DW28A wrote:

Thanks !

1. Maybe add "dnb" to the tags. Apart from that, nothing.
2. Tick rate 2 ? T.T The drums are a constant 1/2 here, it would fit better.

1. 00:09:190 (3,4) - These could easily look better by making a more proper blanket.
2. 00:24:708 (1) - This baet feels off. What's expected in this case would be for it to be 1/1 before, on the big white tick, because it makes more sense and is easier to follow.
3. 00:43:674 (4) - For the comboing to be more consistent, this slider shouldn't have a repeat, and there should be a circle where it used to end. Also, generally avoid using sliderends on storng beats, especially if you're troggling a kiai time where the slider ends.
4. 00:43:674 (4,1,2) - It would be better because more understandable to use a slider for the first few times this rhythm appears. Right now, having circles instantly might be quite confusing because this rythm involves 1/2 beats, while there was no such beat ever before in the map.
5. 00:57:466 (1,2) - These could easily look better, too.
6. 01:23:328 (4) - 02:29:535 (4) - 03:49:535 (4) - Missing clap on the slider's end ?
7. 02:27:121 (1,3) - Make them properly symmetric waves ? These look a bit weird
8. 02:43:673 (1) - If you're willing to, you should give this a smoother curve - current shape has sharp inner edges
9. 03:50:570 (1) - Starting with this, the claps are on the wrong tick if you want to keep them consistant. They should be on big white ticks - 1/1 after their current placement.

1. 01:32:983 (2,3) - 01:44:018 (2,3) - This was very confusing to me. All the stacks before were 1/1, and I didn't expect a 1/2 rhyhm here, because the vocals don't go for such rhythm.
2. 01:50:915 (3) - Same problem as in Easy - the slider ends on a strong beat and ruins the comboing.
3. 02:02:294 (1,2) - Make these two blanket each other better ? especially the end... These two and all the other similar ones actually

1. AR7 OD4 is a very bad difficulty setting. This kind of OD is used for lower diffs - your Normal has it - so there is basically no difference between Hard and Normal in terms of accuracy, and a huge gap between Hard and the two Insanes. It also makes the Hard feel abnormally easy.
2. 00:43:673 (1,2) - this felt a bit too big for this part - might be because the rest of the circles are spaced with 1.0 distance snapping apart from the jumps. I think it'd be better to reduce this a bit.
3. 01:03:846 (3,4) - This looks awfully weird and kinda bad. It would be better to stack them properly.
4. 01:18:156 (1,1,2) - 01:23:673 (1,1) - 02:24:363 (1,1) - This was confusing as all hell. The slow slider is a gimmick that I didn't expect AT ALL in a Hard diff, and it comes extremely surprising because I don't find anything in the song to justifiy it. The spacing after this is a bit weird, but has been used before in the diff. Really, don' tmake this a slow slider.
5. 01:48:501 (1,2,3) - this is pretty original, I liked it
6. 02:32:466 (5,6) - 02:46:087 (5,6) - 03:27:639 (4,5) - 03:33:156 (5,6) - looks bad. Just use a stack, or proper spacing

1. ... meh. You started overmapping after "Insane"... which spoils the fun.
2. 01:44:018 (2,3,4) - that was pretty cool
3. 02:06:949 (6,7) - this jump has horrible flow. It would flow much better if the slider was going to the left.
4. 02:11:949 (1) - hidden under 02:11:259 (3) -
5. 02:15:052 (1,2) - Very surprising jump, all the more so because 02:16:087 (3,1) - looks the same but the time gap is different
6. 02:49:190 (1,2) - very confusing because 02:46:432 (1,2,1,2) - were jumps and... the pattern is similar. You can add a circle on the x axis at 02:49:708 - to fix it
7. 03:18:156 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This stream has a very weird shape that's pretty hard to follow. Maybe make it simpler or reduce the distance between the circles ?
8. 03:44:535 (1) - It might be better to remove this note. The jump as it is is quite surprising, and the rhythms you used before imply there would be no circle here
9. 04:06:259 (4,5,6) - Move this down so it makes a triangle with 04:05:915 (2,3) - because it feels pretty inconsistent right now: you use a superjump on 2,3 but then 3,4 is boring DS'd

I'm globally okay with the diff so have a cat

Shiro wrote:

As per your request.

