Maxylan wrote:

Thanks for applying to my queue!

The mod

00:33:276 (1) - 00:49:176 (5) - This is an original idea, I think it's cool but at the same time I don't think ONLY circles can do the song justice on this part. There's a lot of sounds that can be emphasized in different ways here so it's a little sad thank you and i will look into it if i can add some more stuff to it because i do agree with you on that
01:01:776 (6,7,8) - Why stop emphasizing sounds here? You did it a second before with the sliders.
04:15:714 (4) - This screams combo breaker because of the frequent repeat in combination with the very small time window to move to the next slider.
04:16:014 (5) - Same as above. yes i know of this problem and im search for a solution for it, still dont know any so suggestions are welcome
01:32:113 (1,2,3) - These three breaks flow unbelievably harsh because of the speed of the slider and the direction it's facing, the angle is too wide. (i probably missed a ton more instances like this but I skimmed through the map twice and really it's so quick with so many different notes that it's damn near impossible to find more!) agreed fixed
00:13:950 (7,8) - This is a weird jump to make mmh should be fine imo, a part before it does it like this aswell
04:28:764 (5) - This is a little slow velocity on a slider that comes after a burst/stream, it's almost inevitable to slider break. agreed

TL:DR A very, very! Cool map. The only real problem I have with it is the single tap circle parts but I think it's very much optional if you want those change. Personal opinion is that they don't do the song justice. Thank you very much! i will look into it if i can add some more to it

• My Love
  00:04:200 (4) - imo this slider could look better
  00:09:600 (6,7,8,9) - rearrange this to smth like http://prntscr.com/g5kneu looks better imo, could so something similar in next patterns (which are not really.. patterns? xD)
  aesthetics at 00:27:726 (4,5,6,7,10) - could be improved, like this for example http://prntscr.com/g5ks7l
  00:12:150 (6) - Don't like how this plays after that stream, either make this into 2 circles or put the slider at the end of the stream like http://prntscr.com/g5ko3x
  00:16:626 (2,3) - kind don't like the flow of this because 00:16:626 (2) - shape, yeah, kickslider plays as circles but this is kinda weird tho
  00:19:176 (3) - why not make this a stream? this reverse is kinda meh, while playing you expect more a stream than this + would make more sense with 00:19:776 (5,6,7,8) - since both have same sound
  00:23:376 (4) - this should be a circle, I don't hear anything at 00:23:451 - to be filled with the kickslders, would play better if it was a single circle
  00:28:476 (8,9,10) - spacing between these should be equal because the have the same sound
  00:29:826 (4,5) - too much spacing, compare it to 00:28:476 (8,9) - as an example, why is the spacing at 00:29:676 (3,4) - MORE than the other part? if the sounds at 00:29:676 (3,4) - are not as strong/loud than the others? kinda doesn't make sense
  00:30:276 (6,7,8,9) - same here, why are these jumps so big if the sound on them are quiet
  00:37:326 (5,1,2) - spacing here is reaaally confusing, 00:37:326 (5,1) - this looks like 1/4 because the change of spacing (shorther then the rest), imo this whole slow section is lack of consistency on spacing which makes it hard to read, mostly when you use kicksliders
  00:37:926 (4,6) - any reason why these have more spacing? I kinda understand why you used more on 00:37:926 (4) - since it has a different sound, but the rest are like the same, 00:38:376 (7,8,9) - pitch goes higher on these 3 but I don't see any change in spacing
  00:39:876 (3,4) - same, confusing spacing, ok, I can see you overlap them when it's 1/1, but this is still confusing, maybe play with NC's to make it better
  00:41:076 (8,9) - here for example, try to ignore sliderbody and overlap is as it was a single circle, that would help it
  00:50:376 (5,6) - should have more spacing
  01:16:476 (3,4,5) - maybe make them reverses? I see you take care of small things before but not this time, why?
  01:18:726 (4,5,6) - reason behind overlaps on 1/1 being confusing it's because of this 01:18:726 (4,5,6) - spacing it's the same as 1/1
  01:23:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hand made stream? kinda looks ugly (maybe this is intentional?)
  01:25:776 (1,2) - why is spacing here too short? break consistency with 01:24:726 (2,2) - also, the sound on 01:25:926 (2) - it's stronger/louder than 01:24:726 (2,2) - so why is it spacing less than the others? doesn't make sense to me
  01:32:526 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - awkward flow, peoeple will play this trying to snap every double, and it being wide angle, makes it awkward to play
  01:33:201 (9,6,2) - spacing on these doesn't make sense, 01:33:051 (8,9) - and 01:33:726 (5,6) - has different spacing, feels like too random, but then 01:34:176 (1,2) - spacing it's shorter when it's beat it's louder
  01:36:726 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - and now here the spacing and smh flow keeps the same as everything before, but the song it's quite more intense at 01:36:726 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - visuals and spacing it's the same, even tho the song changes a lot :l
  01:34:176 (1,2,3) - 01:38:376 (1,2,3) - both parts sounds the same, but they play different, you used linear spacing on 01:38:376 (1,2) - which you also used in 01:37:251 (10,11) - 01:33:051 (8,9) - etc... but the sound at 01:38:376 (1,2) - its not the same, which should be mapped differently, the flow it's different at 01:34:176 (1,2) - but then you used linear... also spacing it's different, try to keep consistency as using the same kind of flow and spacing for the same kind of sounds but make it different in different sections of the song, that would help the player to difference sections between each rythm
  01:43:626 (10,1,2) - try to make these equal on spacing, 01:43:776 (1,3) - are reverses, but remember they plays as single circles, in this case just move 01:43:776 (1) -
  01:49:176 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this looks exactly the same as 01:50:451 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - but both sounds are quite different, this again doesn't make sense to me, if the song changes, map should change too in order to reflect those differences, but... everything looks like the same at this point (from 01:32:376 - )
  01:56:451 (1,2,3,4,5) - feels undermapped tbh
  02:06:613 (4,5,10,11) - any reason of stacking these? and no stacking 02:08:713 (4,5) - 02:09:613 (10,11) - ??? stacking them again on 02:10:813 (4,5) - but not on 02:11:713 (10,11) - break consistency
  02:20:215 (10,12) - this is confusing since both slidershapes looks like the same but they have different timing, one it's 1/2 and the other it´s 1/4, so.. when playing you might think that the second one it's also 1/2 + there's thay "WOOO" on 02:20:440 (11,12) - so why mapping it the same way?
  02:43:315 (4) - should be a single circle, breaks consistency. eg you used kickslider on 02:43:315 (4) - but also on 02:44:515 (6) - but both sounds r quite different
  02:44:365 (5,6,7) - awkward flow too, take care of that, and... if you used such awkward flow to emphasize certain sound, try to make it consistent, 02:45:415 (5,6,7) - again here you have the same thing with a better flow and.. without a kickslider 02:45:565 (6) -
  02:49:915 (9,10,1) - shouldn't these have more spacing ? just like you did on 02:47:665 (7,8,9,10,1) -
  02:52:165 (1,3) - shouldn't be stacked, the song doesn't do that back and forth thing, 02:52:165 (1,3) - beats are different, in this case I recommend smth like.. stack 02:52:165 (1,2) - instead because both have same sound
  03:04:165 (4,5) - take care of this, is not... 1/6? wait.. is this.. 1/12 or smth? it sounds like 1/4 to me.. and according to aimod, there's something messed up there http://prntscr.com/g5ljj9
  03:24:499 (9,1) - this spacing looks more like 1/6 than 1/4 which ruins the change of spacing on 03:24:874 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - to make it looks like 1/6
  03:59:814 (4,5) - maybe nc on 04:00:114 (5) - to make the difference on rythm? this being 1/1 but looks like 1/2
  04:15:114 (1,2,3,4,5) - all these have toooo much spacing considering their timing
  04:22:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same shape used on 1/4 streams, less spacing doesn't really help it to make it looks like 1/6 since you have a lot of spacing variety on 1/4..
  04:24:714 (2,3,4) - awkward flow
  04:25:014 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why all this plays the same, you should increase spacing by each pattern just like song does, increase it's intensity
  04:28:764 (5) - http://prntscr.com/g5lmle could blank better
  some streams in the last section could look and play better, this for example 04:56:373 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5) - looks terrible, imo.. it fits the song in some way but idk, are the streams ugly on purpose?
  also try to take care of aesthetics of the map, try to use similar patterns for similar parts of the song being different for different parts, but same in where music is the same, the map looks messy, but I hope this mod helps with that
  GL

