already said by Shini lol okay and so Lopkyy still on tags?-Sh1n1- wrote:
Lopkyy in description is more than enough if you really want to show gratitude, do you really want to rank the map? just remove and everything should be ready to go.
right you can tell it now but it seems no clarity about this, I dont see lopkky involved with ranking process in here and from first time you made this set, theres no information about part which both of youve mapped, so the way out is remove lopkyy from tags. please reconsider about this if you really want this set get requalifiedPoii wrote:
if he only put 1 or 2 notes in your diff, its not a collab dude, at least tell me which part that he made ?
okaySurono wrote:
already said by Shini lol okay and so Lopkyy still on tags?-Sh1n1- wrote:
Lopkyy in description is more than enough if you really want to show gratitude, do you really want to rank the map? just remove and everything should be ready to go.right, you can tell it now. please reconsider about this if you really want this set get requalifiedPoii wrote:
if he only put 1 or 2 notes in your diff, its not a collab dude, at least tell me which part that he made ?
Surono wrote:
I saw Kisses point from 01:22:727 - here and its about spread
* delete 01:23:121 - this on futsuu and add notes on muzukashii, I dont know why 4plet 1/2 on futsuu ok
* 01:23:713 - 01:24:898 - 01:25:490 - add don around here, its similar with Kantan density ok
* 01:25:292 - just add don in here for futsuu, since oni has 3plet + finishers
I think the spread of this set would be fine and neat if you fix these
no i don't want your mp3, better now?Wafu wrote:
I also mentioned the mp3 quality in the older post, nobody still gave a response to it. I said I can give you a better one without changing offset. Yes, it is a suggestion, but you need to respond to everything with a reason. For the time being, I'll leave the sample-exact mp3 here. You are not forced to use it, but at minimum give your response to it.
vai ter voltaAtaraxia wrote:
saudades lopkyy foda . . .
qualifica ae nrml xddd
Lanturn wrote:
SILENT SIREN / Silent Siren / サイレント サイレン / サイレントサイレン
Regarding the artist field. When Silent Siren was published by Brand-New Music (http://www.brand-newmusic.co.jp/artist_ ... _siren.php) and dreamusic (http://dreamusic.co.jp/artist/silent-siren/profile/), they officially went by "Silent Siren" with "サイレント サイレン" (Brand-New Music) and "サイレントサイレン" (dreamusic) on the side for reading assistance. SILENT SIREN is now the bands current name under the label by EMI-RECORDS. (http://www.universal-music.co.jp/silent-siren/)
This song was published under Brand-New Music so the most appropriate Artist to use would be the first one
Artist: Silent Siren
The Katakana is just to assist the reader as shown on the official publisher site so it shouldn't be used (throw in tags). You can see the romanization only being used in the official music video as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4i1xbKCK7Y
Your current artist field uses dreamusic's artist choice.
tl;dr, remove the unicode artist and use Silent Siren.
That's not a proper answer. I agree with Lanturn's reasoning, if you do not have anything else to say, I will proceed with the disqualification in order for you to fix the issues mentioned above. Thank you!Igor Sprite wrote:
Naotoshi wrote:
Kurai tbm ta morrendoKurai wrote:
Naotoshi wrote:
ta tudo dando errado xdNet0 wrote:
@Igor Sprite Para com os meme velho, fodendo Valdomiro velho kkkk, só ajeita o artist pra Silent Siren nos dois campos e vai estar pronto pra qualificar novamente.
i don't know what is happening hereGabe wrote:
:weary:
