DakeDekaane wrote:

Why am I here? ._. Because


[Easy]

Try to make better some blankets, it will give a nice look to the diff.

HP Drain 0, I know this is an easy but, increase it at least by 2~ Increased by one
Approach Rate seems too slow to me, make it 2 or even 3. Nah
Increase Overall Difficulty by 1 if you like, maybe it would make it not too easy. I'll think about this.

00:08:526 (2,3) - Fix spacing But it is fixed already..
00:08:970 (3,1) - This overlap looks really ugly, either stack the head of 00:10:748 (1) and the tail of 00:08:970 (3) or move it to another place. Fixed
00:08:526 (2,3) - Spacing Eh.. it's already been fixed.
00:41:859 (1,2,3) - Do this in a curve, in a line looks very simple :c Alright

01:05:859 (2,2) - Try to avoid overlaps like this in easier diffs, and let's try to make the map friendly to newbies. I wanted to copy the last chorus beat into this.
01:21:859 (1,2,3) - Curve this No
01:23:637 (1,2,3) - ^ ^

rezoons wrote:

wa's Hard
01:17:637 (5) - The position of this note is weird. fixed
01:47:193 (4) - Finish hitsound? I think same whistle sounds better

• 
  01:43:193 This seems like an odd time to end the Kiai time.

• 
  00:17:859 (1,2,3,4) If you wanted to keep consistency, you could replicate the rhythm at 00:14:304 (1,2,3,4)
  00:38:304 (3) This looks oddly placed. Maybe do something like this? (Sorry, the distance space isn't perfect but you'll get the idea.)
  00:39:193 (1) Having more than one repeat isn't a very good idea in an Easy.
  * 00:54:748 It feels too empty without a circle (it may also improve the flow of this section).
  01:30:748 (1,2,3,4,1) I think it would look better if you put these in a "flower" pattern and then make a blanked with 1 (slider) and 2 (blue combo)

• 
  It looks a bit too spaced out. Maybe lower the distance spacing a bit? Just a thought.
  00:13:637 It feels like there should be a circle here to me.

• 
  00:39:859 Add a circle maybe?
  00:42:748 (1) This new combo doesn't seem too necessary.
  * 01:10:748 (5) It would sound better if there was a clap on the start point.
  * 01:18:081 It breaks the flow if there isn't anything here, especially since this didn't happen in the first part of the chorus.
  01:22:748 (3) This looks a bit odd to me. I think you should make it look symmetrical with 01:21:859 (1)
  01:28:526 (7) To me, it looks better if the red point in the middle of the slider was not a red point (sorry, don't know the exact terms).

• 
  Why does this have different combo colors than the rest of the difficulties?
  00:17:415 (10) This would make more sense (according to the pattern set from 7,8, and 9) if this was facing the other direction.
  * 00:26:859 (2) I don't think this circle is really necessary.
  * 01:09:526 (2) ^

Good luck with mapping.

CrestRising wrote:

[wa's Hard:]

• 
  00:39:859 Add a circle maybe? fixed
  00:42:748 (1) This new combo doesn't seem too necessary. fixed
  * 01:10:748 (5) It would sound better if there was a clap on the start point. fixed
  * 01:18:081 It breaks the flow if there isn't anything here, especially since this didn't happen in the first part of the chorus. fixed
  01:22:748 (3) This looks a bit odd to me. I think you should make it look symmetrical with 01:21:859 (1) fixed
  01:28:526 (7) To me, it looks better if the red point in the middle of the slider was not a red point (sorry, don't know the exact terms). well, I don't know what you mean

rezoons wrote:

Hi ^-^,
I've done a quick mod. Did'nt really find a lot of things.

Vinyl Dash's Easy
00:28:526 (1) - Why a new combo in a middle of a sentence. Because of the beat.
00:30:128 (1) - Same here. I suggest that you put the new combo at 00:28:081 and 00:29:859. ^ I trust big white ticks for new combos.
00:54:748 - Maybe add a note. Fine.
01:17:859 (2) - Same remark about the new combo. Same reason why I told the last two fixes..
01:38:081 (1) - If you want to match the lyric start the slider 1/2 beat later. That will ruin the easy for the end IMO. I focused mostly on the beat.
01:41:415 (1) - ^ ^
01:44:970 (1) - Start the spinner 1/2 beat later and add a finish hitsound. No, andYes

CrestRising wrote:

Hi there, from my queue.
* = Slightly more suggested than others.


[VinylDash's Easy:]

• 
  00:17:859 (1,2,3,4) If you wanted to keep consistency, you could replicate the rhythm at 00:14:304 (1,2,3,4) It's fine where it is right now.
  00:38:304 (3) This looks oddly placed. Maybe do something like this? (Sorry, the distance space isn't perfect but you'll get the idea.) I'll look into it.
  00:39:193 (1) Having more than one repeat isn't a very good idea in an Easy. But it represents the beat :U
  * 00:54:748 It feels too empty without a circle (it may also improve the flow of this section). Been told before, its fixed.
  01:30:748 (1,2,3,4,1) I think it would look better if you put these in a "flower" pattern and then make a blanked with 1 (slider) and 2 (blue combo) Thats actually not a bad idea. I'll think about it.