Itasha_S13 wrote:

o/ m4m Hello!
oh god the formatting

My Love
00:04:200 (4) - imo this slider could look better changed it
00:09:600 (6,7,8,9) - rearrange this to smth like http://prntscr.com/g5kneu looks better imo, could so something similar in next patterns (which are not really.. patterns? xD) yea they could look a bit better, arranged (kinda?) them like how you showed
aesthetics at 00:27:726 (4,5,6,7,10) - could be improved, like this for example http://prntscr.com/g5ks7l improved them
00:12:150 (6) - Don't like how this plays after that stream, either make this into 2 circles or put the slider at the end of the stream like http://prntscr.com/g5ko3x the slider at the end doesnt fit, but i made it into 2 circles
00:16:626 (2,3) - kind don't like the flow of this because 00:16:626 (2) - shape, yeah, kickslider plays as circles but this is kinda weird tho agreed changed
00:19:176 (3) - why not make this a stream? this reverse is kinda meh, while playing you expect more a stream than this + would make more sense with 00:19:776 (5,6,7,8) - since both have same sound changed
00:23:376 (4) - this should be a circle, I don't hear anything at 00:23:451 - to be filled with the kickslders, would play better if it was a single circle ye
00:28:476 (8,9,10) - spacing between these should be equal because the have the same sound changed
00:29:826 (4,5) - too much spacing, compare it to 00:28:476 (8,9) - as an example, why is the spacing at 00:29:676 (3,4) - MORE than the other part? if the sounds at 00:29:676 (3,4) - are not as strong/loud than the others? kinda doesn't make sense agreed fixed the spacing
00:30:276 (6,7,8,9) - same here, why are these jumps so big if the sound on them are quiet fixed aswell
00:37:326 (5,1,2) - spacing here is reaaally confusing, 00:37:326 (5,1) - this looks like 1/4 because the change of spacing (shorther then the rest), imo this whole slow section is lack of consistency on spacing which makes it hard to read, mostly when you use kicksliders the beginning of this already shows what the spacing is like, 1/1 = overlap, 1/2 = non overlap, 00:36:726 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is louder than the others which is why the spacing is bigger, after that is done the spacing i used goes back to normal, this is used throughout this section so i dont know why it would be confusing and this section is mostly consistent on spacing with the louder sounds being emphasized with bigger spacing and kicksliders
00:37:926 (4,6) - any reason why these have more spacing? I kinda understand why you used more on 00:37:926 (4) - since it has a different sound, but the rest are like the same, 00:38:376 (7,8,9) - pitch goes higher on these 3 but I don't see any change in spacing (6) does have a different sound similar to (4) i did add a little more spacing to (7,8,9)
00:39:876 (3,4) - same, confusing spacing, ok, I can see you overlap them when it's 1/1, but this is still confusing, maybe play with NC's to make it better again these are introduced in the beginning of this section
00:41:076 (8,9) - here for example, try to ignore sliderbody and overlap is as it was a single circle, that would help it would break the patterning and spacing, this way it would make it inconsistent in spacing instead of consistent which is what we are aiming for
00:50:376 (5,6) - should have more spacing ye agreed because of the stream
01:16:476 (3,4,5) - maybe make them reverses? I see you take care of small things before but not this time, why? i dont really know what you mean by this but these are just normal 1/2 jumps
01:18:726 (4,5,6) - reason behind overlaps on 1/1 being confusing it's because of this 01:18:726 (4,5,6) - spacing it's the same as 1/1 i dont really agree with this, yes the spacing is almost identical to the 1/1's but the players ability to read the difference should help him/her to understand the difference
01:23:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hand made stream? kinda looks ugly (maybe this is intentional?) made it (i hope) a bit nicer
01:25:776 (1,2) - why is spacing here too short? break consistency with 01:24:726 (2,2) - also, the sound on 01:25:926 (2) - it's stronger/louder than 01:24:726 (2,2) - so why is it spacing less than the others? doesn't make sense to me changed
01:32:526 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - awkward flow, peoeple will play this trying to snap every double, and it being wide angle, makes it awkward to play this is fine by me
01:33:201 (9,6,2) - spacing on these doesn't make sense, 01:33:051 (8,9) - and 01:33:726 (5,6) - has different spacing, feels like too random, but then 01:34:176 (1,2) - spacing it's shorter when it's beat it's louder 01:33:051 (8,9) - and 01:33:726 (5,6) - almost has no difference in spacing other than some pixels and for 01:34:176 (1,2) - spacing isnt everything
01:36:726 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - and now here the spacing and smh flow keeps the same as everything before, but the song it's quite more intense at 01:36:726 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - visuals and spacing it's the same, even tho the song changes a lot :l but the song doesnt change a lot here? its almost identical to the previous doubles section
01:34:176 (1,2,3) - 01:38:376 (1,2,3) - both parts sounds the same, but they play different, you used linear spacing on 01:38:376 (1,2) - which you also used in 01:37:251 (10,11) - 01:33:051 (8,9) - etc... but the sound at 01:38:376 (1,2) - its not the same, which should be mapped differently, the flow it's different at 01:34:176 (1,2) - but then you used linear... also spacing it's different, try to keep consistency as using the same kind of flow and spacing for the same kind of sounds but make it different in different sections of the song, that would help the player to difference sections between each rythm made them the same way
01:43:626 (10,1,2) - try to make these equal on spacing, 01:43:776 (1,3) - are reverses, but remember they plays as single circles, in this case just move 01:43:776 (1) - changed
01:49:176 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this looks exactly the same as 01:50:451 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - but both sounds are quite different, this again doesn't make sense to me, if the song changes, map should change too in order to reflect those differences, but... everything looks like the same at this point (from 01:32:376 - ) they may look the same but they are mapped differently, just remember this song has a lot of different sounds if im going to emphasize,
change, map etc. every one of those changes the map is going to be a mess of ideas, just because they are doubles doesnt mean they are the same thing,
these 2 are mapped differently
01:56:451 (1,2,3,4,5) - feels undermapped tbh changed
02:06:613 (4,5,10,11) - any reason of stacking these? and no stacking 02:08:713 (4,5) - 02:09:613 (10,11) - ??? stacking them again on 02:10:813 (4,5) - but not on 02:11:713 (10,11) - break consistency changed
02:20:215 (10,12) - this is confusing since both slidershapes looks like the same but they have different timing, one it's 1/2 and the other it´s 1/4, so.. when playing you might think that the second one it's also 1/2 + there's thay "WOOO" on 02:20:440 (11,12) - so why mapping it the same way? im not focusing on that sound and it shouldnt be that much of a problem
02:43:315 (4) - should be a single circle, breaks consistency. eg you used kickslider on 02:43:315 (4) - but also on 02:44:515 (6) - but both sounds r quite different changed
02:44:365 (5,6,7) - awkward flow too, take care of that, and... if you used such awkward flow to emphasize certain sound, try to make it consistent, 02:45:415 (5,6,7) - again here you have the same thing with a better flow and.. without a kickslider 02:45:565 (6) - i cant really see how this is awkward flow?
02:49:915 (9,10,1) - shouldn't these have more spacing ? just like you did on 02:47:665 (7,8,9,10,1) - changed
02:52:165 (1,3) - shouldn't be stacked, the song doesn't do that back and forth thing, 02:52:165 (1,3) - beats are different, in this case I recommend smth like.. stack 02:52:165 (1,2) - instead because both have same sound changed
03:04:165 (4,5) - take care of this, is not... 1/6? wait.. is this.. 1/12 or smth? it sounds like 1/4 to me.. and according to aimod, there's something messed up there http://prntscr.com/g5ljj9 looks like something got messed up with the previous timing fix, changed them
03:24:499 (9,1) - this spacing looks more like 1/6 than 1/4 which ruins the change of spacing on 03:24:874 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - to make it looks like 1/6 ye changed
03:59:814 (4,5) - maybe nc on 04:00:114 (5) - to make the difference on rythm? this being 1/1 but looks like 1/2 changed
04:15:114 (1,2,3,4,5) - all these have toooo much spacing considering their timing agreed
04:22:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same shape used on 1/4 streams, less spacing doesn't really help it to make it looks like 1/6 since you have a lot of spacing variety on 1/4.. should be fine imo
04:24:714 (2,3,4) - awkward flow changed
04:25:014 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why all this plays the same, you should increase spacing by each pattern just like song does, increase it's intensity ye was thinking of doing that
04:28:764 (5) - http://prntscr.com/g5lmle could blank better this doesnt look much different to me?
some streams in the last section could look and play better, this for example 04:56:373 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5) - looks terrible, imo.. it fits the song in some way but idk, are the streams ugly on purpose? changed that one
GL
[/box]
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/615414 < my map <

Uraomote Error wrote:

hi M4M4M4M4M

[My Love]
00:00:000 (1,2,3,4) - Why don't you try this? ye i like that changed

SPOILER

00:04:200 (4) - Why not NC? changed
01:46:326 (5,6,7) - try to make these slider symmetrical like this: (6) has a different sound which is why its a different slider, did make it look a bit better

SPOILER

02:19:315 (3,4,5) - ^ same here (4) has a different sound

SPOILER

04:33:564 (2) Another ugly slider body. Try this: changed

SPOILER

OK. That's it.

GL~~~

mindmaster107 wrote:

Here from M4M
My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/647724

The map is way to complex for me to judge, but I will talk about it's flaws and examples of how to fix this.

