forum

Religious Freedom

posted
Total Posts
582
show more
Purple
"you shouldnt call people stupid when ur english sucks"

"not calling him stupid tho"

that was obviously the implication, you just backtracked because you didn't want to seem like more of a dickhead than you already are.
No, I made the post in a hurry so I made the mistake of implying such thing when I didn't really mean to.

You could say I was implying he was stupid because I pointed out he was doing something he shouldn't do. But then you may as well take *this* post as implication of me being a fucking retard for actually wasting time answering you.

also fun fact: you called everyone else stupid in your first post in this thread, so its kinda hypocritical of you :lol:
No, I only called the idiots idiots.

fun fact: Despite not being a native english speaker, Wishy reads english language text way better than you do. Clarification: Yes thats an insult
tyrael6192
Technically I'm not a native english speaker either, I only started learning the language 7 years ago.

pls, you obviously didn't make the post in a hurry... when you have to use such a pathetic excuse to justify something you said, you know something's not right.

Feel free to not clarify your insult, because it really isn't like you've offered anything except insults to this thread. Most of your posts have been entirely ad hominem and have brought nothing to the table or shed light on any major issue that has previously been brought up.
Ekaru
Okay, this thread isn't even about religion anymore.

Anyone want to make bets on the lock?
Kanye West
my bet is that sakura is going to lock the thread because she loves us
tyrael6192
THREAD TRAIN BACK ON TRACK CHOOO CHOOO

Kant's concept of autonomy involves making decisions without any emotional inclinations. All things have to be done for no reason other than that they are morally good, and it is your duty to remain moral so you have to do them.

I'd argue that this isn't really autonomy. If anything, it seems like an oppression of a part of our humanity and a restriction against the consideration of consequences - that is, you have to do the 'right' thing regardless of the outcome. This leads to situations such as the murderer-at-the-door; your friend is hiding in your house, and a murderer comes to the door and asks you if your friend is in your house so that he can come in and kill him. Kant says you have to tell the truth and say yes, thereby allowing your friend to die, because you cannot subvert the moral value of telling the truth in order to save your friend.

What do people think
Purple

tyrael6192 wrote:

Technically I'm not a native english speaker either, I only started learning the language 7 years ago.

pls, you obviously didn't make the post in a hurry... when you have to use such a pathetic excuse to justify something you said, you know something's not right.

Feel free to not clarify your insult, because it really isn't like you've offered anything except insults to this thread. Most of your posts have been entirely ad hominem and have brought nothing to the table or shed light on any major issue that has previously been brought up.
No use in wasting time with you. I would if people would get entertained, but it doesn't look like they like where this is going.

One thing though: I did say its important not to come up with ridiculous claims without evidence, and your claim "it really isn't like you've offered anything except insults to this thread." is a perfect example of conjuring up something while presenting absolutely no evidence to back it up.
tyrael6192
I don't need to, you know full well yourself that your posts are full of malice and a third party needs merely to skim read any part of what you've said to understand the sour tone you're using. Oh what's that your last ad hominem failed, better revert to the "no use wasting time with you". Not like you've got anything better to do, am i right? :) Keep it up your e-peen is getting bigger
Purple

tyrael6192 wrote:

I don't need to, you know full well yourself that your posts are full of malice and a third party needs merely to skim read any part of what you've said to understand the sour tone you're using.
Huh? So now its from "you are contributing nothing to this thread" to "you are using a sour tone". Didn't you accuse me of reverting something back to not appear like a "dickhead"? No prob mate, I will just assume you didn't mean to.

But you are right, I *am* using a sour tone, but only because this is the Off-Topic subforum. I'm sorry if I wasn't allowed to, I see everyone do it :?

Oh what's that your last ad hominem failed, better revert to the "no use wasting time with you". Not like you've got anything better to do, am i right? :) Keep it up your e-peen is getting bigger
But tyrael, you yourself called me a dickhead in your first post in this thread directed towards me. I mean, theres evidence of it, just go back and check it. I said there is no use in wasting time with you because I always honestly think that I should just ignore people who make direct insults- its generally a better strategy than insulting back anyway.

EDIT: Also, I gotta say it was really disrespectful of you to say this:

ella tiene arena en su taco

qft
Really. Specially for someone who didn't talk to you in this thread at ALL and specially for a moderator. Not to mention the sexist and racist undertone to it.
Wishy
You can have mistakes because of a hurry, I often make mistakes in my posts many times because of this. :(
tyrael6192
posts im not gonna read: that one

im tRYING TO GET THIS BACK ON TOPIC OK I DONT WANT THIS TO DIE, HELP ME OUT HERE

CAN WE TALK ABOUT FREEDOM WITHIN RELIGION AS WELL AS FREEDOM PERTAINING TO RELIGIOUS PRACTICE

'qft' yes get my funny joke
or

oh you know what edit i just read it i couldnt help myself... maliciousness as in pertaining to ad hominem and insulting behaviour. If that counts as a contribution to the thread then by all means be my guest.
but indeed my friend i did call you that, because if you actually read your first post it merits such a response. I do not think it was a morally justified thing of me to call you such, but i still did it because that's what i earnestly thought about your approach - "youre all idiots and you need to speak to real philosophers"
DaddyCoolVipper
I want this thread to die actually

c'mon, Sakura!
Kanye West

Purple wrote:

ella tiene arena en su taco

qft
Really. Specially for someone who didn't talk to you in this thread at ALL and specially for a moderator. Not to mention the sexist and racist undertone to it.
it's unhealthy to eat sand
Sakura

DaddyCoolVipper wrote:

I want this thread to die actually

c'mon, Sakura!
what? why me
tyrael6192
sexist and racist undertones?! i study spanish and i understood something he said so i felt the need to agree on the basis of humour

im so fucking racist
Sakura
Just get back on topic ._.
tyrael6192
oh that was evil

do it again
Purple

tyrael6192 wrote:

sexist and racist undertones?! i study spanish and i understood something he said so i felt the need to agree on the basis of humour

im so fucking racist
So you didn't mean any disrespect. Nice, but its up to Sakura to accept your apology, not me
Wishy
Thought this was off-topic.
Kanye West
on-topic in off-topic

gotta add that one to the nonexistent paradox thread
Sakura

Wishy wrote:

Thought this was off-topic.
Oh you
tyrael6192

Purple wrote:

So you didn't mean any disrespect. Nice, but its up to Sakura to accept your apology, not me
I JEST MY DEAR FELLOW, I JEST! THERE IS NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE FOR SUCH SIMPLE TOMFOOLERY IN THIS PLACE!
Wishy
Sakura
You know what, you're right, this thread is dead.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply