CanadianBaka wrote:

please BN NOTICE THIS MAP IT'S SO GOOD I WANT IT RANKED INSTANTLY!!!!

[ Lilu ] wrote:

i think this mod's going to be kinda useless, but here i go

im going to be super nazi because im sure theres nothing thats actually badly wrong with the map... since you have so many mods already

the only difficulty there is

00:28:930 (3) - Ever so slightly too pointy, maybe just smooth out the second 'hump' of the slider. https://puu.sh/t3jDM/5c8f96051e.jpg ✓ i think i fixed it

00:33:805 (1,2) - https://puu.sh/t3jHe/426c72e68f.jpg These arrows, adjust one of the slider so they are horizontal. in fact maybe do the same with these ones? 00:27:805 (1,2) - would kind of ruin the overlap + blanket so not risking it. not noticeable in game as well ^^

00:37:367 (2) - curve towards the 3 ✓

00:40:367 (2) - what if you made 2 blanket 1? https://puu.sh/t3jOI/0295bf4669.jpg (ik its a bad blanket, this is just an example) nuh sliders are going in different directions so it would break the flow

01:52:367 (2) - you seem to really like tiny curves, but this ones straight? you could curve it to the 3 a tiny bit i want it to be linear for aesthetics with the other linear slider 01:52:930 (4) -

02:56:492 (2,3,4) - this makes a yuck looking triangle, maybe move the 3 a bit? ✓

04:20:305 (1) - do you have to have this slider point away from the 2... its a break in flow for NO reason at all aesthetics and such

04:30:430 (5,1) - looks dank (y) (y)

05:02:305 (1) - rotate this a little so it flows with the stream better ✓ made it a bit less curved since it didnt look too good


thats all from me

Gl with getting this ranked heh, most of the things i mentioned are just little nitpicks of mine, the map is fine for rank imo.

1. 00:12:805 - 00:21:805 - on this section the only place you used circles before the downbeat was 00:18:430 (6,7) - you used 1/2 slider on the other two places 00:15:430 (5) - 00:21:430 (5) - . I recommend you to use 1/2 sliders instead of circles on this section 00:00:430 - 00:12:617 - since its the beginning of the song and is pretty calm and in the next section 00:12:805 - 00:21:805 - replace the two 1/2 sliders i mentioned before with circles cuz the music is a bit more "strong" compared with the beginning and clickable stuff makes it stand out a bit more.
2. 00:22:930 (4) - not the best heart slider ive saw. i made one for you:
   
   heartslider

   320,220,22930,2,0,B|377:188|419:276|372:302|345:339|300:314|259:346|259:346|241:297|190:294|187:249|161:202|244:150|275:207,1,500,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   416,48,25367,6,0,P|384:64|364:68,1,43.749998664856,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:39:430 (8) - this works better as two circles imo also you used circles here to 00:45:430 (6,7) - consistency is cool
4. 01:24:430 (1) - i dont think u need that nc
5. 01:25:930 (1) - ^
6. 01:34:367 (2,3,4,5) - you can reduce the overall spacing of that pattern a bit and increase it on 4>5 for more emphasis on the cymbal sound on 5
7. 01:45:805 (1) - i think u can just remove this nc. the music changed on the previous sliders so they belong to the same combo
8. 01:59:305 (1,2,3,4) - hitsounding the slider heads (aka white and red ticks) instead would be more fitting
9. 02:46:930 (1) - remove nc if you did with 01:25:930 (1) -
10. 02:57:805 (1) - add finish, like you did with 01:33:805 (1) -
11. 03:04:555 (2,3) - using a 1/2 slider instead of 2 would fit better because theres nothing where 3 is placed
12. 03:05:305 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - they all are mapped to the same sound yet you used more spacing on the circles than the sliders also this jump is really huge 03:05:867 (7,8) - and the songs intensity hasnt changed at all
13. 03:12:055 (7,8,9,10) - not sure about snapping here. sounds like 1/3 imo but better recheck it to be sure
14. 03:25:930 (4) - 03:28:930 (4) - 03:30:805 (1) - 03:33:805 (1) -
15. 03:42:055 (1,2) - 1/2 sliders are too dense for this part of the music. using 2 circles is more fitting because vocals are only on white and red tick, theres nothing else to map and they fit the current pace of the song
16. 03:43:367 (2,3,4) - this feel kinda overdone. the spacing is even larger than some of the jumps on your kiais and the song is really slow paced so less density fits better. using a 1/1 slider instead of these 3 circles fits better. this applies to the rest of this section (until 03:54:430 (5) -)
17. 03:45:055 (6,7) - circles. same reason as 03:42:055 (1,2) - and this applies to the rest of this section like i said above ^
    reducing overall density for that part fits really cool since the song becames more calm here and lower density makes it more outstanding
18. 03:57:805 (1,2,3,4,5) - this pattern has the same spacing as the previous section i pointed out above but it fits here since the song changed, it has more sounds in the bgm and its a bit more intense. just another reason to justify what i said earlier to make it more clear
19. 04:08:305 (1) - add a timing point (redline) to reset the metronome
20. 04:27:617 (4,1,2) - i guess you can make this a 1/1 slider instead. the downbeat has nothing to map and a 1/1 fits the vocals that are really strong
21. 04:31:930 (1) - 1/2 slider + circle works better imo. the 1/2 slider fits the "hold" vocal beat and the circle emphasises better the vocal on the downbeat
22. 04:36:430 (3) - what about moving it to x300|y120. placing objets where the slider is pointing at looks cool
23. 05:02:023 (2,4) - pretty sure theyre overmapped. deleting them would be cool because you will be able to make a jump with 05:01:930 (1,2) - and drums are strong here
24. 05:13:930 (1,2,3,4) - same ^

pkhg wrote:

this song <3

[Connection]

1. 00:12:805 - 00:21:805 - on this section the only place you used circles before the downbeat was 00:18:430 (6,7) - you used 1/2 slider on the other two places 00:15:430 (5) - 00:21:430 (5) - . I recommend you to use 1/2 sliders instead of circles on this section 00:00:430 - 00:12:617 - since its the beginning of the song and is pretty calm and in the next section 00:12:805 - 00:21:805 - replace the two 1/2 sliders i mentioned before with circles cuz the music is a bit more "strong" compared with the beginning and clickable stuff makes it stand out a bit more. ✓
2. 00:22:930 (4) - not the best heart slider ive saw. i made one for you: ✓ holy thank you
   
   heartslider

   320,220,22930,2,0,B|377:188|419:276|372:302|345:339|300:314|259:346|259:346|241:297|190:294|187:249|161:202|244:150|275:207,1,500,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   416,48,25367,6,0,P|384:64|364:68,1,43.749998664856,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:39:430 (8) - this works better as two circles imo also you used circles here to 00:45:430 (6,7) - consistency is cool ✓
4. 01:24:430 (1) - i dont think u need that nc ✓
5. 01:25:930 (1) - ^ ✓
6. 01:34:367 (2,3,4,5) - you can reduce the overall spacing of that pattern a bit and increase it on 4>5 for more emphasis on the cymbal sound on 5 ✓
7. 01:45:805 (1) - i think u can just remove this nc. the music changed on the previous sliders so they belong to the same combo ✓
8. 02:46:930 (1) - remove nc if you did with 01:25:930 (1) - ✓
9. 03:04:555 (2,3) - using a 1/2 slider instead of 2 would fit better because theres nothing where 3 is placed ✓
10. 03:05:305 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - they all are mapped to the same sound yet you used more spacing on the circles than the sliders also this jump is really huge 03:05:867 (7,8) - and the songs intensity hasnt changed at all ✓
11. 03:12:055 (7,8,9,10) - not sure about snapping here. sounds like 1/3 imo but better recheck it to be sure tried 1/3 but doesnt match up imo xd
12. 03:25:930 (4) - 03:28:930 (4) - 03:30:805 (1) - 03:33:805 (1) - ????
13. 03:42:055 (1,2) - 1/2 sliders are too dense for this part of the music. using 2 circles is more fitting because vocals are only on white and red tick, theres nothing else to map and they fit the current pace of the song i kind of like this imo since sliders are easier to play the circles and i guess you could say i was mapping the echo aha
14. 03:43:367 (2,3,4) - this feel kinda overdone. the spacing is even larger than some of the jumps on your kiais and the song is really slow paced so less density fits better. using a 1/1 slider instead of these 3 circles fits better. this applies to the rest of this section (until 03:54:430 (5) -) ✓
15. 03:45:055 (6,7) - circles. same reason as 03:42:055 (1,2) - and this applies to the rest of this section like i said above ^
    reducing overall density for that part fits really cool since the song becames more calm here and lower density makes it more outstanding also like last time
16. 03:57:805 (1,2,3,4,5) - this pattern has the same spacing as the previous section i pointed out above but it fits here since the song changed, it has more sounds in the bgm and its a bit more intense. just another reason to justify what i said earlier to make it more clear ~
17. 04:08:305 (1) - add a timing point (redline) to reset the metronome ✓
18. 04:27:617 (4,1,2) - i guess you can make this a 1/1 slider instead. the downbeat has nothing to map and a 1/1 fits the vocals that are really strong eh i kind of like this part being notes since the vocals arent to extended like 04:24:430 (1) -
19. 04:31:930 (1) - 1/2 slider + circle works better imo. the 1/2 slider fits the "hold" vocal beat and the circle emphasises better the vocal on the downbeat i think the current one provides better transition to the next part imo
20. 04:36:430 (3) - what about moving it to x300|y120. placing objets where the slider is pointing at looks cool ✓
21. 05:02:023 (2,4) - pretty sure theyre overmapped. deleting them would be cool because you will be able to make a jump with 05:01:930 (1,2) - and drums are strong here ✓
22. 05:13:930 (1,2,3,4) - same ^ the stream notes here are more noticeable than ^ so keeping this one

nice map gl

u can pm me if u need help like how to add the heart slider or something else xd

1. 01:59:305 (1,2,3,4) - hitsounding the slider heads (aka white and red ticks) instead would be more fitting
2. 02:57:805 (1) - add finish, like you did with 01:33:805 (1) -

1. 00:37:180 - you're ignored a sound here and 00:41:305 - here but not here 00:41:680 (4) - seems a bit weird for me
2. 00:45:617 (7) - I don't hear anything strong here. slider instead of 00:45:430 (6,7) could be better
3. 01:00:242 - missed a strong drum sound?..
4. ...And the vocal stars here 01:00:430 - so I think it should be clickable
5. 01:49:367 - circle here and slider 01:49:555 - fits the vocal better. There's also a snare drum on 01:49:555 - so it should be clickable
6. 01:50:867 (6) - almost nothing really important musically. I think something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7035553 (at least circle-slider order) is better for this part
7. 02:03:242 (8) - I don't hear anything clickable. You can make 02:03:055 (7,9) - like 00:09:055 (4,5) - or just a stack
8. 02:09:242 (7) - mapped to the breath?
9. 02:26:867 (5) - ^
10. 03:19:367 - 03:20:117 - would you like to represent these drum beats? and...
11. ...vocal starts from here 03:19:930 - clickable?
12. 03:22:367 - kickdrum
13. 03:36:055 (5,6,7,8,1) - any reason to skip really strong melody here? 1/6 sliders'n'stuff...
14. 03:56:117 (5,6,7) - a bit weird part. I can't understand, do you ignore drums in this part or not. Some beats are represented. Some are not - 03:56:492 - 03:56:867 - 03:59:117 - 03:59:492 -
15. 04:04:367 (2,3) - swap them on timeline. fits the vocal part 1000 times better
16. 04:48:617 (6) - nothing really clickable in music
17. 04:51:242 - why did you skipped sound here, but didn't skipped it in the nearest parts like 04:54:242 (10) -

Dammond wrote:

Black Vultures Clan Modding Queue
Hi!
My mod is fully about overmapping/undermapping

1. 00:37:180 - you're ignored a sound here and 00:41:305 - here but not here 00:41:680 (4) - seems a bit weird for me nah sounds fine imo since the song gets a little bit more upbeat there + would lose the emphasis on the next note imo x)
2. 00:45:617 (7) - I don't hear anything strong here. slider instead of 00:45:430 (6,7) could be better ✓i agree!
3. 01:00:242 - missed a strong drum sound?.. nah it isnt as strong as the "held" note here 01:00:805 - imo
4. ...And the vocal stars here 01:00:430 - so I think it should be clickable zz
5. 01:49:367 - circle here and slider 01:49:555 - fits the vocal better. There's also a snare drum on 01:49:555 - so it should be clickable ✓
6. 01:50:867 (6) - almost nothing really important musically. I think something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7035553 (at least circle-slider order) is better for this part it would have less emphasis on the next note + would have consistency with places like 01:56:867 - etc
7. 02:03:242 (8) - I don't hear anything clickable. You can make 02:03:055 (7,9) - like 00:09:055 (4,5) - or just a stack i think it flows better like this and the example is just a calm part so its mapped less
8. 02:09:242 (7) - mapped to the breath? sure LOL but mostly repeated things i said before i.e. emphasis and such
9. 02:26:867 (5) - ^ ^
10. 03:19:367 - 03:20:117 - would you like to represent these drum beats? and... not following the drums
11. ...vocal starts from here 03:19:930 - clickable? would ruin the pattern ahh
12. 03:22:367 - kickdrum i want to follow to more prominent beats on this part
13. 03:36:055 (5,6,7,8,1) - any reason to skip really strong melody here? 1/6 sliders'n'stuff... following the violin here so im just hearing 1/4 aha
14. 03:56:117 (5,6,7) - a bit weird part. I can't understand, do you ignore drums in this part or not. Some beats are represented. Some are not - 03:56:492 - 03:56:867 - 03:59:117 - 03:59:492 - because the beat is actually more audible compared to the rest
15. 04:04:367 (2,3) - swap them on timeline. fits the vocal part 1000 times better i want 04:04:555 - to be clickable
16. 04:48:617 (6) - nothing really clickable in music would ruin the whole pattern thing + its represented by low spacing
17. 04:51:242 - why did you skipped sound here, but didn't skipped it in the nearest parts like 04:54:242 (10) - because theyre not the same sound?? she's actually singing on the second part

