I fully agree with this, if this isn't passing then atleast make tv size/full version/remix of the same song allowed to be multiple time qualified
Why would someone rank the same song twice in less than a week? That's super unlikely to happenDjulus wrote:
i agree so, i'd add limit to qualify the same songs not just removing it cuz i think in future one guy would spam-qualify 130491 maps lol, just in case btw
Serizawa Haruki wrote:
Djulus wrote:
i agree so, i'd add limit to qualify the same songs not just removing it cuz i think in future one guy would spam-qualify 130491 maps lol, just in case btw
Why would someone rank the same song twice in less than a week? That's super unlikely to happen
But how is a mapper ranking the same song twice in that period of time any different from 2 mappers doing that? I think both aren't an issue so I support the removal of the ruleAscendance wrote:
Unlikely but within the realm of possibility. Maybe they really like the song :pSerizawa Haruki wrote:
Why would someone rank the same song twice in less than a week? That's super unlikely to happenDjulus wrote:
i agree so, i'd add limit to qualify the same songs not just removing it cuz i think in future one guy would spam-qualify 130491 maps lol, just in case btw
Serizawa Haruki wrote:
Why would someone rank the same song twice in less than a week? That's super unlikely to happen
Fayew wrote:
i fully support this since i found this rule very pointless when first reading rc
reason: the more qualified maps we have, the more variety of what to play comes
Ascendance wrote:
Fayew wrote:
i fully support this since i found this rule very pointless when first reading rc
reason: the more qualified maps we have, the more variety of what to play comes
What variety comes from multiple of the same song coming through at once?
Dave251 wrote:
I got that you don't like low quality maps which are made in the process of speedranking and so it could be solved with rule which would be something like "Song has to be at least 7 days old before getting ranked." (Rule like "Mapper has to has been working on this map for at least 7 days", because we cannot know how long the mapper worked at such a map.)
Edit: Solution with which you came cannot work.
Serizawa Haruki wrote:
Why would someone rank the same song twice in less than a week? That's super unlikely to happen
Loctav wrote:
And yes, remixes and TV sizes should not be Ranked in this time span either, because it's still the same song, just with loli voices or 2 minutes shorter.
Loctav wrote:
And if you want to make an exception for the taiko/catch/mania faction, maybe try to make the Ranked queue be independent for each game mode?
RC wrote:
"...unless no game modes of both sets overlap - this includes remixed versions. For example an osu!taiko and osu! mapset of the same song can exist in the Qualified section, whilst an osu!taiko and osu!/osu!taiko hybrid set cannot..."
Loctav wrote:
It happened A LOT in the past, especially when stuff like Sword Art Online or other hyped anime content was released. That's why the rule exists in the first place. (trust me, after the 5th IGNITE set, we all grew tired of it)
ailv wrote:
To say that remixes are "...still the same song, just with loli voices..." is just simply false. While the songs may share similarities, what makes a song a remix is that fact that it adds or changes the original, which leads to it being a different song.
ailv wrote:
This is already an exception, see the RC:
RC wrote:
"...unless no game modes of both sets overlap - this includes remixed versions. For example an osu!taiko and osu! mapset of the same song can exist in the Qualified section, whilst an osu!taiko and osu!/osu!taiko hybrid set cannot..."
ailv wrote:
He's referring the the same person qualifying the same song twice, not multiple people.