Please reply to this mod saying what you didn't fix (and what you did) and why.
Also, if you have any question, feel free to ask me in-game.

General

1. Maybe add "dnb" to the tags. Apart from that, nothing. "Drum'n'Bass" will already do, I guess.
2. Tick rate 2 ? T.T The drums are a constant 1/2 here, it would fit better. No way. Apply that to the easier diffs: does that *look* good IYO?

Easy

1. 00:09:190 (3,4) - These could easily look better by making a more proper blanket.
2. 00:24:708 (1) - This baet feels off. What's expected in this case would be for it to be 1/1 before, on the big white tick, because it makes more sense and is easier to follow.
3. 00:43:674 (4) - For the comboing to be more consistent, this slider shouldn't have a repeat, and there should be a circle where it used to end. Also, generally avoid using sliderends on storng beats, especially if you're troggling a kiai time where the slider ends.
4. 00:43:674 (4,1,2) - It would be better because more understandable to use a slider for the first few times this rhythm appears. Right now, having circles instantly might be quite confusing because this rythm involves 1/2 beats, while there was no such beat ever before in the map.
5. 00:57:466 (1,2) - These could easily look better, too.
6. 01:23:328 (4) - 02:29:535 (4) - 03:49:535 (4) - Missing clap on the slider's end ?
7. 02:27:121 (1,3) - Make them properly symmetric waves ? These look a bit weird
8. 02:43:673 (1) - If you're willing to, you should give this a smoother curve - current shape has sharp inner edges
9. 03:50:570 (1) - Starting with this, the claps are on the wrong tick if you want to keep them consistant. They should be on big white ticks - 1/1 after their current placement.

Updated (BounceBabe).

Normal

1. 01:32:983 (2,3) - 01:44:018 (2,3) - This was very confusing to me. All the stacks before were 1/1, and I didn't expect a 1/2 rhyhm here, because the vocals don't go for such rhythm. Destroys flow if you ask me but... ok.
2. 01:50:915 (3) - Same problem as in Easy - the slider ends on a strong beat and ruins the comboing. Deal w/it. As for the following combo, it isn't too short, I'll keep this as it is ATM.
3. 02:02:294 (1,2) - Make these two blanket each other better ? especially the end... These two and all the other similar ones actually Mkay.

Hard

1. AR7 OD4 is a very bad difficulty setting. This kind of OD is used for lower diffs - your Normal has it - so there is basically no difference between Hard and Normal in terms of accuracy, and a huge gap between Hard and the two Insanes. It also makes the Hard feel abnormally easy. I'll raise it by +2 then. Oh, and HP Drain too. But I think it was actually quite fine.
2. 00:43:673 (1,2) - this felt a bit too big for this part - might be because the rest of the circles are spaced with 1.0 distance snapping apart from the jumps. I think it'd be better to reduce this a bit. Exaclty, reduced by a bit.
3. 01:03:846 (3,4) - This looks awfully weird and kinda bad. It would be better to stack them properly. Sure thing.
4. 01:18:156 (1,1,2) - 01:23:673 (1,1) - 02:24:363 (1,1) - This was confusing as all hell. The slow slider is a gimmick that I didn't expect AT ALL in a Hard diff, and it comes extremely surprising because I don't find anything in the song to justifiy it. The spacing after this is a bit weird, but has been used before in the diff. Really, don' tmake this a slow slider. Okay.
5. 01:48:501 (1,2,3) - this is pretty original, I liked it Glad to hear that!
6. Just use a stack, or proper spacing- looks bad.
   02:32:466 (5,6) - Definitely no. This is a refinement in my eyes, normal stacking would ruin flow IMO.
   02:46:087 (5,6) - Just the same as above.
   03:27:639 (4,5) - Well, ok, I can handle this one.
   03:33:156 (5,6) - Uhm... yeah, ok, this one too.

