OEvil wrote:

[Hey, From My OEvil's Modding/Timing/M4M Queues ]

[General]

Tags
- Consider adding "384" to all of your tags k

[Normal]

My Edits:
- 00:20:239 (1) - Remove this slider.
- 00:20:239 - Add a circle at {x:272 y:36}, with a NC.
- 00:20:592 - Add a circle at {x:172 y:56}. No I'm not following the lyrics and the current arranget looks good for me
- 01:23:062 (3) - Remove this circle.
- 01:23:062 - Add a spinner from here until 01:24:474. a spinner here would be a bit short for a Normal diff

[Hard]

My Edits:
- 01:23:062 (3) - Remove this circle.
- 01:23:062 - Add a slider from here until 01:24:473.

SPOILER

=.= Sorry I don't like these stuffs

[Summer]

Cool Difficulty

hoLysoup wrote:

hi

[Summer]
00:08:592 (2) - NC從這裡開始, 00:08:944 (1) - 這裡remove NC k
00:36:120 (1) - 這裡不需要NC, 節奏很明顯了, NC是多餘了 k
00:41:062 (1) - 這個slider 從00:40:886 - 這裡開始比較合適我覺得, 跟著歌聲走. 打起來感覺舒服點 kiai段的这个节奏错位问题我自己也早就发现了 其实当时map的时候是有意的因为当时觉得把长白线空过去了有点奇怪 就变成现在这样对称式的节奏 =。= 一直没决定到底改不改节奏 要改的话是个大改动=。= 我再考虑下
00:46:709 (1) - ^這裡也是 不過只是我個人感覺 因為你的kiai 都是跟著歌聲走, 所以中間也應該這樣比較好. 之後的不說了
01:20:239 (1) - remove NC? 不想
01:40:709 (6) - NC? k
02:03:650 - 從這裡開始的stream, 距離可以大一點我覺得. 因為下一個部份的stream速度又更快了. 轉成小slider也不錯, 個人覺得 不 这个地方我有意的小间距用以和后面加速的滑条形成更大的反差 所以不打算改
02:32:415 - 再加一個beat? 感覺少了甚麼 sorry 我蛮喜欢kiai前这个gap的
03:06:297 (4) - 這個slider, 我覺得換成一個beat比較合適 因為音樂也只打到這一個beat就沒了. 試試看吧, 效果不錯 嗯 之前也有人提到 以后再有人反应这里我就改掉

[Hard]
這個難度是沒有問題. 我只是覺得不像hard, 比較像insane. 放了太多stream了:
00:47:592 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9)
00:22:180 (6,7,8,9,10,11)
insane來說當然沒問題 可是hard來講實在是有點難了
重點是跟你的normal比起來 差距太大
建議改簡單一點 =。= 嗯 非常头疼的问题 觉得现在就很好就不想改 然后又被普遍认为太难……

[Normal]
tick rate 1
比較合適. 因為也沒有用到slidertick的hitsound 所以沒需要用到tickrate 2 嗯不错 2确实太密了

就這樣
繼續加油~!
可以m4m嗎? http://osu.ppy.sh/s/92845
謝謝

Broccoly wrote:

hi m4m

[Summer]
00:06:297 (1,2,3) - Isn't this too jumpy? It's only the beginning of the song.. try reducing it about like this: 00:11:944 (1,2) shortened
00:08:239 (6,7,2,3) - ^ a bit =.=
00:22:709 (1,2) - ^ x3.0.. not really hard, I never missed this part
00:23:944 (4,1) - it's really hard to stop after a big jump the anti-jump has already appeared before this, this is to keep consistency
00:24:298 (1,2) - not a good flow =.= eh, changed, although the previous one is also fine
00:30:120 (3,4) - woa.. this is like airman jump somehow shortened a bit
00:44:415 (2) - Ctrl + g? flows better imo hmm, I like the current direction better. 1 to 2 is a bit twisted though, 2 to 3 and then 4 is quite smooth
The section you use x1.33 -
+ Too fast honestly that it feels overmapped when the actual objects are not. This solo is not like an intense guitar solo but a pleasant, peaceful violin. 1.1~1.2 should be enough. Try remapping this part; it could be more fun, and look better
+ The distance between sliders are fine, but between circles & circles, or sliders & circles should be smaller.(use around x1.2, x0.8 for each after fixing the bpm to 1.1~1.2)
For example,
02:04:356 (1,2) // 02:07:180 (1,2) - should be closer (DS x1.2 looks fine) sorry but I think they're fine, I've tested many times
02:07:356 (2,3,4) - the space between objects make players break sliders easily in this kind of situation also fine here
02:12:827 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - and it makes these almost unable to read. a slider and two circles should be overlapping more. ok this is NG. I admit. I've just come up witha nice new pattern

--
02:35:239 (3,1) - suddenly too close fine imo, considering the direction the slider
02:37:356 (2,3) - horribly large jump yeah, lazy when mapping this part... changed a better one now
02:41:768 (3,4,1) - is there a reason for anti-jumps? yeah you got the point. changed the arrangement and now they would be fine

