Okay here I go.
lol I really don't know how to map low diffs.
Although I rejected about half of the mod in Firmament, they're still helpful tho.
Those sounds are 1/8 in fact, but I want to use 1/6 to show them.
Please poke me if you still think this one is not good!
[]
Edit: Updated kata's Muzukashii & yassu-'s Oni!
Edit2: Remember to calibration.
Thanks for the big modding! Especially in Kantan and Futsuu, it helps very much!JUDYDANNY wrote:
Hello, via M4M queue.
Please fix the hitsound from soft to Normal.
Some of players sounds effectivenes but, everyone is not necesarily so. Sure, fixed.
Serious problems are middle diffs quantity(dense).
[Kantan][Futsuu]
- 00:20:426 (2,3) - hihat sounds same as 00:14:463 - etc... , but its too sudden quantity, recommend to remove them and 00:20:799 - add don
instead for preparing to play the 1/1 double. Applied.
Too dense
- ①00:26:016 - ~ 00:50:985 - .
It has already high quantity.
My brain ...
A(00:26:016 - ~ )→dush! B(00:51:730 - )→rest.. Kiai(01:09:246 - )→dush!
... A is kiai too...? Yea lol, almost whole Kantan uses same pattern.
I think its not strong part, it needs to warming up.detailchanging&removing example...
00:26:761 - ,00:27:879 - , 00:29:743 - ,00:31:606 - ,00:32:724 - ,00:33:842 - .
00:38:687 - ,00:39:805 - , 00:41:668 - ,00:42:414 - k, 00:42:786 - move to 00:43:532 - ?, 00:44:650 - ,00:45:768 - ,00:46:140 - k,00:47:258 - ,00:50:240 -
All applied except the last one.
Here's the junction of two different rhythm sections, I think a bit different pattern can be used.[]
- ②01:45:022 - ~ 02:09:991 - , same as ①. Sure
- 01:01:793 (3,4) - seems better to remove and add on 01:01:420 - instead to follow the bass drum. Ok
- 01:07:383 - not enough rest, recommend to remove. Sure
- 01:17:072 (1,2) - and 01:18:563 - recommend to remove, for emphasized to dkkdd. ok
- 02:20:799 (12,13) - same as 1st. ok
- 02:26:389 - same as 1st. ok
- 02:36:078 (14,15) - , 02:37:569 (15) - same as 1st. ok
- 02:47:258 - too long, should remove there. Sure
- 03:11:109 - same as 1st. ok
- 03:15:209 - (1,2) - seems overmapped as Kantan to follow this case. hmm I think that's ok, it's 4/1 break later.
- 03:34:588 - , 03:35:706 - should remove them, its too long. ok
- 03:55:457 (7,8) - change to (don,remove). I dont think its acceptable the case of 7plet as Kantan. suree
Overall:
①Please take care ""1/1 blanks, 1/1 patterns"".
Futsuu is needed 1/1 patterns, 2/1 over breaks, 1/1 over breaks, to avoid the high dense.
②There're too long patterns. They should be fixed. Okay
Full texts:[Firmament]
- 00:23:780 - move to 00:23:407 - to make a consistent with hihat rhythm. Applied
Too dense
①00:26:016 - ~ 00:50:985 - .detailchanging&removing exmple...
00:27:134 - ,00:28:066 - +00:28:438 - move to 00:28:252 - ,
00:30:115 - ,00:31:047 - +00:31:420 - ^
00:33:097 - ,00:34:029 - +00:34:401 - ^
00:36:078 - ,00:50:799 -
All applied.- 00:56:202 - don? bass drum sounds as usual, vocal sounds lower too. Sure
- 00:58:252 - move to 00:58:438 - ? to make a consistent with before doubles. Make consistent is good.
- 01:00:674 - remove, long a bit. I think so, but I still want to keep these.
- 01:04:588 - move to 01:04:960 - sounds and plays better with back grounds. Reason reasonable.
- 01:11:855 - and 01:14:836 - remove + 01:15:581 - add don, 01:17:072 - add kat, 01:17:817 - +01:18:004 - remove? All applied.
- sounds ambiguity with vocal imo. try more! Sure><- 01:31:047 - remove, It's too long.Okay
- 01:34:215 - remove, for vocal ending reverblation. I probably know what you want to say... I think the current pattern (3/2 break) is suitable enough to emphasize the vocal ending tho.
- 01:37:196 - move to 01:37:010 - ? to focus what you follow there. The suggestion is nice, but I think make sure their consistent is more important.
