It comes out natural to start talking with "I" and to proceed the speech using "my", "I am", "I have" or "had", connecting them with amazing experiences and personal pains, that are more or less understandable and worth it to laugh about, or delicate.
the philosopher's stone more like the philosopher's stoned 💀💀💀
Freedom of speech lets everyone share own experiences, from an awkward memory to you seeing a dog down the street, through sure decision or not. Others will relate, ask for details or reply with the most despicable insult. Now, when reading any text:
Don't know how to end it, wanted to say it's so rough cos I wrote almost all of it at school without thinking much
Sometime, a listener feels exploited as an instrument to praise a speaker, which, when it seems they're here only for compliments, becomes more and more importunate to their eyes. It's frequent to center "I" in a phrase, then it's hard to not intend by purpose request of honor and main attention. It's a characteristic attitude in toddlers, whose one of the first words is "mine", really nice, and pronounced to reconfirm the crap out of the ownership like no form of dialogue exists.
It's literally justifiable in the moment the child walks vague in the world, where the interest first lies usually in toyz 'n gamez 'n frienz (who are also clueless in the world), creating closeness of possessive type with these. More toyz means the best, according to the kid's mind, by associating quantity and, more humbly though, quality with the persona. So the tendency fades when growing up not if the targets of objectification change; instead when the belongings are not excessively weighted as own value, to the point it replaces anything truly important to someone (that'd be addiction), for example the family, one talent, health.
It's literally justifiable in the moment the child walks vague in the world, where the interest first lies usually in toyz 'n gamez 'n frienz (who are also clueless in the world), creating closeness of possessive type with these. More toyz means the best, according to the kid's mind, by associating quantity and, more humbly though, quality with the persona. So the tendency fades when growing up not if the targets of objectification change; instead when the belongings are not excessively weighted as own value, to the point it replaces anything truly important to someone (that'd be addiction), for example the family, one talent, health.
the philosopher's stone more like the philosopher's stoned 💀💀💀
Freedom of speech lets everyone share own experiences, from an awkward memory to you seeing a dog down the street, through sure decision or not. Others will relate, ask for details or reply with the most despicable insult. Now, when reading any text:
- Do you see the "other" as a competitor of an imaginary competition?
- Are you able to interpret the "other" like their reflections were confronted to yours? Can you understand if they were meant to lower or to find a common solution?
- How much do you fear not getting respect, but denigration?
So, how much deliberately do you write? - Thoughts on grammar police?
Don't know how to end it, wanted to say it's so rough cos I wrote almost all of it at school without thinking much