdem ein bisschen abgerundet und schöner gemacht
03:16:322 (2,3,4,5,6) Hier würden sich 1/2 slider viel besser spielen, 3/4 fühlt sich ziemlich erzwungen hier an ich finde das passt so perfekt zur Musik
03:26:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6) ^ hier sind es doch sogar 1/2 slider
03:30:484 Bist du dir sicher den Drum hier zu ignorieren? hmm, folge eigentlich der Gitarre und finde diese mini Break passt da schön, idk
04:01:976 (3,4,5,6) Das würde schön aussehen ohne die (6) unter der (4) geändert
04:05:725 (4,5,6,7,8,1) Ein bisschen Bewegung in dem Stream würde echt nice sein, er sieht einfach nur so herzlos platziert aus. Mach ihn mal etwas kurvig, denn sieht es schon besser aus, und spielt sich auch nice. okay
04:44:464 (2,3,4,5,6) Wie die sich berühren sieht in keinster Weise gut aus find das jetzt nicht sooo schlimm aber okay
04:55:461 (3,5) ^ ^

Achja, deaktiviere Widescreen Support und Letterboxing. yo

So, viel Glück mit deiner Map :3
Hoffe der Mod hilft etwas~

Baraatje123 wrote:

Hi

[Insane]
Can't you give it a custom diffname? It's for approval anyways, then "Insane" feels a bit bland tbh I don't like these "super duper ohmagad I am so creative" diff names, feels too forced to me, I like it more simple

00:00:210 (1,2,3) - Can you please space them more (or less) so the distance wouldn't eb the exact same as the following sstream? it is intended this way
00:08:207 (5,6) - These 2 are low spaced, while the others 00:07:208 (2,3,4) - all have big spacing. Why not use it here too? Playing wise they kinda have the same spacing, the distance from sliderhead (2) to sliderhead (3) is exactly the same as from sliderhead (5) to (6) and that's the movement you are going to do while playing. Also this keeps the flow and a nice pattern at the sime time.
00:15:205 (2,3,4,5,6) - Spacing is soo low compared to the previous parts. Why not increase it? changed a bit? idk if this is really better now
00:52:862 (4,5,6) - The emphasis feels a bit odd. Sliderends have no emphasis, but (4,5) (all 3 audible parts) are of equal power in the music. imo 3 circles would work better true, changed
00:58:860 (5,6) - The lower spacing actually makes this a bit awkward don't feel like this is a problem
01:12:856 (8,1) - nazi - why not tro to match (8)'s head so it's perfectly on top of (1)'s tick? done
01:24:020 (1,1) - Spinnerstarts have absolutely 0 emphasis, so it's better to start the spinner 1/4 (or 1/2) later, and a circle on the strong sound (applies to both spinners) I reeeaally dislike these spinner-circle-spinner-etc parts in maps
01:35:183 (2,3,4) - Not a fan of these overlaps, consider spacing them out more hm okay, changed
01:51:179 (2,3,4,5) - Flow feels really broken here. It's a circle, then completely the otherway around (from (4,5) true, fixed
02:20:837 (4,6) - See the nazi suggestion made above aye
03:07:990 (1) - Is there a need for the whole stream to have whistles? Can't you just juse them as a different sampleset as hitnormal, so the ears of people who turn off custom sounds don't get raped by the default skin's whistls uhm, good point, I'll ask phaZ about it
03:16:322 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Try to make this prettier. I do think this rhythm is nice, but the slightoverlaps make this look a little bad. Why not make them all blankets? done, kinda
03:24:819 (1) - Why is there a NC? There is no sound which supports it because there is a new motif starting in the music and a new pattern, combo would also get too big otherwise
03:24:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18) - The combo is really long, especially when you apply ^^, so add a few NCs, hm I don't think it is really a problem but okay, changed it 03:25:486 (7) - if you only do this one, it's already fine! wouldn't make too much sense to only add NC here and not 03:26:152 (1) - and 03:24:819 (1) - aswell (music wise and pattern wise) imo
03:59:143 (2,3,4,5,6) - Overlap feels a bit untidy intended

Hmm, usually I dislike old maps, but this one's not that bad
Good job!