②01:45:022 - ~ 02:09:991 - .detailchanging&removing example...
01:46:140 - ,01:47:072 - +01:47:445 - same as 1st.
01:49:122 - ,01:50:053 - +01:50:426 - ^.
01:52:103 - ,01:53:035 - +01:53:407 - ^.
01:55:084 - All applied
About 01:56:948 - ~~, seems better to use 00:37:942 - ~ patterns. Sure- 02:09:805 - should remove for decreasing difficulty. Applied
- 02:11:296 - , 02:14:277 - ,02:17:258 - I think these should unify with 1st. Hmm okay.
- 02:19:681 - same as 1st. Denied because I rejected 1st's.
- 02:23:594 - move to 02:23:966 - same as 1st,and 02:24:153 (1,2) - change to (d,k)? Okay
- 02:30:674 - ,02:30:861 - seems better to remove same as 1st. and seems longer. Sure
- 02:33:656 - ,02:33:842 - same. ^
- 02:34:588 - add and 02:35:519 - remove, not suitable as complete. rip 1/2 quintuplets.
- 02:36:078 - add and 02:37:010 - remove, same as above. Applied
- 02:42:600 - ,02:42:786 - same as ^^^. ^
- 02:50:053 - same as 1st, remove? Okay
- 03:04:774 (4,5,6,7,8) - consider to change the only 1/1 pattern "k-k-d-k", it's already very long pattern. It can already well cover only 1/1 I prefer the original pattern, but yours is reasonable.
- 03:10:364 - inconsitent with 02:25:271 (36,37,38,39,40) - . shoud add more. lol I forgot, added.
- 03:14:650 - simiar as Kantan, seems a bit over imo. Make them become k-k-kkd.
- 03:29:184 - Muzukashii....? consider to remove. Okay
- 03:32:165 - same. Sure
- 03:42:227 - ,03:45:209 - remove... too long T_T <w> Okay
- 03:48:563 - ,03:49:308 - ,03:50:053 - remove too. ^
- 03:53:035 - same. Applied
- 03:56:016 - same. ^
- 04:01:606 - ,04:02:724 - same. I prefer to delete 04:03:470 - this one. (not 04:02:724 -'s)
That's all for now, Good Luck
- 00:16:886 (7,8) - change to ..(remove,finish) ? feels lack of power cuz of not unified with 00:14:091 -. Interesting, applied.
- how about 00:20:985 - move to 1/2 left and 00:21:730 - move to 1/1left? (from00:20:053 - ,ddkdd-kdd-k 1/2) sounds not clear with background accompaniment. I make them become another pattern, current pattern will emphasize the cymbals sounds better I think.
- 00:24:339 - change to k? to make a consistent with the kat rhythm with the background sound? Denied, I see the rhythm, but looks like not at here.
- 00:24:525 (27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,1) - too sudden and harder. its not consistent the colors. Consider to nerf the stream (difficulty and density)? Sure, 5-3-7 pattern.
- ↑e.g.(ddkkd-kkddkkdkkkd)https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10244983
- 00:32:911 (29,30,31) - dkd? to make a consistent with 00:26:761 (4,5,6) - . Denied, I want to follow vocal completely in most verse.
- 00:37:662 - remove? Its a bit hard on 00:36:451 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1) -, consider to nerf there? Ive nerfed before, but I don't like the effect. Also, many modders told me that (I need to add more note), so this is the result.
- 00:46:886 (44,45,46,47,48,49) - change to k-kd-dk? inverted the rhythm, and for making a consistent the vocal. wow, okay.
- 00:49:122 - move to 1/2 right? same as above. Sure
- 00:57:134 - remove? No, to keep consistency with 02:16:140.
- 00:59:463 - no add kat? noo
- 01:01:979 (6,8,9) - remove them and 01:02:538 - change to kat? Semi-applied
- feels over on calm and 01:02:538 - seems better to follow the pure sound.- 01:04:401 (5,6) - kd, 01:05:147 - k? 01:05:519 (10,11,12,13) - change to kkd-k? sounds not clear with background accompaniment. Denied, I think that cymbals sounds are clear :3.
- 01:14:091 (29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38) - consider to change to "d-kkd-d-kkkkd"? too sudden the 7plet.. Denied, I think that can be accepted.
- 01:16:513 - add k? Okay
- following the vocal same as 01:17:631 (50,51,52) - .- 01:26:761 (36,37) - k-d? want to variate the pattern with vocaland plays much better imo lol. Nah <w>
- 01:30:302 - and 01:30:768 (57,58) - remove them. 01:29:929 - add k there? sounds not clear with background accompaniment. I think the effect isn't good.