Escalation

1. ... meh. You started overmapping after "Insane"... which spoils the fun. That is up to discussion, that's just matter of taste.
2. 01:44:018 (2,3,4) - that was pretty cool Nice!
3. 02:06:949 (6,7) - this jump has horrible flow. It would flow much better if the slider was going to the left. Uhm... sure.
4. 02:11:949 (1) - hidden under 02:11:259 (3) - In my eyes, it isn't but... yeah, ok. Is this right now?
5. 02:15:052 (1,2) - Very surprising jump, all the more so because 02:16:087 (3,1) - looks the same but the time gap is different So? Surprising doesn't mean buzzkilling.
6. 02:49:190 (1,2) - very confusing because 02:46:432 (1,2,1,2) - were jumps and... the pattern is similar. You can add a circle on the x axis at 02:49:708 - to fix it I'll apply your suggestion.
7. 03:18:156 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This stream has a very weird shape that's pretty hard to follow. Maybe make it simpler or reduce the distance between the circles? I think I keep this. Pretty simple reason: the curves are circular and beautiful. I like them.
8. 03:44:535 (1) - It might be better to remove this note. The jump as it is is quite surprising, and the rhythms you used before imply there would be no circle here Okay then.
9. 04:06:259 (4,5,6) - Move this down so it makes a triangle with 04:05:915 (2,3) - because it feels pretty inconsistent right now: you use a superjump on 2,3 but then 3,4 is boring DS'd I guess I'll keep this too. A final jump on hardest part wouldn't hurt, since it isn't really overmapped now.

RAIN

I'm globally okay with the diff so have a cat

EDIT: I was so focused on the map I forgot to pop >.> taking the bubble for the Hard diff settings and slow sliders, and the hidden slider in insane

1. add 'dnb' to the tags as shiro suggested. not only is it searched more than the long term 'drum'n'bass', but it also is easier to search up. i also advise changing your current tag 'drum'n'bass' to 'drum and bass' for a more clean search. if not, try 'drum' and 'bass' only.

1. 00:07:121 - this would be better shortened to the downbeat of the measure, the first big white tick, which is at 00:07:811. 'you want to get different variation from 00:09:190 (3, 4), and plus, the guitar / bass drops an octave here, which would be good to emphasize.
2. 00:25:052 - i would suggest adding a note here to follow the lead singer's 'it'. to better suit this easy difficulty, i'd say make this a short slider starting at (1) and ending here.
3. 00:54:708 - there was already two straight sliders previous to this. try to add in some diversity and make this an arc slider arcing upwards. perhaps try an arc at 01:05:742 as well.
4. 00:55:225 - why does this slider end here? the sound in the music you mapped the repeats to at 00:53:846 - are also present here at 00:55:397 yet you ended the slider on the red tick following no music whatsoever (just a self-created rhythm). please extend it as well as the one at 01:00:742.
5. 00:57:466 (1, 2) - try to create a better blanket here for aesthetic purposes.
6. 01:34:708 - blanket this better for aesthetic purposes.
7. 01:54:018 (5) - add a new combo here. the combo extends up to an eight which is pushing it for an easier difficulty, and the music pattern that's occured on (1, 2, 3, 4) already repeats here, so why not emphasize it?
8. 02:10:570 (5) - the mood of the music starts to change here. add a new combo and remove the one at 02:11:949 to emphasize?
9. 02:36:087 - the slider doesn't very well fit the music as it has potential to. i propose breaking it up into two separate sliders and filling in the empty space in the music like this. also try something similar at the next long straight slider (not directly after this, but the one coming after that).
10. 04:02:639 (1, 2, 3) - make the blanket better for aesthetics?

