why the fuck would you say thisSkullFull wrote:
please, don't post here for an year so I can post here in 2017 writing "it's this"
why the fuck would you say thisSkullFull wrote:
please, don't post here for an year so I can post here in 2017 writing "it's this"
I dont know, then we'd end up with tonnes of threads with like 1 or two replies. Or you just straight up multiply the shitposting around here to spam levels and peppy deletes OT for reals this time.ree wrote:
I'll make a reassessment about the imageboard thing: we have the activity. I guess it could work if we made threads quickly enough instead of redirecting things to itt. What do you think?
From what I can tell it's the higher moderation's decision to disallow any kind of 'money transactions' in osu!, not exactly by the moderation team itself. In general I actually welcome these "projects" since it helps these users to improve in what they're doing and making theirself bigger. you know.Mahogany wrote:
I'm going to use this locked thread as an example. Yes, the topic was locked for legitimate reasons - Many people are complaining about not receiving the orders they've placed, and there's a lot of speculation as to the legitimacy of the post. However, the reasons actually given in the locked post are, frankly, bullshit.Even if the idea behind is great for players, I'd like to avoid the promotion of 'money transactions' on osu! forums.Then how do you explain this topic? It isn't locked, despite doing the exact same thing. If the issue is due to people not getting their orders and complaints about the legitimacy, at least fucking say that. If you're going to ban advertising and transactions, make it a fucking rule and close the other topic too. (not that I want that to happen at all, though, thnikk is cool)
It isn't really consistent, I agree. I will try to address this.Mahogany wrote:
If you're going to ban advertising and transactions, make it a fucking rule and close the other topic too.
ree wrote:
You cared enough to post, at least.
If that is an actual rule, then it's pathetically enforced if you consider the fact that thnikk's shop has over 500 posts made. That'd make me doubt the competency of the overall moderation team immensely.Stefan wrote:
From what I can tell it's the higher moderation's decision to disallow any kind of 'money transactions' in osu!, not exactly by the moderation team itself.
If you are, I'd really encourage you to try and nudge the direction moreso towards a "stricter guidelines" sort of solution.Stefan wrote:
It isn't really consistent, I agree. I will try to address this.
'negro'... now that's racistballdoowell wrote:
tbh posting in a thread older than 3 days is negromancing.
WELL I wasn't necroing TO THIS EXTENTgracefu wrote:
kai99 please
wait that wasn't an option for you to do? wow i am surprised you wouldn't consider doing it at firstColdTooth wrote:
I'm seriously considering of actually starting to insult people not only in the mentioned thread, but in their dms.
I'm very close to doing it.pentaqola wrote:
wait that wasn't an option for you to do? wow i am surprised you wouldn't consider doing it at firstColdTooth wrote:
I'm seriously considering of actually starting to insult people not only in the mentioned thread, but in their dms.
Asphiee wrote:
threads relating to necro should be necro'ed
yes but no, have a lot of threads relating to necroAsphiee wrote:
threads relating to necro should be necro'ed
Can you stop being retarded?igorsprite wrote:
have a specific time to be considered necro? every time a thread with 2~4 months is necroed, someone aks "is this a necro?" and the answer isn't clearly. i want to know because i continued that necro list, but i'm not using a good parameter.
thisigorsprite wrote:
have a specific time to be considered necro? every time a thread with 2~4 months is necroed, someone aks "is this a necro?" and the answer isn't clearly. i want to know because i continued that necro list, but i'm not using a good parameter.
Yes. Igor is the great necromancer.eblf2013 wrote:
You know igor is back when a necro happens.
you should've just said "this" and it would've been even betterigorsprite wrote:
have a specific time to be considered necro? every time a thread with 2~4 months is necroed, someone aks "is this a necro?" and the answer isn't clearly. i want to know because i continued that necro list, but i'm not using a good parameter.
Your post is a necro for sureManishh wrote:
I wonder what considered as necro, like 3months?
iJustABeginner wrote:
This generation sucks.
Anyways, in b4 lock.
Said every generation, everJustABeginner wrote:
This generation sucks.
Anyways, in b4 lock.
nah gen 9 is fine so far, gen 8 sucks for sureJustABeginner wrote:
This generation sucks.
Anyways, in b4 lock.
Gen 9 is the best so farPolyspora wrote:
nah gen 9 is fine so far, gen 8 sucks for sureJustABeginner wrote:
This generation sucks.
Anyways, in b4 lock.