1. You can add tag mlp to help us find your map easier.
2. Disable audio lead in for all diff, there's no need to use it.
3. Enable countdown for all diffs, or disable it for all diffs. Try to keep consistency in settings, but I'd recommend you to enable countdown! It fits here so good.
4. If it's possible - use 1024x768 BG, if no - you should have good reason to use this bg.
5. I can hear Slider Tick Rate 2 here, so use it for all diffs, please! It fits and makes thythm more consistent
6. Personally, I think that it's ok to map this break because song is short.Try to map break? At least for harder diffs.

1. 00:08:526 (2) - I don't feel like whistle fits here. Here and so on.. this whistle feels too soft. why don't you put claps here and so on? (Sounds like beat at 00:09:415 - so, there's no any reason to use whistles)
2. 00:39:193 (1) - I understand why it's here.. but I'd recommend you to replace it with shorter slider and circle. Beginners probably won't notice second reverse in time, it's quite confusing for them. Also: this slider is inconsistent because it has two reverses (usually, you use sliders with one reverse, and this slider will confuse beginners)
3. 00:42:304 (2) - how about whistle hitsound here? Just because this beat feels like it should be louder than regular beat :V
4. 00:54:748 - maybe circle here? It feels awkward without hitobject here because there's SHOULD be something with clap hitsound!
5. 01:08:526 (2) - overlapped with 01:05:859 (2) - not a problem, but if it's easiest diff it's better to avoid overlaps. For example you can stack 01:05:859 (2,2) - to solve this problem.
6. 01:16:526 (1,2,1) - nazi - somehow i expected blanket sliders here.why not?
7. 01:36:970 (1) - overlapped with spinner's hitburst. Confusing for beginners for some reasons. If it's possible, try to avoid this overlap.

1. You're using 1/2 notes quite often and OD5 makes it TOO hard, how about OD4? Remember, than Normal souldn't be too challenging diff!
2. 00:10:526 (2,4) - nazi- overlapped with hitburst - not a problem but makes your flow look worser :< At least you can try something like this.
3. 00:21:415 (1,1) - two NCs in a row looks a bit..weird.. meh.. how about removing NC from 00:23:193 (1) - for consistency and better looking pattern?
4. 00:25:859 (2,3) - this kind of flow is a bit confusing. some people will probably start (3) from the reverse, so how about re-arranging you pattern a bit?
   
   example

   
5. 00:39:637 (1,1) - spinner sounds like break will start right after it and it's kinda unexpected to see ONE slider after this "final" spinner. How about using slider instead of spinner? Or at least fix 00:41:859 (1) - it's overlapped with spinner's hitburst, you can move it down to fix it!
6. 00:49:859 (1,2) - hey! you can Ctrl+g them to follow vocals better! note: don't forget to fix spacing if you apply it.
7. 01:07:637 (1,2,3) - same as 00:25:859. Nice and cute copypasta here!
8. 01:27:193 (1) - there's no need to put new combo. it breaks your comboing and also doesn't fit with music/vocals at all!
9. 01:36:081 (1) - I'll be happy if you move this slider closer to spinner center. It's too far from spinner center and will make Flashlight-players really angry. Just put it closer to spinner center to keep flow more consistent and readable.
10. 01:38:304 (4,4) - how about new combo here? For vocals? I think it fits quite good.
11. 01:47:193 (1) - replace it with spinner? Spinner in the end is more common for Normals and easier to play. And remove finish/reduce volume here. It feels TOO loud the way it is now :< (if you disagree, at least put circle at 01:46:748 - to follow BOOM >3<)

1. AR 7 here will fit MUCH better. It will help you to avoid overlaps and things.. So, yea, do it!
2. It's [Hard] diff and i you use jumps here, make them easier to read - put NC here! It's NOT overusing NC, as long as you have reasons to put them.
3. 00:23:415 (4,5,6) - during this part hitsounds are TOO loud. -10-15% would be nice, imo. Also: try to re-arrange circles a bit for onsistent spacing. example
4. 00:26:970 (2) - nazi - try to avoid this confusing overlap? i'm pretty sure that you can stack it with 00:25:859 (3)!
5. 00:42:304 (4) - same as yeasy, whistle or something, it feels louder than regular beat. BUT REDUC VOLUME OF HITSOUNDS FIRST
6. 00:52:748 (5,6,7) - nazi - this stack feels weird and a bit random, imo. It's quite weird, so how about unstack for consistent?
7. 01:18:081 (7) - well.. If you map hard - poin out jumps by placing new combo at them, if you can't do it - then this jump is unfitting. Personally, I don't feel like there's any reason to keep this jump here.
8. 01:20:970 (3) - and some similar patterns - clap + NC to point out jumps. It'll look better if you do it, i think.
9. 01:22:748 (1) - can you explain me: what's the point of this New Combo? It's Nc overusing and it dosn't fit with ANYTHING in your diff, so, remove it, please!
10. 01:41:859 (2) - - nazi - stack it with (3) to be consistent with 01:41:415 (1) - also it will make your pattern a vit more awesome.
11. 01:47:193 (4) - new combo to make end of this diff more epic? It'll fit here, anyway.

