KaoriYour tags conflict as well as your uninhenrited timing points
00:03:472 (1) - this sounds too early, 3490 would be more on the music
00:13:091 (1) - too early, it's at 13102
00:13:948 (2) - too early, it's at 13961
00:22:684 (1) - too early, 22695
00:23:505 (2) - too early, 23524
00:30:329 (2,3) - don't overlap so much, at the very most, under 1 of the heads only:
or at least follow the rest of the psacing used elsewhere, this one is the odd one out
00:40:329 (3,4,5,6) - every spacing between each of them greatly differs, 00:40:929 (5,6) - should not be so much greater than 00:40:729 (4,5) - any increas in spacing between 00:40:729 (4,5) - looks underwhelming from 00:40:329 (3,4) - even though peak appears at 00:40:929 (5) -
01:00:315 (2,3) - 01:00:715 (4,5) - why are the bigger spacings on these beats, 01:00:315 (2,3) are more connected to each other rather than differentiating from each other
01:05:915 (1) - move it more to the left, the movement from 01:05:515 (4) - is really acute and there is no impact made for the change in tone in the music
03:17:915 (2,1) - do you really need to overlap this way, this can easily be avoided
03:21:915 (1,2,3) - visual spacing looks really close
03:24:115 (2,3) - given how big this is, the lead in to the next phrase 03:24:915 (4,1) - is really weak
03:30:715 (3,4) - at the very least, 03:31:115 (4,1) - should be as much or greater in spacing than this
03:32:315 (5,6) - why the jump in spacing here? And not at 03:32:915 (6,1) -
04:56:740 (1) - doesn't hit exactly with the current timing
Can really be polished much more, especially spacing-wise. many at times the small spacing leading to a new phrase or holds and new vocals hinders movement and emphasis more than it could be
Good Luck