Regardless of what visual style you go for, you do need one. A map needs to be cleanly structured, even if that structure is ugly (Look at HW maps, and A-L-I-E-N). A good way of explaining this, is be ugly consistently. Understand what you are making and keep it consistent. This will improve reading on the map as a whole. (I know that you are trying to make it hard to read, but do this with complex rhythm patterns and clever overlaps, not confusion and inconsistency.)
03:15:274 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - This part does this perfectly. Contrasting with the well mapped section before it, it shows off the change in the music, while still being consistent in itself. It uses blankets, triangles, and more blankets to make the objects feel like they are mapping to a song, and not randomly flung into the map with the music.

The map feels very monotonous, with little visual shift between certain parts. Maybe you could map calm parts normally and use your awesome structuring for the kiai/intense sections. This, or you could try having more or less overlaps between major song changes.

You don't seem to understand how flow works, which in itself is not too big of a deal, but you don't how spacing emphasis works across an entire map. Spacing does differ to show off general intensity, but it is not clear enough. You need contrast. Make the small spacing smaller, and the large spacing larger. In the haze of objects, a player cannot tell the difference between the objects you want to emphasize, and the ones you don't.

Examples below outline some issues with your map.

02:44:665 (7,8,1) - Also you under-map some parts. Your rhythm choice cannot ignore just major sounds like this. How it works is you map actively to the instrument you wanna follow, and cover the rest with passive notes. You may argue that mappers do this all the time, which is true, but it is to show off the low intensity of the song. This is not a calm section.

02:56:365 (1,2,3) - Make your spacing clear on object to object too. Make rules of spacing you follow for some instruments, and some for others. For a song this complex, you really are not reflecting the depths of the instrument choice with your spacing and rhythm.

03:04:465 (5) - This is not snapped to this. Interestingly, you can snap repeating sliders to whatever you want, since they are hit passivly and you don't have to worry about a thing mapping directly to the music.

Arphimigon wrote:

Lab Aesthetics Mod!

Results given in [x, y] formats

[My Love]
Object at 00:24:651 - should be placed at: [233, 124] currently at: [234, 125] to move in line with slider at time 00:24:726 -
Object at 00:27:726 - should be placed at: [233, 107] currently at: [234, 106] to move in line with slider at time 00:27:576 -
Object at 00:33:576 - should be placed at: [82, 312] currently at: [81, 313] to move in line with slider at time 00:33:276 -
Object at 00:39:276 - should be placed at: [487, 249] currently at: [488, 250] to move in line with slider at time 00:38:976 -
Object at 00:41:376 - should be placed at: [184, 144] currently at: [185, 145] to move in line with slider at time 00:41:076 -
Object at 00:51:276 - should be placed at: [313, 343] currently at: [314, 342] to move in line with slider at time 00:51:576 -
Object at 00:55:476 - should be placed at: [118, 158] currently at: [119, 159] to move in line with slider at time 00:55:776 -
Object at 00:56:076 - should be placed at: [190, 84] currently at: [191, 85] to move in line with slider at time 00:55:776 -
Object at 00:56:076 - should be placed at: [190, 84] currently at: [191, 85] to move in line with slider at time 00:56:376 -
Object at 00:56:976 - should be placed at: [399, 217] currently at: [400, 218] to move in line with slider at time 00:56:676 -
Object at 00:57:576 - should be placed at: [215, 129] currently at: [216, 130] to move in line with slider at time 00:57:276 -
Object at 00:57:726 - should be placed at: [166, 182] currently at: [165, 181] to move in line with slider at time 00:57:876 -
Object at 00:58:176 - should be placed at: [65, 279] currently at: [66, 280] to move in line with slider at time 00:57:876 -
Object at 00:59:376 - should be placed at: [300, 368] currently at: [299, 367] to move in line with slider at time 00:59:526 -
Object at 01:00:876 - should be placed at: [306, 105] currently at: [305, 106] to move in line with slider at time 01:00:576 -
Object at 01:01:176 - should be placed at: [282, 83] currently at: [283, 82] to move in line with slider at time 01:01:476 -
Object at 01:04:476 - should be placed at: [458, 170] currently at: [457, 171] to move in line with slider at time 01:04:776 -
Object at 01:05:376 - should be placed at: [323, 55] currently at: [322, 54] to move in line with slider at time 01:05:676 -
Object at 01:05:976 - should be placed at: [244, 130] currently at: [245, 131] to move in line with slider at time 01:05:676 -
Object at 01:06:576 - should be placed at: [92, 286] currently at: [93, 287] to move in line with slider at time 01:06:276 -
Object at 01:20:826 - should be placed at: [168, 143] currently at: [169, 142] to move in line with slider at time 01:20:976 -
Object at 01:28:326 - should be placed at: [393, 170] currently at: [392, 169] to move in line with slider at time 01:28:176 -
Object at 01:32:751 - should be placed at: [331, 222] currently at: [332, 221] to move in line with slider at time 01:32:826 -
Object at 01:38:526 - should be placed at: [21, 322] currently at: [22, 323] to move in line with slider at time 01:38:676 -
Object at 01:59:526 - should be placed at: [372, 383] currently at: [371, 384] to move in line with slider at time 01:59:676 -
Object at 02:22:615 - should be placed at: [90, 208] currently at: [91, 207] to move in line with slider at time 02:22:765 -
Object at 02:53:590 - should be placed at: [131, 273] currently at: [132, 274] to move in line with slider at time 02:53:365 -
Object at 03:05:093 - should be placed at: [164, 224] currently at: [163, 227] to blanket slider body at time 03:04:793 -
Object at 03:05:693 - should be placed at: [116, 141] currently at: [117, 144] to blanket slider body at time 03:05:393 -
Object at 03:06:293 - should be placed at: [294, 111] currently at: [298, 109] to blanket slider body at time 03:05:993 -
Object at 03:06:893 - should be placed at: [392, 169] currently at: [390, 171] to blanket slider body at time 03:06:593 -
Object at 03:09:293 - should be placed at: [327, 78] currently at: [325, 76] to blanket slider body at time 03:08:993 -
Object at 03:10:493 - should be placed at: [110, 230] currently at: [115, 231] to blanket slider body at time 03:10:193 -
Object at 03:34:962 - should be placed at: [321, 283] currently at: [322, 284] to move in line with slider at time 03:34:512 -
Object at 04:08:214 - should be placed at: [369, 297] currently at: [370, 298] to move in line with slider at time 04:08:064 -
Object at 04:11:964 - should be placed at: [106, 160] currently at: [107, 161] to move in line with slider at time 04:11:664 -
Object at 04:12:939 - should be placed at: [128, 112] currently at: [129, 113] to move in line with slider at time 04:13:014 -
Object at 04:47:448 - should be placed at: [56, 151] currently at: [55, 152] to move in line with slider at time 04:47:673 -

Results for STACKED OBJECTS may be wrong, ya can ignore those
I hope I didn't malfunction!

kinda long but ye it IS a marathon

Mking wrote:

Hey there! M4M from your queue (also posted in your queue)
((My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1402853&m=0)

[My Love]
00:27:726 (4,5,6,7,8) - should be moved to x236 y108 to fit this pattern more (just move the slider anchor a bit around so it doesnt overlap with 5) moved it around a bit because it overlapped a lot
00:33:276 (1,2,1) - these should recieve a little bit different spacing cause the one gap is 3/4th and the other is 1/1 should be fine
00:37:776 (8,9,10,11,12,13) - why are these further spaced? they dont represent any different sounds, the song doesnt change much 1. for variaty and 2 there kinda is a different sound here
00:50:526 (1,2,3,4,5) - this pattern can be improved by moving 1 exactly above 3 and 2 above 5 done
01:10:326 (10,1,2,3,4,5) - this is too confusing, put an NC on 2? ye
01:16:626 (11,12,1,2,3) - the stream should start on this note, you can clearly hear sounds nope (11) and (12) have more of an extended sound there is not really sound on the blue ticks
02:06:613 (4,5) - its better when using overlaps like this to put them on the end of a jumps pattern not in the middle of one im following the tones of the instrument here(dont know what instrument it exactly is?) and (4) and (5) have similar sounds so that is why they are stacked
02:34:465 (1,2,3,4,5) - really random spacing? not really anything is emphasised with this actually there is emphasis, (1) and (3) and the louder sounds and (2) and (4) are less louder so spaced less, (5) is like that because its different from the rest, the pattern repeats itself like that aswell a bit further in the map

Thats about it, the map repeats itself alot so a lot of patterns turn back
(short mods can sometimes be even better than long mods
Gl with the map! thanks!

Yusomi wrote:

hii my m4m
nice song !