BriedisLT wrote:

Sorry if I come across as rude sometimes. Don't take it personally. honesty is the best
[box=m4m]00:12:456 + - 01:15:605 + - 00:17:121 - - 00:45:030 - - 00:49:113 - - 01:47:430 - - 01:53:095 + - 02:19:754 + - 02:35:750 - - 02:40:748 - - 02:41:081 - - 02:57:077 - - 03:12:406 - - 03:33:734 + - 04:01:059 - - 04:26:052 - - 04:33:217 - - 04:59:376 + - missed beat note changes done according to colour
00:22:203 (1,2,3) - fill in blues -- missed beat notes\ I want the emphasis on the guitar here
00:33:034 (4,5) - muh triple okay
00:40:698 (7,8) - sliders starting on reds is not usually a good idea unless it fits the music like here
01:00:693 (3,4,5,6) - ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww don't see the problem
01:15:522 - here stars 1/6 beats that are wut m8 and ignoring them or not hitting all of them is unsatisfying and lacking during play uh I don't hear any 1/6s here
01:16:855 - include circles on the whites, the hats need loving too okay
01:21:020 (1,2,3) - this part is 1/6 and should realistically be 4 circles I only hear 3 beats here
01:26:352 - 1/6 part again pls halp uh, again...?
01:21:187 (3,4) - consider a slider here I'd really prefer 01:21:354 to be clickable
02:05:091 (3) - u faking wot with this, it seriously doest fit into rhythm ...guitar? it's perfect D:
02:57:993 (3,4,5,6) - pls no this is physically hurting me, just move it over to the left on the timeline and everything will be awesome nah sorry but I'll have to hurt you here
03:02:159 - more 1/6 nonsense nah
03:08:241 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - consider splitting the combo done
03:16:322 (2,3,4,5,6) - just follow the rhythm better but it follows it perfectly right now
03:30:484 - left the void - kills the pace well okay
04:01:975 (3,4,5,6) - just move these to the left please no again
04:17:971 - two 1/6 beats idk idk either
04:20:804 (3,4,5) - this doesnt work, just use regular sliders and circles instead why wouldn't it work, I really like it
04:35:050 okay - 04:35:716 would be weird to play - muh triples

I have the feeling you are focusing too much on the drums and ignoring other instruments sometimes

i hate pp wrote:

Hello

Zzzz...

01:36:183 (5) - I don't think so why not D:
02:05:341 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - Break this up into 2 combos so the number doesn't reach 15 added NC on (4) but don't really see why a combo of 15 would be bad
02:18:005 (3,4,5,6) - Make the spacing consistent changed a bit
02:32:001 (5,6) - Make this flow down okay
02:34:167 (3) - Reverse slider current way is more interesting
02:45:830 (6) - ^ don't like it that much
03:05:825 (2) - ^ "this kills the flow"
03:15:822 (2) - Move this up why? I think it is currently perfect pattern and spacing wise
04:20:804 (3) - Reverse slider mmhh, would be a bit boring imo
04:59:626 (2) - Move this so it matches the symmetry of 04:58:793 (4,5) - I am more concerned about it lining up nicely with 04:59:460 (1,2) -

Nice map.

Good luck with it thank you

Shiirn wrote:

holy shit it's Shiirn

Suggestions
Major suggestions
Unrankable issues

Insane

1. Generally speaking this feels kind of awkward and the patterns are fairly weak and you make a few mistakes with emphasis that are best worked out with experience rather than instruction, but don't get me wrong: this is a fun map.
2. 00:04:542 (2,3,4,5,6) - feel like these would be better if they were symmetrical over the axis. was my intention to not do it like this at first, but changed now
3. 00:14:206 (8,9,10) - make triangle equilateral ...it is?
4. 00:38:199 (10,1) - these can be blanketed, or better they are fine already
5. 00:49:363 (1,2,3) - blankets arent perfect but hardly noticeable fixed
6. 00:50:862 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Make a proper honeycomb pattern. done And try to avoid having 1/2 doubles like (8,9) are. I like this double, makes it interesting and kinda fits
7. 00:54:694 (1) - curve this more sharply so that it angles more at (2). done
8. 01:36:183 (5) - neat idea but im not too sure about the rankability because if its angle of going back into itself. please be okay
9. 01:58:677 (1) - weird idea but maybe move the node to the left so it's not a perfectly vertical slider? imo looks cooler. nah, I want it to be parallel to the stream
10. 02:43:831 (11,1) - blanket these done, kinda?
11. 02:49:829 (2,3,4,5) - I hate stacked 1/2 doubles. I'd rather have a neat pattern. I spread out the second one but kept the first one
12. 02:51:995 (1,2) - these don't... well, blanket. lol hu? they look fine to me
13. 02:52:828 (3,5) - ^ ^
14. 03:20:154 (1) - new combo for readability hmm, added it 03:19:821 - here instead because it fits the music better there
15. 03:31:151 - I expected there to be a note here. I tried it but don't like it
16. 03:46:147 (3,4,5,6) - I think this square is off....? might be an optical illusion. everything is perfectly rotated by 90°
17. The rest of it follows in this kind of vein. The patterns are clumsy but are perfectly functional. Keep going, buddy.