[Hard]
00:21:827 (4,5,6) - jump into a stream in a hard diff is not a good idea; it's hard to do that. yeah you're right, made it much easier
00:30:827 (5,3) - bad overlap. Especially since 3's color is similar to the background. nope, I love this pattern, I think the hiding is intuitive
00:34:886 (4,5) - bad flow yes, also too hard, made it easy and smooth
02:16:180 (3,4,5) - i recommend changing the rhythm like this (in all the patterns here)

(because the triplets in the music are not well conveyed since some upbeats are on the slider's tail. // you can change the last slider into a repeat slider or a triplet circle) made it easy in a even simpler way

[Normal]
00:04:709 (4,1) - (nazi) perfect blanket? k
00:43:533 (2) - make this shape neater changed
00:45:297 (1,2) - (nazi) better blanket k
01:29:768 (2,1) - (nazi) blanket each other? k

That's about it~ Hope this helps
GL

Thunderstorm wrote:

Hey! =)

Some suggestions

[Overall]
I'd suggest to reduce kiai time (for example use fountains instead of full sections, 'cause it's too much all across the map) I think the current status is fine, hope this won't cause unrankablity
Why 2 insanes? for I think Summer is too hard as an Insane so I found a regular one

[Normal]
01:23:062 - Why don't you try to put a spinner here insread of circle? If it will eds here 01:24:474 auto will make 7k. Much better instead of empty space imo
sorry I think spinners in a Normal diff is needed, but if I set a spinner here, it would be too short for beginners to handle. Also, I love the gap before the chorus

[Hard]
01:09:474 (1) - it will looks and plays better if you space it away imo sorry but there actually is a sudden stop of drums, so I don't think this is bad or unfitting
01:23:062 - same suggestion 'bout spinner as in [Normal] sorry but I personally love the gap, in every diff
01:24:827 (1,2,3) - Didn't looks good ofr me, also (1,2) makes (3) almost invisible and hard to read. I'd suggest to respace it, or if you want to keep it, put start of (3) under the end of (1) fixed the shape a bit

[384's Insane]
Can't find something major

[Insane]
"Insane must be insane, but I believe that we can make our difficulties harder and more interesting w/o transforming it into mess. If you have those in your mapset, let me know writing something like "Don't be nazy", and I won't." (From queue warnings). So, you've been warned Don't take it personally.
Imo 75% of jumps here looks random. If you plan fast jumping difficulty, make it looks fine at least. Spacing of these jumps is also random almost everywhere. Must be kind of system here. But meh, okay. I knoe what you mean, but somehow the jumps often are to form blanckets or something which the map relative between each part, instead of just polygon jumps or symmetrical jumps, thus this may seems messed up. But somehow I think they made the map fun and didn't cause runreadablity or unplayablity problem so I'd prefer mostly keep them
00:06:297 (1) - completely break playin' rhythm. I'd suggest to space it away. Or put it under 00:05:944 (2) I may stack it accurately under the previous note if someone else mentions this again, but I would rather not to move it away, I set these anti-jumps because I sensed sudden stop of drumbeats at these points so I conveyed them in this way
00:11:944 (1) - ^
00:24:297 (1) - ^
01:06:121 (1) - ^
01:09:474 (1) - ^
01:23:062 - same suggestion 'bout spinner as before
02:02:944 - you really need a SB speed up warning here nice idea. I may ask my friends for this simple help. I know nothing about SB myself =.= omg
1.3x looks and sounds like a mess here imo. I'd suggest to reduce it at 1.20 at least. =.= somehow I love this part beacause I think that it is the speed-up makes the map really smooth, smooth like the violin tune. And I only used a bit big distance between slider. the distance between circles and circles aren't big. So I think this actually didn't add up much difficulty to the whole map


Rest seems acceptable fine
gl

- Miomio Chii - wrote:

/me bite Zero__wind and run away

Zero__wind wrote:

- Miomio Chii - wrote:

/me bite Zero__wind and run away

omg what's this about O.0

Magicphoenix wrote:

Hard guest diff plz... lol

Verlaren wrote:

General:
deselect letterbox during breaks

Normal:
00:43:533 (2) - make a simple slider
01:28:709 (1) - make a more beautiful slider
01:42:121 (1) - ^
01:44:944 (1) - make a more symmetrical slider
02:18:827 (2) - ^
02:38:239 (1) - remake. This is unrankable.
03:00:827 - remove this kiai

Hard:
00:31:886 (5) - unrankable. remake pls
01:24:827 (1,2,3) - arrange the sliders differently. At the moment is unrankable.
02:35:415 (1) - make a more symmetrical slider
02:52:356 (1) - ^
02:55:180 (1) - unrankable. make a more beautiful slider
03:00:827 (1) - ^

384's Insane:
01:23:062 (2) - IMO need to remake
01:33:474 - add note. sounds is really good
01:41:944 - ^
02:49:709 - ^