My Love

00:00:000 (1) - omg reminds me of integraation, i love that map
00:02:137 (3) - for this one i think the loop could be tidied up a bit, maybe try this oeh yea that looks nice
00:37:776 (8,9) - , 00:38:226 (11,12) - if you're using that sound to increase spacing then 00:38:076 (10) - shouldn't be as spaced mmh true yea spaced it a bit less
00:39:876 (1) - i dont understand ncs here NC's indicate the transition of 1/1 to 1/2 to 1/4 etc. it to clear up confusion with it, i might change this part of the map tho im not too sure
00:45:876 (7) - i think this should be nc, helps avoid huge combo number ^
01:16:026 (7,8) - 5.46x spacing here owo owo
01:24:576 (1) - holy, this song is so good yus :)
01:44:226 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - i think spacing things out just a little would look nicer here changed
02:00:501 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i don't think triples are the best thing to represent the sound here, since the blue and white tick sounds are a lot stronger than the red, it just doesn't feel right to me to have them emphasised the same way as the weak red tick youre right about that, changed it
02:36:865 (3,4,5) - aw, such an interesting rhythm being ignored here ;w; i know i wanted to focus on the electronic sounds more
02:54:940 (6,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - whoa, cool stream this is like one of my favorite things in the map
03:06:893 (1) - excuse me mister? :eyes:
03:20:374 (12,1,2,3) - omg these sounds are so cool ! i would love it if you made em stand out, maybe some SV changes and some cool sliders? done
03:24:874 (3,4,5,6,7) - 300bpm? ; w; tbh it isnt actually that bad, its a 5 note burst so with some spamming its easy to hit, i myself SS'ed it even though im 15k lmao
04:15:539 (3) - don't think this is the best place to start this slider, maybe just start it on the white tick for simplicity mmh looks like it got a bit messed up, fixed it tho and i put it on the white tick
04:43:511 (1,2,1) - you could make spacing nice and even to improve aesthetics here oh god what happened there

cool map, good luck ! Thank you very much!

1. 00:50:526 (1,2,3,4,5) - flip them horizontally (and move them back where they were that is); this way you get much better flow imo
2. 00:54:276 (7) - NC?
3. 01:21:876 (3,4) - why this has the same spacing as next jump when there's nothing to emphasize? Make spacing the same as here 01:21:726 (2,3) -
4. 01:23:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - when you make a stream like this, try to keep the spacing consistent in distance rising (each note +0.10x would be just fine); this will make your map look much more cleaner
5. 01:26:826 (2,3,4,5) - I'd stack them (in stacks of two ofc); same goes for 01:29:526 (6,7) -
6. 01:39:276 (8,9,10) - this doesn't flow well; 01:39:426 (9) - move this below 01:38:076 (6,4,5,6) - to make it flow-friendly and add nice emphasis which works pretty well there
7. 02:06:763 (5) - you should really emphasize this note; here's how I'd map this part(paste it to your map's folder and see if something like this would fit your tastes); obviously make someting similar for the rest of this section
8. 03:20:524 (1,1) - they feel too "normal" for the sounds they represent;use some creativity and make them more "aggresive"
9. 04:09:264 - I feel like it'd be nice touch to have the spacing going up each triple
   04:40:511 - did he just say that?

Catshy wrote:

Heya!
From my modQ

[My Love]

1. 00:50:526 (1,2,3,4,5) - flip them horizontally (and move them back where they were that is); this way you get much better flow imo yea i like the idea, did move it a bit closer tho because i didnt like how far (1) was from the stream
2. 00:54:276 (7) - NC? ye
3. 01:21:876 (3,4) - why this has the same spacing as next jump when there's nothing to emphasize? Make spacing the same as here 01:21:726 (2,3) - ye spaced it the same
4. 01:23:076 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - when you make a stream like this, try to keep the spacing consistent in distance rising (each note +0.10x would be just fine); this will make your map look much more cleaner this is intentionally done because of the increase in volume, that is also the reason why the circles before it go from spaced to less spaced its a fade out fade in effect
5. 01:26:826 (2,3,4,5) - I'd stack them (in stacks of two ofc); same goes for 01:29:526 (6,7) - na
6. 01:39:276 (8,9,10) - this doesn't flow well; 01:39:426 (9) - move this below 01:38:076 (6,4,5,6) - to make it flow-friendly and add nice emphasis which works pretty well there mmh this feels fine to me, if its mentioned again i can change it
7. 02:06:763 (5) - you should really emphasize this note; here's how I'd map this part(paste it to your map's folder and see if something like this would fit your tastes); obviously make someting similar for the rest of this section mmh i like your idea but the emphasize is still wrong(for example you have (9) emphasized in the first section but not on the second one, even though its the same) because this section repeats itself, im going to try something
8. 03:20:524 (1,1) - they feel too "normal" for the sounds they represent;use some creativity and make them more "aggresive" changed them to the ones i used in the beginning
9. 04:09:264 - I feel like it'd be nice touch to have the spacing going up each triple yea was a suggestion on another mod its a nice touch
   04:40:511 - did he just say that? he did yes

[Afterword]
Wow, that's really difficult genre to map. The fact that you didn't give up on mapping this song is impresive by itself.
Map looks a bit chaotic (but I guess that's good in this case); with some polishing it might get a spot in ranked(or loved) section. Good luck and have a nice day c: its indeed a difficult genre, i heard that a bunch it was really fun mapping this(didnt even mind remapping it lmao). The map itself is chaotic yes but that was something i was going for because like you said the song itself is that aswell and yea it needs a bit of polishing

Battle wrote:

[diff]
combo colors yea i wanted to add comco colors but i really dont know any
would be better if you used soft samples at 10% and 5% for the slider ends at the start true changed
00:08:400 - tbh this section ended up feel a lot more spaced and like, faster than what I expected since it's still a relatively calm section building up to the main parts of the song. The way the NC-ing is is pretty much just standard, but it would feel a lot better if each pause had it's own NC, in addition, I feel like the pause for each little music section here doesn't feel as "cut off" as the music feels since you're still going along with flow with the most part while the song kinda feels like after each little music phrase it cuts off to do something else yea i see what you mean, changed it up a bit and did the NC's

in terms of ncs, this is what i mean

00:18:276 (7) - would help polarity if you snapped this to a 1/3 so 8 is much more reasonable to hit why didnt i think of doing that
00:20:076 (5) - mm I don't really like the decision to ignore the red tick and end on the blue tick, I feel both should be clickable since the breakcore drum thing changes a bit to lead into the higher pitch starting from the red tick changed
00:33:276 (1) - idg the 1/4 sliders in this section tbh, the music is pretty calm for the most part since the vocals are just very soft, sure there's a few emphasis-worthy things coming in the bg, but they aren't really 1/4 notes the slider is here also for some emphasis but because its almost always on a 1/1 gab between the other circles this is the only thing i could come up with, it also break up the section a bit because it would otherwise only be circles
01:13:776 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - tbh a lot of places in your map flow quite harshly, this for example switches multiple times between pretty wide angles, while in and of itself isn't that bad, this is a lot sharper than later parts of this section where the music is starting to get more intense, if anything you should be building up to harsher flow instead of throwing it around here and there flow is like the one thing i still dont get, everyone says my flow is "weird" but no one explains what or why its weird what you said is i think that "weird" thing. Changed
01:38:976 (6,7,8,9,10) - kind of a mixture of very clustered notes, I feel like it would be a lot easier and comfortable to play if you just had spacing larger for things like these, sliders have a lot of leniency, especially for 1/4 sliders, so you should probably take advantage of the fact that they play like 1/2 sliders while making things a bit neater looking as well changed
01:48:876 (1) - would make sense to just extend this repeat because of the rattling breakcore thing going on here there were notes on the red and blue tick but it does sound a bit better, changed
02:08:075 (14) - tbh the things like these in this section don't really feel like they just suddenly break the flow of what you're doing because it doesn't really feel like there's a pattern being followed, if you had a very like, basic structure then threw something in a direction that disrupted the structure you set up, I feel like that would be better at making the player "feel" a disruption like the music does to this calm section tried something
02:54:865 (5) - why not just nc this and remove nc for 02:55:015 (1) - sure
03:38:364 - idk, this is like the quieter breakcore section but there's not even really any difference from the regular breakcore section, if you made things like a lot more compact and densely spaced for streams and just spacing in general it would have helped but that kinda requires a lot of restructuring mmh yea true it isnt really a big part so i changed it
03:42:564 (8) - kinda same thing about the feeling of being disruptive in gameplay as before, it doesn't really feel like these bursts in the music are well represented in gameplay imo changed
04:45:573 - tbh none of the prominent breakcore drums are really expressed since a lot of the things are streams instead of like, kicksliders for the drum kinda stuff so there's not really a sense of any like, emphasis around here imo yea there isnt really any emphasis there youre right, gonna change it

kind of a mixture of consistently sharp flow which doesn't really fit some parts and makes some of the streamy parts feel a bit harsher than they need to be, especially given the bpm, and the stuff above which kinda repeat itself which kinda leaves me with a meh feeling

dsco wrote:

first off: the timing is a little messed up. this is (almost entirely) a single bpm song, and its 200bpm 7/4 the entire way through, though your offset needs to be set to -25. to mod this, i used the timing you have, so don't change it until after you go through my mod (its gonna take a lot of resnapping and fixing). this has also affected your NCs in that they are not placed on the correct beats in a majority of cases (a few examples: 01:25:776 (1,3) - 01:27:876 (1,3) - 00:45:876 (1,3) - 01:42:576 (1) - ) which you will have to go through and fix (too many to list in the mod, and fairly consistent with how many beats off they are). the string sections starting 02:05:976 (4) - here and 03:29:974 (1) - here do not require extra timing points, the string sounds are just desynced from the metronome at 1/3 beat. you can tell this is the case because 02:08:076 (14) - will land on a large white tick should your timing be correct.