Sonnyc wrote:

1. 00:42:698 (7,8,1) - (8) is having a really strong sound, and you've decided to express as full hitsounds. But in term of spacing, giving a bigger jump to (1) wasn't effective on emphasizing (8). made a little jump towards (8) but I really want to have the bigger distance to (1) afterwards because new motif in the music and stuff
2. 02:11:506 (10,11,1) - Weird spacing. changed
3. 02:32:834 (8,1) - Hope these symmetry were done better. I like it
4. 03:00:493 (2,3) - Stack these better please, but not sure if it will break again due to editor bugs. done
5. 03:26:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - (1,3,5) contains a beat in the slide, while (2,4,6) relatively doesn't. You could've expressed those difference, but currently everything is just the same as a 1/2 slider. I am focusing on the guitar here and not on the drums idk
6. 03:30:484 (3,4,5,6) - (3,4) are 1.2x and (4,5,6) is 1.00x. Considering there was a rhythm shift at (5,6), containing both spacing and rhythm change didn't felt nice. Consider maintaining a consistent 1.0x for (2,3,4) or keep using 1.2x for (4,5,6). changed to 1.0x but it doesn't look as nice now imo hmm
7. 03:34:650 (1,2,3) - Good stack patterns here, but the transition to the intro felt pretty unnatural. Actually the pattern begins to work natural starting 03:34:983, and that's because 03:34:817 has no major beat that demands a click. Changing your rhythm to make 03:34:817 empty will make the transition natural. I don't get what you mean by bad transition, I honestly don't see a problem and like it how it currently is
8. 03:41:481 (5,6) - Personally having a different curve didn't felt organized. well okay
9. 04:02:975 (6) - Consider nc to discern with the previous S curve 120' rotation pattern. considered it but adding a NC here would mean also having to add one 01:12:356 (6) - and 02:58:993 (6) - for consistency which doesn't fit/looks bad imo and I don't like at all
10. 04:15:305 (4,5,6,7) - Nice attempt on your spacing increase pattern, but the broken flow of (7,8) pretty damaged it. Anyways, adding NC at 04:15:972 will make your spacing increase pattern work better. again not changing it because having to change all previous similar parts for consistency doesn't look good imo
11. 04:23:302 (3) - Redundant note. Remove this since the silence begins after 04:23:136. the guitar is still playing there and that's what I am mapping to
12. 04:26:802 - 04:27:469 - These strong beat getting ignored didn't felt well. focusing on the guitar again

Good work.

Natsu wrote:

Hi, phaZ requested this (2 times) on my queue

General:

1. Can you provide me an official source for this metadata? nothing official, I just found this in the properties and details of the mp3 http://puu.sh/oee2W.png under album