Summer:
00:16:003 (3) - make a more beautiful or more simple slider
00:17:768 (3) - make a more symmetrical slider
00:22:709 (1) - ^
00:59:415 (1) - slider isn't beautiful. remake pls
01:05:944 - add note. sounds is really good
01:17:239 - ^
02:05:768 (1) - hidden slide in this place....is not good idea
02:08:415 (3) - make a more beautiful or more simple slider
02:12:121 (2) - ^
02:17:062 (1) - unrankable
02:46:709 (2) - make a clear slider

Arusha Shuna wrote:

From my mod queue service
sorry about the long reply, IRL issues

General
-Remove "Rock" from tags, genre will be determined after the approval of the map.
-I'm getting a .osb file here, delete it and resubmit
-Use lowercase on tags
-My main concern here is the difficulty curve, "Hard" is already feels like an Insane, and "Insane" (Summer) is just brutal : P
Normal
01:24:827 (1) - maybe make the curve part a little bit 'curvy'-er? Maybe put the second slider point to (240,136)
01:55:180 (1,2) - strange for having some 'stray' notes over here, map through the next break
02:24:474 (2) - maybe make it a bit 'curvy'-er? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/765022
02:25:533 (3) - short, repeating slider kinda doesn't fit for a normal IMO, a spinner may be a better replacement
02:44:239 (5) - move them somewhere else, hard to sightread for a relatively new player
03:00:121 (2,1) - very hard for a normal, maybe change the 03:00:121 (2) - to 2 circles with 1/1 beat apart?
"Hard"
It feels like an Insane diff already...
01:30:474 (1,2,3) - it's a nice pattern but i think it's really hard to sightread
01:55:180 (1,2) - same problem with other difficulty (of yours)
02:03:650 (3,4,1) - maybe fix the spacing? they're all 1/4 beats apart but have different spacing
02:44:239 (1) - keep the spacing 1.2x, the anti-jump doesn't really fit in here

Summer
This is basically crazy jumps the map is it? x_x
01:55:180 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as other difficulty (of yours)
02:04:356 - http://puu.sh/2WFn7.jpg
02:33:650 (3) - symmetrical problem, red slider point 1 Lv4 grid to the left
I can't really mod this diff, i think if i do mod it may won't go in favor with your jumping style. Sorry.

Good luck with the map!
A very fine map if you ask me.

JauiPlaY wrote:

[General]
应该没问题
不过你这kiai是不是太多太长了一点,依我看第3大段kiai是完全不必要的 ok

[Normal]
00:22:709 (1) - 尾巴的锚点再往下1格 k
01:22:003 (1,2,3) - 换成slider比较好 不然太难掌握(对nm而言) nope， 我比较倾向于这3个重音到要自己敲下去 如果用滑条的话2就不是自己敲的了
01:55:180 (1,2) - 这...有啥意义? [/color]
02:25:533 (3) - 很没意思的做法 换成2个短的也比一直按着强 改了

[Hard]
01:05:062 (1,2,3,4) - 1324会不会好玩点 可以一试
01:55:180 (1,2) - 同nm
02:18:209 - 加note 本来有 为了降低难度删掉了
02:37:003 (1) - Ctrl+G? 考虑到后面那个note的位置，其实反过来也不算很顺 我就不再无谓地增加难度了
02:42:650 (1) - ^ 其实我承认这个想法还不错啦 不过为了保持一致性 我就不改了
02:53:239 (3) - ^ 这个也是


[Summer]
01:21:297 (2) - 碰到血条了 omg带着后面一大堆的东西一切挪了半天 希望现在属于可接受程度了
01:32:768 (1,2,3) - 132比较顺手 nope， 考虑到之后的滑条1的话 我觉得现在这样比较好
01:38:239 (7,8,9) - 后面这3个稍微偏移个5度神马的比较好 k
01:55:180 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 你对比一下人家384 看看什么叫勤劳=。= omg
03:06:297 (4) - 感觉circle就足够了 暂时没改 不过可能会被吐槽 到时候再改吧

nm细节粗糙了点 看上去歪歪扭扭的像是赶工作品 阿列是这样么0.0 虽然Normal我做得很快但是感觉还比较细啊自己还修过不少nazi =。=可恶
不过别的大致Ok

Quiz-chan wrote:

Hi~ from my queue

[General]
Everything just in order.

[Normal]
00:29:768 (1) - Remove new combo and put it on 00:31:180 (3) instead. k
00:42:474 (1,2) - I loved what you did at 00:36:827 (1) , why don't you do it here again? =.= not feel like placing a reverse here
00:56:592 (1) - I find this spinner quite unnecessary, it doesn't fit since nothing has changed in the instrumental, but it appears out of nowhere. Erase it and then add a circle at 00:59:415 . This spinner is here to bring the score board variety because thie is the easiest diff =.=
01:07:886 (1) - The sliderpath is overlapping itself in an unappealing way, can you fix that? k
01:16:709 (2) - I dunno, just my personal taste, maybe add a node as shown in the image below? Improves flow IMO.