1. OMGOMGOMGOMG USE AR 8 BECAUSE IT FITS HERE Srsly, try AR8 it fis much better and it's also more common for Insane diffs.
2. 00:19:637 (1) - I'd remove Nc for consistency.You're experienced mapper, and you know it, right?
3. 01:43:193 (1) - same as Normal.
   
   It feels more like [Hard] diff. :< But really well-mapped [Hard] diff.

Teru21 wrote:

[wa's Hard]
00:22:748 - add clap fixed
00:24:304 and 00:24:526 - add whistle fixed
00:31:859 (6) - X:304 Y:316 would be good cause 00:30:748 (3) also a curve slider fixed
00:30:526 (2) - x:228 y:56 to make it move smoothly with 00:30:748 (3) fixed
00:36:081 (2) - stack this with 00:34:748 (3) perfectly please.. turn of grid snap and move it XD fixed
00:37:859 (3) - aline this with 00:37:415 (1) . if you put it there, it seems you broke your own pattern ;A; fixed
00:38:081 (4) - should stack with (5) imo.. make 3 and 4 jump? XD changed, but another way :p
01:04:970 (3,2,3) - it looks untidy if it stack here and there. consider to move it somewhere else XD with AR7 it'll looks better
01:14:748 (1) - second slider point 3 grid down and third slider point(last slider point) 2 grids to the right or 1 grid to the right fixed
01:47:193 (4) - stack under (2) ? now it's good imo.

-Bakari- wrote:

[wa's Hard]

1. AR 7 here will fit MUCH better. It will help you to avoid overlaps and things.. So, yea, do it! agree
2. It's [Hard] diff and i you use jumps here, make them easier to read - put NC here! It's NOT overusing NC, as long as you have reasons to put them. added some NCs
3. 00:23:415 (4,5,6) - during this part hitsounds are TOO loud. -10-15% would be nice, imo. fixed Also: try to re-arrange circles a bit for onsistent spacing. example fixed
4. 00:26:970 (2) - nazi - try to avoid this confusing overlap? i'm pretty sure that you can stack it with 00:25:859 (3)! fixed with small jump
5. 00:42:304 (4) - same as yeasy, whistle or something, it feels louder than regular beat. BUT REDUC VOLUME OF HITSOUNDS FIRST fixed
6. 00:52:748 (5,6,7) - nazi - this stack feels weird and a bit random, imo. It's quite weird, so how about unstack for consistent? imo two hitclaps in one place aren't weird and random
7. 01:18:081 (7) - well.. If you map hard - poin out jumps by placing new combo at them, if you can't do it - then this jump is unfitting. Personally, I don't feel like there's any reason to keep this jump here. fixed
8. 01:20:970 (3) - and some similar patterns - clap + NC to point out jumps. It'll look better if you do it, i think. fixed
9. 01:22:748 (1) - can you explain me: what's the point of this New Combo? It's Nc overusing and it dosn't fit with ANYTHING in your diff, so, remove it, please! fixed
10. 01:41:859 (2) - - nazi - stack it with (3) to be consistent with 01:41:415 (1) - also it will make your pattern a vit more awesome. fixed
11. 01:47:193 (4) - new combo to make end of this diff more epic? It'll fit here, anyway. fixed

eLtigreXXx wrote:

[wa's Hard]
Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:21:543 - snap to 00:21:526 fixed
00:56:304 (2) - x:60 y:64 00:56:526 (3) - x:200 y:28 )or align these ok
nice :3 thanks :>

SuperMoutarde wrote:

[Hard]
00:40:970 (1) - I would remove new combo here ok
01:07:415 (6,7,1) - I would place new combo on the current 6 instead (so remove it on the current 1) ok
01:44:748 (4,5,1) - Same. Would be place new combo on current 4. ok

1. 00:11:637 (4) - Not really bad, but the slider after the red point. Looks weird imho, especially that it's so short... How about something like this?
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:28:526 (1,2,4) - Not a really good placement imo.. Try this.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:33:859 (1,2) - ^

1. 00:24:970 (1,2) - Nooo.. Don't do this. It can confuse new players. especially people who don't understand this flow. Also it looks weird. Although you have to change some part on the map
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
   
   
2. 00:37:415 (4) - imho it's better if the body of this slider is pointing up than down.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:41:859 (1) - imo it's better if you change this slider to 3 circles, It's a normal. It'll be too easy since player can hold the cursor in the middle of the slider (idk if it's true though, just my guess)
4. 01:07:637 (1,2,) - same as 00:24:970 (1,2)

nanda2009 wrote:

[wa's Hard]

1. 00:28:526 (1,2,4) - Not a really good placement imo.. Try this. ok
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:33:859 (1,2) - ^ Now here is well imo.