1. lower the hp drain by one.
2. 00:27:121 (1) - this breaks the flow.. i liked the other areas you used this slider, but try something more like an arc here, like this. it flows much better.
3. 00:53:328 (5) - add a new combo to keep consistent with your current combo pattern that was used previous to this and in the second kiai where this part is somewhat similarly mapped if not copy-pasted.
4. 02:49:190 (3) - nice blanket. but i do want to point out that this doesn't follow the music to the best of it's abilities. could you possibly shorten the slider to here so it's mapped to finish at the bass drop and then add a note where it originally ended?
5. 02:56:432 (7) - new combo here, please. it emphasizes the drums here and it's a tad bit long for an easier difficulty's combo length.
6. 02:54:363 (3) - same as above, but consider cutting the slider down to here to follow the vocals for a more unique effect instead.
7. 03:14:018 (1, 2) - these sliders are kind of.. oddly placed together on the playfield. can you try doing something like what you did at 03:08:501 (1, 2) - so it blankets a bit better?

1. 00:36:432 (3, 4) - could you maybe replace these sliders with something that follows the vocals a bit better? i'm fine with the (4) slider but the (3) slider's duration covers three seperate words where other sliders like at 00:32:294 - cover only two. maybe make these into something like this.
2. 00:57:639 (4) - new combo to keep consistent with your combo pattern.
3. 02:24:880 (1) - remove the nc here, the previous nc only lasted one slider and should be extended to keep consistent the combo pattern.
4. 02:35:397 (1, 2, 3, 4) - this plays pretty mild for a hard. can you try making the beat pattern a bit less 1/2 following here and do something like what you did with the blue combo that comes after this?
5. 02:46:259 (6) - can you either directly stack this under five or space it out please?

1. 00:57:121 (3) - unstack this and instead do something like this for better flow.

Elly-chan wrote:

first half of mod

random modding.

[General]

1. add 'dnb' to the tags as shiro suggested. not only is it searched more than the long term 'drum'n'bass', but it also is easier to search up. i also advise changing your current tag 'drum'n'bass' to 'drum and bass' for a more clean search. if not, try 'drum' and 'bass' only.

[Easy]

1. 00:07:121 - this would be better shortened to the downbeat of the measure, the first big white tick, which is at 00:07:811. 'you want to get different variation from 00:09:190 (3, 4), and plus, the guitar / bass drops an octave here, which would be good to emphasize.
2. 00:25:052 - i would suggest adding a note here to follow the lead singer's 'it'. to better suit this easy difficulty, i'd say make this a short slider starting at (1) and ending here.
3. 00:54:708 - there was already two straight sliders previous to this. try to add in some diversity and make this an arc slider arcing upwards. perhaps try an arc at 01:05:742 as well.
4. 00:55:225 - why does this slider end here? the sound in the music you mapped the repeats to at 00:53:846 - are also present here at 00:55:397 yet you ended the slider on the red tick following no music whatsoever (just a self-created rhythm). please extend it as well as the one at 01:00:742.
5. 00:57:466 (1, 2) - try to create a better blanket here for aesthetic purposes.
6. 01:34:708 - blanket this better for aesthetic purposes.
7. 01:54:018 (5) - add a new combo here. the combo extends up to an eight which is pushing it for an easier difficulty, and the music pattern that's occured on (1, 2, 3, 4) already repeats here, so why not emphasize it?
8. 02:10:570 (5) - the mood of the music starts to change here. add a new combo and remove the one at 02:11:949 to emphasize?
9. 02:36:087 - the slider doesn't very well fit the music as it has potential to. i propose breaking it up into two separate sliders and filling in the empty space in the music like this. also try something similar at the next long straight slider (not directly after this, but the one coming after that).
10. 04:02:639 (1, 2, 3) - make the blanket better for aesthetics?

i may conclude that the usage of hitsounds were definitely not the brightest in this difficulty. no offense (yet some may be taken), they almost gave me a migraine. i would suggest rehitsounding everything and make the hitsounds actually not be randomly placed. i also advise trying to use soft sample hitsounds instead of normal hitsounds. it sounds plain out obnoxious.

