did i just
booty wrote:
mazare party rings in my ears at night please help
booty wrote:
mazare party rings in my ears at night please help
Cheers for coming to check o/Percyqaz wrote:
last minute mod including some issues i think definitely need to be fixed before this is ranked
Ash's 4k ExtraSPOILERmissing note at 00:32:676 in column 3 and 00:32:751 in column 4 - looks like a mistake when mirroring/replicating pattern for this section
00:37:476 - same mistake from pasting and mirroring col 4 yes, col 3 no, since no cymbal crash is present (wonder how they ended up being so similar cus I don't copypaste stuff :thinking:)
00:54:276 - i think the first jumptrill should be normal and then the subsequent ones should change each time to different split patterns because it's more interesting to look at/play and you haven't been afraid to use longer split jumptrills already Fair point, though I think it was more of a personal preference to keep the jumps one handed here to give the chords like 00:54:876 a bit more emphasis.
^ also applies to 02:24:276
01:10:926 - the end of this jumptrill is not consistent with the others in the map. I like this one better because the last jump is on the "thud" of the drum and then there is a small stop so i'd prefer if all the jumptrills had the single note into hand removed (and mirroring the hand to match this one would be nice too if it doesn't mess up patterns right after) Was kinda deliberating on this for a while myself, guess I ended up not actually making a decision lol
^ affects 00:06:126, 02:40:926 and 03:21:726, but not 00:14:526
01:32:376 - I like these little bursts and how they go with that quiet buzzing kinda noise but i'd advise against them being here because the sound is very quiet compared to the rest of the music and this draws attention to it. the sound also actually starts at around 01:32:076 where there are no notes accompanying it, and just becomes noticable when the sound mapped to the long note in column 4 cuts out. see also: 01:39:876 The general idea was to bring it forward a little when it was unsupported for variety, essentially. You're not wrong and I do see your point; I'd prefer to keep it as it is though.
^ also applies to 00:17:976 and 03:43:176
01:34:776 - what about putting 3 long notes here instead of 1, on 1/3 snap to match that little rolling sound like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10689756 I have given this thought before, though for technical accuracy it would need to be a 1/4 roll, which I found extremely difficult to implement well, hence why I ended up (sadly) leaving this out.
01:35:976 - i think this note could benefit from being a long note as the sound it's mapped to is sort of drawn out and is the only thing happening in the music for a brief moment Fair point, though I feel the space for the echo works equally well here since it's not as drawn out as the gong is a measure later.
01:49:176 - this is very annoying to play, but also i think the sound exactly at 01:49:176 is no longer a drum beat and so a jump is not justified there. therefore, something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10689914 will fit the music better (i know this means the long notes need to be moved which could mess stuff up but i think this is more important) Totally see where you're coming from, but at the same time I feel that the suggestion would be counterintuitive to a buildup like this, hence why there is a jump in the middle. Annoying, yes, but not overly difficult for a something like this.
02:03:876 - i think this jumptrill is unjustified, especially compared to the one right after it which is mapped to a clear drum buildup Fair enough. Technically justified through the additional harp, but, yeah, probably shouldn't be emphasised as much as the percussion here.
03:17:076 - osu.ppy.sh/ss/10689990 i think this section should look like this because it was following very faint sounds when it could follow vocals which are more apparent to players. when i played this section the rhythm felt like it came out of nowhere until i played it back a few times. More of a personal preference not to follow vocals here, that's about all there is to this one.
03:51:277 - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10689858 i think the end should look like this because there are only notes to distinct sounds (the ln in column 1 starts earlier on another distinct sound) Feels a little odd to abruptly stop the roll here imo. There are still distinct sounds the notes are mapped to, albeit a little quieter. Personally, I think it's fine as is. (though I did miss that note at the start for some reason. p sure I put that there lol)
if anything is unclear or you want me to elaborate you know where to find me o/
theres an official card in the metadata discord server that shows the current is correct http://prntscr.com/j56lx6_underjoy wrote:
http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.html
I think the metadata should be
MAZARE (kradness,ななひら,Yukacco) - Mazare Party
never trust std mapsets in regards to meta, even if they are ranked
I think "MAZARE" for artist is not enough
I'm not quite convinced since first link shows what I sent, and second says "kradness".error_exe777 wrote:
theres an official card in the metadata discord server that shows the current is correct http://prntscr.com/j56lx6_underjoy wrote:
http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.html
I think the metadata should be
MAZARE (kradness,ななひら,Yukacco) - Mazare Party
never trust std mapsets in regards to meta, even if they are ranked
I think "MAZARE" for artist is not enough
also grats on qualify !!
_underjoy wrote:
error_exe777 wrote:
theres an official card in the metadata discord server that shows the current is correct http://prntscr.com/j56lx6
also grats on qualify !!
I'm not quite convinced since first link shows what I sent, and second says "kradness".
I don't want to be picky or whatever but I'd still use the () version of meta.
Evening wrote:
Opposite of mapping too much, you skip the vocals, which is a big feature in the song, why?
