ts8zs's mod
ts8zs wrote:
破月
[ONI]
00:16:704 (2) - k,why K? or 00:20:286 (2) - K? Decided to remove both finishes at 00:23:868 - and 00:16:704 -, as suggested by few modders
00:47:599 (2) - mov to 00:47:487 - ? Possible, but I'd prefer following background music at 00:47:375 (1,2,1,2,1) - instead
01:16:256 (4) - d See response to 01:16:032 - below v
01:20:510 (1,2,3) - kkd https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8612612 Unchanged since I want to follow vocal at 01:20:286 (2,1,2) -
02:03:495 (1,2) - ^ ^
01:44:689 (1,2,1,2,1,1) - kkkddk See response to 00:47:599 - above ^. Current setup fits the pitch variants best imo
01:48:383 (1) - k to keep same to 01:48:271 - But background music suggests otherwise, with significant pitch drop between the 2 notes
01:59:241 (4) - d v
02:13:457 (3) - d v
01:16:032 (2,3,4) - same to 02:13:345 (2,3,4) - Prefer kkk because they have the same level of vocal pitch
02:17:935 - k and 02:18:047 - d See my response to 01:20:510 - above
[MUZ]
01:04:614 (1,2,1) - dkk? Keeping unchanged due to vocal consideration
01:11:554 (1) - k ^, similar reasons. Consider falling pitch at 01:11:107 (1,1) -
01:12:002 (1) - del & 01:12:226 - d It feels really weird to have such gap imo...
02:09:316 (2) - 02:09:092 - I think current pattern fits the background music closer
02:14:017 - d Possible but then I'll have to do the same for later similar parts. Would that be too dense?
[FUT]
00:48:942 (1) - d Unchanged because of vocal consideration at 00:48:942 (1,1,1)
00:52:525 (1) - k ^, 00:52:525 (1,1,1)
01:09:763 - slider starts here? Changed, seems fine to me?
01:11:554 - ^,本家似乎不这么摆? ^
01:48:495 (1) - k Again, pitch consideration at 01:47:599 (1,1,1)
[KAT]
fine!
Thx for your mod