Updated (BounceBabe)

[Normal]

1. lower the hp drain by one. okay
2. 00:27:121 (1) - this breaks the flow.. i liked the other areas you used this slider, but try something more like an arc here, like this. it flows much better. I can't seem to figure out how this breaks the flow. An arc would not improve it if you ask me.
3. 00:53:328 (5) - add a new combo to keep consistent with your current combo pattern that was used previous to this and in the second kiai where this part is somewhat similarly mapped if not copy-pasted. 'kay
4. 02:49:190 (3) - nice blanket. but i do want to point out that this doesn't follow the music to the best of it's abilities. could you possibly shorten the slider to here so it's mapped to finish at the bass drop and then add a note where it originally ended? Changed this somehow.
5. 02:56:432 (7) - new combo here, please. it emphasizes the drums here and it's a tad bit long for an easier difficulty's combo length. Sure thing
6. 02:54:363 (3) - same as above, but consider cutting the slider down to here to follow the vocals for a more unique effect instead.I don't remember if I fixed this with the suggestion above *so awkward*
7. 03:14:018 (1, 2) - these sliders are kind of.. oddly placed together on the playfield. can you try doing something like what you did at 03:08:501 (1, 2) - so it blankets a bit better? You can try and set it up to see for yourself, that in that case, an overlap would occur with that previous long arc.

overall a nice normal difficulty. it looks pretty clean already, so not much to say about it aside from small stuff. Thanks!

second half

[Hard]

1. 00:36:432 (3, 4) - could you maybe replace these sliders with something that follows the vocals a bit better? i'm fine with the (4) slider but the (3) slider's duration covers three seperate words where other sliders like at 00:32:294 - cover only two. maybe make these into something like this. Did it my way.
2. 00:57:639 (4) - new combo to keep consistent with your combo pattern. Aye.
3. 02:24:880 (1) - remove the nc here, the previous nc only lasted one slider and should be extended to keep consistent the combo pattern. Sure thing.
4. 02:35:397 (1, 2, 3, 4) - this plays pretty mild for a hard. can you try making the beat pattern a bit less 1/2 following here and do something like what you did with the blue combo that comes after this? But it plays soooo smooth :c
5. 02:46:259 (6) - can you either directly stack this under five or space it out please? nyaaaa..... ok. ;~;

very nice hard difficulty. loved almost everything about it. I am so glad to hear (read) that!

[Escalation]

1. 00:57:121 (3) - unstack this and instead do something like this for better flow. I'll take the example!

switching this map to a star icon for the time being since this is the second mod after it was popped. don't worry, i have intentions of rebubbling.

Lally wrote:

if a GD mapper is afk from the game, the mapper (Quiz-chan) should care about all the diffs imo o3o why don't you give a look alone and reply to the mod what for you is right to fix, this map waited enought time for now

I'll just quote a PM in which jericho2442 wrote:

I´ll get her to check it out after her finals are done, thats more important atm

Quiz-chan wrote:

...and that's not like... forbidden?

Elly-chan wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:07:121 - this would be better shortened to the downbeat of the measure, the first big white tick, which is at 00:07:811. 'you want to get different variation from 00:09:190 (3, 4), and plus, the guitar / bass drops an octave here, which would be good to emphasize. Okay
2. 00:25:052 - i would suggest adding a note here to follow the lead singer's 'it'. to better suit this easy difficulty, i'd say make this a short slider starting at (1) and ending here. I handled this with a slider
3. 00:54:708 - there was already two straight sliders previous to this. try to add in some diversity and make this an arc slider arcing upwards. perhaps try an arc at 01:05:742 as well. Now guess what, I did it that way beFORE I read this.
4. 00:55:225 - why does this slider end here? the sound in the music you mapped the repeats to at 00:53:846 - are also present here at 00:55:397 yet you ended the slider on the red tick following no music whatsoever (just a self-created rhythm). please extend it as well as the one at 01:00:742. I got this.
5. 00:57:466 (1, 2) - try to create a better blanket here for aesthetic purposes. Sure
6. 01:34:708 - blanket this better for aesthetic purposes. Okay
7. 01:54:018 (5) - add a new combo here. the combo extends up to an eight which is pushing it for an easier difficulty, and the music pattern that's occured on (1, 2, 3, 4) already repeats here, so why not emphasize it? Fixed already
8. 02:10:570 (5) - the mood of the music starts to change here. add a new combo and remove the one at 02:11:949 to emphasize? Fixed as well
9. 02:36:087 - the slider doesn't very well fit the music as it has potential to. i propose breaking it up into two separate sliders and filling in the empty space in the music like this. also try something similar at the next long straight slider (not directly after this, but the one coming after that). Okay
10. 04:02:639 (1, 2, 3) - make the blanket better for aesthetics? Sure