1. 00:22:203 (1) - remove NC, I don't see any special reason to break your combo pattern it's there because of the high guitar beginning to play
2. 00:48:696 (1) - this new combo doesn't make much sense with your comboing i'd just remove it, if you really want to make something special with the melody and the comboing, then a better place for this would be 00:48:863 (2) - done also we already talking about this part, I'm kinda curious in why you didn't mapped 00:49:113 - ? because I mapped it to the guitar and not the drums
3. 01:15:355 (9,10,11,12,13) - this kind of rhythms feels super bad to play, because you are making the player to start streaming at the bluetick which don't have a big emphasis in the song as the previous white one does. just start the circle stream at 01:15:522 - I disagree, replacing the slider with a circle so the stream can start where the sliderend was before feels super bad to me and making the slider a single tick shorter isn't better either
4. 01:16:022 (1) - I'd remove this NC and put the NC in 01:16:522 (3) - that will fit better what is going in the music right
5. 01:21:520 (1) - no hitsound? added claps
6. 01:24:020 (1) - ^ ^
7. 01:36:183 (5) - looks bad, but somehow it fits the music lol stuff like this was so "in" 5 years ago :^)
8. 01:36:849 same issue as 01:15:355 (9,10,11,12,13) - not that big of a problem that it would justify destryoing the previous pattern imo
9. 03:08:490 (5) - following your NC pattern at the stream, you are missing one at 03:08:490 (5) - no, I put a NC whenever the high pitched guiter changed "direction"/started a new motif, I did the same with the chaning of the stream direction
10. 03:10:657 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - and the NCs on this one are inconsistent with the previous and next circle streams, maybe you should add NCs at 03:11:156 (7) - and 03:11:490 (11) - yeah, added NC at 03:10:990 (5) - and 03:11:406 (10) - to again follow the guitar buuut I am not so sure about this because now there is a NC at 03:11:406 - at a kinda weird point idk
11. 03:11:906 - ignoring this beat doesn't make much sense, since is part of the main melody in the song. true
12. 03:12:823 (3) - why ending sliders where the melody of the song is changing? this is basically the same issue as 01:15:355 (9,10,11,12,13) - , I think you will know what I'm talking about, since your NCs are well placed 03:13:489 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - but the first one is not because of your rhythm choice because I wanted to make a small parallel slider to the second part of 03:11:990 (1) - like 03:12:489 (2) - is to the first part :^) but yeah, I could change it here
13. 03:16:322 (2,3,4,5,6) - ignoring these drums to extend the sliders to the blue ticks make the rhythm super bad atleast for me, could you consider reworking this part? so many people complaining about this part, I really liked it but I guess I have no choice but to change it
14. 03:23:986 (1) - same as 03:12:823 - the long slider fits here very well though
15. 03:26:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - red and white ticks have the big emphasis at this part, so your current rhythm is not nice here, I really can't not agree with the current one. the most impactful parts of the guitar melody are exactly on all the slider ends and starts (?)
16. 04:22:637 (1) - remove NC and add one at 04:23:302 (3) - that fits the song alot better okay
17. 04:34:633 (6,7,8,9) - due to the stack leniency this stack doesn't looks good in game changed

I think this need more improvement, anyways you can call Desperate for rebubble, since his icon is a bit old and probably he have new suggestions to make

pishifat wrote:

01:15:605 (10) - 01:36:933 (6) - 04:46:880 (2) - fixed all as you suggested these ones after sliderends which are probably easier to adjust by using the same rhythm as 03:01:992 (6,7,8,9) -

and 01:21:020 (1,2,3) -

also could you like handle spacing for 00:48:863 (1,2,3,4) - 02:35:500 (2,3,4,5) - in a way that doesn't look the same as your previous 1/2 stuff (so basically smaller)
i get that it's for visuals but it's also super misleading lol doesn't look as nice now but I know what you mean

Lasse wrote:

👀 time flies

things:
00:39:699 - having such an important melody start on a reverse seemed really unfitting with what you do the whole time changed
01:16:355 - this should really use at least 30% volume, it felt way too quiet while I played this with normal settings (and also in the editor) + it's right after a long 70% section so it feels even more quiet changed
01:21:520 (1,1,1) - all of them end on cymbals, so finished on each one would make sense, yet you only have them one one of them? okay
01:36:183 (5) - kinda edgy, but it was perfectly sightreadable for me and fits the guitar really well, so fine for me these were cool in 2012
03:10:490 (4) - 03:10:490 (4,1) - can you get some spacing similar to 03:09:490 (1,2,3) - here? my main problem with this is the 1/4 slider overlapping the okay
02:09:340 - not as bad as the other one, but this section still felt a bit too quiet, +5-10% volume would be great I think it's fine, it's already louder than the equivalent part in the beginning at 00:22:703 -
following stream, which (at least for me) made it kinda uncomfortable to play how about http://i.imgur.com/bX6lDmq.jpg or http://i.imgur.com/TSR2o2h.jpg ? sorry no, I find my slider usage here to be way more intuitive to play
03:37:316 (1) - can't you stack this on 03:35:983 (9,10) - instead? would still fit the whole symmetry thing and a jump fits so much better with the song, would just have to change 03:37:316 (1,2,3,4) - a bit then good idea
04:59:293 - could add 30% volume timing point music gets a bit louder here already done

snaps are okay to me, current seems like the best solution for gameplay and all

let me know when I can qualify is it happening? :O