forum

Acid House Kings - Are We Lovers Or Are We Friends?

posted
Total Posts
58
show more
Nixnez
Second time modding your map I think? XD

[General]
- (Very minor issue) System prompt me to save after resnapping all notes.

[Easy] + [Normal]
- Nice and easy.

[Hard]
- 01:12:505 (4) - I would kinda want this beat at 01:12:331 (4) due to vocal(You did this for the first pre-chorus part, why the change?). Up to you if you're keeping the clap.

A very pleasant song to listen to, and relaxing map to play with.
Sorry can't really suggest anything useful. XD
Topic Starter
gyt

Soul-less wrote:

Second time modding your map I think? XD yeah, do you wanna mod a third one? :)

[General]
- (Very minor issue) System prompt me to save after resnapping all notes.

[Easy] + [Normal]
- Nice and easy.

[Hard]
- 01:12:505 (4) - I would kinda want this beat at 01:12:331 (4) due to vocal(You did this for the first pre-chorus part, why the change?). Up to you if you're keeping the clap. I wanted change something here - this song is so repeating. Now I remap this part a bit - makes it harder, but better, IMO.

A very pleasant song to listen to, and relaxing map to play with. Thanks!
Sorry can't really suggest anything useful. XD
senaya
а ты не хотел бы запилить простую стриборду в брейках или припевах, например, где медленно снизу вверх поднимаются шарики светлые? :)
типа как в этом ролике http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wDsz9nU4pc но получше)))
Topic Starter
gyt

senaya wrote:

а ты не хотел бы запилить простую стриборду в брейках или припевах, например, где медленно снизу вверх поднимаются шарики светлые? :)
типа как в этом ролике http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wDsz9nU4pc но получше)))
Не умею сторибордить, но всё может быть. Сама-то мапа понравилась?
senaya

gyt wrote:

Не умею сторибордить, но всё может быть. Сама-то мапа понравилась?
ну, шарики то просто будет сделать.
олсо, да. мапа добрая, какраз под песенку.
Yusu Aoi
Here's my mod :P

Easy:
Nice^^

Normal:
01:16:168 Give here a note?
01:18:959 ^

Hard:
00:22:447 (6) End this slider on 00:23:319 ?
00:33:610 (5) End this slider on 00:34:482 ?


Star!:))
Behon
Easy:
-A slider tick rate of 1 sounds better to me.
-00:45:994 (1 through 4): Adding claps here to go along with the previous combo would be nice.
-01:31:691 (3): Insert a break after this like you did in the first verse.
-02:25:063 (1): Maybe end this at 02:25:761, so it's not so close to the spiner?

Normal:
-Same thoughts on a slider tick of 1.
-00:41:982 (3): Maybe add a whistle to the whole slider?
-01:40:587 (3): See above.

Hard:
-Same slider tick thoughts.
-00:30:296 (3,4): Too many whistles in this combo. Maybe change these to claps?
-00:37:098 (1): Add a finish to the start?
-01:28:900 (3,4): Again, think about changing these both to claps.
-01:35:703 (1): Add a finish to the start?
-02:37:273 (1): Add a finish to the start?
-02:59:598 (2): Change the clap to a finish.

You asked me to mod this, what, a month ago? Sorry I took so long.
Topic Starter
gyt

ShiroKitty wrote:

Here's my mod :P

Easy:
Nice^^

Normal:
01:16:168 Give here a note?
01:18:959 ^

Hard:
00:22:447 (6) End this slider on 00:23:319 ?
00:33:610 (5) End this slider on 00:34:482 ?


Star!:)) not changed anything, but I will think about it. Thanks for mod!

