1. Easy (2.75 stars, 98 notes)
2. Insane (4.92 stars, 256 notes)
3. Kiiwa's Hard (4.6 stars, 201 notes)
4. S h i o n's Normal (3.91 stars, 123 notes)

wcx19911123 wrote:

timing

1. Offset: 758ms BPM: 174.00
2. Offset: 6,255ms BPM: 178.00
3. Offset: 7,591ms BPM: 180.00
4. Offset: 8,929ms BPM: 176.00

最后一条应该比较准，前面那点timing难度已经超越supercell，我不能保证啥0.0
顺带2ha那个BPM比这个高不少0.0 真的是同一首歌么0.0..

S h i o n wrote:

又腐

[TimingPoints]
749,740.740740740741,4,2,1,70,1,0
1489,833.333333333333,4,2,1,70,1,0
2290,769.230769230769,4,2,1,70,1,0
3464,769.230769230769,4,2,1,70,1,0
4823,769.230769230769,4,2,1,70,1,0
6185,769.230769230769,4,2,1,70,1,0
8925,340.909090909091,4,2,1,70,1,0

Pokie wrote:

　General

1. "S h i o n" doesn't work when searching as a keyword (Check this), I prefer to switch all blanks into underlines (S_h_i_o_n)[/color]
2. 01:26:485 - Nori Soumen~ (海苔素麺)hhh

　Easy

1. 01:14:383 (1) - Slider's head with normal sample set?声太大了

　Insane

1. 發現懶的繼續用英文寫
   00:35:860 (1) - 其實vocal在紅線已經停了的情況下弄個3/4的加速slider是不是有點蠢是不是是不是其实跟的是音乐那个有点类似滑轮的声音。
   00:58:019 (1) - 感覺應該像前面00:57:508 (3,4) - 搞個跳, 現在顯得和前一個slider靠的太近懒懒懒懒懒

1. LeadIn:2000
   00:06:899 (2) - Unsnapped.Seem like you must change the pattern since the timing change on reverse make the end point off.
   00:33:133 (7) - Remove NC...?
   01:11:315 (4,5) - ...not very fit imo.Delete 5 and extend 4 sounds better.Just my feeling.
   01:13:531 (5,1) - Same as above .

1. S h i o n must be written as S_h_i_o_n
2. Add opening to the tags
3. Remove letterbox during breaks, there aren't breaks in your map

1. 00:26:997 (2,3) - I would set Normal sampleset on (2)'s tail and remove it from (3)'s tail. It sounds and fits with the music better
2. 00:38:929 (1) - What about to reduce this spinner till the previous downbeat so that you can add a circle on 00:40:974 that fills the vocal in the music? I feel this rhythm more enjoyable to hear/and play: http://puu.sh/383ZF.jpg
3. 01:03:474 (x) - Why this empty downbeat? Add circle on here placing it at x:180 y:352
4. 01:03:815 (6) - I'd extend it by 1/2 (till the next downbeat) to fill the "o" vocal

1. 00:01:447 (2,3,4) - I don't like how you have used whistles here, honestly D: What about to remove it from (2) and (4), adding it on (3), instead? They fit better
2. 00:16:429 (3) - Improve this blanket moving the last waypoint till x:496 y:232
3. 01:26:656 (4) - New combo

1. OD -1?
2. 00:03:473 (3) - Mh, whistle on reverse arrow to emphasize the vocal?
3. 00:08:591 (3) - x:144 y:192 to blanket it with next slider? It flows pretty nice
4. 00:10:122 (3) - I don't like this slider honestly. What about to totally stack it with 00:08:929 (1)'s curve? I mean:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   28,268,10122,2,0,P|4:180|56:64,1,195
   184,148,10974,5,2,0:0:0:0:

   
   (I moved 00:10:974 (1) as well to make the spacing consistent)
5. 00:16:258 (4) - eeeh this is very confusing. It looks to be snapped 1/2 after the previous slider. Stack it with 00:17:110 (5)'s head? Moreover, I would remove new combo from 00:16:429 (1) adding it on 00:17:110 (5). It's more logical but especially less confusing.
6. 00:27:338 (1) - Keeping my suggestion above, remove new combo here adding it on 00:28:019 (3) instead
7. 00:32:110 (4) - Almost off screen. Move it some grid up
8. 00:39:525 (3) - There is nothing in the song on the blue tick. I got your intention here but it'd be better to move this slider 1/4 earlier extending it by 1/4 to fill the sound on the red tick instead: http://puu.sh/384D4.jpg
9. 00:40:633 (2) - With slider tick 1 this slowdown is confusing, unexpected and unreadable. Remove that slow down please
10. 01:04:838 (x) - Add circle here. That empty downbeat could confuse players
    
11. Stylish map, even if I would change some of the stuff I wrote above, to make it more flowing and readable.

1. 00:08:929 (3) - New combo to warn players about BPM change. It would also be consistent with previous patterns that have just two elements for each combo
2. 00:19:156 (3) - New combo?
3. 01:04:838 (x) - Same of hard, please.
4. 01:06:201 (1,2) - Mh, you should reduce the spacing between these two elements because, actually, the spacing is the same of 01:08:929 (1,2) that are snapped 1/2 and not 1/4 like this one and the next 01:07:565 (1,2). Consider to reduce those two spacings then. I played it as 1/2 and not 1/4.

Chewin wrote:

Hello

Easy

1. 00:26:997 (2,3) - I would set Normal sampleset on (2)'s tail and remove it from (3)'s tail. It sounds and fits with the music better2's tail - no drum sound.3's tail - base drum.so..
2. 01:03:815 (6) - I'd extend it by 1/2 (till the next downbeat) to fill the "o" vocalI like to follow the strong instrument here..