m4m :3
[Black Another]
00:17:148 (1,2) - make them with similar curve or straight? Will looks better (for example https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/O4KNoQQY)
00:19:891 (1) - hm, I would like to make two 1/2 sliders instead of this one, like you did here 00:17:148 (1,2), for making rhythm consistent. Also I dont like how you skip beat on this tick - 00:20:234
00:20:577 (2) - try this angle? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/j1jp2Xs0 Looks better for me, also movement is more fun than you have now
00:27:262 (10,1) - too close imo. try to move this stream - 00:26:920 (6,7,8,9,10) a bit down
00:27:777 (5) - nc? o.o
00:30:520 (10) - ^
00:36:348 (1,2,3,4,5) and 00:36:862 (6,7,8,9,10) - dunno why you decided to make such spacing here, it looks random for me ~_~
00:43:805 (5,6) - sound on 6 is so strong, I would like to make more spacing between 3,4 and 5,6 https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/e1KeAVRw
01:19:548 (1) - why nc? o.o
01:43:547 (1,2) - what about bigger spacing than you have now? Sound on 2 is strong enough https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/vAoRK8T8
[Leader's Another]
00:12:348 (3) - 00:13:034 (1) - missing normal sampleset on slider's head?
00:37:377 (1,2) - make a 1/2 slider + 1/4 slider like you did here - 00:36:348 (1,2)? Because it feels strange when you skip sound on red tick
01:01:548 (2,3) - 1 pixel overlap really trigger me, move 3 slider a bit down?
01:17:491 (1,2,3) - oh, you suddenly increase spacing here, maybe will be better to make it similar to 01:16:805 (1,2,3) and next jump will feels cool
01:38:062 (1,2,3,4) - try this placement? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/Tc13FyRE
[Hyper]
00:14:405 (3) - nc?
00:37:720 (1,3) - swap nc? xd
01:27:091 (1,2) - ugh, I think if you'll stack it in this way it will plays better https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/ZYc85jpo
[Standard]
I dont recommend you to make sv changes in lowest diff
00:31:548 (2,3,4) - wtf is that jump
00:32:920 (5,1) - I would like to stack it, mom please
01:02:405 (3) - nc?
01:29:148 (2) - 01:30:520 (2) - add normal sampleset on it's head
01:32:577 (1,1) - dc ><
[Black Another]
00:17:148 (1,2) - make them with similar curve or straight? Will looks better (for example https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/O4KNoQQY)
00:19:891 (1) - hm, I would like to make two 1/2 sliders instead of this one, like you did here 00:17:148 (1,2), for making rhythm consistent. Also I dont like how you skip beat on this tick - 00:20:234
00:20:577 (2) - try this angle? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/j1jp2Xs0 Looks better for me, also movement is more fun than you have now
00:27:262 (10,1) - too close imo. try to move this stream - 00:26:920 (6,7,8,9,10) a bit down
00:27:777 (5) - nc? o.o
00:30:520 (10) - ^
00:36:348 (1,2,3,4,5) and 00:36:862 (6,7,8,9,10) - dunno why you decided to make such spacing here, it looks random for me ~_~
00:43:805 (5,6) - sound on 6 is so strong, I would like to make more spacing between 3,4 and 5,6 https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/e1KeAVRw
01:19:548 (1) - why nc? o.o
01:43:547 (1,2) - what about bigger spacing than you have now? Sound on 2 is strong enough https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/vAoRK8T8
[Leader's Another]
00:12:348 (3) - 00:13:034 (1) - missing normal sampleset on slider's head?
00:37:377 (1,2) - make a 1/2 slider + 1/4 slider like you did here - 00:36:348 (1,2)? Because it feels strange when you skip sound on red tick
01:01:548 (2,3) - 1 pixel overlap really trigger me, move 3 slider a bit down?
01:17:491 (1,2,3) - oh, you suddenly increase spacing here, maybe will be better to make it similar to 01:16:805 (1,2,3) and next jump will feels cool
01:38:062 (1,2,3,4) - try this placement? https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/Tc13FyRE
[Hyper]
00:14:405 (3) - nc?
00:37:720 (1,3) - swap nc? xd
01:27:091 (1,2) - ugh, I think if you'll stack it in this way it will plays better https://pandahero.s-ul.eu/ZYc85jpo
[Standard]
I dont recommend you to make sv changes in lowest diff
00:31:548 (2,3,4) - wtf is that jump
00:32:920 (5,1) - I would like to stack it, mom please
01:02:405 (3) - nc?
01:29:148 (2) - 01:30:520 (2) - add normal sampleset on it's head
01:32:577 (1,1) - dc ><