eh nani!? haha, just want to increase my posts
CS5 maps are fun.Ascendance wrote:
I don't think this map is ready to be qualified at all. The top diff has emphasis issues that are all over the place and it feels like an eternal struggle to even play the map.
- Why is Evanent's Rain CS3.8? It breaks spread pretty heavily here considering the top diff is CS5. Moving this to CS4.5 would fit the gap so much more nicely and create a much better spread. (I don't really agree that the top diff should even be CS5, it doesn't play very well with it.) - Well, the original idea was to have a CS2 Overdose in the set, then I made this CS3.8 Rain, I want to keep it like this because I like it.
All done, some edits on previous mod note I left, since it seems like I wanted to stay CS5 as Intended to (idk I felt like something wrong if it was 4 and 4.5), the beginning map already remapped,Ascendance wrote:
As I said @murut the map is pretty good apart from the really glaring issues in the mod. Poke me when you’ve finished fixing the notable sections and I can go through with a full mod to get this back to qualified ASAP
Different mapper have different opinion I guess, but yes, remapping could be frustrating if others have no problem with it.YukaRei wrote:
I like the diff with CS5, I like all the mapset, It feels really frustrating that because someone doesn't like it makes murumuru to remap the highest diff or makes changes that could be made long time ago, the diff was modded in base of that CS, remapping now is what doesn't make any sense. Ctb mapping is really getting standardized, this is dissapointing.
It seems like someone is only coming to mapsets to get them disqualified...S U B J E C T I V E
It can already, but since I already poke Ascendance, i wait for this week :pSYAHME wrote:
I think this maps can re-qualified
I'd appreciate if you didn't make such accusatory statements towards me. If I wanted to only DQ this map, I wouldn't have offered to come back and help it be pushed back into qualified. Also, I definitely was not the only one who had issue with the set, in fact, someone else who had an issue with the set was the one who approached me about it. All of your points really make me upset because it makes me think you really don't understand anything about the modding or mapping process. Just relax and stop throwing out needless stuff, we're working hard to move this back to qualified.YukaRei wrote:
I like the diff with CS5, I like all the mapset, It feels really frustrating that because someone doesn't like it makes murumuru to remap the highest diff or makes changes that could be made long time ago, the diff was modded in base of that CS, remapping now is what doesn't make any sense. Ctb mapping is really getting standardized, this is dissapointing.
It seems like someone is only coming to mapsets to get them disqualified...S U B J E C T I V E
OK Done, now mapset ready. Now relax XDAscendance wrote:
I'd appreciate if you didn't make such accusatory statements towards me. If I wanted to only DQ this map, I wouldn't have offered to come back and help it be pushed back into qualified. Also, I definitely was not the only one who had issue with the set, in fact, someone else who had an issue with the set was the one who approached me about it. All of your points really make me upset because it makes me think you really don't understand anything about the modding or mapping process. Just relax and stop throwing out needless stuff, we're working hard to move this back to qualified.YukaRei wrote:
I like the diff with CS5, I like all the mapset, It feels really frustrating that because someone doesn't like it makes murumuru to remap the highest diff or makes changes that could be made long time ago, the diff was modded in base of that CS, remapping now is what doesn't make any sense. Ctb mapping is really getting standardized, this is dissapointing.
It seems like someone is only coming to mapsets to get them disqualified...S U B J E C T I V E
Top diff looks nicer now, here's some distance stuff i noticed while playing:After he applies these, I'm okay with the mapset going forward again @BNs. Good luck from here on out
- 00:18:181 (1) - Useless NC, remove it Sure
- 00:17:528 (9,1) - pretty hard jump, increase it to an hdash! Told ya, thats why I keep H-Dash. Revert but more easy one lol.
- 00:19:267 (5,6) - this would feel much nicer with an hdash for such a strong sound. Cool
- 00:20:137 (1,2) - pretty far also, reduce or make into an hdash H-Dash
- 00:21:224 (2) - tilt more towards 3 for a more natural movement? Done
- 00:33:181 (5,6) - decrease distance or make it into an hdash H-Dash seems ok since its on second beat.
- 00:34:050 (1,2) - depending on what you do with the earlier mod of this pattern, change it to be consistent Consistent... seems like it adds PP but hope it works fine, pretty nice flow though.
- 00:58:833 (5) - x:199 makes the pattern a bit more smooth here Sure
- 01:05:354 (1,2) - really squished pattern here, try 01:05:572 (2) - x:394! Sure
- 01:10:572 - I'm pretty upset that you copypasted the previous kiai :/ it makes the map not as fun as it could be. I hate when mappers do this so I can't really help if you don't want to change this. Just try to apply suggestions from the previous kiai if you decide to keep that. I think I keep it, maybe I already mind about making something a little bit different with different hitsoundings but that might remapping whole mapset (and *uhuk* i don`t like make bn/qat do more stuff *uhuk*), since it fits the song and pattern, so repeating pattern is fine. But next time on future will be no more lazy mapping :3
Hmm somewhat ok with current but seems like I done change like how 00:53:180 (1) wasJBHyperion wrote:
Why doesn't 00:49:920 (1) - start on the downbeat at 00:49:702 - for the strong wind instrument sound like 00:53:180 (1) - does?
Otherwise fine, call me back
Done updated :pcelerih wrote:
[Cup ]
- 00:47:094 (2) - has higher pitch so can you make it so this one is more horizontal than 00:46:224 (1) - Look kinda fractional changes but sure
- 00:48:833 (4,1) - and distance here is particularly small, can you increase it? Hmm, since it changes that, I might added a bit distance on all of the 00:49:702 (1,2,3,4,1). The second (1) i turned to 2x instead since it has high pitch.
[Salad ]
- 00:21:007 (3,1) - dash here is way weaker than all the other ones of the start of the map see 00:14:050 (3,1) - 00:07:094 (3,1) - I'd recommend making it a dash that's close in distance to the other ones, since this is all on the same sound I think I used a bit anti-flow to make something a little different, so lesser distance on 00:21:007 seems a bit fair, 00:07:963 (1) and 00:14:050 (3,1) have different stronger distance since its not really anti-flow.
- 00:34:920 (3) - on this drum hit sound 00:35:354 - you always had dashes, would be cool to have one here too for consistency. Would rather nicely tie up the entire start of the map imo Ok removed repeated and making different movements
Other diffs look good to me, call me once you've replied to these couple of points ^^
thanks, glad you like it :3lulu lemon wrote:
gratss on qualify! love this song
so i assume the romanization is a lie to me sedFycho wrote:
Hi, your romanisation of title is incorrect:Title: 香る樹葉花
Romanised Title: Kaoru Juyouka