Flower wrote:

Hi~ mod from the queue~
Only unrankable stuff marked. others are all suggestions, you can choose to take or not.

[Easy]
00:03:531 (1) - The piano hit is so weak that cannot be the reason to place it here, as beginners will often mis-hit it on 00:03:367. You should either place the note here or change it to a slider.
00:06:154 (3) - ^ - I'd say they're a good enough reason to place a note there, as well as hitting 1/1 being easier than hitting 1/2.
00:20:895 (1) - relatively short spinner. the next note start at 00:23:190 which make the beginners confusing on handling the spinner. you can put note at 00:21:223 ,00:21:879 and 00:22:534 instead. - Mmm, the spinner is long enough for auto to 8k it, and the slider after it is close enough to the center imo.
00:26:797 (1) - The stack is confusing. I suggest you put it further, at least like this - Well, unless this is some aeofiheoarih unrankable thing for Easy, I'd like to keep it, since I like the "meaningful pause"-ish feel :p

SPOILER

00:31:715 (2) - confusing. the vocal is on 00:31:551 and the downbeat here is not significant. beginners are not able to find out the regularity. suggest add note at 00:31:387 and 00:32:043 . - Mapping to the vocals would be more confusing imo, and having 10 1/1 notes right after each other is more than I want to do in an easy, which is why I did it like this.

[Insane]
00:02:055 (1,2,3) - significantly DS inconsistency? - What?
00:10:567 (2,3,4,5,6) - note quite neat... put a circle anywhere and use its approach circle as a reference (recently Niva taught me xD) then delete the reference circle - I really don't think this is very important, and it plays fine already.

SPOILER

00:11:878 (2) - don't forget the stack - ^
00:28:108 (4) - alternative: put a bit further following DS. if so, add NC - ? This is fine even according to distance snap (1.0x).
00:49:009 (2) - suggest delete - That would be kinda silly, since there is clearly a drumsound there
00:49:911 (3,6) - stack with 00:49:091 (3) - ? - Well, it's almost unnoticable, so I guess it should be fine

Flower wrote:

Hi~ mod from the queue~
Only unrankable stuff marked. others are all suggestions, you can choose to take or not.


[Hard]
00:16:469 (1,2,3,4) - imo, it flows better if the notes are put like this Done

SPOILER

00:20:567 (1) - better end at 00:21:879 I don't think so..
00:23:190 (1) - shape not quite good. Added

SPOILER

392,120,23190,6,0,B|416:200|416:200|392:272,1,160,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

00:46:141 (6) - ^ Noh

SPOILER

256,72,46141,2,0,B|176:56|96:68,2,160,4|4|4,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

00:45:157 (3,4,5,6) - not quite neat. since it's hard level you can put it like this

SPOILER

00:47:124 (1,2,3,4,5) - since you are using Ctrl+H then fix it with the previous suggestion.
00:48:436 - delete finish.
01:13:026 (1) - better end at 01:14:174 and the next 01:14:174 (1) - start at 01:14:338 ,and 01:14:502 (2) - delete, add note at 01:14:666
01:22:698 (1) - make a slowdown slider here? ^no change, I feel they're fine as they are.

Flower wrote:

[Normal]
This level must have been easier than CXu's Easy? There are 1/2's :/
00:03:531 (1,2) - Same as easy. A bit strange. suggest adding a note at 00:03:859 Don't want to add a 1/1 yet considering this is a slow part.
00:06:810 (6) - neither on vocal nor on drum. suggest moving to 00:06:646 You can hear the piano there. Plus it's a 1/1 rhythm.
00:31:387 (2,3) - unnecessary to put the sliders like that. suggestion: The current one plays better and emphasizes the vocals at 00:32:207.

SPOILER

01:25:649 (5) - confusing jump :O I disagree. It's readable goes well with the song.

Flower wrote:

[Taiko Muzukashii]
No difficulty spread. Muzukashii level is not easy enough for inexperienced taikoers. Remove streams like xxxxo in 00:43:847 (145,146,147,148,149) , and some of the compact triplets. I'm sorry but last I looked Muzukashii means difficult/hard, it's not for totaly inexperienced players.

[Taiko Oni]
00:02:219 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - same as Muzukashii is ok. The combination is confusing. If you could explain why it's confuseing that would be great.
00:39:912 (82) - x No, I would rather keep my current patterns for this section unless you have a reason I should change it.
00:40:075 (83) - remove ^
00:40:239 - add o ^

NoHitter wrote:

I've talked with Andrea over his mod for my Normal.
He says it's fine even if I don't increase OD.

mintong89 wrote:

GRATZ~