also i think the quiet part could use some rhythm revision. since its such a contrast in pace to the fast sections, why not use more sliders and follow the melody, vocals and background synth more? they are also the most important / relevant parts of that section musically so it feels really weird that the whole section follows the clicky drum sounds in the background that loop and don't change. and sounds like 00:45:276 (3,4,5,6) - are mapped but not the synth melody that repeats (you can hear it start on the head of 00:46:176 (3) - )

last thing i wanna address that pervades throughout the entire map is the use of sliders, particularly kicksliders. you use kicksliders for a very very wide range of sounds and i think you should tone it down. sometimes you use kicksliders when there are no sounds on the blue tick, but to emphasize different things in the music which makes them confusing, and feel like they dont follow the music. it can be okay to do this but generally you want to do it for only one or two particular things in the music instead of emphasizing everything you can with kicksliders, because you also use kicksliders when there are sounds on the blue tick, but you don't use them in different ways, so it ends up losing relation to the music. the same applies to 1/8 repeat sliders, which you use quite effectively to emphasize the sounds here: 01:23:976 (1) - but then lose this relationship/effectiveness by using them here: 01:43:776 (1,3) - or here 02:39:415 (8) - and in other places.

00:10:200 (4) - i think this is better as 2 circles does sound better
00:16:200 (4,2) - unrankable overlap (the slider bodies are perfectly overlapped and the second slider is fully faded in before the first fully fades out) oops changed
00:18:276 (7,8,1) - virtually unreadable especially at such a low SV where 1/3 sliders look very similar to 1/2. maybe just NC to display that its 1/3 or make 7 a repeat slider and change spacing accordingly changing it to reverse
00:22:626 (9) - kickslider since same melody sound as 00:22:476 (8) - ? changed
00:24:126 (2,3,1) - looks sloppy because of the inconsistent spacing yea that does look bad, i had that because (1) had a different sound,
changed
00:24:426 (2,3) - make 2 a repeat slider instead of 1/3? again its virtually impossible to read changed
00:27:276 (1,2,3) - why are these slider ends muted and not others? it makes these feel like you don't hit them when you play them since you aren't doing this for kicksliders previously (though i would recommend not doing it to kicksliders at all) mmh yea its pretty inconsistent the kicksliders
00:36:876 (3,4,5,6) - pretty huge jumps for such a quiet part, almost bigger than anything else previously (applies to all squares in the quiet section) yea im going to change this section to what you suggested, mapping the melody, vocals and the synth
00:49:476 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1) - slowly increase spacing to emphasize to music changed
01:07:176 (2,3) - cant tell why these are clickable? (2) has a click sound on it but looks like (3) is overmapped oops, changed
01:09:276 (3,4) - 01:09:876 (2,3) - 01:11:376 (3,4) - 01:13:476 (3,4) - and so on definitely deserve more emphasis. they are roughly the same size as the jumps around them despite being much more abrasive and in your face drum noises. indeed changed
01:33:051 (8,9,1) - 9 to 1 almost reads like a 1/4 gap since it has equal spacing to 8-9, and could definitely be misread in such a rhythmically dense song/map added some spacing to it
01:43:776 (1,2,3) - not a fan of this rhythm, the blue tick on 1's end has a sound that shuold be clickable and is very similar to 2,3, and the tail of 3 has a very important sound that i think should also be clickable. changed
01:45:876 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - not sure why these are muted when there are audible, prominent blue tick sounds. they indeed have, removed them
01:46:326 (5,7,1) - the 5,1 overlap is sloppy and looks ugly changed
01:53:001 (6,2) - avoid slight overlap fixed
01:55:476 (2) - use 1/8 repeat slider like before? missed that one oops
02:00:426 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - dont think its a good idea to introduce a new spacing concept so late into a section when you've already established how sounds like this are mapped / spaced youre right changed
02:09:013 (6,7,8,9,10) - flows pretty poorly, could use more consistent spacing / spacing changes spacing is done with the pitches in mind im going change the pattern up a bit so it flows better
02:10:963 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - ^ ^
02:14:113 (12) - why is this a slider? no idea tbh lmao
02:18:865 (2) - repeat 2x instead of 3x and then put a circle on the tail? the tail has a very prominent sound changed
02:19:615 (5,10) - ugly overlap fixed
02:21:415 (6) - this should be a kickslider if 02:20:965 (3,4,5) - are, and i dont think the tails should be muted since there are sounds in the music on the blue ticks changed
02:27:865 (1,4) - fix stack fixed
02:27:865 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - overall this pattern is extremely cluttered which makes it visually confusing fixed
02:29:665 (6,7,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this should be grouped into 3s if you listen to the music, (6, 2 and 1 have the same sound and the same 2 sounds after them) changed
02:31:165 (1) - the section starting here feels overspaced when compared to the part before it. the drum parts are much less frenetic and aggressive and the vocalist is back, singing slowly. parts like 02:38:365 (7,8,9,10,1) - 02:38:965 (3,4,5,6,7) - feel overly spaced. mmh yea youre right gonna redo this section
02:32:365 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - very ugly movement, no sharp angles and the spacing and curvature change randomly ^
02:43:915 (2,3,4,5,6) - plays poorly ^
02:45:715 (3,4,5,3,4,5) - ugly overlap ^
02:46:465 (5,4) - ^ ^
02:53:065 (1) - i only hear sounds on 1/4 repeats, not 1/8 changed
03:01:465 (1,7) - ugly overlap fixed
03:08:993 (1) - should be circles imo (see 03:09:593 (3,4) - ) indeed changed
03:11:093 (1,3) - only time you overlap like this in this section so it feels out of place. changed
03:11:693 (4) - 1/4 repeat slider would fit better and emphasize the strings more. changed
03:11:693 (4) - spacing this equally from 03:14:974 (11,12) - each of these objects would give this more balance changed
03:24:724 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - since this is gradually changing speed i think its definitely best to avoid making each sound clickable, as it will confuse the player as to what rhythm it is, and its visually nearly impossible to tell that it changes to 1/6 since you use many 1/4 spacings in this map. changed it to the background sound
03:28:549 (6,8) - fix stack fixed
03:34:512 (2,5) - fix stack fixed
03:54:714 (1,2,3,4,5,6,3,4,5) - this shape overlap is ugly fixed
03:59:064 (8,3) - ugly overlap fixed
04:05:064 - i think there should be a suond on this tick. its quiet but its part of 04:05:139 (3,4,5) - etc. changed
04:05:664 (1,2) - this spacing makes this pattern read like a 1/2 gap instead of 1/4 decreased the spacing
04:06:939 (2,3,4,8) - ugly overlap fixed
04:08:664 (3) - 04:09:114 (3) - 04:09:714 (3) - why are these kicksliders?? i have no idea, changed
04:12:864 (1,2,3,6) - ugly overlaps fixed
04:15:564 (1,2) - not sure why these are two different sliders. if there is a noise change its incredibly subtle and separating it will confuse the player (and can autofail you if you miss one of these sliders) mmh looks like it was messed up again changed it to 1 slider
04:15:714 (2,3) - ugly overlap fixed
04:21:414 (1,5) - ^ fixed
04:22:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i wouldnt map circles to this part, the true rhythm here isnt supported by the editor (its a 5:4 polyrhythm) wait youre right, you can hear it actually going out of sync, also that rhythm sounds really weird
04:24:564 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - would be cool if gradually increased sv, currently feels anticlimactic true changed
05:02:373 (4,1,3) - ugly slight overlaps. i would perfect stack 4 and 1 and get 3 out from under 4 changed

i also think you should try and give your jumps more structure. simply using consistent spacings doesn't matter if you do not shape things consistently or create a consistent visual structure.

good luck with the map! i'm not sure if it can be improved to the point of rankability through modding though :< but at the very least you have learned from the map. it's fun it was indeed really fun mapping this! im going to change up a lot of thing again so its not going to be as messy as it is now, thank you very much for the mod dsco! i will keep these things in mind when remapping some part