Behonkiss wrote:

Easy:
-A slider tick rate of 1 sounds better to me. ok, I try it
-00:45:994 (1 through 4): Adding claps here to go along with the previous combo would be nice. noo
-01:31:691 (3): Insert a break after this like you did in the first verse. of course
-02:25:063 (1): Maybe end this at 02:25:761, so it's not so close to the spiner? I don't see problem here

Normal:
-Same thoughts on a slider tick of 1.
-00:41:982 (3): Maybe add a whistle to the whole slider?
-01:40:587 (3): See above. changed, this sounds cool^

Hard:
-Same slider tick thoughts.
-00:30:296 (3,4): Too many whistles in this combo. Maybe change these to claps? ok
-00:37:098 (1): Add a finish to the start? no
-01:28:900 (3,4): Again, think about changing these both to claps. yes, changed
-01:35:703 (1): Add a finish to the start?
-02:37:273 (1): Add a finish to the start? no too^
-02:59:598 (2): Change the clap to a finish. ok

You asked me to mod this, what, a month ago? Sorry I took so long. thanks for remembering and mod :D
Charles445
General
Try using offset 990. If you do, don't forget to shift inheriting sections and the storyboard.

Storyboard
light2.png has unnecessary empty space. Crop the picture to 80x80

Easy
AR +1
Easies need small combos, so most of this will be combo modding.
00:14:947 - New combo
00:45:645 - Add a circle? It's more consistent that way.
01:23:668 - New combo
01:44:249 - Add a circle for consistency?
02:26:284 - Make this spinner start on the next white tick.
02:32:389 - New combo? not needed though
Nice.

Normal
AR +1
One of the best difficulties you've ever made.

Hard
I really dislike the use of normal circle size here.
02:36:400 (10) - This should end on the blue tick before.
02:47:563 (10) - ^^
Pretty darn solid diff.
Topic Starter
gyt

Charles445 wrote:

General
Try using offset 990. If you do, don't forget to shift inheriting sections and the storyboard. ok

Storyboard
light2.png has unnecessary empty space. Crop the picture to 80x80 I use it for bigger rotation radius

Easy
AR +1
Easies need small combos, so most of this will be combo modding.
00:14:947 - New combo
00:45:645 - Add a circle? It's more consistent that way.
01:23:668 - New combo
01:44:249 - Add a circle for consistency?
02:26:284 - Make this spinner start on the next white tick. ok^
02:32:389 - New combo? not needed though well, not changed then
Nice.

Normal
AR +1 ok
One of the best difficulties you've ever made. I don't think so, but thanks :D

Hard
I really dislike the use of normal circle size here. but I like
02:36:400 (10) - This should end on the blue tick before.
02:47:563 (10) - ^^ blue tick? I don't think that it should end earlier
Pretty darn solid diff.
Thanks for mod!
narakucrimson
Hi there~ At last someone that doesn't post Miku Songs on my queue xD

[General]
  1. I reckon that the name should be "Are We Lovers or Are We Friends?", with no capital O (since it's an article). Yes you will have to full submit no there is no other way yes I'm sorry in advance~
  2. Nice work with those lights on the storyboard~ It's very simple but it works really fine :D
  3. Maaaybe the third kiai is a bit too long... Well, anyway, you could use a kiai fountain on 02:54:013. I think it works fine.
[Easy]
  1. 00:31:338 (4) - Maybe a clap here (slider end) would sound fine~
  2. 00:34:129 (4) - ^
  3. 00:47:734 (4) - I think the whistle sounds better in the end of the slider, not in the beginning.
  4. 01:24:362 (3) - A clap here could sound cool, too.
  5. 01:33:083 (x) - You could use a hitcircle here so it's more similar to the previous pre-chorus, having this mini break start here. Also, if you add the hitcircle, it should have a finish.
  6. 01:46:338 (4) - Same whistle thing here - I fon't think that just in the beginning of the slider sounds good enough. Here you can add a whistle at the end of the slider, or add the whistle AND remove the whistle at the beginning of the slider. Wither one is good for me.
[Normal]
  1. 00:34:129 (3) - A clap here could do!
  2. I don't know, your hitsound usage is weird xD
[Hard]
  1. Just fine
Ok that's all I guess!
Topic Starter
gyt

narakucrimson wrote:

Hi there~ At last someone that doesn't post Miku Songs on my queue xD

[General]
  1. I reckon that the name should be "Are We Lovers or Are We Friends?", with no capital O (since it's an article). Yes you will have to full submit no there is no other way yes I'm sorry in advance~ ok, fixed
  2. Nice work with those lights on the storyboard~ It's very simple but it works really fine :D thanks
  3. Maaaybe the third kiai is a bit too long... Well, anyway, you could use a kiai fountain on 02:54:013. I think it works fine. I made two kiai times here... I will remove some, if it's unrankable or something
[Easy]
  1. 00:31:338 (4) - Maybe a clap here (slider end) would sound fine~
  2. 00:34:129 (4) - ^
  3. 00:47:734 (4) - I think the whistle sounds better in the end of the slider, not in the beginning.
  4. 01:24:362 (3) - A clap here could sound cool, too.
  5. 01:33:083 (x) - You could use a hitcircle here so it's more similar to the previous pre-chorus, having this mini break start here. Also, if you add the hitcircle, it should have a finish.
  6. 01:46:338 (4) - Same whistle thing here - I fon't think that just in the beginning of the slider sounds good enough. Here you can add a whistle at the end of the slider, or add the whistle AND remove the whistle at the beginning of the slider. Wither one is good for me. added whistle here and fixed all ^
[Normal]
  1. 00:34:129 (3) - A clap here could do! nah
  2. I don't know, your hitsound usage is weird xD well, ok :(
[Hard]
  1. Just fine
Ok that's all I guess!
narakucrimson

gyt wrote:

I will remove some, if it's unrankable or something
Nah it's not unrankable at all xD I use a lot of kiai too, but that looked a bit too long in my opinion, just that.

Also, I didn't say your hitsound usage wasn't good ;D
MoodyRPG
[Easy]

00:48:431 (1) - Remove new combo?
00:48:780 (6) - New combo
02:32:385 (3) - ^

[Normal]

02:26:106 (1) - Whistle?

[Hard]

Maybe Circle Size: -1

Star~
Topic Starter
gyt

MoodyRPG wrote:

[Easy]

00:48:431 (1) - Remove new combo?
00:48:780 (6) - New combo
02:32:385 (3) - ^ ok^

[Normal]

02:26:106 (1) - Whistle? and ok

[Hard]

Maybe Circle Size: -1 I like a current one

Star~
Astom
Map seems fine, playable I mean, actually is a little boring. Only one thing is bugging me..

for any chance did you change it on your .osu file? (manually), I don't know if that is allowed and maybe is going to be considered hack. I don't see any reason for don't use 1 or 1,1 , if you can give a good explanation of why yes then no problem (for my at least).

Only that.
Star~

PD: No kudo for this.
Topic Starter
gyt

Astom wrote:

Map seems fine, playable I mean, actually is a little boring. Only one thing is bugging me..

for any chance did you change it on your .osu file? (manually), I don't know if that is allowed and maybe is going to be considered hack. I don't see any reason for don't use 1 or 1,1 , if you can give a good explanation of why yes then no problem (for my at least).

Only that.
Star~

PD: No kudo for this.
I used 86 BPM at first and 2.1 slider velocity. Then I doubled BPM like Ekaru said. viewtopic.php?p=789784#p789784
And I'm too lazy to remap difficulty, because of a nonstandard slider velocity.
Hyguys
Not going to nazi , chill out.

Easy
00:16:338 (2) - Whistle on the end like on the previous slider , but this is only a suggestion claps fits too meh
00:19:478 (4) - Remove clap and put on (5)
01:11:106 (1) - Clap?
02:08:315 (1) - This is kinda random for me , but you can ignore this if you really want this cool wave you did on your map

Normal
+1 Circle Size?
00:33:083 (3) - Clap on end
This diff is cool <3

Hard
00:33:606 (5) - Sadface
01:18:780 (6,1) - You know , this jump is random ;_;
03:10:757 (2) - Whistle

Star
Topic Starter
gyt

Hyguys wrote:

Not going to nazi , chill out.

