1. Joker (5,76 stars, 1393 notes)

Sakurauchi Riko wrote:

hi, m4m thing sup

marathon
ar9.4 maximum for this sr and speed is more appropriate imo It was actually 9.4 before, but I raised it later on after almost everyone testplaying it was telling me to raise it up
00:02:367 (5,6) - 00:03:568 (1,2) - both of the are automatically stacked but very different rhythm, this is confusing for the player Changed that
In general i think the intro could have some spacing emphasis for important sounds, for example 00:01:834 (4) - 00:04:229 (1) - 00:05:049 (3) - the sliderheads of these have more important sounds, so you can add a little bit more spacing towards them
00:06:924 (1) - a very noisy and loud sound is on the sliderend (red tick) that should be clickable instead I agree
00:14:734 (2,3,1) - 00:15:488 (3,4) - again here, you have autostacked 2 differend kind of rhythm which is really confusing. maybe you can autostack the 1/4 rhythm and overlap the 1/2 just like https://puu.sh/ycDuF/3846e6a72f.png . 00:22:300 (7,1,2) - here you have another different kind of rhythm autostacked, i really suggest you to stick to one rhythm for autostack Seems fine to me tho
00:37:613 (1,2,1) - this is very VERY intense and noisy but you spaced it like the other parts before that. i tihnk spacing this out would be closer to the music in terms of intensity Sure
00:49:613 (2,3,1,2) - same thing here, especially for the two sliders Yeah, good point
01:00:238 (1,2,3,1) - i'd make https://puu.sh/ycDFF/c11bf4389b.png , since 01:00:613 (1) - isnt part of the other sliders in the music (it represents a different sound) i think it shouldnt be in the same group. currently you treat it like everythign in that oattern is the same (same overlaps) but the longer slider represents a different sound Yeah
01:03:113 (1,2) - you already know I do XD
02:34:738 (1,2,3) - i suggest to arrange these similar to 00:46:738 (1,2,3) - , you never do this kind of stuff Done!

okay, thats it! sorry if its a bit disappointing mod modding in general is really not my strength It was fine, thanks!
Best of Luck!

Rin Desu wrote:

heyhey here are my suggestion for your map!


00:01:035 (2) - this is actually later in timing like around here 00:01:064 - i know there is a sound before but you time on a specific instrument and that is later. timing should be predictable in this multibpm case.

this one is to late 00:03:678 (2) - try this : 00:03:660 - maybe even some more ms you have to try the exact value on your own.

00:03:678 (2) - sliderend is such an intense sound and should be clickable not a passiv sliderend

this one 00:04:781 (2) - is much more early you should fix this asap 00:03:678 (2) -
00:05:049 (3) - to late too 00:05:038 -

00:07:164 (2) - again this sliderend is so intense should be clickable
00:09:586 (3) - there is no sound but a circle?

00:09:853 (4) - timing a bit late and should be a circle on sliderend and slider delete

00:12:015 (1) - this doesnt seems right maybe time all 3 as a new offsets

00:29:113 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - imo the last 3 sounds are more intense and should be spaced not the first 3

01:04:363 (1,4) - caused by the low velo this stacking on slidertail locks messy. cause hitcircles got that little unclean overlap 01:06:613 (1,2,3) - , so ye i suggest you change the velo to 0,9 or avoid stacks on slidertails in this section

02:00:613 (1,2,3) - ye stacking makes this kinda bad. move more up and left to fix this stack same for this 01:59:863 (1,2,3) - the stack 02:00:613 (1,2,3) - and 4 5 6 should build a square

02:33:613 (1,2,3,4,1) - this flow is questionable

02:42:238 (3) - stack on 6 before

02:44:113 (1,2,3,4) - 4 and the stack are to close looks messy move them a bit apart

03:01:363 (1,2,3) - better 5 circles cause of the strong snare hits

04:47:278 (1) - timing point is to early try 04:47:302 -

04:50:456 (1) - is to late

04:52:289 (1) - should be two circles

04:54:324 - why you are ignore this sound here?