1. about the beginning, the snapping is kind of weird, mainly in regards to 00:05:827 (2,1) - sliderends like these, shouldn't these be snapped on the 1/4 tick? it doesn't make too much of a difference, but it just seems out of place
2. 00:08:827 (3) - having sliders in the middle of these sections feels out of place in the rhythm since most of the rhythm stays constant, making these circles would be a lot better rhythm-wise and pattern-wise
   this of course goes for 00:09:727 (2) - this, 00:10:927 (2) - this, 00:12:127 (6) - this, 00:13:027 (2) - this, 00:13:927 (2) - this, 00:15:277 (4) - this and 00:16:177 (4) - this as well, since it's the same thing
3. 00:16:777 (1,2) - this kind of pattern feels really bland, it's basically giving no emphasis to 00:17:077 (2) - the note on the sliderhead here which is very noticeable in the rhythm, i'd space this out more
   this goes for similar patterns 00:20:977 (1,2) - here, 00:25:177 (1,2) - here, 00:32:677 (5,6,7) - here, etc.
4. 00:18:277 (7) - should probably just be a longer slider without the repeat, nothing noticeable lands on the repeat as is right now
   this goes for 00:26:677 (7) - this, as well
5. 00:20:077 (5,6,7) - this doesn't really give credit to the rhythm complexity here since there's a background 1/8 sound here that becomes noticeable on the sliderend of 5 to the sliderhead of 7, having this as a triple feels really out of place. personally i would make 5 as a whole a 1/8 repeat slider that slowly gets louder in terms of hitsounds as it progresses towards 00:20:677 (7) - this
6. 00:21:877 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - really awkward to hit properly, also doesn't give proper emphasis to 00:22:327 (9) - this sound, i'd space out 00:22:327 (9,10,11,12) - this more from the pattern so it gives that sound the emphasis it should have
7. 00:24:427 (2) - this should be a 1/6 slider ending on 00:24:527 - since no other notes are noticeable besides that one
8. 00:25:927 (4,1) - another noticeable emphasis issue; the stream should start further away from the note instead of being distance snapped to have the same momentum as 00:25:777 (3,4) - or else it loses the emphasis
9. 00:27:577 (3) - making this just a circle would make more sense imo, nothing noticeable on the blue tick here
10. 00:27:727 (4) - having such a strong beat on the sliderend here just feels out of place, i'd remove either 1 or 2 repeats from this slider and add a circle in place on the white tick
11. 00:28:927 (4,5) - this jump suddenly decreases in spacing despite having larger spacing 00:28:477 (1,2,3,4) - here, i can kind of see why because of the quieter snare sound but it really makes this pattern flow pretty bad
12. 00:30:577 (1,2,3,4) - this could definitely be spaced out more, the sounds become a bit louder here
    same with 00:31:777 (2,3,4,5) - the spacing shouldn't be the same as before here considering the intensity of the snares
13. 00:35:677 (3,4) - this doesn't give emphasis to the new rhythm you're following here considering it's so close to the sliderend, just having a separate jump pattern would be nice here
    same thing with 00:44:077 (3,4) - and 00:52:477 (1,2) - etc.
14. 00:37:177 (7,8,9) - emphasis on 00:37:477 (9) - is lost because of the distance snapping here
    same issue with 00:45:277 (5,6,7,8,9) - the jump pattern here, the snare is noticeably more emphasized in the song but not the map
15. 00:39:727 - skipping notes like this feels really weird even in a slow section, i feel like this entire section should have these 1/1 gaps made into 1/2 gaps instead
16. 00:48:277 (1,2) - why is the spacing here greater than the spacing 00:46:177 (1,2,3) - here? it's essentially the same rhythm
17. 00:52:477 (1) - this should probably end on 00:53:077 - with a 1/8 repeat slider starting on 00:53:227 - ending where the slider ends currently to follow the rhythm more accurately
    a similar thing happens 01:12:877 (4) - here but instead of ending it early just make it a circle to a 1/8 repeat
18. 01:06:577 (4) - not having this sliderend clickable basically just destroys any rhythm here, this is like the only noticeable note here besides vocals
19. 01:09:277 (1,2,3,1) - very criminally undermapped part in general, all the 1/1 gaps could and should have notes to make it 1/2 gaps in rhythm instead, this goes for several parts in this section like 01:13:477 (1,2,3) - where there's very noticeable drum hits and they're ignored for the sake of following vocals, which really doesn't make sense in a breakcore song which emphasizes itself more on the instruments than vocals
20. 01:16:777 (5,1) - this isn't emphasized properly as before, and this is actually emphasized less than the two snare hits prior despite you being fairly consistent making these equal emphasis for when they appear in the song
    
    yeah you get the point i'm basically repeating myself endlessly so to keep things short, i disagree with the emphasis on a lot of notes and the usage of distance snapping especially in a 6 star map, in general it feels awkward to play and doesn't represent what the song is trying to accomplish. i think you did very well for a fairly new mapper in terms of structure and patterns, but the spacing and rhythm choices you chose need a lot of work, which is mainly just due to the fact that breakcore is actual cancer to map well. it's kind of noticeable especially in parts like 01:23:977 (1) - this, where 01:23:977 (1,2,3) - all three of these notes are given the exact same spacing despite 01:23:977 (1,3) - these two being emphasized a lot more in the song in terms of volume.
    
    in any case, most of those distance-snap emphasis issues persist through the entire map and i highlighted a few of them so it should be fairly easy to spot which ones need work on, i will highlight a few more of the very-obvious glaring ones. besides that:
    
21. 01:18:577 - snare should be mapped here
22. 01:18:727 (4) - this slowdown, while not really affecting playability much, probably requires a NC for the SV change
23. 01:22:777 (1,1) - most of anyone would look at this pattern and assume the stream starts immediately after the slider finishes, but there's a 1/2 gap here, add a bit more spacing from the stream
    01:33:052 (7,8,1) - a similar thing happens here where the spacing makes this appear like a spaced 1/4 pattern, but there's a gap in between 01:33:202 (8,1) - these two notes instead
    actually this happens a lot during these breakdown parts in general so yea tbh i'd recommend looking at ranked breakcore maps to see how they mapped sections similar to this, you'll see a lot of them try to ditch linear flow like you do in the map here for more dynamic flow to make the map more enjoyable
24. 01:44:977 (1,2) - this is wrong rhythm; if you're following vocals the slider should be on the white tick, and if you're following the drums it's on the red tick
25. 01:52:327 (3,4,5,6) - these should probably be 1/8 repeats considering the background track is literally a 1/8 drum sound
26. 02:06:177 (1) - remove this entire section, it would require way too many timing points and offset adjustments to be viable to map and it won't affect approval drain time assuming you extend 05:04:477 (1) - this slider at the end to the end of the guitar riff; an alternative way of fixing would just be keeping the sliders as is and adding a spinner 02:10:177 (1) - after this one to make the drain time less of an issue
    this goes for the similarly mapped section starting 03:30:327 (1) - here 05:03:177 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - here too
27. 02:15:727 (5,6,1) - this basically takes my concern over the spacing issues and amplifies it by like 10 times, no one's going to know this is a 1/4 kickslider jump to a 1/2 pause until the next rhythm
28. 02:20:227 (1) - not quite sure if i mentioned this the first time i saw it but wiggle sliders like these are unrankable when they're this close together, it counts as a burai slider i.e. unreadable slider from head to tail
29. 02:28:627 (6,7) - SV changes here should be NCed so it's easier to read
30. 02:39:427 (8) - this should be 1/8, not 1/16 (also using 1/16 in general in a 200 bpm song makes some of these impossible to hit because of the slider leniency timings so i heavily advise you don't do that in general)
31. 02:48:277 (3) - should be a 1/8 repeat with hitsounds gradually increasing following the drum track
    similar thing happens 03:29:527 (5) - here as well
32. 03:04:327 (1) - on the other hand this should just be a 1/4 stream
33. 03:04:777 (1) - the SV is kinda fast here for a slow part, don't you think lol
34. 03:24:727 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - following the more potent rhythm here is better than the background drums
35. 03:51:577 (5) - this is 1/8 not 1/16
36. 04:01:327 (1) - you're basically guaranteeing a sliderbreak here from a player perspective, all 1/16s before this were 3 repeats and suddenly it's just one here which most players won't expect at all, not to mention the leniency for hitting this goes way up so trying to hit it properly is impossible
37. 04:22:777 (1) - this fits much more as a 1/8 slider than just a spinner due to the drum track

1. 00:00:014 (1) - i feel like the entire beginning here could use silenced sliderticks, right now it's just sliderends despite the sliderticks not having anything on them; this ends at 00:08:377 (1) - of course
2. 00:16:777 (1) - silencing this sliderend doesn't make much sense since there's a distinct hi-hat note here
3. 00:45:277 (5,6,7,8,9) - why is this so quiet? the hitsounds are barely audible here, and it happens 00:53:527 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - here as well with even more notes that are quiet; if you were going to reduce the volume of these since they're less potent in the song 60% or 50% would do just fine, not 20%
4. 01:33:502 (3,5) - there's no real need to silence the slider ends here either, goes for the entire section really
   03:39:877 (1) - same thing for this entire section, there's noticeable notes on a lot of these sliderends that just go silent for no apparent reason

fieryrage wrote:

i'm not really good at modding breakcore songs so i'm sorry if some of this is weird

1. about the beginning, the snapping is kind of weird, mainly in regards to 00:05:827 (2,1) - sliderends like these, shouldn't these be snapped on the 1/4 tick? it doesn't make too much of a difference, but it just seems out of place yea youre right about that fixed
2. 00:08:827 (3) - having sliders in the middle of these sections feels out of place in the rhythm since most of the rhythm stays constant, making these circles would be a lot better rhythm-wise and pattern-wise
   this of course goes for 00:09:727 (2) - this, 00:10:927 (2) - this, 00:12:127 (6) - this, 00:13:027 (2) - this, 00:13:927 (2) - this, 00:15:277 (4) - this and 00:16:177 (4) - this as well, since it's the same thing mmh should be fine tbh, the sounds are relatively the same and it creates some diversity in the rhythm here
3. 00:16:777 (1,2) - this kind of pattern feels really bland, it's basically giving no emphasis to 00:17:077 (2) - the note on the sliderhead here which is very noticeable in the rhythm, i'd space this out more
   this goes for similar patterns 00:20:977 (1,2) - here, 00:25:177 (1,2) - here, 00:32:677 (5,6,7) - here, etc. spaced them out more
4. 00:18:277 (7) - should probably just be a longer slider without the repeat, nothing noticeable lands on the repeat as is right now
   this goes for 00:26:677 (7) - this, as well changed
5. 00:20:077 (5,6,7) - this doesn't really give credit to the rhythm complexity here since there's a background 1/8 sound here that becomes noticeable on the sliderend of 5 to the sliderhead of 7, having this as a triple feels really out of place. personally i would make 5 as a whole a 1/8 repeat slider that slowly gets louder in terms of hitsounds as it progresses towards 00:20:677 (7) - this at first i didnt really like the 1/8 reverse but with the hitsounds its much better
6. 00:21:877 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - really awkward to hit properly, also doesn't give proper emphasis to 00:22:327 (9) - this sound, i'd space out 00:22:327 (9,10,11,12) - this more from the pattern so it gives that sound the emphasis it should have changed
7. 00:24:427 (2) - this should be a 1/6 slider ending on 00:24:527 - since no other notes are noticeable besides that one i did that to simplify the rhythm but this works aswell
8. 00:25:927 (4,1) - another noticeable emphasis issue; the stream should start further away from the note instead of being distance snapped to have the same momentum as 00:25:777 (3,4) - or else it loses the emphasis changed
9. 00:27:577 (3) - making this just a circle would make more sense imo, nothing noticeable on the blue tick here changed
10. 00:27:727 (4) - having such a strong beat on the sliderend here just feels out of place, i'd remove either 1 or 2 repeats from this slider and add a circle in place on the white tick i had it as 2 repeats first but the 1/8 sound extends after that and you can clearly hear it and didnt sound good,
    i could do 1 repeat less and a circle on the white tick but i think that would cause a bit of a problem with how short the reverse itself is
11. 00:28:927 (4,5) - this jump suddenly decreases in spacing despite having larger spacing 00:28:477 (1,2,3,4) - here, i can kind of see why because of the quieter snare sound but it really makes this pattern flow pretty bad increased the spacing a bit
12. 00:30:577 (1,2,3,4) - this could definitely be spaced out more, the sounds become a bit louder here
    same with 00:31:777 (2,3,4,5) - the spacing shouldn't be the same as before here considering the intensity of the snares changed
13. 00:35:677 (3,4) - this doesn't give emphasis to the new rhythm you're following here considering it's so close to the sliderend, just having a separate jump pattern would be nice here
    same thing with 00:44:077 (3,4) - and 00:52:477 (1,2) - etc. changed
14. 00:37:177 (7,8,9) - emphasis on 00:37:477 (9) - is lost because of the distance snapping here
    same issue with 00:45:277 (5,6,7,8,9) - the jump pattern here, the snare is noticeably more emphasized in the song but not the map changed
15. 00:39:727 - skipping notes like this feels really weird even in a slow section, i feel like this entire section should have these 1/1 gaps made into 1/2 gaps instead mmh im mainly following the melody, vocals and the background synth in this section, i dont really think its a great idea to also map those parts, it would defeat the purpose of this slow section, i will keep it in mind though
16. 00:48:277 (1,2) - why is the spacing here greater than the spacing 00:46:177 (1,2,3) - here? it's essentially the same rhythm oops changed
17. 00:52:477 (1) - this should probably end on 00:53:077 - with a 1/8 repeat slider starting on 00:53:227 - ending where the slider ends currently to follow the rhythm more accurately
    a similar thing happens 01:12:877 (4) - here but instead of ending it early just make it a circle to a 1/8 repeat changed
18. 01:06:577 (4) - not having this sliderend clickable basically just destroys any rhythm here, this is like the only noticeable note here besides vocals
19. 01:09:277 (1,2,3,1) - very criminally undermapped part in general, all the 1/1 gaps could and should have notes to make it 1/2 gaps in rhythm instead, this goes for several parts in this section like 01:13:477 (1,2,3) - where there's very noticeable drum hits and they're ignored for the sake of following vocals, which really doesn't make sense in a breakcore song which emphasizes itself more on the instruments than vocals yea i changed it a bit so the rhtyhm is much more dense than before, seems to fit much better with the upcoming section aswell
20. 01:16:777 (5,1) - this isn't emphasized properly as before, and this is actually emphasized less than the two snare hits prior despite you being fairly consistent making these equal emphasis for when they appear in the song changed
    
    yeah you get the point i'm basically repeating myself endlessly so to keep things short, i disagree with the emphasis on a lot of notes and the usage of distance snapping especially in a 6 star map, in general it feels awkward to play and doesn't represent what the song is trying to accomplish. i think you did very well for a fairly new mapper in terms of structure and patterns, but the spacing and rhythm choices you chose need a lot of work, which is mainly just due to the fact that breakcore is actual cancer to map well. it's kind of noticeable especially in parts like 01:23:977 (1) - this, where 01:23:977 (1,2,3) - all three of these notes are given the exact same spacing despite 01:23:977 (1,3) - these two being emphasized a lot more in the song in terms of volume.
    yea i see, indeed breakcore is pretty cancer to map because a lot is going on, that is also the reason why there are so many kicksliders for different sounds in the map, i use it for 1 consistently, but there are so many that i used that are just 1 sound for the entire map/song but if dont use a kickslider for it is just doesnt fit. Anyways i will look through the map and fix them
    
    in any case, most of those distance-snap emphasis issues persist through the entire map and i highlighted a few of them so it should be fairly easy to spot which ones need work on, i will highlight a few more of the very-obvious glaring ones. besides that:
    
21. 01:18:577 - snare should be mapped here changed
22. 01:18:727 (4) - this slowdown, while not really affecting playability much, probably requires a NC for the SV change redid the section
23. 01:22:777 (1,1) - most of anyone would look at this pattern and assume the stream starts immediately after the slider finishes, but there's a 1/2 gap here, add a bit more spacing from the stream changedyoure right about that changed
    01:33:052 (7,8,1) - a similar thing happens here where the spacing makes this appear like a spaced 1/4 pattern, but there's a gap in between 01:33:202 (8,1) - these two notes instead
    actually this happens a lot during these breakdown parts in general so yea tbh i'd recommend looking at ranked breakcore maps to see how they mapped sections similar to this, you'll see a lot of them try to ditch linear flow like you do in the map here for more dynamic flow to make the map more enjoyable ah okay gonna look and see how i will do that
24. 01:44:977 (1,2) - this is wrong rhythm; if you're following vocals the slider should be on the white tick, and if you're following the drums it's on the red tick changed
25. 01:52:327 (3,4,5,6) - these should probably be 1/8 repeats considering the background track is literally a 1/8 drum sound i find the one i mapped more interesting than the 1/8 sound
26. 02:06:177 (1) - remove this entire section, it would require way too many timing points and offset adjustments to be viable to map and it won't affect approval drain time assuming you extend 05:04:477 (1) - this slider at the end to the end of the guitar riff; an alternative way of fixing would just be keeping the sliders as is and adding a spinner 02:10:177 (1) - after this one to make the drain time less of an issue
    this goes for the similarly mapped section starting 03:30:327 (1) - here 05:03:177 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - here too i had this section like that with timing points at first but due to the timing fix from dsco(the offset of the timing point to -25) this section fixed itself, you can see it because 02:08:077 (1) - ends on a big white tick(i will keep it in mind though if the circles being on 1/6th is going to be a big problem)
27. 02:15:727 (5,6,1) - this basically takes my concern over the spacing issues and amplifies it by like 10 times, no one's going to know this is a 1/4 kickslider jump to a 1/2 pause until the next rhythm like i said earlier im going to look how im going to change this
28. 02:20:227 (1) - not quite sure if i mentioned this the first time i saw it but wiggle sliders like these are unrankable when they're this close together, it counts as a burai slider i.e. unreadable slider from head to tail changed
29. 02:28:627 (6,7) - SV changes here should be NCed so it's easier to read changed
30. 02:39:427 (8) - this should be 1/8, not 1/16 (also using 1/16 in general in a 200 bpm song makes some of these impossible to hit because of the slider leniency timings so i heavily advise you don't do that in general) changed
31. 02:48:277 (3) - should be a 1/8 repeat with hitsounds gradually increasing following the drum track
    similar thing happens 03:29:527 (5) - here as well changed
32. 03:04:327 (1) - on the other hand this should just be a 1/4 stream tbh this doesnt even sound like 1/4, 1/6 or 1/8 maybe its the same thing as 04:22:777 (1) - ? im not too sure but for me 1/8 sounds the best among them
33. 03:04:777 (1) - the SV is kinda fast here for a slow part, don't you think lol mmmmmaybe :eyes:
34. 03:24:727 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - following the more potent rhythm here is better than the background drums i had that at first but because it changes from 1/4th snap to 1/6th snap here 03:24:877 - i changed it for readblilty (because tbh 300 bpm burst isnt THAT bad, you can easily mash your way through it) so i may want some different opinions on this
35. 03:51:577 (5) - this is 1/8 not 1/16 mmh to me it does sound like 1/16 though
36. 04:01:327 (1) - you're basically guaranteeing a sliderbreak here from a player perspective, all 1/16s before this were 3 repeats and suddenly it's just one here which most players won't expect at all, not to mention the leniency for hitting this goes way up so trying to hit it properly is impossible changed
37. 04:22:777 (1) - this fits much more as a 1/8 slider than just a spinner due to the drum track mmh dsco said that this was a 5:4 polyrhythm that wasnt supported by the editor and suggested to not map it, gonna get some more opinions on this