Easy
00:16:338 (2) - Whistle on the end like on the previous slider , but this is only a suggestion claps fits too meh
00:19:478 (4) - Remove clap and put on (5) ok
01:11:106 (1) - Clap?
02:08:315 (1) - This is kinda random for me , but you can ignore this if you really want this cool wave you did on your map hm, I copypaste it many times here. It isn't random for me.

Normal
+1 Circle Size?
00:33:083 (3) - Clap on end well, ok.
This diff is cool <3 two people like it now. Cool!

Hard
00:33:606 (5) - Sadface This slider is awesome, isn't it? :D
01:18:780 (6,1) - You know , this jump is random ;_; it's like 01:15:989 (5,1) - not so random for me again
03:10:757 (2) - Whistle too many whistles are here already

Star
Astom
Well laziness is not a good excuse.

I don't know if this is gonna give you problems, so... good luck.
p3n
[Easy]
fine with me

[Normal]
Generally I wouldn't use so many whistles. In some places they sound really good:
00:17:734 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4)
00:48:780 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5)
...and in some places they sound off:
00:43:548 (3,4,5,6)
00:56:106 (5,6,1,2,3,4)
Thats just personal preference though.
01:25:931 (2) - move back 1/2 (white tick) and add 2 repeats to better match the song (I know it tries to follow the faint background lyrics but it plays weird imo); have to adjust surrounding spacings afterwards

[Hard]
Rare to see a "Hard" without any 1/4 spamming or trollolo-jumps these days ;) Plays a bit weird because of some "strange" hitsounds but overall this is pretty good imo. Reminds me of the 2008 maps (in a very good way!)


~star
Topic Starter
gyt

Astom wrote:

Well laziness is not a good excuse.

I don't know if this is gonna give you problems, so... good luck.
It's not only laziness. I don't see a real problem here.

p3n wrote:

[Easy]
fine with me

[Normal]
Generally I wouldn't use so many whistles. In some places they sound really good:
00:17:734 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4)
00:48:780 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5)
...and in some places they sound off:
00:43:548 (3,4,5,6)
00:56:106 (5,6,1,2,3,4)
Thats just personal preference though.
01:25:931 (2) - move back 1/2 (white tick) and add 2 repeats to better match the song (I know it tries to follow the faint background lyrics but it plays weird imo); have to adjust surrounding spacings afterwards fixed in a bit another way

[Hard]
Rare to see a "Hard" without any 1/4 spamming or trollolo-jumps these days ;) Plays a bit weird because of some "strange" hitsounds but overall this is pretty good imo. Reminds me of the 2008 maps (in a very good way!)

~star thanks! I keep in mind your hitsound suggestions.
winber1
Hard

00:14:769 (6) - idk if you want to deal with this or not, but this note should start 1/2 tick earlier. It reads perfectly as it stands now, and it does not sound bad either, so you don't have to change (but imo, i still like it better if the slider started 1/2 tick earlier)
00:25:932 (5) - move 1/2 tick earlier? if you apply this change, you may consider adding a note at 00:26:28 as well.
00:26:455 (1,2,3,4,5) - you may consider following the that instrument in the background (whatever that is idk...) and use the red ticks.
00:33:606 (5) - sounds better imo if you end this at 00:34:303. This wavy slider is kinda ugly anyways lol. one side is a lot bigger than the other >_>
00:36:048 (x) - add note?
00:36:396 (x) - ^?
02:22:617 (7) - add whistle to the end of the slider
02:25:408 (7) - ^?
02:26:106 (1) - add whistle
02:30:641 - i would use normal hitsounds till the end of this slider at 02:31:338 (3) - , but that's just me
02:53:838 (5) - add finish at the end of slider?

Normal

00:28:548 (x) - add note with clap
00:30:990 (5) - This pattern (00:28:896 (1,2,3,4,5) - ) just doesn't fit. I know this ruins symmetry, but combo 5 sounds a lot better 1/1 tick later at 00:31:338 (5) -
01:31:338 (4,5,6) - perhaps you could follow vocals a little more, just because you use 1/2 ticks in this beatmap, so if you already do, why not match it to something in the music? :3
02:30:990 (2) - i would use soft hitsound for the beginning of this slider.. (with whistle)

Easy

01:25:408 (1,2,3) - move all of these notes 1/1 tick and add a note at 01:27:152?