SPOILER

a bit
01:24:827 (1) - Maybe shape this different so the slidertick would be visible? That can be a mean combo break for newer players if they think that slider is either 1/1 or 1/2 (less likely). nice point
01:33:297 (4,1) - Better set the NC on (4) to emphasize the new beat measure? k
02:10:356 (2) - Could you improve this blanket with one more node? hope it's fine now
02:24:474 (2) - This slider looks a little unappealing, because its circular part.... is a little sharp and acute. Could you make this smooth? k
02:26:944 (5) - I bet, a NC would do great here because it is the start of a new measure and the instrumental pattern starts over. k
02:38:239 (1) - I wanna be honest, I don't like this slider's shape at all. It is just plain out odd and squeezed to minimum size possible. marked but not chaning it now, there's not much space to let it go omg. I need to do a big rearrangement if I changed this =.=
02:49:886 (3) - Add NC, then at 02:51:297 (1,2) , set the newcombo on (2) instead. k
03:05:768 (4,5) - Are those finish hitsounds really needed here? Cuz in my opinion, they're rather unnecessary and redundant. No I think they're fine

All in all, quite nice diff already. It is pretty fun to even look at, so not much to complain about.

[Hard]
01:24:827 (1,2,3) - Hehe, this is pretty original. I like it. owo
01:26:944 (2,3) - This breaks flow, in my eyes. It would really help to re-arrange this, no matter how, but this should be changed. marked, tconsidering about better ways, though I think they're already with no worth-mentioning problem
01:30:474 (1,2,3) - This doesn't flow perfectly either. I bet you should let those sliders overlap a little less. sorry, I love them
01:45:474 (2) - Ctrl+G on this would actually give it a smoother flow. marked, will fix if someone else mentioned it again
02:31:886 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Nice idea! :3
03:06:297 - I would really strongly recommend using a circle here instead of a slider, because its end is mapped to nothing... and that bothers me strongly. OK finally I changed this. It has been complaint three times or more as I remember =.=

Otherwise, very nice diff to play, it's already quite clean, so even less to complain about.

[Summer]
00:05:944 (2,1) - This sudden anti-jump felt quite uncomfortable to play. The player got used to normal spacing and then... not really feel like changing this part =.= Maybe one day I'll change my mind
00:11:592 (2,1) - ...confronting this might make him break his combo. :/ ^
00:16:003 (3) - This slider has an ugly shape. ok hope it's better, I don't why it looks so unpleasant though
00:15:915 (2) - Erase this; it's just redundant and may count as overmapping, because it doesn't follow any sound in the background.
00:21:033 (4) - ^
00:38:327 (4) - ^
00:43:974 (4) - ^
01:04:092 (2) - ^ removed
01:10:797 (2) - ^
01:12:209 (2) - ^
01:12:915 (2) - ^ ok
01:15:033 (3) - ^
01:16:621 (2) - ^ (although this one doesn't feel thaat bad)
01:26:327 (4) - ^
01:31:974 (4) - ^
02:34:092 (4) - ^
02:39:739 (4) - ^
If you added those to serve for difficulty purposes, it is just unnecessary, since the diff itself is quite complicated with its high SV.
You are just overmapping with those circles, so be careful when adding them, next time. some were add to controll the movement when there're no pleasant places to go, and the ones at kiai part is somehow, hmm, just a way of emphasize as I suppose. I fixed some though
02:17:062 (1) - This slider has a quite awkward shape, expand it (length-based). Oh could you let me fuck the HP bar. I didn't ever want to make make it look like this but there's no space for it =.=
03:06:297 (4) - Circle here would be enough. ok

I, personally, got a severe problem with those circles that follow no sound, but all in all, this diff is very cool to play!


Good luck!

OMG, luv dis map, haf mah star!!

yanlu wrote:

Hi~ M4M from my queue :3

[Summer]