04:56:373 (3) - to early 04:56:416 -

05:01:091 (1) - idk about this shape. it doesnt look well and doesnt support the music. or you just put a "?" cause you dont know a better shape ? since im bad at shapes myself i cant give you any other option that would be better ;(

ye when you fixed timing call me again if you want

have a nice day!

( ill give you my map later cause it isnt rdy yet would be nice if you mod the two highest diffs later)

Kobold84 wrote:

00:15:613 (4,5,6) - вот эту штуку очень неудобно играть из-за того, что флоу идёт изначально слева-направо, но в итоге приходится вводить вверх-вниз. Решается 00:15:863 (5) - ctrl+g здесь. Оставлю это как есть, не нравится мне тут что-то менять.
00:23:363 (6,7,1) - я бы сделал равномерный спейсинг здесь, так как в музыке уже с ноты-6 начинается нарастание. Равномерный спейсинг в сторону увеличения, я имею в виду, чтобы 6-7 было таким же, как 7-1. Хорошая идея.
00:28:363 (1,2) - не вижу смысла тут стакать их по музыке, если только не 2 под слайдер-3 запихать. Согласен.
00:31:363 (4,1) - здесь слышу 1/4 тройку. Не слышу :с
00:31:488 (1,2) - как по мне, их следует сделать не простыми нотами, а 1/4 слайдерами, чтобы показать момент в музыке резко прерывающийся, плюс чтобы они отличались от 00:31:988 (3) - Попробую.
00:32:613 (3,4,5,6,1,2) - жестоко. Но красиво. Ага)
00:33:988 (2,3,4) - маленький же спейсинг слишком, 00:34:238 (4,1) - вот тут музыка не отличается от того, что было раньше, а такой огромный прыжок приходится делать. Исправил.
00:35:113 (1,2) - ctrl+g, возможно? Я по крайней мере два раза при игре тянулся невольно к тому, чтобы начать паттерн с ноты-2, в итоге промахиваясь. И ведь играть так удобнее, по-моему. Да, так будет лучше.
00:49:613 (2,3) - андермаппинг же, тут точно нужно 1/2 четыре ноты. Нет, тут будет два слайдера :в
00:56:363 (2,3,4,5) - может быть, это будет слишком, но я уверен, что тут возрастает темп в музыке, из-за чего стоит увеличить спейсинг во второй половине паттерна. Мне больше всего понравился такой вариант: https://i.imgur.com/fQwA9hU.png Я попробовал сам поексперементировать.
01:00:550 - явно пропустил 1/4 тут, но опять же, чтобы добавить туда что-то, придётся паттерн полностью переворачивать. Не слышу 1\4
01:17:488 (1,2,3) - ну это тут лишнее, слишком вычурно для такого обычного ритма здесь. Прислушайся)
01:24:238 (1,2,3) - то же самое.
01:45:613 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g для каждого? Но это такое, просто играть удобнее с этой стороны немного. По идее да, будет лучше.
02:03:613 (1,2,3) - выглядит небрежно и не совсем под такт музыке. Конкретно тут я уверен, что стакнуть ноту-2 и 3 было бы лучшим решением. Не знаю, правда, куда запихнуть ноту-1 тогда. Вот так, к примеру: https://i.imgur.com/5kfk9B0.png Оставлю как есть, мне вот тут как раз все подходит.
02:28:738 (2,3,4) - а тут-то чего стакнуто 2-3, если до этого всё было не так, в то время как музыка не поменялась совсем. Все, поправил.
04:52:289 (1) - слышу реверс-слайдер! Не слышу, но пусть будет по твоему, если что потом удалю.

neonat wrote:

Some opinions here

Do not put the album as the source

00:09:853 (4) - doesn't quite end with the guitar, also the second sound after, unmapped to?
00:18:113 (2,3,4,5) - with those claps entering here, would think it would be more frenzied with the map
00:35:738 (4,1) - I would suggest unstacking it, let it continue to move
00:37:113 (1,2,3) - rather than continuous movement in one direction, back and forth with the tune of the song
00:57:488 (4) - would be better if this was placed higher, the movement of 00:57:113 (2,3,4) - is currently not that well transitioned, it causes more awkwardness than it should
01:33:988 (2,3,4,1) - the movement breaks at 01:34:363 (1) - and it is very forced right now, it does not move well
02:10:363 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think those guitar doublets should be emphasized here rather than the drums, they are the main point in this section
02:31:488 - 02:31:738 - I feel these pauses in the song should be emphasized, so that would mean that 02:31:613 should be empty to have that gap to feel the stop in the music
03:01:363 (1,3) - would stacked circles or something emphasize this part of the song better? Those strong drum beats that go along with it as it starts building up
03:54:613 (1) - because this stands alone while the rest 03:54:863 (2,3,4) - stands in a line, it sets it apart from the rest of it's section, but 03:54:613 (1,2,3,4) - is a continuous decreasing pitch. Could you make the pattern such that it could show that decreasing pitch together?
04:25:863 (3) - can you make it curve more towards the right, also it doesn't stack nicely to 04:25:363 (1,3) -
04:34:988 (6,1) - 04:35:863 (1) - 04:36:613 (1) - 04:37:363 (1) - they have the claps, they are the strongest emphasis in this portion of the song, would like to see more distinction for them, something like spacing could help

There's a part in the song that usually occurs before the kiai, it happens multiple times, I picked one to show the example of what I felt about that section
02:38:988 - the peak of the tone is here, as well at 02:39:738 and 02:40:488 - should swap the positions of the slider and circle so that the slider starts on the red line - 02:38:863 (1,2) - 02:39:613 (1,2) - as for 02:40:363 (1,2,3,4) - circle at 02:40:363 and triplets at 02:40:488 so the slider starts at 02:40:613


Good Luck

1. 00:29:113 (1,2) - would be great if you increased the spacing here instead of 00:29:613 (1,2) - since guitar's melody is actually fading out
2. 00:34:863 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - also inconsistent with 00:28:863 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - maybe consider to make 'em same nc settings and stuff
3. 01:29:113 (1,2,3,4) - it's really weird to see with such small spacing while instrument got really intense here, i suggest you to making something 2x larger than 01:28:738 (1,2,3) - in spacing, some on 03:03:613 (1,2,3,4) -
4. 04:39:550 (4) - maybe move somewhere around 57|80 for more noticeable 1/4 rhythm from 04:39:363 (3) -
5. 05:09:695 - there's still weak string sound btw, maybe mappable lol

Akitoshi wrote:

eh im late

i'll drop only some quick opinion, (im p busy atm sorry)

1. 00:29:113 (1,2) - would be great if you increased the spacing here instead of 00:29:613 (1,2) - since guitar's melody is actually fading out But there are drums there ;v
2. 00:34:863 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - also inconsistent with 00:28:863 (4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - maybe consider to make 'em same nc settings and stuff It fits actually
3. 01:29:113 (1,2,3,4) - it's really weird to see with such small spacing while instrument got really intense here, i suggest you to making something 2x larger than 01:28:738 (1,2,3) - in spacing, some on 03:03:613 (1,2,3,4) - Yeah, good idea
4. 04:39:550 (4) - maybe move somewhere around 57|80 for more noticeable 1/4 rhythm from 04:39:363 (3) - It is noticeable tho
5. 05:09:695 - there's still weak string sound btw, maybe mappable lol nah, the map is over already ;x

no kds if useless Ty)

13:16 [[Pika]]: uhhh metadata
13:16 [[Pika]]: artist: Donquixote Doflamingo (Hideyuki Tanaka)
13:17 [[Pika]]: kanji title: 新時代のサーガ
13:17 [[Pika]]: romaji title: 
13:17 [[Pika]]: shit where did it go
13:17 [[Pika]]: Shinjidai no Saga
13:18 CircleChu: Am I really supposed to write "Donquixote Doflamingo" as an artist? :O
13:18 [[Pika]]: i do think Lo
13:19 [[Pika]]: http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/product/EYCA-10254?s_ssid=e31d225a19c2263aa5 
13:19 [[Pika]]: ye look at artist Lol
13:20 [[Pika]]: :^)
13:21 CircleChu: And also ONE PIECE capitalized, right?
13:22 [[Pika]]: ye
13:23 [[Pika]]: leme go cash in kd--- wait they useless now
13:23 [[Pika]]: fuk