The OD Setting is very unreasonable in my opinion. Your previous Yearmix 2015 has a similar BPM (175 vs 176) and that one only has OD8. Given that 2016 is obviously much harder than 2015, I think OD9 would be more than enough. 10 is simply too high and won't do any good to your playcount (and rating) cuz it's a marathon and nobody wants to miss in the middle or get a very bad accuracy.
ORDER BY MapperName ASC
cbd
28:06:308 (4,5) - hoyl this spacing is too bigg
28:07:501 (3) - i feel this is better with 2 circles, 28:07:671 - basically is loud
28:23:864 (3) - 28:32:046 (3) - same
Cheese
13:15:342 - this is a downbeat tbh so better make it clickable. consider using the same rhythm in 13:14:661 (4,1,2,3,4) - as 13:09:206 (5,1,2,3,4) -
13:40:911 (1,2) - need more aesthetics
14:04:604 (3,1) - probably reduce spacing a bit? its a bit surprised to me when im playing, not expecting such a big ds lol
DahplA
14:23:354 (2,3) - i recommend you to reduce spacing here, the sound is not as intense as 14:24:036 (6,7) - tbh
14:27:274 (1) - see no reason to extend slider when 14:27:445 - is much more obvious than 3/4
14:35:797 (2,3) - very misleading spacing without any notice or sign. This is kind of bad at the middle of a marathon... maybe you can do some other patterns, or ctrl+G 14:36:308 (3) - but then you have to adjust spacings later on
14:38:524 (2,3) - same, consider 14:43:979 (2,3) - is good
14:46:706 (2,3) - 14:50:456 (1,2) - no
hmm after considering that you're doing such pattern consistently in your part, maybe NC the second slider at all places so players would expect sth different? the 1/2 really looks like 1/4 imo
marv
27:15:853 (1) - why NC
nasobol
15:38:609 (3) - no sound to support your 1/4
15:39:206 (7,2) - need blanket here
15:39:547 (1,3) - the flow is kinda bad because of 15:39:888 (3) - curve. Try adjust the curve so the triangle flows naturally
15:41:252 (1,1) - why NC? they belong to one part.
15:42:274 (1,2) - it would be better if you try with the same slider shape. Just because its better in aesthetics lol
15:47:047 (4) - this is ugly, since you dont need the red anchor here.
15:47:388 (1,3) - space them as you did before for the equilibrium tri
15:53:524 (4) - same as mentioned above
16:01:706 (1) - not sure why you use this reverse cuz the strong beats were on 16:01:877 - 16:02:047 -
16:01:365 (6,1) - 16:03:070 (1,1,3,1) - etc please redo the NC here, it looks so messy. I dont know your undergoing logic lol
16:04:433 (1) - same.
16:08:183 (1,3) - aesthetics
16:10:740 - actually make a triple here, its quite obvious
16:11:422 (3,4) - judgin by the song you should swap the thyrhm
16:12:274 - it is clickable
16:13:638 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - more aesthetics please. The circles seem too random and they dont look good
16:19:092 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - alright i will take this as an example...so basically you are not mapping to the beats. We know that the drum is more intense at 16:19:092 (1,3,6,7) - than the others, so its more reasonable to emphasis them better. Not just mapping 8 circles with a shape being very random and casual.
So basically idk why you keep using the reverse slider like 16:18:070 (3) - , they are weird af. And aesthetics definitely need more improvement. Especially compare it with other collab parts. This needs to be reworked, im not so satisfied with its quality atm.
Neilperry
05:36:479 (4) - for consistency this should be converted to 2 circles
niyuji
02:45:683 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - honestly i dont think spaced 1/4 stream is cool here, because 1/4s are kind of vague and whats more, it feels too sudden to do a spaced movement when the other notes are just reverse sliders. Of course, it's fine if u keep this but from gameplay aspect it's better to nerf a little xD
02:53:524 (1,1) - maybe reduce distance a bit, and 02:54:036 (2,3,4) - is too spaced when music is very still
03:15:854 (1,2,3,4) - would be good if you make a linear stream, just move 03:15:854 (1) -
Secretpipe
03:32:388 (3,1) - blanket
03:41:252 (1,2) - looks bad tbh
03:43:297 (3,4,5,1) - need blanket
03:41:933 (3,4,5,1,2) - the flow is a pain here tbh
Obviously needs more aesthetics
21:16:877 (3,4,5) - spacing is confusing
21:18:752 (5,5) - etc for these kind of sliders as the sound is similar try to use the same length
21:22:502 (5,6) - maybe separate them? its a strong beat, so you can put 21:22:672 (6) - somewhere like 463|336 etc
22:13:297 (7,1) - maybe not such a small overlap, feels weird
22:17:388 (5,1) - the reverse arrow is fully covered and their duration is so low.
