WELCOME FANZHEN0019 WOW
fanzhen joined the party and oops this map has been finally revived, was in the graveyard 5 months orz.
fanzhen joined the party and oops this map has been finally revived, was in the graveyard 5 months orz.
And changed the diff names, updated!NatsumeRin wrote:
[Beginner]
00:18:514 (2,3) - nope, for whatever's sake, if you already make things such crowded, give up 1/2s.
00:54:514 (3,4) - ^
01:00:347 (1,2,3,4,5) - use sliders and beginners will thank you for that
01:05:181 (3,4) - same thing
01:13:680 (1,2,3,1,2) - sliders will probably work better
01:29:180 (1,2) - lazy to point out more of them, i'm not sure which one is faster, mod it or make a new one...
All fixed, and I have rearranged the diff with 1.0x spacing and changed some rhythm that might be weird for beginners.
[Normal]
01:00:847 (3,4,5) - http://puu.sh/5yTTv.jpg beats like this seems better to me current rhythm seems fine to me
01:36:180 (4,5) - same
[Hyper]
00:21:180 (4) - probably right a bit. fixed
00:40:847 (2,3,1) - hope you can make the spacing equal fixed
01:39:680 (2,3,4,5) - some zigzag should be better than a straight line here..? something simple and clear should be fine here
The 2 higher diffs are well done but the Beginner....
I completely disagree with that. Since there are no ticks on them, hitting the beginning of the sliders is enough to keep one's combo from breaking. All of them reflecting song's tempo, and for being used in the hardest diff, they're VERY well justified.SuperMICrophone wrote:
"unreadable sliders"
That's intentional - AR here is enough high, so that one SHOULD be able to see the different between them. I played this map a lot of times before and i must say that it is works enough intuitive to see what was going on. Again, justified for the hardest diff.SuperMICrophone wrote:
"DS unreadability"
Furudo_Erika wrote:
fanzhen is the best mapper <3
Frostmourne wrote:
Furudo_Erika wrote:
fanzhen is the best mapper <3
96,72,73680,6,4,B|144:72|144:72|196:120|196:120|228:60|228:60|168:8|168:8|112:8,2,320
Ntasuto wrote:
EDIT#1
ExtraEDIT#2
- 01:15:014 (2) - 01:15:347 (4) - no audio for these beats to follow o.O uh,no. i think the lyric changed.
it should be like the previous notes : 01:13:680 (1,2,3)
Extra
- 01:17:930 - a note would fit perfectly here. i agree 'cuz a sample can be heard here.but lets keep that
01:18:597 (6) - this should be here: 01:18:764 uh,i dont wanna re-arrange it.
01:38:680 (3) - No audio for the beat to follow for the consist
01:51:847 (1,2) - Believe is complete wrong.> 01:51:847 (1) - It has no audio to follow, thus it must be removed and the second slider: 01:52:014 (2) - starts wrong. It should be move here : 01:51:972
This is what it should look like :
BEFORE:
AFTER :
i dont think move it to yellow line is necessary.
Alright,I changed it anyway. In fact it sounds a bit strange. I put there because I just want to make a triangle.Zero__wind wrote:
and for fanzhen's extra. dkun is right to tell that there's no beat at that point but still,
I don't regard it as an unrankable issue as it's only one 1/2 baet, a common and ordinary rhythm, which doesn't do such harm to the map
Don't piss me off by saying "Wow then I'm gonna make a map filled with beats at points where there's no music"
anyone who is reasonable can tell the difference between these cases
I admit it may be better if that part got rearranged, without that single beat, which shouldn't exist but,
that don't mean it should be considered as something unrankable
Zero__wind's post is technically not a mod post, but the points he mentioned have already been fixed in Charles' mod, thanks for support anyway.Ntasuto wrote:
Another
- I believe 00:31:264 (2) - should be here instead: 00:31:430 :/ Why? It must be weird. Starting the triplets on white tick is not recommended unless the song ifself tells you to.