i may conclude that the usage of hitsounds were definitely not the brightest in this difficulty. no offense (yet some may be taken), they almost gave me a migraine. i would suggest rehitsounding everything and make the hitsounds actually not be randomly placed. i also advise trying to use soft sample hitsounds instead of normal hitsounds. it sounds plain out obnoxious. I re-hitsounded the diff. I hope you like it a little more now.... >_>

DiamondCrash wrote:

ALEKS719:

01:00:225 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this is pretty much unreadable, that decreased spacing is nonsensical. uhhhh, i don't find it unreadable/unfitting, all testplayers didn't have problems with it
03:36:087 (5) - This slowdown is just strange, considering on that distorted synth sting before this section, the slider speed increases, as to emphasize the distortion. Decreasing the slider speed here therefore seems like an odd decision. m, okay

IceBeam wrote:

thanks for mod,DC,but I'd like to keep those stacks as they are if it's possible,it's just expression of my style

D33d wrote:

I'm quite vehement in suggesting that those vertical manual stacks be changed to normal stacks. There's no need for them as they are. As DC said, it causes the more effective antijumps to be cheapened. I agree with him about the 3/4 sliders' overuse as well, because there's no need for it and they weaken the feel of the music considerably.

tuddster wrote:

Mapset is really, really fun, especially Escalation. Might even be the best ever Glad to hear that

All of these are suggestions!

[BB's Easy]
You forgot the "DnB" tag which is present in other diffs. Thanks for pointing out an unrankability!!
Your name is fading in and out and in again and it's a mess. I would suggest fading it out at the first break and leaving it out. That wouldn't make sense, would it? It would be just like in RAIN.
02:43:673 (1) Don't make this repeat and just put a circle on "club"? Even without repeat, the slider ends on "club".
02:54:708 (1) No. Yes. All I could do would be a 4/1 slider that repeats once.

[Normal]
great! Thanks!

hitsounds seem quiet... meh... you're right.
01:59:535 (1,2) immediately recognized this as a copypasta, maybe change it? haha, the entire diff is a C&P diff.
02:28:156 (2) Make this match with the end of the grey slider. sure

[Hard]
Very good! Thanks!
00:49:880 (3) (and others) one less repeat? I get your idea behind this, but I am sorry, I wanna keep it this way. :c
03:42:983 (1) keep mapping to the thing those yellow notes were on, instead of spinning here. To make it match the rhythm, I need to use 1/4 objects because there's a short drumroll coming up. But this is a Hard, so I'd rather not insert 1/4 rhythms.
03:18:156 (1) repeating slider instead. Sorry, but this spinner is mapped to the sound in the background that doesn't have a certain pitch because its pitch is raising constantly.

[Escalation]
[Normal]
00:31:949 (3) maybe get rid of that sharp angle? Only alternative I could think of would be a wave. But that wouldn't flow well compared to this slider.

[Frenzy]
03:01:949 (1,2,3) delete? If not, I think this fits the voice better. The hit-normals represent a syllable of the singer each and the soft-whistles are there because there's a strong synth sound that sounds every 1/2 beat. It sounds like a rock guitar.
03:10:225 (1,2,3,4) is it possible for these to make a better pentagon? This looks a little lopsided It actually isn't. But I changed something minor on it.
03:13:673 (1) remove the new combo, and put it on the previous slider. Make sure to fix the combos a bit later The new combo wasn't set just to follow the vocals, but the rhythm line. Otherwise, the entire quiet half of the Frenzy part would look completely different.

[Maximum]
Maybe a pulsing storyboard for that Maximum Power sign? Also it would be cool if you could storyboard some brighter kiai on here, because there is a LOT of power in this section. Not a bad idea after all!

[Rain]
[Overall]
tick rate -1? Ticks make a lot of noise in this map. Besides, they are not really necessary.
02:13:587 the break here is kind of long. Maybe put something in the second half of it?

