not only is this not a duplicate (as the idea proposed in that thread suggested having scores from thousands of ranks apart as opposed to from players within your rank range), that thread is eight years old at this point.Sandy Hoey wrote:
Duplicate?: https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/27123
quote from above
Denil25 wrote:
Yes, performance ranking is nice!what about low rank players? You have to determine the difference betwen your pp(or rank) and pp(or rank) you see at the scoreboardKaine wrote:
mayb make it for rank ranges? everyone in 1500-2000 sees same lb, 2000-2500, etc..
In your example the Difference is 500, but you cant use this difference for players like 1kk rank where the players in interval like ~50k++ could have the same sklll
the main idea that scoreboard will show scores untill ~your pp(+-) So then we have a scoreboard where each guy has a possibility to get #1 ranknope. This guy wants scoreboard likeSandy Hoey wrote:
Duplicate?: https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/27123
1 guy from #1000
1 guy from #2000
~~~here goes your score~~~
1 guy friom #3000
etc
If i get his right ofc
yeah i think it would be a bit skewed if it were to just take a flat rank differential, especially at lower ranks where scores could fluctuate wildly. as an example, some six digit players are capable of passing maps like airman without issues, and grouping them with players that differentiate wildly in rank at that level would produce some very weird leaderboards.
gotchu fam :^)WEIRD FACE wrote:
Remind me to dump my 62 stars here when the 24hrs are over.