Nice map! :3

Edit:

SPOILER

gyt wrote:

I used 86 BPM at first and 2.1 slider velocity. Then I doubled BPM like Ekaru said. viewtopic.php?p=789784#p789784
And I'm too lazy to remap difficulty, because of a nonstandard slider velocity.

Astom wrote:

for any chance did you change it on your .osu file? (manually), I don't know if that is allowed and maybe is going to be considered hack.
idk i just saw this lol. if you press ctrl and click the the SV arrow things in the timing section, it increases/decreases by .01 (same goes for the distance snapping, except it uses shift). If you hold alt+shiftand scroll up or down with ur mouse wheel, you increase/decrease the distance snapping by .01 I actually used this in an Easy guest diff I made)

you can also increase/decrease the offset or bpm that way without actually going into the timing and control point window thing.
Topic Starter
gyt

winber1 wrote:

Hard

00:14:769 (6) - idk if you want to deal with this or not, but this note should start 1/2 tick earlier. It reads perfectly as it stands now, and it does not sound bad either, so you don't have to change (but imo, i still like it better if the slider started 1/2 tick earlier)
00:25:932 (5) - move 1/2 tick earlier? if you apply this change, you may consider adding a note at 00:26:28 as well.
00:26:455 (1,2,3,4,5) - you may consider following the that instrument in the background (whatever that is idk...) and use the red ticks.
00:33:606 (5) - sounds better imo if you end this at 00:34:303. This wavy slider is kinda ugly anyways lol. one side is a lot bigger than the other >_> well, I see - I map things in really weird way, but no for all^ (also this slider isn't wavy and ugly for me - it's slider art, lol
00:36:048 (x) - add note? bad vocal here (it doesn't fit red tick, I think)
00:36:396 (x) - ^?
02:22:617 (7) - add whistle to the end of the slider
02:25:408 (7) - ^?
02:26:106 (1) - add whistle ok for whistles
02:30:641 - i would use normal hitsounds till the end of this slider at 02:31:338 (3) - , but that's just me I don't fully understand - sounds good for me
02:53:838 (5) - add finish at the end of slider? no, because it doesn't sound cool with next patterns

Normal

00:28:548 (x) - add note with clap ok, but I use whistle
00:30:990 (5) - This pattern (00:28:896 (1,2,3,4,5) - ) just doesn't fit. I know this ruins symmetry, but combo 5 sounds a lot better 1/1 tick later at 00:31:338 (5) - It fits for me, oh :(
01:31:338 (4,5,6) - perhaps you could follow vocals a little more, just because you use 1/2 ticks in this beatmap, so if you already do, why not match it to something in the music? :3 It follow this - 01:28:896 (3,4) and a bit music (not vocal)
02:30:990 (2) - i would use soft hitsound for the beginning of this slider.. (with whistle) nah

Easy

01:25:408 (1,2,3) - move all of these notes 1/1 tick and add a note at 01:27:152? 1/1 tick earlier? but I like how it is now

Nice map! :3

Edit:

SPOILER

gyt wrote:

I used 86 BPM at first and 2.1 slider velocity. Then I doubled BPM like Ekaru said. viewtopic.php?p=789784#p789784
And I'm too lazy to remap difficulty, because of a nonstandard slider velocity.

Astom wrote:

for any chance did you change it on your .osu file? (manually), I don't know if that is allowed and maybe is going to be considered hack.
idk i just saw this lol. if you press ctrl and click the the SV arrow things in the timing section, it increases/decreases by .01 (same goes for the distance snapping, except it uses shift). If you hold alt+shiftand scroll up or down with ur mouse wheel, you increase/decrease the distance snapping by .01 I actually used this in an Easy guest diff I made) thanks for info :)

you can also increase/decrease the offset or bpm that way without actually going into the timing and control point window thing.
Astom
Hi there, again.



