kevinReplied in game and fixed stuff~
01:50:596 (5) -seperating this at 01:50:896 - would make way more sense with drum pattern to me
02:10:696 (5,1) - seems better if you did what you did for 02:09:496 (5,1) - spacing wise, or at least have some consistency cause it's pretty much the same thing
06:22:848 (1,2) - 06:27:087 (3) - 06:30:238 (2,3,4,5) - I'm really unsure about these and lots of other 1/4 you mapped in in this part, they sound quite off for guitar and srums are only 1/2 on many spots
I mean some of them seem okay as simplification but sometimes they just seem so wrong
mind explaining why you comboed the intro like this instead of putting them on the start of each measure, that seem way more fitting with what the song does
and then on 00:33:796 (1) - it suddenly changes to a way more reasonable one even though the background rhythm is the same?
00:16:696 (3,4,5) - 00:19:096 (3,4,5) - and wherever else you did those stacked 1/2 after sliders in the intro: why? I don't think they work very well with the emphasis of the song
00:38:596 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - enable stacking/press f5, it looks stupid like this, manually move 00:39:196 (3,4,5) - 8x8 pixels down/right
00:52:996 (1,2) - so clumped, makes it kinda annyoing to read and also looks bad to me. maybe something like http://i.imgur.com/szFKeih.jpg ?
03:10:696 (5) - with all your curved sliders around here this just looks out of place considering it maps the same things
03:11:896 (3) - starting the stream from here would be nice, still follows the drums and nicely accentuates the held vocal
06:00:196 (1,2,1,2) - can you make this a bit less clumped?
06:05:896 (13) - - this turn felt way too harsh on a pretty "normal" beat in comparison to others, how about going with something like http://i.imgur.com/ZeXy2pP.jpg (very unpolished example) ?
06:39:368 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - same as kevin's 1/4 things here
also things like 07:01:985 (1) - where it sounds more like http://i.imgur.com/KaAr5YH.jpg or whatever but that would play like shit lol
07:02:423 (3) - sounds kinda early to me
03:41:389 (1) - 03:44:089 (1) - 03:50:989 (1) - not sure about these, kinda seems like it should start 1/16 later? (on the next 1/8 tick)
03:53:671 ( 1) - and this is snapped differently?
04:52:996 (5) - shouldn't this have nc? seems like you nc at least once every measure for this part
04:54:496 (5,6) - why do you suddenly have to use a 4x repeat and start the stream from the blue tick, it doesn't really play well and the guitar seems to change on 04:54:796 - anyways
05:06:196 - http://i.imgur.com/VBc7koL.jpg would still work well with the guitar but let players start the stream on an actually strong sound and makes it more consistent with other streams
01:17:596 (5) - no idea if you care, but this looks stupid without sliderends, how about changing the end a bit http://i.imgur.com/AVjvnvE.jpg ? though personally I think http://i.imgur.com/0KuBvBc.jpg would look nicer and make a better visual transition to the next object
01:28:996 (1,2) - this is the most triggering intentional overlap I've seen in a while lol
01:31:996 (9) - vocals change here, so having the stream change here instead of 01:32:296 (13) - would make more sense
05:23:446 (4,5) - sudden spacing drop here didn't play well at all with such an angle, could make it more acute or use more similar/same spacing
biggest issue to me is the ending cause I'm really unsure about the rhythms as stated above