- 01:31:699 - add there? - feels weak a bit with plays. Sure
- 01:33:749 (5,6) - remove, 01:34:308 - move to 01:34:681 - , 01:35:426 (15,17) - remove? - feels over dense. Try reduse the dense more. Applied
- 01:36:730 (21,22) - remove, 01:37:289 - remove? Sure
- 01:43:997 (27) - kat seems much better with smoothing plays. Applied
- About 1/2-7plets 01:45:395 - ~ 01:52:476 - , It's very different from 1st (00:26:389 - ~) part, try to recheck again. Because the singer sings in different vocal-pitch xd, but I'll still recheck.
- 01:57:134 - ,02:00:115 - remove, same as 1st 00:38:128 - etc.. The second part is different with the first part, and there's much more changeable than 1st's. Thus, I think this can be accepted.
- 02:00:488 (16,17,18,19,20) - d-k-kdk? if you want to use kdk on there? Ok
- 02:03:283 (30,31,32,33,34,35,36) - add 1/4 triple anywhere to make a consistent with the rhythm. lol I forgot, added.
- 02:06:544 (45,46) - remove same as 1st. Denied, reason same as 01:57:134 - ,02:00:115 -. But I still remove some to make it looks cleaner.
- 02:16:047 (26,28) - feels over, consider to remove? Only remove (26).
- 02:20:985 - remove same as 1st? Denied cuz i think it's needed :3
- 02:23:221 (15,16,17,18,19,20,21) - how about d-k-d-ddk-d? similar as 1st. Denied cuz i rejected 1st's.
- 02:24:991 - kat seems much better with smoothing plays. Agree
- 02:32:911 (32,33,34,35,36) - kkd-k-d seems better to keep the conistent with the 1/2 rhythm. Change to k-d-kkd.
- 02:38:966 - maybe its not bad to add kat. Gooood
- 02:45:768 (39,40) - kd? same as 1st. Denied cuz i rejected 1st's.
- 02:49:774 (60,61) - remove? same as 1st. Same as above.
- 03:00:768 (58,60) - ,03:03:004 - remove? seems over a bit. Previous one fits music so no, latter one remove.
- how about change to ..03:09:339 - k,03:09:619 (27,28,29,30,31,32) - kdkkdd, 03:10:643 - d? Fixed the first one, amazing catch. The others denied because the sounds [-> 03:09:991 - 03:10:084 - kat, 03:10:178 - 03:10:364 - don.]
- 03:23:966 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - how about change to d-ddkdk-kkd? 3-7-3plets seems over power. Sounds not bad.
- 03:26:668 - add k? Keep consistency is good
- 03:31:047 (23,24,25,26,27,28) - ddk-dkd? Yes, nice catch.
- 03:33:470 (42,43) - kd? same as 1st, 2nd. Denied cuz I rejected others.
- If you apply above(kd suggestion) and you like, 03:33:376 - add don to emphasized the climax? nah <w>
- 03:34:494 (49,50) - remove? feels over. I think this one can be accepted :3
- 03:36:451 (62,63) - same, kd? noo
- 03:37:103 - not remove...? lol I forgot to remove, sure.
- 03:37:569 (67,69) - ^. I think I'll keep this. Suddenly a blank is strange imo.
- 03:45:954 (2,3) - ,03:47:538 - remove? I think I'll keep them.
- 03:51:358 - maybe not bad to make 1/4 triple ddd or kdd imo. kdd
- 03:53:780 (16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - seems better to change to kkddkdk-kkd imo. how about? The pattern is good, but I exchange them (kkd kkddkdk).
- 03:57:320 (44,45) - kd same as 1st 2nd 3rd. 03:57:227 - add d or k? same as 3rd. Denied the previous one because I rejected them, latter one applied.
- 03:57:879 - remove? Ok
- 04:02:631 (83,84,85,86,87,88) - seems better to change to kddkdd. Applied
lol I really don't know how to map low diffs.
Although I rejected about half of the mod in Firmament, they're still helpful tho.
Sorry, I decided to change to the original pattern.Smallwu wrote:
Done~Jonawaga wrote:
continue, no kd
[Oni]
03:15:022 (5,6,7,8) - this definitely isn't 1/6. Please map this with 1/4ths.rip 1/6no :3
and call me back
Those sounds are 1/8 in fact, but I want to use 1/6 to show them.
Please poke me if you still think this one is not good!
[]
Edit: Updated kata's Muzukashii & yassu-'s Oni!