[Hard]
- 00:19:956 (5) - NC here already?
- 01:00:622 - to emphasis the rhythm you should make it like 00:49:956 (3,4,5)
- 01:16:289 (2) - ctrl+g flows better because the cursor moves down from 01:14:956 (5,1) - so this would make the most sense imo
- 01:43:289 (3,4,5) - imo the sliders are placed wrong here. I feel the beats at 01:43:289 and at 01:43:622 should be connected with a slider. Same with 01:43:956 and 01:44:289. So in the end it should look like this (slider-slider-circle instead of circle-slider-slider):
- 01:49:622 (6) - I would stack this slider under 01:48:289 (2,4) - I like this pattern/flow more (you may want to re-do the slidershape then though)
- 02:18:456 - add circle?
- 02:49:956 (2) - a straight slider instead of a wave would fit better because it looks nicer as a symmetry axis between (1,3)
- 04:07:622 (8) - I would move it to x:288 y:8 because you put the previous circles always in groups of 2 while seperating with a small jump. So you should make (6,7) a group of 2 circles aswell and seperate (8) from them by a jump.
- 04:56:622 (5) - I like this shape more (ctrl+h+j+g), the transition from the circles into the slider looks better:
- 00:11:289 (1,2,1) - how about deleting (2,1) and adding one repeat to the first slider. Afterwards add a few circles like this, imo it fits the music way better:SPOILER
256,96,11289,6,0,P|260:172|220:216,3,140,0|0|0|2,0:0|0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
144,180,13622,1,0,0:0:0
108,256,13956,1,2,0:0:0
184,292,14289,1,0,0:0:0
256,328,14622,1,4,0:0:0 - 01:32:622 (5,6) - this spacing isn't intended, right?
- 02:31:956 (1) - why NC here?