1. 00:08:239 (6) - 感覺需要個NC提醒.. 我觉得它们是在同一个combo set里就还好了
2. 00:11:415 (1,2) - 跟前面對比感覺沒特別跳...(像00:05:768 (1,2) - 這兩個音)
   所以建議00:11:592 (2) - stack在00:11:944 (1) - 如何? 有点纠结…因为这里叠了的话其他好几个地方都要改 但是又有的不太好改……
3. 00:16:003 (3) - 這slider拉的很莫名啊...就像前面的00:15:650 (1) - 不好嗎/.\ omg 这个被喷了无数次…我都不知道我当时为啥让它长这样儿了=。=已经改正常了
4. 00:19:356 (2,4) - 交換位置? 我让1和3也互换了 我觉得这样比较舒服
5. 00:21:033 (4,5) - 你slider是直的...這個也放直的? ok
6. 00:22:003 (3) - stack with 00:20:592 (3) - 's head? 改了 虽然感觉关系不大
7. 00:22:268 (5) - dele? 你的連打是從白線開始的O.O (00:13:886 (6,7,8,9,1) - ) oh no 为什么这里又被问到了…我觉得这是个7连打没错呀Q^Q 我仔细听了的=。=
8. 00:23:592 (3,4) - 交換節奏比較合 是因为3开始的地方没vocal所以用一个noet？不过我压根儿就没有去map vocal…而且怎么说呢…换的话排版真心不太会改=。=所以就没动
9. 00:26:768 (1,2,3,4,5) - 唱得很一般可是間距大的莫名....... 好吧~缩了不少 这个好改
10. 00:28:886 (2) - 這遮擋+跟(3)的跳...flow也不好/.\ 試試別的? 不然放x432/y24也順得多 嗯根据建议我构思了一个应该更好的~
11. 00:25:179 (4,5,6,7,8) - 排的弧一點?(直不直又不夠弧 扭扭曲曲的...D; k
12. 00:31:886 (5) - 尾巴的點調整下~ 包覆的不夠好 希望现在可以了=。=
13. 00:33:474 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - 同前面的連打...放的實在扭曲( /_T; k
14. 00:34:886 (3) - 放著卡卡的...x193/y135 ? 不太喜欢…我觉得这样简单一摆还好些……
15. 00:36:474 - 少個音...加個note or 00:36:297 (5) - change to slider =。= 不 我不管这vocal的 我觉得5个note之后停顿非常带感！
16. 00:38:945 (3,4,5,6) - hmm...try this? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/769407 (黃金大三角ww!!(誤.. 6离1太近了…这个地方我再思考一下
17. 00:42:474 (1) - ctrl+G 觉得现在这样比较顺
18. 00:43:974 (4) - 刪掉吧...? 诶怎么说呢 我只是把它作为一种强调的手段了=。=嗯 不过有其他人也挑到这里了 或许以后会去掉吧
19. 00:44:415 (2) - 也弧?跟4一樣 兴趣不大 就没动
20. 00:47:680 (5) - dele 这里真的有鼓点的呀Q^Q
21. 01:01:180 (3,4) - 拉開一點間距? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/769414 這也能讓下兩個note有個銜接> < 可以 改了个和截图差不多的
22. 00:37:356 (2) - remove finish in head 其实我不太记得我最初map的时候为什么要加了…嘛 暂时没动 感觉无可厚非吧
23. 00:43:003 (2) - ^
24. 01:12:297 (3) - 轉個幾度? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/769597 k
25. 01:16:180 (4,1) - 節奏交換比較好 (slider+3連 ok
26. 01:29:592 (2) - 沒stack好...不過我覺得放stack 01:30:121 (4) - 頭或尾更好? 没有挪 保持一致性吧
27. 01:35:592 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 唔...感覺順著flow這"w"線反了...應該像"3"這樣> <或是直接")"就好了.. etto 我这样摆其实是包了前面的note2
28. 01:46:974 (5) - 同前面 =。=
29. 01:56:062 - 02:02:768 - 可以在map....不然01:55:180 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 加得滿奇怪的我覺得 嗯Q^Q
    
30. 02:04:356 - 到 02:27:121 - 不予置評.....這跟前面完全不同打法了...而且我也打不來orz
    
31. 02:34:356 (1,3) - 間距開一點? 一個往上一個下調點 ok
32. 02:37:886 (4) - ctrl=g 感觉不太顺=。=难道果然鼠标和板子移动习惯不一样么……
33. 02:40:886 (4) - 不....放別的地方嘛QAQ (像是244/164之類.. 行吧 放到了那一带
34. 02:49:003 (2) - just stack with 02:48:474 (2) - better 我觉得现在这样还好
35. 02:57:650 (8) - x388/y204 咦？不错哟~
36. 03:02:239 (5,6) - 綠色就這是直的.-.故意的? 嗯…因为…etto 没什么可因为的 没什么地方可弯的
37. 03:06:297 (4) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/769612 只是推薦owo 简化成一个note了=。=
    
    some partten's flow is a bit strange..but the map is fun~

[Hard]

1. 00:18:121 (3) - 很容易造成誤讀..放在x304/y44如何 no 我真的觉得这是perfect的空拍位置Q^Q
2. 00:32:592 (1,2,3,4) - 唔...這是學gd insane的梗嗎...不過我覺得不太適合.. 猜错了owo 我的diff都是先做的=。= 我想想怎么改吧 虽然感觉问题不大 先马克了
3. 00:40:709 (4,1) - ^ 比较喜欢这种梗啦 又不是低难度不会很坑爹的…啊咧 高AR综合症不要来找我
4. 00:47:239 (2) - 再彎一些 k
5. 01:00:650 - 感覺這有個重音..單note好>< 感觉不算应该强调的地方 就这样吧
6. 01:03:650 - 停頓的點很怪.. 怎么说呢…一是那里没有鼓 而是想转移阵地了=。=
7. 01:27:474 - 01:27:650 - 媽呀嚇死人這跳-.- 诶 这个地方另一个mod也提到了 马克了 暂时还没想出怎么改…其实跳得真的不难 我找很多#5W左右的人都试过的omg 滑条跳是有水分的
8. 01:55:886 - 到02:02:768 - 的break同insane. 5555555555看来是要做了…
9. 02:42:121 (4,1) - 同前面 =。=
10. 03:05:768 (1,2,3,4) - ....這太整人了至少也要0.5x吧這OAQ 改了！虽然我很喜欢本来那个样子的呀…离得近感觉特别有强调的感觉=。=
    
    其他還不錯~

nice song and map is fun~:3
(sorry so nazi mod orz..
good luck~ a star for you!

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

Hi hi :>

Normal

1. 00:25:533 (1) - volume, just notice that simillar parts using different volume, should be same as here 00:14:239 (1) - 0.0 yeah you got the point
2. 00:32:239 (4) - note+clap k
3. 00:39:650 (1) - can use finish yes!
4. 01:08:944 (2,3) - this would be a bit confusing for easiest diff, try ctrl+g, it plays easier and fits song aswell nice point, I didn't ever think about this
5. 01:20:239 (2,3) - same ^ yes~
6. 01:38:944 (3) - finish fixed all
7. 02:18:474 (1) - finish
8. 02:21:297 (1) - finish
9. 02:24:121 (1) - finish
10. 02:52:356 (2) - finish
11. 03:05:768 (4,5) - i think you should make easier ending, just use 1 slider

ok

Hard

1. 01:47:415 - this 2 breaks looks weird, i think you need to make 1 break like in 384's Insane Yeah I think I should full fill it now =.=
2. 02:14:415 (4) - whistle k
3. 02:21:297 (1) - finish k
4. 02:04:356 - i dont think this speedup is necesarry for H diff =.= Why had I ever made the diff like this Q^Q
5. 02:58:003 (1) - finish k
6. 03:03:650 (1) - finish k
   Diff is nice but its more like Insane, and it makes gap between Normal and Hard unrankable, i dont think anyone will bubble this mapset without 4+ stars Normal diff

I'm about to cry=.=

Insane

1. 00:23:944 (4,1) - i really think you should move it somewhere else http://puu.sh/305Ke.jpg considering about this
2. 00:41:062 (1,2) - this slider sounds wrong, if you remove it you wont hear any sound at downbeat
   00:40:709 (4,1,2) - remove it
   00:40:709 - note
   00:40:886 - 1/1 slider
   00:41:415 - 1/2 slider
   00:42:121 (8) - change it to 2 notes
3. 00:46:356 (4,1) - same, no sound at downbeat where #1 starts
   00:46:356 - note
   00:46:533 - 1/1 slider
   00:47:062 - 1/2 slider or 2 notes Finally I'm reworking on this part =.= actually I also noticed this problem by myself...
4. 01:02:768 (3,4) - ctrl+g pattern fits better nice idea
5. 01:13:533 (1,2) - ctrl+g ^ changed in a bit different way
6. 01:28:709 (4,1) - same thing that i mentioned before I got that
7. 01:34:356 (4,1) - ^
8. 01:38:768 (1) - i think non stacked is better sorry I prefer it to be like this=.= and other similar parts
9. 01:41:592 (6) - ^
10. 01:47:415 - this 2 breaks looks weird, i think you need to make 1 break like in 384's Insane
11. 02:04:356 (1,2) - this speedup and jump is very unpredictable, i think you need to reduce spacing for this 2 sliders at least fixed
12. 02:21:297 (1) - finish k
13. 02:36:474 (4,1) - same thing that i mentioned before yeah, a big deal of work =.=
14. 02:42:121 (4,1) - ^
15. 02:46:533 (1) - prefer not stacked
16. 02:58:003 (1) - finish k
17. 03:03:650 (1) - finish k

Good luck o.o!

MineC24 wrote:

Modding queue~ (Sorry, I'm late..)

Normal

00:27:297 (4,1) - change curves (same as the flexion rate) fixed a bit
00:38:944 (3,1,2) - change sliders Place (how about this? -> http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/776670&#41; =.=
01:16:709 (2) - change slider (01:15:650 (3) copy -> rotate 90 clockwise -> ctrl + G) not neccessary
01:36:474 (1) - (imo) more curve plz (Seems a little bad..) k
01:38:944 (3) - change slider (01:37:886 (2) copy -> remove 1 reverse -> rotate 180) no I don't want to make it curved like that
02:09:297 (4) - (imo) looks bad red slider point... I think it's fine
02:46:356 (3) - Straight slider plz why is that

Hard

00:12:121 (2) - (imo) curve plz no, It's parallel with the previous slider
00:25:180 (4) - 2nd slider point -> move x:68 y:304 k
01:06:827 (2,3,4) - how about this? -> don't flow good
01:11:415 (5) - change slider -> (01:11:768 (6) copy -> remove 1 reverse -> rotate 180) k
02:25:886 (5) - 2nd slider point -> move at left (confuse by 02:25:886 (5,1)) no, not bueadutiful