22:16:365 (1) - should be 1/2?
22:20:286 (5) - NC
22:26:933 (6,7) - wow sudden spacing boost
22:27:786 (3) - the reverse here does not fit music
Strategas
01:02:899 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I really think it's a bad idea to use such stream at the beginning of the song when the music is not so intense. In fact you used a much more friendly and small spaced stream 01:24:547 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - when the drums are actually more intense. It would really nice if you reduce ds a bit here.
01:04:092 (9,1,2,1,2,1) - judging from music the NC should be on 01:04:092 - 01:04:433 - 01:04:774 - so 01:04:092 (9,1) - 01:04:433 (2,1) - 01:04:774 (2,1,2,3,4) - are the three groups. Therefore 01:04:433 (2,1) - the spacing is very unreasonable, 01:04:774 (2) - should be emphasised instead.
01:13:127 (5,6,7) - 01:32:558 (7,1) - sudden spacing?? They are kinda unexpected
01:34:263 (2,3,4) - dont expect a triplet cuz there's no 1/4 sound?
01:36:990 (2) - same here
09:01:621 (2) - not sure if you need it here. Your other rhythms just ignore this
09:19:604 (2) - why not use a triplet
11:20:627 (1,1,1,2,1,2,1,1) - 11:25:911 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - etc. I didn't get the NC spam in this section
11:39:206 (1) - i dont think this is necessary to NC, or swap with 11:39:717 (1) - as you did later on
16:49:092 (1) - why nc when you didnt in other places
17:12:615 (1,1) - not sure if its fine to block the reverse arrow
17:48:922 -17:59:661 (3) - 18:05:115 (4) - i think ending slider at 1/2 is better, and add a circle at 3/4
23:17:067 (5) - wtf ASPIRE??? sooo confusing same for others?? not sure if its k especially for total reverse like 23:29:340 (1) -
Should be all. milan and pishi god mappers
ORDER BY MapperName ASC
cbd
28:06:308 (4,5) - hoyl this spacing is too bigg
28:07:501 (3) - i feel this is better with 2 circles, 28:07:671 - basically is loud
28:23:864 (3) - 28:32:046 (3) - same
Cheese
13:15:342 - this is a downbeat tbh so better make it clickable. consider using the same rhythm in 13:14:661 (4,1,2,3,4) - as 13:09:206 (5,1,2,3,4) -
13:40:911 (1,2) - need more aesthetics
14:04:604 (3,1) - probably reduce spacing a bit? its a bit surprised to me when im playing, not expecting such a big ds lol
DahplA
14:23:354 (2,3) - i recommend you to reduce spacing here, the sound is not as intense as 14:24:036 (6,7) - tbh
14:27:274 (1) - see no reason to extend slider when 14:27:445 - is much more obvious than 3/4
14:35:797 (2,3) - very misleading spacing without any notice or sign. This is kind of bad at the middle of a marathon... maybe you can do some other patterns, or ctrl+G 14:36:308 (3) - but then you have to adjust spacings later on
14:38:524 (2,3) - same, consider 14:43:979 (2,3) - is good
14:46:706 (2,3) - 14:50:456 (1,2) - no
hmm after considering that you're doing such pattern consistently in your part, maybe NC the second slider at all places so players would expect sth different? the 1/2 really looks like 1/4 imo
marv
27:15:853 (1) - why NC
nasobol
15:38:609 (3) - no sound to support your 1/4
15:39:206 (7,2) - need blanket here
15:39:547 (1,3) - the flow is kinda bad because of 15:39:888 (3) - curve. Try adjust the curve so the triangle flows naturally
15:41:252 (1,1) - why NC? they belong to one part.
15:42:274 (1,2) - it would be better if you try with the same slider shape. Just because its better in aesthetics lol
15:47:047 (4) - this is ugly, since you dont need the red anchor here.