[Icebeam]
03:51:259 (7) Move this up so it lines up with (3). definitely!

[Naraku]
03:18:156 (1) maybe put a stream here like in Escalation? c:

[Reiji-RJ]
00:11:604 (4) line up with (2)? why not?

tuddster wrote:

So how did I do with my first mod?

DiamondCrash wrote:

REIJI-RJ:

00:45:052 to 00:55:915 - delicious, om nom, nom nom. owowowww =w=

tuddster wrote:

[Rain]

[Reiji-RJ]
00:11:604 (4) line up with (2)? it is stack D:
03:31:777 (6) - Move left and down a bit so it lines up with the other four notes. gradual distance increase~

1. God, PLEASE, do something about those combo colours. It simply makes no sense to have 8 COMBO COLOURS for no real good reason.
   There's a bunch of creative things that you could do with them, such as:
   
   1. Colourhaxing [RAIN] so that each mapper has a distinctive colour, and a common colour amongst all of us. Like: Reiji - Orange/Grey , Aleks - Blue/Grey, IceBeam - Green/Grey, Me - Purple/Grey. On the rest of the difficulties you could dispose of the grey, since it doesn't really fit in the mapset except for something exceptional.
   2. Using different colours depending on which section of the map you're in - for example, use 4 colours on the start, then change two colours when the pace goes faster, then change the other two colours on the chorus, and so on. I'd recommend the colours on the chorus to be the brightest.
   And, who knows, there could be an infinity of cool stuff to do! Not just have 8 colours because "fuck it, I can have 8 colours!".
   
2. Man, seriously, that background is way too colourful. You don't really create a feeling to the map - usually, when it's more monochrome, you can give a certain feeling to the map, play with your combo colors, skinning, SBing, etc... With all those colours on the BG, it just doesn't help. I can actually help you with this. A good idea would be to have it "tuned" to a colour of your choice (which I can do), and then, for the SB in [RAIN], change the colour of the background image according to the mapper of each section. Hell, that would be cool!

BounceBabe wrote:

Sorry, but this is my creation and i don't let anyone ever change stuff on my difficulties unless you have permission. You didn't ask for permission to adjust the mods on my difficultie. I was willing to take a look if you at least made good choices on changing the difficultie and if you could adjust them to my style, but you couldn't. Please delete my difficultie or change it back to my last update if you want to keep it.

D33d wrote:

If the guest mapper is reasonable and understands that their absence is holding up the map, then I see no problem with it. If you can't get hold of them, then go ahead and change things.

BounceBabe wrote:

You didn't ask for my permission though and i updated my difficultie and sent it to you, but then you suddenly applied the mods on your own. This has nothing to do with a BATs decicion you know, it is mine. I won't say it once again, please delete my diff or put it back to how it was, when i gave it to you, updated, the last time.

Quiz-chan wrote:

There is no going back anymore because I don't have another copy of the old version left. Updated.

narakucrimson wrote:

@BounceBabe:
I say you shouldn't bitch so much about it, you're threatening the owner with removing your diff, when you could simply ask for it to be reverted in a good way. I asked normally for it to be removed, i wasn't threatening at all. So why the hell aren't you doing that, and instead being so agressive? Where was i agressive? I only don't want my own map to be touched by others, it's my right to ask for it. I don't see the problem here, i would remove a guest difficultie as well if the creator of it would ask for this. That has nothing to do with "threatening", it's a decicion what i've made and i wish to get at least respected and not getting such answers and then people call me disrespectful.
You say you're bored of osu!, I don't see why I shouldn't be thinking you're just a stubborn girl that can't afford not being nice at all. Why am i not "nice at all"?, what kind of "rule" did i break or better what did i do wrong to deserve this comment from you. And i am NOT bored of osu!, i am just sad over how far the community went. I am against this "rank-for-rankability-system". It doesn't leave any space for the creator. And that's why i want not these kind of changes on my difficultie.

Quiz-chan wrote:

There is no going back anymore because I don't have another copy of the old version left. // Well, you do. If you didn't delete my last message to you over the update, then you still have it.