Summer

Slider tick rate set : 2 have a try

00:16:003 (3) - change by Straight no need to
01:38:239 (7) - imo, NC ^

My mod = poor mod
GL

1. kiai可以統一一下 (不過還是看G神意見
2. 黃色卡片是個團體吧 可以大概tag一下成員 雖然我也不懂

1. 基於BPM和SV挺高的 我會建議你OD-1
2. 00:08:415 (7) - 這個飛太遠了 如果跟著音樂起伏的話(6,7)之間的距離應該要比(7,1)還要來的小 現在反而是倒過來了 可以擺個等距跳之類的
3. 00:08:944 (3,4) - 幅度相同點 不然好醜
4. 00:14:239 (1) - 這裡的vocal用一條slider帶過不太好吧 音樂裡也沒有什麼長音 擺明就是要跟vocal 快換成note+1/2滑條
5. 00:19:886 - finish
6. 00:20:592 (3) - 吐槽吐槽 這條slider第一個紅點之前和第二個紅點之後的直線不平行 建議動一下最後一個點
7. 00:21:827 (2,3,4) - 等距? 看是要把(4)拉出去一點 不然就是放棄(3)的遮放進來一點
8. 00:30:827 (6,1,2,3) - 這裡的flow不太好 順著(6)的軌跡應該是(1)>(3)>(2)繞個圓圈回來 建議(2,3)調換一下位置 然後考慮重擺(4)
9. 00:42:474 (1,2,3) - 這兒也是 順著(1)的軌跡畫圓應該是把(3)ctrl+G 然後接ctrl+G後的(2) 不過這樣太傻逼了 為求方便及flow建議把(1)ctrl+G就flow了
10. 00:47:415 (3,4) - 沒跳無感 這裡算是高潮了吧 像是你後面的00:58:709 (1,2) - 都比這個的間距來的大
11. 01:06:121 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - (1,2,3,4)的flow都是逆時針 突然到了(5,6,7)時變順時針 打起來十分不爽 建議(6,7)掉個位置 (後面的串串大概要做點變化 不過不做也沒差)
12. 01:15:827 (8) - x:256, y:344較美觀
13. 01:29:415 (2) - 其實我覺得這類直線slider都挺怪 建議和(4)一樣彎
14. 01:36:474 (1,2,3) - vocal點都在紅線上 不過slider頭卻在白線真的挺怪 建議三個選起來往後挪1/2 然後在01:36:474 - 上個note
15. 01:42:650 (3) - 怎麼說呢 因為前面的spacing也不是等距 這裡突然用random spacing排有一種縮起來的感覺
    
    範例

    
16. 02:08:415 (3) - 第二個點x:276, y:320
17. 小提琴加速真是個詭異的主意
18. 02:37:533 (4) - ctrl+G (5)往上擺
    
    圖

    
19. 02:41:591 (2,3) - 建議同彎
20. 02:52:886 (1,2,3) - 感覺可以擺的再開一點 不要開spacing 盡量讓手在這裡能伸展 像是把(2)的尾巴疊在後面那個(1)上面等等

1. 00:03:297 (2) - ctrl+j的方向比較flow
2. 00:07:886 (2) - 不用拘泥於疊在(6)的頭 可以用1.0擺會看起來比較美觀 (至少不會擠在一團
3. 00:11:062 (3,4) - 不是很好flow..況且接下來接到(1)的spacing又是兩倍 這樣遮只會增加難度 我的想法是繞出來跟(2)弄個小三角形 再一口氣跳上去(1)
   
   範例

   
4. 00:31:886 (3,4,5) - 這跑太遠了 要不就兩邊拉近點要不就(4)往下然後(3,5)形狀條一下
5. 00:47:062 (6,7,1) - *吐槽*直線太古板了 (
6. 01:04:533 (4) - clap下錯位置了嗎? 聽起來有點像故意的不過...嘛 看你 >_<
7. 01:25:886 (3) - ...在I下2/1有點蠢 可以學學前後kiai段的擺法
8. 02:16:003 (2) - 一樣跑太遠了 我覺得1.4就夠了
9. 02:18:474 (1,2,3,4) - 基於前面這麼善良以及送分 這裏沒有連起來我只想投1分 跟02:19:886 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 一樣吧 (前兩句還有押韻
10. 02:37:180 - 貌似漏clap了...
    對稱挺好的233

MineC24 wrote:

384's Insane

imo, HP Drain - 1 It is suitable for this diff currently! so no change:3

00:15:827 (1) - stack by 00:14:415 (1)'s head good
01:26:768 (4) - red slider point -> move x:252 y:280 ok
03:06:121 (2) - (imo) Ctrl + G...? There's no jump here. no change:3

Flask wrote:

拖好久的mod!