15:47:388 (1,3) - space them as you did before for the equilibrium tri
15:53:524 (4) - same as mentioned above
16:01:706 (1) - not sure why you use this reverse cuz the strong beats were on 16:01:877 - 16:02:047 -
16:01:365 (6,1) - 16:03:070 (1,1,3,1) - etc please redo the NC here, it looks so messy. I dont know your undergoing logic lol
16:04:433 (1) - same.
16:08:183 (1,3) - aesthetics
16:10:740 - actually make a triple here, its quite obvious
16:11:422 (3,4) - judgin by the song you should swap the thyrhm
16:12:274 - it is clickable
16:13:638 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - more aesthetics please. The circles seem too random and they dont look good
16:19:092 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - alright i will take this as an example...so basically you are not mapping to the beats. We know that the drum is more intense at 16:19:092 (1,3,6,7) - than the others, so its more reasonable to emphasis them better. Not just mapping 8 circles with a shape being very random and casual.
So basically idk why you keep using the reverse slider like 16:18:070 (3) - , they are weird af. And aesthetics definitely need more improvement. Especially compare it with other collab parts. This needs to be reworked, im not so satisfied with its quality atm.
Neilperry
05:36:479 (4) - for consistency this should be converted to 2 circles
niyuji
02:45:683 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - honestly i dont think spaced 1/4 stream is cool here, because 1/4s are kind of vague and whats more, it feels too sudden to do a spaced movement when the other notes are just reverse sliders. Of course, it's fine if u keep this but from gameplay aspect it's better to nerf a little xD
02:53:524 (1,1) - maybe reduce distance a bit, and 02:54:036 (2,3,4) - is too spaced when music is very still
03:15:854 (1,2,3,4) - would be good if you make a linear stream, just move 03:15:854 (1) -
Secretpipe
03:32:388 (3,1) - blanket
03:41:252 (1,2) - looks bad tbh
03:43:297 (3,4,5,1) - need blanket
03:41:933 (3,4,5,1,2) - the flow is a pain here tbh
Obviously needs more aesthetics
21:16:877 (3,4,5) - spacing is confusing
21:18:752 (5,5) - etc for these kind of sliders as the sound is similar try to use the same length
21:22:502 (5,6) - maybe separate them? its a strong beat, so you can put 21:22:672 (6) - somewhere like 463|336 etc
22:13:297 (7,1) - maybe not such a small overlap, feels weird
22:17:388 (5,1) - the reverse arrow is fully covered and their duration is so low.
22:16:365 (1) - should be 1/2?
22:20:286 (5) - NC
22:26:933 (6,7) - wow sudden spacing boost
22:27:786 (3) - the reverse here does not fit music
Strategas
01:02:899 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I really think it's a bad idea to use such stream at the beginning of the song when the music is not so intense. In fact you used a much more friendly and small spaced stream 01:24:547 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - when the drums are actually more intense. It would really nice if you reduce ds a bit here.
01:04:092 (9,1,2,1,2,1) - judging from music the NC should be on 01:04:092 - 01:04:433 - 01:04:774 - so 01:04:092 (9,1) - 01:04:433 (2,1) - 01:04:774 (2,1,2,3,4) - are the three groups. Therefore 01:04:433 (2,1) - the spacing is very unreasonable, 01:04:774 (2) - should be emphasised instead.
01:13:127 (5,6,7) - 01:32:558 (7,1) - sudden spacing?? They are kinda unexpected
01:34:263 (2,3,4) - dont expect a triplet cuz there's no 1/4 sound?
01:36:990 (2) - same here
09:01:621 (2) - not sure if you need it here. Your other rhythms just ignore this
09:19:604 (2) - why not use a triplet
11:20:627 (1,1,1,2,1,2,1,1) - 11:25:911 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - etc. I didn't get the NC spam in this section
11:39:206 (1) - i dont think this is necessary to NC, or swap with 11:39:717 (1) - as you did later on
16:49:092 (1) - why nc when you didnt in other places
17:12:615 (1,1) - not sure if its fine to block the reverse arrow
17:48:922 -17:59:661 (3) - 18:05:115 (4) - i think ending slider at 1/2 is better, and add a circle at 3/4
23:17:067 (5) - wtf ASPIRE??? sooo confusing same for others?? not sure if its k especially for total reverse like 23:29:340 (1) -
Should be all. milan and pishi god mappers