I talked to MMzz, so no worries. We came to a consensus.
aabc271 checked the Oni and he said it is fine, so I will make the last checks? Sorry for letting you waiting.
[
Kantan]
01:23:893 (1,2,3) - all d? So it fits better to the previous one: 01:18:840 (1,2,3) -
01:53:893 (1,1) - k d? So you follow the kat rythm.
02:23:104 (11) - Instead of a slider, it might better to continue having notes.
02:26:735 (2) - Move to 02:26:893 ? Sometimes it isn't possible to avoid another spacing. So that would be fine.
I'm fine with the Kantan now.
[
Futsuu]
{
00:54:683 (11,18) - both k
00:57:367 - add a d here
00:58:630 - ^
} What do you think about this? I think in this way the patterns would be a bit smoother.
01:03:525 (6,10,15,17) - Suggesting kat on these notes, so you have a little more variation.
01:12:210 (3) - kat?
Hey, Futsuu was pretty nice.
[
Muzukashii]
02:16:315 (1,2,1,1,1) - Maybe d d k k d is better? d d k d k dosen't fit so well with the previous d d k k d.
Good Muzukashii. Decent mapped.
[
Oni]
01:27:289 (1) - Consider having here a kat. plays a bit easier and fits maybe better to the song?
02:28:473 - Ah, this comes kinda out of the sudden. Fine with the music, but maybe it would be good to delete notes 02:29:026 (5) - , 02:29:657 (5) - .
Or you use this pattern:
Well, Kantan was the diff. which was -in my opinion- problematic before. The other diffs are fine as the other people said before.
Just here and there some suggestions from me.
Since you waited because of me for a rebubble, I will ask MMzz to check it one more time. Also I will ask another BAT to help.
Sorry for late response.