Thanks for the checking dude.Maxus wrote:
[4K Insane]
01:02:976 - Quite confused bout 1/3 here. first you fully followed the 1/3 sound here, and then suddenly the 1/3 at 01:07:876 - and 01:07:976 - got ignored and replaced by 1/2. I did this for patterning reasons. There would be a very sudden and inconsistent jump, so avoiding this note was the most preferable thing to do.
and then at 02:33:076 - , suddenly there isn't any 1/3 usage at all when it's same section as 2 section before. So i'm not sure why the usage here is inconsistent. There is a discernable difference in the actual song over the string instrument. The second section is not played in the same way as the first section, so it was mapped accordingly.
01:40:776 - Having this as 1/4 when it's 1/6 is incorrect here, since this diff is trying to be precise with the snap, other snap has to be precise too, including this. This was actually a 1/12 snap, but I see where you're coming from. Fixed this.
03:09:626 (189626|3) - Quite sure this note is a mistake here, if you follow the 1/3, there isn't any 1/6 here. no other diff has this note as well. This patterning is following the clicking sound which, itself, is being played in 1/6.
fixed, update will appear on Insp1r3's next updateMaxus wrote:
There's apparently wrong snapping between Ash's diff and booty's diff at 03:51:276 - .
Maxus wrote:
And at Cokii's 4K Hard
03:52:876 (232876|3,232976|2) - I'm not sure how this snap supposed to be. this is simply too far from original sound and it felt more like wrongly snapped instead of simplification. removed the notes at 03:52:876 (232876|3,232976|2) - and added a note at 03:52:926 (232926|1) -
I don't think there's anything I need/want to change at this point, so no update to send?Maxus wrote:
[Ash's 4K Extra]
00:24:276 - 01:38:676 - 03:49:476 - having this as highest diff and ignored all these 1/8 is simply a shock tbh, i don't think it should be substituted with jumpstream and jumptrill when there isn't even any changes in music pace here. and even you still actually use 1/8 burst at 01:49:176 - , so this isn't really 1/8 free burst diff at least from what i see. I get where you're coming from, but it was more of a personal choice only to include the 1/8 where I felt the intensity of the song was the strongest (so in a sense the 1/8 use was more for emphasis than anything else). Elsewhere where the 1/8 was ignored, I instead focused on the other sounds around the drum roll. (Also the true difficulty, i.e. not abusing the hitwindows, of the 1/8 is much higher than jumpstreams or jumptrills, hence why I tried to avoid using those except when I felt I absolutely had to.)
01:08:451 (68451|3,68601|3) - I don't think there's any 1/4 here tbh, try confirmed it with others. I think this was more for the 1/4 echoes from that percussive instrument (goodness knows what the name is for that) rather than following the 1/3.
01:49:626 (109626|2,109776|0,109851|3,109926|0,110001|3) - if you try to follow vocals, the series of LNs here are
extremely awkward. i don't know what these actually supposed to follow especially the 1/4 LN.
Even if "somehow" there's something here. the fact that it follow vocal 1 at 01:49:476 - , then vocal 2 at 01:49:626 - , then something at 01:49:776 - , then vocal again at 01:50:076 - , and synth at 01:50:526 - is very mixed up with no focus that it is vague what you try to do here. This is following the bass line rather than the vocals, which do do this. Well, 4 1/4 repeats represented like this rather than an anchor.
Will mention this first, since the snap thing need to be fixed here.
And don't forget to also reply Evening's concern as well. soon (tm) hopefully insp1r3 isn't going to kill me for being so slow
Good luck.
Not all of it, that comes tomorrow (tm)Pachiru wrote:
congratz ash you finally did it!!
There is no reply to Evening's mod yet.Feerum wrote:
Please reply to all mods, same goes for everyone who has a GD here!
Alright, updated the metadata that matches the one in the album listed here: http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.htmlKuo Kyoka wrote:
Did the map just got bubbled after added a new diff which is jakads' diff without a single mod for it?
And why you even nominated it even thought you know it's not comfortable for you? It's like you just make the bases and let other to solves it for you
About metadata:
Artist: MAZARE (kradness,ななひら,Yukacco)
Romanised Artist: MAZARE (kradness,Nanahira,Yukacco)
Title: Mazare Party
Romanised Title: Mazare Party
Official website: http://kradness.jp/
Album information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwOz3IvQmWQ
More references: http://exittunes.com/detail/qwce-90005.html
Album hosted by kradness
The song is composed by: かめりあ (Camellia)
Yes, it's included whole metadata, it's not an explaintion, but it's included
Because if it's an explaintion will be like explaintion Camellia's the composer (作詞・作曲:かめりあ)
But this is whole artist name, example like other song: "Crusaders In Virtuality / Quarks(kradness×Camellia)". And making it with only Quarks made no senses due to his new album http://tandeki.extsm.com/ also have the same metadata with it. That's reference example.
And yes, I already saw the post about metadata check, but I don't really follow it tho, I wish I could ask kradness for confirmation ...