[384]

1. 00:03:297 (2) - ctrl+j的方向比較flow 我用了ctrl+g..
2. 00:07:886 (2) - 不用拘泥於疊在(6)的頭 可以用1.0擺會看起來比較美觀 (至少不會擠在一團 好
3. 00:11:062 (3,4) - 不是很好flow..況且接下來接到(1)的spacing又是兩倍 這樣遮只會增加難度 我的想法是繞出來跟(2)弄個小三角形 再一口氣跳上去(1) 好
   
   範例

   
4. 00:31:886 (3,4,5) - 這跑太遠了 要不就兩邊拉近點要不就(4)往下然後(3,5)形狀條一下 fixed
5. 00:47:062 (6,7,1) - *吐槽*直線太古板了 ( 233 Let's jump!
6. 01:04:533 (4) - clap下錯位置了嗎? 聽起來有點像故意的不過...嘛 看你 >_< 果然是下错位置了 :3
7. 01:25:886 (3) - ...在I下2/1有點蠢 可以學學前後kiai段的擺法 对称233(没错 我是蠢mapper(雾
8. 02:16:003 (2) - 一樣跑太遠了 我覺得1.4就夠了 fixed
9. 02:18:474 (1,2,3,4) - 基於前面這麼善良以及送分 這裏沒有連起來我只想投1分 跟02:19:886 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 一樣吧 (前兩句還有押韻 连起来就不好看 就这么办 (也有押韵
10. 02:37:180 - 貌似漏clap了... add
    對稱挺好的233 233

Flask wrote:

拖好久的mod!

[General]

1. kiai可以統一一下 (不過還是看G神意見
2. 黃色卡片是個團體吧 可以大概tag一下成員 雖然我也不懂 这个大概不用 从来没见单独提过乐队里的成员

[Summer]

1. 基於BPM和SV挺高的 我會建議你OD-1 其实我本来是7 SG test了一遍说 太容易了 OD8
2. 00:08:415 (7) - 這個飛太遠了 如果跟著音樂起伏的話(6,7)之間的距離應該要比(7,1)還要來的小 現在反而是倒過來了 可以擺個等距跳之類的 这一段都改了
3. 00:08:944 (3,4) - 幅度相同點 不然好醜 差不多
4. 00:14:239 (1) - 這裡的vocal用一條slider帶過不太好吧 音樂裡也沒有什麼長音 擺明就是要跟vocal 快換成note+1/2滑條 我觉得这样挺好 我喜欢串子后面接长滑条
5. 00:19:886 - finish k
6. 00:20:592 (3) - 吐槽吐槽 這條slider第一個紅點之前和第二個紅點之後的直線不平行 建議動一下最後一個點 k
7. 00:21:827 (2,3,4) - 等距? 看是要把(4)拉出去一點 不然就是放棄(3)的遮放進來一點 本来就没打算等距 1 2 3是等的 3到4我让它恢复到正常ds了
8. 00:30:827 (6,1,2,3) - 這裡的flow不太好 順著(6)的軌跡應該是(1)>(3)>(2)繞個圓圈回來 建議(2,3)調換一下位置 然後考慮重擺(4) k
9. 00:42:474 (1,2,3) - 這兒也是 順著(1)的軌跡畫圓應該是把(3)ctrl+G 然後接ctrl+G後的(2) 不過這樣太傻逼了 為求方便及flow建議把(1)ctrl+G就flow了 嗯之前这前面的结构不太一样 1的方向是根据前面走的 现在前面换了 我忘了动这个了……
10. 00:47:415 (3,4) - 沒跳無感 這裡算是高潮了吧 像是你後面的00:58:709 (1,2) - 都比這個的間距來的大 嗯 我自己改到这还没看你说什么我也发现了 不知道怎么弄的 应该是误操作 fixed
11. 01:06:121 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - (1,2,3,4)的flow都是逆時針 突然到了(5,6,7)時變順時針 打起來十分不爽 建議(6,7)掉個位置 (後面的串串大概要做點變化 不過不做也沒差) 七边形跳顺序改了
12. 01:15:827 (8) - x:256, y:344較美觀 k
13. 01:29:415 (2) - 其實我覺得這類直線slider都挺怪 建議和(4)一樣彎
14. 01:36:474 (1,2,3) - vocal點都在紅線上 不過slider頭卻在白線真的挺怪 建議三個選起來往後挪1/2 然後在01:36:474 - 上個note 不是那样的改 改成和后面的结构一样了 两短一长
15. 01:42:650 (3) - 怎麼說呢 因為前面的spacing也不是等距 這裡突然用random spacing排有一種縮起來的感覺
    
    範例

    
    改了 虽然和图有些出入
16. 02:08:415 (3) - 第二個點x:276, y:320 这个点有问题 不过我稍微修了一下
17. 小提琴加速真是個詭異的主意 omg 覆水难收 不想remap了Q^Q
18. 02:37:533 (4) - ctrl+G (5)往上擺
    
    圖

    
    这个不喜欢 没动
19. 02:41:591 (2,3) - 建議同彎 虽然我觉得直的也没啥不好 不过还是改了
20. 02:52:886 (1,2,3) - 感覺可以擺的再開一點 不要開spacing 盡量讓手在這裡能伸展 像是把(2)的尾巴疊在後面那個(1)上面等等

1 2 3都拉开了

其他基於時間考量我就先不mod了..這質量大概還需要一點改進 但總體已經不錯! 加油!!