Nice map, gl

Overall hitsound volumes seem too high in parts that aren't in the chorus,resulting in the chorus not sounding as impactful tbh, and things like in the starting,where 60% volume is used straight off the bat even thougn there are barely any sounds to be heard? It feels too loud imo.

00:10:930 (3,4,5) - I feel that 4,5 are too close to 3 for a few reasons,one being that this a different sound being played compared to every single other sound from the start to this point,and secondly,because it is a different sound,it may be hard to predict/know that its a doubletap,because you've been using sliders to express those doubletap sounds in the beginning 00:00:430 (1,6,5) - , so it may be wise to do the same here for 4,5 so they don't get confused/easier transition.

00:28:367 (2,3) - Blanket nicer pls urmigurdhttp://puu.sh/tO1S1/8f4fc211b2.jpg

00:37:180 - I messed up my melody here again because there was a sound,yet it wasn't clickable,tbh I feel that you should make these transitions clearer,because in the earlier part you've been mapping to the piano all along,with the vocals that is. But now a new set of sounds come in and the player wouldn't know whether to click them or not, I suggest you make 00:36:805 (1) - a 1/2 slider since it helps cover the gap in timing.

00:39:055 (7) - Suggest placing this at 414 118 to support the clap sound,also,no reason for 5,6,7 to have less DS than 00:39:430 (8,9,1) - right?... o-o

00:49:180 (2,3) - Not the same *triggered* its fine if u dont change tho ;/

01:00:055 (5,6) - Change this to http://puu.sh/tO2uh/694255caf5.jpg so it fits the drums

01:01:930 (3) - Recommend you stop the slider over 01:02:305 - because theres a sound/tune change here 01:02:305 -

01:06:805 - tbh I feel that 81 bpm fits this part better,bcuz
1.The drum sounds are the main sounds here,not the wavy sounds, so I think changing to 81 bpm JUST for this part is fine. Then reset the bpm here 01:09:805 -
2. and yes,the drum sounds ARE off by a few ms.

some offset problems 01:10:555 (2) - dis is late by ~15ms
01:10:930 (1,2) - late by 20ms
01:11:492 (1,2) - Same ^

01:24:805 (1,2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7232475 fuk u sux at double blanketing ._. XD

01:26:680 (5) - Better to rotate this by 45 degrees,the flow here would be much smoother than curving straight away

01:37:742 - Sound here,i recommend you put some slider or note to cover it up

01:40:930 (4) - Recommend extending this to 01:41:492 - to express the long flute sound a lot better

01:50:492 (5,6) - Ctrl+G rhythm? sounds a lot better imo

01:54:242 - make a 1/2 slider instead? Seems better imo and fits the background sound.

01:56:492 (5,6) - Same,ctrl+G rhythm?

01:54:055 - Why empty you could've did what I suggested on 01:54:242 -

02:04:367 (2,3) - Pls change the clap sound on the sliderend is so bad ><

02:30:805 - Offset problems apply to this part as well,consider it well

03:00:805 - Tbh,this part NEEDS to have more impact onto the player. This is one of the most beautiful/impactful parts of the song with the music being so tense and Garnidelia's voice giving everyone orgasms, but it doesn't feel so overwhelming when theres so many gaps. When players wait for the next note,it's often too late to make it feel powerful anymore. I rather you fill up the gaps with jumps or sliders,I suggest doing something like what I did looking at it from 03:02:305 - ,with the note at the top left being 03:00:805 (1) - , http://puu.sh/tO40s/cc48169fd3.jpg . Be more creative,and do what you need to do for the next few parts if you do agree with me.

03:10:930 (3,4) - Distance them further because 4 has a finish sound and sounds a lot more powerful than the notes before,it needs to be emphasized.

03:12:180 - 03:12:305 - Should have notes because there are drums here played in 1/6, and add a 1/4 slider here 03:12:430 - in order to sync up with the vocals once again,fits really well tbh

03:18:054 (6) - Should be a 1/3 reverse slider considering you want to map to the vocals mostly.

03:20:867 - Add a note here in order for the transition from 1/1 to 1/2 to be smoother. With a note,people will know that the next part would be different rather than expecting another slider + 1/1 gap

03:23:305 (5) - I prefer you go into 1/8 snap divisor and make this a 5/8 slider, to emphasize the vocals as it feels like a held note,and that garnidelia's voice is being stretched there,so there wouldn't be any harm in doing so,it also helps to emphasize the next jump part because 1/1 gaps before giant jumps r gey ;x

03:30:055 - I rather the rhythm be like this in 1/6 : http://puu.sh/tO4tQ/a24ead0b45.jpg because it emphasizes the background 1/6 sounds better,and ignoring those makes the player really uneasy.

03:36:055 - I rather the rhythm be like this in 1/6 : http://puu.sh/tO4Ep/0be838b92b.jpg . Ignore the random spinner placement, but the rhythm change is because the music is somewhat 'rising' in tune and ignoring that kind of kills the experience imo ;/

03:48:242 (5) - This note is unnecessarry imo, you're mapping PURELY to the vocals here,anything overmapped just to cover the rhythm shouldn't be placed to further emphasize the lone vocals.

03:59:680 - From here I'd rather the rhythm be : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7232736 because there are sounds in the gap that could've been mapped,leaving so many gaps even though there are sounds is rly annoying for the players cuz they wanna click but they cant ;x

04:12:430 (1) - the back and front are unaligned ._.

04:18:805 - I rather this part be filled with 1/6 or 1/3 sliders to fit the drums in the background, the drums here are purposely off from the vocals,which makes mapping to the vocals really weird tbh, and after you do so,make 04:20:305 - a note(if it is already a note then nvm) and 04:20:492 - a 1/4 slider

04:43:742 (6) - This isn't necessarry,I think you can just add jumps like how you did in previous parts because that plays the double clap better

04:49:555 (4) - Same for this ^

05:11:305 (5) - Missing NC wutttt

05:38:492 - y no stop spinner here :9

rhythm choice is a bit weird tbh,considering the drum sounds land on sliderends are several occasions,and I feel that the structure could be improved DS-wise because there are some irregularities where the clap notes have the same DS as other notes,or even lesser,which I personally feel is fine,but not for other players who want jumps to emphasize the claps etc.

01:00:055 - Add hitsounds to this part IF Shira makes the changes
01:12:242 (2) - dis clap was rly weird ;x up to you to change it

_Meep_ wrote:

To get you to bubbled
dank mod my meep

General

Overall hitsound volumes seem too high in parts that aren't in the chorus,resulting in the chorus not sounding as impactful tbh, and things like in the starting,where 60% volume is used straight off the bat even thougn there are barely any sounds to be heard? It feels too loud imo.

Connection
Shira

00:10:930 (3,4,5) - I feel that 4,5 are too close to 3 for a few reasons,one being that this a different sound being played compared to every single other sound from the start to this point,and secondly,because it is a different sound,it may be hard to predict/know that its a doubletap,because you've been using sliders to express those doubletap sounds in the beginning 00:00:430 (1,6,5) - , so it may be wise to do the same here for 4,5 so they don't get confused/easier transition. its fine imo since it can have a smooth transition to the next section where the song picks up a bit

00:28:367 (2,3) - Blanket nicer pls urmigurdhttp://puu.sh/tO1S1/8f4fc211b2.jpg

00:37:180 - I messed up my melody here again because there was a sound,yet it wasn't clickable,tbh I feel that you should make these transitions clearer,because in the earlier part you've been mapping to the piano all along,with the vocals that is. But now a new set of sounds come in and the player wouldn't know whether to click them or not, I suggest you make 00:36:805 (1) - a 1/2 slider since it helps cover the gap in timing. vocals for this part is obviously more important than the instruments owo. the note starts when the vocals do so to make it easier to read, its a stack so players can look at the ar and click

00:39:055 (7) - Suggest placing this at 414 118 to support the clap sound,also,no reason for 5,6,7 to have less DS than 00:39:430 (8,9,1) - right?... o-o its fine imo xD

00:49:180 (2,3) - Not the same *triggered* its fine if u dont change tho ;/

01:00:055 (5,6) - Change this to http://puu.sh/tO2uh/694255caf5.jpg so it fits the drums

01:01:930 (3) - Recommend you stop the slider over 01:02:305 - because theres a sound/tune change here 01:02:305 - vocals

01:06:805 - tbh I feel that 81 bpm fits this part better,bcuz nah its fine, i think its just the hitsounds. if you take the claps off they sound fine
1.The drum sounds are the main sounds here,not the wavy sounds, so I think changing to 81 bpm JUST for this part is fine. Then reset the bpm here 01:09:805 -
2. and yes,the drum sounds ARE off by a few ms.

some offset problems 01:10:555 (2) - dis is late by ~15ms
01:10:930 (1,2) - late by 20ms
01:11:492 (1,2) - Same ^

01:24:805 (1,2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7232475 fuk u sux at double blanketing ._. XD

01:26:680 (5) - Better to rotate this by 45 degrees,the flow here would be much smoother than curving straight away select the whole pattern, tis triangle

01:37:742 - Sound here,i recommend you put some slider or note to cover it up following the wrong sound D:

01:40:930 (4) - Recommend extending this to 01:41:492 - to express the long flute sound a lot better since the next section is more notebased, i want there to be a better transition so players can read it properly

01:50:492 (5,6) - Ctrl+G rhythm? sounds a lot better imo 01:50:867 (6,7) - i want these 2 to be clickable

01:54:242 - make a 1/2 slider instead? Seems better imo and fits the background sound. violin

01:56:492 (5,6) - Same,ctrl+G rhythm?

01:54:055 - Why empty you could've did what I suggested on 01:54:242 - wat its not empty

02:04:367 (2,3) - Pls change the clap sound on the sliderend is so bad >< vocals ><

02:30:805 - Offset problems apply to this part as well,consider it well

03:00:805 - Tbh,this part NEEDS to have more impact onto the player. This is one of the most beautiful/impactful parts of the song with the music being so tense and Garnidelia's voice giving everyone orgasms, but it doesn't feel so overwhelming when theres so many gaps. When players wait for the next note,it's often too late to make it feel powerful anymore. I rather you fill up the gaps with jumps or sliders,I suggest doing something like what I did looking at it from 03:02:305 - ,with the note at the top left being 03:00:805 (1) - , http://puu.sh/tO40s/cc48169fd3.jpg . Be more creative,and do what you need to do for the next few parts if you do agree with me. no.. since the violin is the main sound here i want to emphasize it more. plus the lyrics in this part appear for the "singer" to be at a lost state so i try to make it more simple by mapping it like this

03:10:930 (3,4) - Distance them further because 4 has a finish sound and sounds a lot more powerful than the notes before,it needs to be emphasized.

03:12:180 - 03:12:305 - Should have notes because there are drums here played in 1/6, and add a 1/4 slider here 03:12:430 - in order to sync up with the vocals once again,fits really well tbh i think itll be harder to read like that so ill keep with mine

03:18:054 (6) - Should be a 1/3 reverse slider considering you want to map to the vocals mostly. no since the "ru" should be clickable

03:20:867 - Add a note here in order for the transition from 1/1 to 1/2 to be smoother. With a note,people will know that the next part would be different rather than expecting another slider + 1/1 gap vocals

03:23:305 (5) - I prefer you go into 1/8 snap divisor and make this a 5/8 slider, to emphasize the vocals as it feels like a held note,and that garnidelia's voice is being stretched there,so there wouldn't be any harm in doing so,it also helps to emphasize the next jump part because 1/1 gaps before giant jumps r gey ;x note here is to prep the players for the jumps ;x

03:30:055 - I rather the rhythm be like this in 1/6 : http://puu.sh/tO4tQ/a24ead0b45.jpg because it emphasizes the background 1/6 sounds better,and ignoring those makes the player really uneasy. jumps are cool too

03:36:055 - I rather the rhythm be like this in 1/6 : http://puu.sh/tO4Ep/0be838b92b.jpg . Ignore the random spinner placement, but the rhythm change is because the music is somewhat 'rising' in tune and ignoring that kind of kills the experience imo ;/ jumps are cool too. spacing shows the rising tune as well

03:48:242 (5) - This note is unnecessarry imo, you're mapping PURELY to the vocals here,anything overmapped just to cover the rhythm shouldn't be placed to further emphasize the lone vocals.

03:59:680 - From here I'd rather the rhythm be : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7232736 because there are sounds in the gap that could've been mapped,leaving so many gaps even though there are sounds is rly annoying for the players cuz they wanna click but they cant ;x vocal emphasis for "hi-ka-ri"

04:12:430 (1) - the back and front are unaligned ._.

04:18:805 - I rather this part be filled with 1/6 or 1/3 sliders to fit the drums in the background, the drums here are purposely off from the vocals,which makes mapping to the vocals really weird tbh, and after you do so,make 04:20:305 - a note(if it is already a note then nvm) and 04:20:492 - a 1/4 slider

04:43:742 (6) - This isn't necessarry,I think you can just add jumps like how you did in previous parts because that plays the double clap better too many jumps xD

04:49:555 (4) - Same for this ^

05:11:305 (5) - Missing NC wutttt

05:38:492 - y no stop spinner here :9 its where sound ends imo xD

rhythm choice is a bit weird tbh,considering the drum sounds land on sliderends are several occasions,and I feel that the structure could be improved DS-wise because there are some irregularities where the clap notes have the same DS as other notes,or even lesser,which I personally feel is fine,but not for other players who want jumps to emphasize the claps etc.

TC

01:00:055 - Add hitsounds to this part IF Shira makes the changes
01:12:242 (2) - dis clap was rly weird ;x up to you to change it

thats my mod ;3 i'll come back when u fix everythin

Hokichi wrote:

Ok let me see how should I mod this
Also, no kudos please thanks. I can shoot you one later (when I finally get 1, and it doesn't seem like you would need one)

[General]
Unused hitsounds: (Check if these are used please)
soft-hitclap21.wav
soft-sliderslide12.wav
soft-sliderslide21.wav
soft-sliderslide22.wav
soft-sliderslide3.wav

Hitsounds with delay:
soft-hitclap8.wav
soft-hitfinish10.wav

04:32:305 - Basically there are 2 timing points here so you can just delete 1 of them

[Connection]
00:01:555 (2,1) - Try to improve the blanket? Like lower the 3rd node a little bit to the bottom-right corner
00:13:555 (2,1) - Same
00:15:430 (4,1) - Same zzz
00:16:930 (1,2) - zzz Please pay more attention to blankets. They need love too <3
00:22:930 (1) - Teach me to slider art
02:45:805 (1) - Ctrl + G would make a better flow for emphasis~
03:42:055 (1,2) - Maybe just 2 1/2 circles since the music is soft. And use smaller hs volume please zzz rhythm is fine imo since beautiful vocals
03:45:055 (4,5) - Same ~
03:54:711 - Are you sure you wanna miss this sound? yea i dont really want to use doubles and triples often
03:56:680 - And this? ~
04:18:805 (2) - This hs isn't necessary imo i think its fine for the drum but idk
04:43:555 (4,1) - Stack
04:46:930 (5,1) - Same
04:51:430 (1,3) - You can either stack or overlap more clearly

1 down, 1 to go
Gosh rank this already

1. 00:23:680 - the slider tick snare at this point of time should really be at 00:24:055 - because that's where the snaredrums in the music is.
2. 00:46:930 (4) - cymbals at this point is kinda harsh for such soft music. I highly suggest either finding a softer cymbal crash to match the vibe of the music or not having a finish here at all.
3. 01:05:305 (3,4) - too intense for a relatively calm part of the song. Also, I don't think the music supports this density of rhythm as there are only 1/2 held vocals at this point and nothing on the 1/4 ticks.
4. 01:13:367 (2,3,4,1) - I reaallly don't think these static back-forth patterns are fitting for these parts. The backforth between two spots prevents using spacing to emphasise different sounds in the music, which imo should be present when the drum snare is so much more 'intense' than the vocals. Circle 2 is spaced 'correctly' but circle 4 isn't with spacing similar to the snare despite being a relatively weaker vocal. These happen a lot throughout the choruses so I won't be pointing out each one but I do see this as a slightly clumsy way to represent the music.
5. 01:24:055 (4,5,6,7) - perhaps incorporate an increase in spacing in circle 6,7 to go along with the buildup in the music to the next kiai part. would represent the music buildup better imo.
6. 01:42:055 (4) - space this circle out more because of the snare? you tend to do that as evident at 01:39:055 (4) - , 01:45:055 (4) - .
7. 01:46:367 (3) - overmapped circle. Nothing on this tick to support this circle.
8. 01:52:555 (3) - ctrl+g this slider? you tend to use wider angle patterns at this part and the flow angle here is pretty constricted in comparison.
9. 01:55:930 (1,2) - perhaps you are missing whistles on the slider end and tail as you have used them at previously similar spots like 01:49:930 (1,2) - .
10. 02:06:055 (4) - strong vocal, this circle should really be spaced more over 02:06:242 (5) - .
11. 03:36:992 (1) - default whistle at the end of this spinner sounds very out of place. perhaps a custom one will better accommodate the piano.
12. 04:03:242 (5,6,7) - the broken DS between these circles is kinda messy. A solution to this without distorting the current placements too much would be to move 04:03:242 (5,1) - together a bit more upper left to equalize DS between the mentioned circles.
13. 05:09:430 (1,2,3) - the current pattern hints towards a sound being repeated 3 times but that is not the case here as the only sound that is repeated is the drums on 1 an 3. I suggest readjusting the pattern here to reflect this better as it may help represent the music better.

Rizen wrote:

hi from NM ticket

General (Issues present!)

1. Timing: good
2. Metadata: taken from metadata server: so you should probably adjust the source field to the one in the picture.
3. Skinning: n/a
4. Storyboard: n/a
5. Files: good
6. Hitsounds: along with the ones Hokichi has named, there's also soft-hitfinish7.wav and soft-hitwhistle9.wav that have a delay. tried to fix but didnt seem like there is a delay based on audacity
7. Tags: perhaps add "ガルニデリア" to the tags (japanese for the band name)

Connection

1. 01:05:305 (3,4) - too intense for a relatively calm part of the song. Also, I don't think the music supports this density of rhythm as there are only 1/2 held vocals at this point and nothing on the 1/4 ticks.
2. 01:13:367 (2,3,4,1) - I reaallly don't think these static back-forth patterns are fitting for these parts. The backforth between two spots prevents using spacing to emphasise different sounds in the music, which imo should be present when the drum snare is so much more 'intense' than the vocals. Circle 2 is spaced 'correctly' but circle 4 isn't with spacing similar to the snare despite being a relatively weaker vocal. These happen a lot throughout the choruses so I won't be pointing out each one but I do see this as a slightly clumsy way to represent the music. idk i think its just based on personal preference.. the whole map is kinda based on the back and forth patterns.
3. 01:24:055 (4,5,6,7) - perhaps incorporate an increase in spacing in circle 6,7 to go along with the buildup in the music to the next kiai part. would represent the music buildup better imo.
4. 01:42:055 (4) - space this circle out more because of the snare? you tend to do that as evident at 01:39:055 (4) - , 01:45:055 (4) - .
5. 01:46:367 (3) - overmapped circle. Nothing on this tick to support this circle.
6. 01:52:555 (3) - ctrl+g this slider? you tend to use wider angle patterns at this part and the flow angle here is pretty constricted in comparison.
7. 02:06:055 (4) - strong vocal, this circle should really be spaced more over 02:06:242 (5) - .
8. 04:03:242 (5,6,7) - the broken DS between these circles is kinda messy. A solution to this without distorting the current placements too much would be to move 04:03:242 (5,1) - together a bit more upper left to equalize DS between the mentioned circles.
9. 05:09:430 (1,2,3) - the current pattern hints towards a sound being repeated 3 times but that is not the case here as the only sound that is repeated is the drums on 1 an 3. I suggest readjusting the pattern here to reflect this better as it may help represent the music better. vocals

good luck!

p.s. it doesn't look like you applied hokichi's mod since the unused hitsound files and delays are still there from their mod. those issues, along with the overlapping duplicate timing points are unrankable issues so I encourage you to make you have applied their mod correctly. idk its updated with hokis mod applied for me

1. 00:23:680 - the slider tick snare at this point of time should really be at 00:24:055 - because that's where the snaredrums in the music is.
2. 00:46:930 (4) - cymbals at this point is kinda harsh for such soft music. I highly suggest either finding a softer cymbal crash to match the vibe of the music or not having a finish here at all.
3. 01:55:930 (1,2) - perhaps you are missing whistles on the slider end and tail as you have used them at previously similar spots like 01:49:930 (1,2) - .
4. 03:36:992 (1) - default whistle at the end of this spinner sounds very out of place. perhaps a custom one will better accommodate the piano.

Shiratoi wrote:

hs stuff idk how to do

1. 00:23:680 - the slider tick snare at this point of time should really be at 00:24:055 - because that's where the snaredrums in the music is. Ye
2. 00:46:930 (4) - cymbals at this point is kinda harsh for such soft music. I highly suggest either finding a softer cymbal crash to match the vibe of the music or not having a finish here at all. Forgot to add a sample for this whoops
3. 01:55:930 (1,2) - perhaps you are missing whistles on the slider end and tail as you have used them at previously similar spots like 01:49:930 (1,2) - .I changed it a bit to not follow the guitar parts but to stick soley to drums
4. 03:36:992 (1) - default whistle at the end of this spinner sounds very out of place. perhaps a custom one will better accommodate the piano.Wrong sampleset whoops

Rizen wrote:

@Shiratoi, don't forget to open the "General (Issues present!)" box, there are metadata and hitsound issues listed there

ninfia wrote:

hey there! i'm relatively new to modding, so i'm trying to take the liberty on myself by giving out free to mods to further improve my mapping abilities. you can take the suggestions i make with either a grain of salt or take 'em to heart; i don't care! but i hope at least one of my suggestions eventually help you carry out ranking this mapset.

00:13:555 (2,1,2) - i'd say work on the aesthetics a little bit more here. i can see you're attempting to go for a blanket, but there are some visible imperfections with what you're attempting. that's only an aesthetic flaw though, everything in terms of technicality is fine!

00:22:930 (1) - very pretty!

00:37:930 (1) - i'd say to distance this note a little bit further away from the previous note. pay careful attention to the music, there's a pretty large spectrum of emphasis on this red tick without any notable formations of spacing to back it up. maybe you can add something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9812037
to emphasize piano note here. mm i think the little flow change is fine especially for such a calm part

00:39:805 (3) - the same here! ~

00:40:930 (1) - and same here? i guess there's a theme here. i'll stop linking these particular issues in spacing since it's totally up to your discrepancy how you want to interpolate the rhythm. ~

00:46:930 (4,1) - blanket issues

00:49:180 (1,2,3) - some spacing issues - the third slider should be further away than the distance between note 1 and 2.

01:18:805 (1) - rotate this slider 1 or 2 degrees either direction.

02:16:930 (1) - this note should be a little further away to emphasize the music. same reason

with the logic that there's a triple here: 02:36:617 (4,5,1), then there should also be triples here: 02:40:742 (4,1), 02:43:742 (4,1), 02:45:430 (5,1), 02:48:617 (7,1), 02:51:617 (7,1), 02:54:617 (6,1), 02:57:430 (6,1), 02:58:555 (3,1). it'd take a bit of work, but triples can add an almost exponential amount of much needed emphasis on a vital piece of the music. it's up to you though! kinda want to differentiate between kiais but ill see for more opinions~

03:06:805 (1) - add clap hitsound

03:24:805 (1,2) - work on blankets here

03:36:805 (1) - this is just a suggestion but if you want this note to stand out more, (given it's a different combo color), try changing up the flow just a little bit here and adding something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9812169. up to you though! adjusted

04:03:055 (4,5,6,7) - this feels a little weird since this is the only instance of a pattern like this in the map. eh i think its better like this for vocals

04:20:305 (1,2) - this should just be one slider drum beat

i see no issues with the ending segment.

overall, the map is pretty good! good luck getting it ranked~

1. 00:30:805 (1,1) - It would be more representative of the song, if you place the slider head of this slider: 00:31:367 (1) - on this circle 00:30:805 (1) - cause the piano sound and the voice are both strong, and match well together.
   
   
2. 00:40:367 (4,5) - Try to CTRL+G those two objects, since the sound here: 00:40:742 - is pretty strong and really deserve to be clickable. Also, by making this, you'll change the gameplay of this part to make it more smooth, and less dense in terms of click for the player.
   
   
3. 00:54:805 (4) - This slider should be changed into something different, cause that's not a good idea to make this sound 00:55:180 - unclickable. Why? Cause there is a strong vocal here (that is why you mostly focus for your rhythm choice), and also a string sound. That's quite unfortunate to let this beat unclickable in my opinion. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
4. 01:12:055 (1,2) - Considering that those two beats are pretty strong, and that they're starting the new kiai, why not making them more spaced? The same things apply to this 02:36:055 (1,2) - since they're both covering the same sound.
   
   
5. 01:35:117 (1) - Ending a spinner like you did here sounds not really good in my opinion. You based your spinner on the voice of the singer, so you should end it when the voice is ending, and it ends here 01:36:430 - // It will also allow you to make this beat 01:36:805 - clickable, things that will improve the gameplay of this part.
   
   
6. 02:06:055 (4) - Don't you think that it would be better to add an NC out there? Cause the voice is changing a lot here, so it's not really appropriate to keep it in the same combo with the previous part.
   
   
7. 02:59:867 (2) - I don't understand why you gave such spacing on a circle that is placed on a sound that is barely audible. It's better to give more attention on a beat that is strong like this 03:00:055 (3) - instead of a beat placed on a blue tick that is almost inaudible. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
8. 03:05:305 (1) - Map this slider with two circles instead, like those previous patterns, since they're all based on the same sound.
   
   
9. 03:23:305 (1,2,3) - It particularly disturbed me while playing it, cause since they all use the same combo color, it's difficult to notice if the 03:23:867 (3) - is before 03:23:680 (2) - or after. So I think you should start the NC here 03:23:680 (1) - instead, to avoid misleading problems.
   
   
10. 03:24:805 (1) - I really enjoy this sparkle sound, and it's a nice hitsound selection, but would you like to reduce a bit the sound of the hitsound? My only issue here is that it's still pretty loud, and it can be pretty distabilizing if this cover others hitsounds. I tried to put it at 35% and it's pretty nice. It goes same for this hitsound 04:08:305 - !
    
    
11. 03:56:680 - Since there is another instruments that play in the background, you can't map it the same way as this 03:42:805 (1) -, otherwise it would "harm" the emphasis of the song in terms of density. That's why you can't leave this 03:56:680 - empty while there is quite a string sound here that deserves to be mapped.
    
    
12. 04:30:430 (1,2) - The velocity of those sliders out there are strongly different, so to avoid bothering the player, I highly suggest you to use two different NC here, and starting the combo here 04:31:930 - instead of here 04:32:305 - since the vocals come back on the first 1/4 slider, so that would be weird to keep it teamed with a slider that has a different sound.

Pachiru wrote:

Here is my mod, I'll do my best to help you!

Sounds like you're having two hitsounds with a +5ms delay. Those hitsounds are "soft-hitfinish7.wav" & "soft-hitwhistle9.wav". To be sure, please recheck those hitsounds, it's important! took a look at it in audacity and it seemed fine but ill double check it with someone to make sure https://puu.sh/yNSqD/2fc2f4860e.png

1. 00:30:805 (1,1) - It would be more representative of the song, if you place the slider head of this slider: 00:31:367 (1) - on this circle 00:30:805 (1) - cause the piano sound and the voice are both strong, and match well together. flipped this slider as well 00:28:930 (5) -
   
   
2. 00:40:367 (4,5) - Try to CTRL+G those two objects, since the sound here: 00:40:742 - is pretty strong and really deserve to be clickable. Also, by making this, you'll change the gameplay of this part to make it more smooth, and less dense in terms of click for the player. 00:40:555 - mm i want to prioritize this beat more making claps clickable
   
   
3. 00:54:805 (4) - This slider should be changed into something different, cause that's not a good idea to make this sound 00:55:180 - unclickable. Why? Cause there is a strong vocal here (that is why you mostly focus for your rhythm choice), and also a string sound. That's quite unfortunate to let this beat unclickable in my opinion. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
4. 01:12:055 (1,2) - Considering that those two beats are pretty strong, and that they're starting the new kiai, why not making them more spaced? The same things apply to this 02:36:055 (1,2) - since they're both covering the same sound. i want the players to build momentum by going into small spacing to emphasize the kiai even more
   
   
5. 01:35:117 (1) - Ending a spinner like you did here sounds not really good in my opinion. You based your spinner on the voice of the singer, so you should end it when the voice is ending, and it ends here 01:36:430 - // It will also allow you to make this beat 01:36:805 - clickable, things that will improve the gameplay of this part.
   
   
6. 02:06:055 (4) - Don't you think that it would be better to add an NC out there? Cause the voice is changing a lot here, so it's not really appropriate to keep it in the same combo with the previous part.
   
   
7. 02:59:867 (2) - I don't understand why you gave such spacing on a circle that is placed on a sound that is barely audible. It's better to give more attention on a beat that is strong like this 03:00:055 (3) - instead of a beat placed on a blue tick that is almost inaudible. Here is my suggestion.
   
   
8. 03:05:305 (1) - Map this slider with two circles instead, like those previous patterns, since they're all based on the same sound.
   
   
9. 03:23:305 (1,2,3) - It particularly disturbed me while playing it, cause since they all use the same combo color, it's difficult to notice if the 03:23:867 (3) - is before 03:23:680 (2) - or after. So I think you should start the NC here 03:23:680 (1) - instead, to avoid misleading problems.
   
   
10. 03:56:680 - Since there is another instruments that play in the background, you can't map it the same way as this 03:42:805 (1) -, otherwise it would "harm" the emphasis of the song in terms of density. That's why you can't leave this 03:56:680 - empty while there is quite a string sound here that deserves to be mapped.
    
    
11. 04:30:430 (1,2) - The velocity of those sliders out there are strongly different, so to avoid bothering the player, I highly suggest you to use two different NC here, and starting the combo here 04:31:930 - instead of here 04:32:305 - since the vocals come back on the first 1/4 slider, so that would be weird to keep it teamed with a slider that has a different sound.

Okay so I'm done with the mod, now let me tell you that the map is very nice, the way how you played with the sliders and stacks is very nice. You really did good with your ideas on this rework! I'm glad to see how it improved! Don't give up!

1. 03:24:805 (1) - I really enjoy this sparkle sound, and it's a nice hitsound selection, but would you like to reduce a bit the sound of the hitsound? My only issue here is that it's still pretty loud, and it can be pretty distabilizing if this cover others hitsounds. I tried to put it at 35% and it's pretty nice. It goes same for this hitsound 04:08:305 - !

Bibbity Bill wrote:

here's the mod you asked for

[Connection]
01:29:492 (2) - personally, i feel the spacing is a bit too big and i would make it 1.5x, if you don't want to change it you could atleast make it a bit more even on the spacing
01:48:430 (5,1) - why no triple here or a 1/6th repeat slider dont want to complex the rhythm
02:12:805 (1) - same as earlier, why ignore the guitar and not emphasize it atleast in some way ~
03:00:055 (3) - why not rotate this at a bit sharper angle or line up with 4
03:36:617 (6,1) - could make this a triple
03:36:992 (1) - why the whistle? for the piano im assuming but idk
03:50:680 - why not a note or slider or something to emphasize this sound? i want the rhythm to be simple in this calm section
03:55:555 (3) - also why not make this into a 1/6 repeat or a triple ~
04:00:430 (4) - why not rotate this a bit so you can make a triangle out of 03:59:680 (2,3) - blanket & overlaps
04:01:555 (3) - same as earlier, could 1/6 slider or triple ~

hopefully it was helpful and not too nitpicky and opinionated, good luck on ranking

Time Capsule wrote:

want me to check?

Chekito wrote:

sorry but I wont use formating
m4m

00:00:430 - At the very beginning you are forced (by the editor) to put NC on the first slider, maybe you could add it on the next similar sliders (As 00:03:430 (4) - 00:06:430 (4) - 00:09:430 (4) - ) to keep the consistency
00:12:430 (2,3) - Have you tried doing Ctrl+G on this? It'd play better imo 1/2 would be harder to read imo
00:16:930 (1) - Please your blankets make me feel like i'm watching at Mir's mapsets kya
00:22:930 (1) - yeah i love u too thanks mr.mirai
00:36:055 (2) - Stack with 00:34:367 (2) - ? (or stack the slider to the circle better)
01:01:930 (4) - This would play better as a slider imo, it feels like the space between this and the next note doesn't really fit the feeling of "The song is becoming intense!"
01:09:805 - For this small part you could do something like this http://puu.sh/yPsbu/37b91c7ade.osu (sorry i had to do it like this because i can't really explain it). Don't mind the placements, but I wanted to show you that you could do a jump at the first two circles then stack the third circle at the end of the first jump and repeat the process. It would really fit the feeling of the song in that moment and I think you will also agree that
01:13:742 (4) - You could move this behind the followpoint, because right now, the placement of that circle reflects the position of the next note (whose is suposed to be below 01:13:555 (3) - ) So you're not really reflecting it correctly imo, so you could just move it to x444 y:130 ... at least give it a try yea i get what youre saying but i kind of want the quieter parts to play horizontally while the louder drums play vertically plus i like the stacks with the sliders and such..
01:34:555 (3) - you could make this straight lol it feels kinda weird while playing since its going to nowhere nope want to keep it parallel to 01:12:805 (1) -
01:42:055 (4) - I know this is stacked with a previous circle, but the spacing is way bigger than the previous similar one 01:38:680 (3,4) - (this is 2,85x spacing and the previous is 2,65x) i think its fine since its not really that noticeable in game
01:43:555 (3) - Yes, after a lot of thinking and testing, I concluded that doing Ctrl+J on this slider would fit a lot better than the current one, because it will fit both flows (01:43:930 (1) - as a flow break and 01:43:367 (2) - as a fluid flow) no i want to break the flow here to emphasize the drum like i did here 01:44:680 (3) -
01:45:805 (1,2) - I mean it's the slowest and calmest part that i've heard on the song, and you used way TOO MUCH MORE spacing than the other parts (even considering the difference of time between notes it's still too high)
It just doesn't make sense at all
01:52:367 (2,3) - Normal spacing vs 01:57:430 (5,6) - Big spacing on similar parts lol why... you also used a way lower spacing on the same similar part 02:03:430 (5,6) -
02:33:805 - same than before nah variety
02:48:055 (4) - NC for vocals and emphasis? unexpected big jump lol
02:55:555 (3) - woahh try doing Ctrl+G on this, I mean you lose a bit of spacing but it plays hella good LOL gotta keep da emphasis
02:58:930 (1) - pls add a curve at the end of this slider, I assure you that It will be a lot better b-but 02:57:805 (1) -
03:03:430 - Undermapped lol why only focusing on violin here
03:06:430 (2) - This feels like a single circle more than a slider yea
03:09:430 - BabyRage noo
03:36:055 (3,4,5,6) - Why did you map it 1/4? That's clearly 1/3 lol u caught me
03:39:805 - Tell me im not the only hearing a non-hitsounded whistle here piano ig
04:03:242 (5) - NC for emphasis would difference both patterns a lot and that would look better
last kiai is weird to play but it looks ok
04:38:680 - You should add small kiais (like 1 sec kiais) on specific parts of this whole section since it has the feeling and intensity of a kiai, but you can't put a whole kiai on this cuz that would be a lot. Then you could just use 1 sec kiais, to represent the most intense parts of this section (just in case you don't know but you can give it the brightness and stars effect from a kiai just with 1 second) dont wanaaaaa
05:09:430 (1,2,3) - I don't really think these three are from the same rhythm, I mean, they doesn't really seem to be fitting being all in the same pattern and position vocals


done, sorry for the wall, but most of them are shitty suggestions

1. I think 'Bond' would be a more impactful name lol
2. 00:10:930 (1) - Tbh this looks kinda ugly, maybe make a less snaky curve
3. For these kind of sliders that end on nothing, it'd be better if you silence their ends off with 5% vol.
4. 01:06:805 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The build-up is pretty weak here, try to use succesively increased spacing or slider velocity here for a much better effect.
   The same goes for 02:30:805 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 04:03:805 (1,2,3) -
5. 01:46:555 (2) - Delete the finisher on the first note.
6. 01:48:430 (2) - Actually 1/4 slider would be better here for the bass.
7. 03:03:430 - Would be better to put a 1/4 slider in here too to bring some variety into this section. Then do the same at 03:09:430 - for consistency.
8. 03:21:617 (5,1) - That's a pretty weak jump, would increase it.
9. 03:36:055 (3) - NC for 1/6 rhythms.
10. 03:42:055 (1,2) - 03:45:055 (4,5) - 03:48:055 (4,5) - 03:51:055 (4,5) - Instead of 1/4 sliders that unnecessarily increase note density here and are overmapped due to sliderends, it'd be better if you switch these off with 1/2 sliders.
11. 03:54:430 (5) - Delete finisher on this start.
12. 04:20:305 (1,2) - This antijump feels pretty out of place because a) it can be easily misread as 1/4 and b) it doesn't occur anywhere else in the map, making it a strange single case. Something like this works well:
    https://puu.sh/yX5n4/d7f8c14615.jpg
13. 04:36:430 (3) - That finisher is a bit premature, better delete it and put it on the next spinner instead.
14. 05:13:554 (4,5,6) - First off, there are no 1/8 beats that the 5-slider is following. Second, you could easily make this more special with 1/6 beats that are present in the background.
15. Consider making your combos longer by setting your NCs after each measure (4 white ticks) instead of how you do it right now - it's kinda spammy.