Official Ranking Submission Rules and Guidelines

Uhm now is a rule, and need be fixed, obviously is unreasonable but go and tell that to them.

PD:Maybe you don't change it, but ask a BAT or MAT about it.
Topic Starter
gyt

Astom wrote:

Hi there, again.



Official Ranking Submission Rules and Guidelines

Uhm now is a rule, and need be fixed, obviously is unreasonable but go and tell that to them.

PD:Maybe you don't change it, but ask a BAT or MAT about it.
Hi! Like winber1 says:

idk i just saw this lol. if you press ctrl and click the the SV arrow things in the timing section, it increases/decreases by .01 (same goes for the distance snapping, except it uses shift). If you hold alt+shiftand scroll up or down with ur mouse wheel, you increase/decrease the distance snapping by .01 I actually used this in an Easy guest diff I made)

you can also increase/decrease the offset or bpm that way without actually going into the timing and control point window thing.
So I don't need to manually edit .osu file for this.
Astom
Wtf... I didn't know that, sry <.<

Oh well then there is not problem on your map, go and rank it :3.
NoHitter
General
Maybe you could decrease the volume slightly when the singer repeats the vocals at 02:11:106 and 02:22:269.
Maybe add the comboburst of the two others?

Easy
00:35:873 (x) - Add a note here instead of the break. The break looks awkward - should be removed.
01:33:780 (x) - Same as above.
02:30:292 (1) - IMO it sounds better if this is normal sampleset. (Just plain hit-normal). Also New Combo this due to a glitch.
02:30:641 (x) - Add note here.
02:51:571 (2) - Maybe not overlap this with the previous slider.
02:58:548 (4) - The repeat on the offbeat sounds awkward.

Normal
00:35:873 (x) - Add a note here instead of the break. The break looks awkward - should be removed.
01:33:780 (x) - Same as above.
02:30:292 (1) - IMO it sounds better if this is normal sampleset. (Just plain hit-normal).

Hard
00:22:443 (6) - Maybe shorten this to 00:23:315 then add a note at 00:23:664.
02:31:338 (3) - IMO make this three notes at 02:31:338, 02:31:513, and 02:31:687.

Nice map overall.

Edit:
Bubbled then. Good luck :)
Topic Starter
gyt

NoHItter wrote:

General
Maybe you could decrease the volume slightly when the singer repeats the vocals at 02:11:106 and 02:22:269.ok, I used 40% here
Maybe add the comboburst of the two others? well, making these comboburst is so boring, but I try maybe. Their "castanet poses" are nice

Easy
00:35:873 (x) - Add a note here instead of the break. The break looks awkward - should be removed. I put slider here
01:33:780 (x) - Same as above.
02:30:292 (1) - IMO it sounds better if this is normal sampleset. (Just plain hit-normal). Also New Combo this due to a glitch.
02:30:641 (x) - Add note here. well, ok^
02:51:571 (2) - Maybe not overlap this with the previous slider. fixed maybe
02:58:548 (4) - The repeat on the offbeat sounds awkward. but I like it :(

Normal
00:35:873 (x) - Add a note here instead of the break. The break looks awkward - should be removed.
01:33:780 (x) - Same as above. ok, also I changed this section a bit
02:30:292 (1) - IMO it sounds better if this is normal sampleset. (Just plain hit-normal).

Hard
00:22:443 (6) - Maybe shorten this to 00:23:315 then add a note at 00:23:664. well, I like it too. Also it's for consistent with 00:33:606 (5) slider
02:31:338 (3) - IMO make this three notes at 02:31:338, 02:31:513, and 02:31:687. try it, it's nice but don't consistent with next patterns, I think

Nice map overall.thx, now I have 3 star labeled maps. Cool :|
abalee
Standard. Guessing it should be moved to another place.
Ranked.
Colin Hou
I'm deadly late q_q

sorry gyt, and gratz on ranking this
Topic Starter
gyt
Wow, thanks! :o
NoHitter
Congrats!
akrolsmir
I remember modding this forever ago, why'd it take so long :P Anyways congrats!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply