With that loan we can build a palm?
charamaru wrote:
i can only offer 2 of my hands to the hand thread, sorry.
abraker wrote:
oh well here you go then
Now thats my kinkabraker wrote:
oh well here you go then
that is awfulPlini wrote:
[CENSORED]
prefer it without the banana tho
hey! no kinkshaming!Penguin wrote:
that is awfulPlini wrote:
[CENSORED]
prefer it without the banana tho
I definitely agree with this.Westonini wrote:
The kink itself may not be something that's normal, but I think it's normal to have one.
I agree!Achromalia wrote:
I definitely agree with this.Westonini wrote:
The kink itself may not be something that's normal, but I think it's normal to have one.
I don't think it's particularly wrong to have kinks.
It depends to some extent on what kink it is, as sometimes this'll involve something quite explicitly illegal.
But if it's merely borders on something and cannot be directly equated with anything illegal, I think the kink would be okay by humanity's standards.
Otherwise, it'd be illegal, y'know?
levesterz wrote:
Its exist to serve a purpose. A purpose it shall fullfill.
Penguin wrote:
I have a hand fetish, but not with the sexual aspect, so it's not really a fetish. I just find certain types of hands very attractive.