hitsound-related issues

1. 00:00:014 (1) - i feel like the entire beginning here could use silenced sliderticks, right now it's just sliderends despite the sliderticks not having anything on them; this ends at 00:08:377 (1) - of course changed
2. 00:16:777 (1) - silencing this sliderend doesn't make much sense since there's a distinct hi-hat note here fixed
3. 00:45:277 (5,6,7,8,9) - why is this so quiet? the hitsounds are barely audible here, and it happens 00:53:527 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - here as well with even more notes that are quiet; if you were going to reduce the volume of these since they're less potent in the song 60% or 50% would do just fine, not 20% fixed
4. 01:33:502 (3,5) - there's no real need to silence the slider ends here either, goes for the entire section really mmh i dont really like how it sounds without the silenced sliderends
   03:39:877 (1) - same thing for this entire section, there's noticeable notes on a lot of these sliderends that just go silent for no apparent reason i dont hear any notes on the sliderends?

in general, i feel like the map is a bit too flowy especially for a breakcore map where there's instruments going on all over the place; there's a lot less emphasis on things that should be emphasized imo gonna fix the emphasis and i like how you say that its too flowy now even though battle said that i used a lot of harsh flow mmmh will see what i can about that lmao

Nyxi wrote:

we back bois

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello M4M from my queue~

My Love

1. Not sure if this song is amazing or retarded (maybe both) lol
2. Two green points exist at the same time at 01:13:477 - oops
3. 00:00:014 (1,2) - improve blanket (and maybe make 00:00:014 (1,3) - line on top of each other better too) with sections like this clean looks best done
4. 00:06:277 (1) - could tune both the first (stronger, circular) and the latter curve to be more constant smooth curve (you see how for example the latter is almost straight in the beginning fixed
5. 00:09:277 (5) - NC this instead, it's the downbeat (similarly how you NCd 00:08:377 (1) - anyways; same onwards with 00:10:477 (6) - and so on this looks nicer imo to have it in groups and the NC starting on the next note
6. 00:24:427 (2,3) - 00:24:427 (2) - snap this end to yellow tick instead (more accurate) and reverse slider these so it plays better too oh i always thought it was on the 1/6th note, looks like i was wrong changed it and it does play better
7. 00:28:027 (5,6,7,1,2,3,4,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - why are pretty much all of these very similar in terms of spacing and angles (or just even that they all are circles) and whatnot when there are multiple differences for the sounds in the music? (5,6,7,1,2,3,4) these arent that much different, (5,6,7)
   have a much less louder sounds than (1,2,3,4) so i changed spacing in that(which is actually pretty noticable(i did change around (1) and (3) so the rotation changed)) and for (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) i changed it around a bit so that there is some emphasis on the unique sounds in there(for example the ones you hear on (3) and (6))
8. 01:13:477 (1,2) - I know it's supposed to be similar to stuff before like 01:11:377 (1,2) - but this could really use something else since patterned this way it looks like 01:13:777 (2) - would continue straight from the sliderend with 1/4 gap instead i think its fine, because that has been introduced before it(also the reason later in that section they dont connect is because the intensity increases so like here: 01:17:677 (1,2) - )
9. 01:19:477 (9,10,1) - kinda meh looking flow (there'd be more than I'll mention of similarly meh stuff tbh). Like it'd be more natural to change direction even somewhat at 01:19:627 (10) - than going linearish line when player is likely to "stop" there after the jump from the kickslider youre right changed it around a bit
10. 01:20:977 (5) - switch NCs to the emphasised sounds instead (so01:21:277 (3,3) - too (I'd rather just not use so many NCs for this though considering you'd want one at 01:21:877 (1) - anyways done
11. 01:26:677 (7) - NC this instead (like there'll prob more a lot of these mentioned, since with chaotic rhythms like this it's important to keep solid consistent NCing to structure the rhythms little for the player); same with 01:29:377 (7) - (and so on) true gonna redo the NC a bit
12. 01:45:877 (3) - not same sounds as 01:46:027 (4,5,6) - (lacking the latter sound) ; circle only perhaps? On the other hand 01:46:777 (3) - could be kickslider instead considering the unmapped 1/4 backlash changed
13. 01:52:027 (6) - what's this emphasis for? Seems unnecessary for that weird sound, i have no idea what that is but to me a reverse sounds better on that
14. 01:56:077 (6) - NC this instead ye
15. 02:23:227 (5,6) - reverse slider instead? The following ones could stay as is since it's "familiar" from the same section secs ago i dont really see why because that one is the same as the others after it
16. 02:30:877 (8,9,10) - this should be 1/5 instead (only 6 sounds from beat to beat not 7) so if you want to do that you'll need additional timing point of 250 for that (250 bpm 1/4 = 200bpm 1/5) then reset the timing back. Also use kickslider for it lol can i even do that? also that is much complexer than i thought the sound is actually 1/12th (on 250 bpm) later than the white tick but i will leave it on the white tick for playablity
17. 02:56:677 (3) - begin NCing from this and on beat? (like 02:58:477 (1) - ) ye
18. 03:02:377 (4) - end on 1/3 tick seems more accurate indeed
19. 03:11:677 (1) - the string sound seems more like 1/4 triple (maybe off time, but anyways it's clearly faster than 1/3) looking at it, it is an offtimed triple but on 1/8 so i think imma leave it like this so atleast the middle one of the triple is hit
20. 03:24:877 (1,2,3,4,5) - lol definitely use some smaller spacing for 1/6 (like dude it looks like 1/4 atm). Best'd be to just use kicksliders for this too though made the space a lot smaller and no i wont(okay maybe if you really convince me) i NC spammed it so now its really obvious(same with the other one with the weird timing points stuffs)
21. looking at this song and map maybe not all my NC suggestions fit that well anyways considering what this is like lol uuuh imma redo a lot of the NC's probably so i hope it isnt going to be an NC spam lmao
22. 03:44:077 (7,1,2,1) - god bless this song rhythms even in calm sections LOL
23. 03:56:152 (2) - Nc this instead (similarly to how you did earlier with pattern transition over 1/4 wherever the time stamp was) done
24. 04:08:527 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - apply some changes to these as the pattern progresses? The sounds change after all oh i never actually noticed that, was actually planning on changing it around a bit
25. 04:33:652 (3) - start on red tick instead, actual starting point aside it's not audible in the beginning true changed
26. 04:43:027 (2) - doesn't sound too fitting, for example could remove the reverse and make it longer (so that it still ends on same place) since atm it's not really fitting either on the background sounds nor the vocal for the reverse parts and sounds bad oh youre right about that removed the reverse and changed it so the slider ends on the blue tick
27. 04:52:852 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - lower the spacing for the less intense sounds in the latter parts of the stream? changed
28. 05:02:077 (3) - this should be 1/5 too instead of buzz like this (well, not really against buzz, you'll avoid the timing points hassle, so maybe just buzz of sorts for the previous 1/5 too ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) added a timing point so it sounds better
29. Your map ain't 5 minutes of drain time at the moment. It ends at 05:05:227 - and begins at 00:00:014 - which results in little over 5 seconds over the 5 minutes, but your breaks at 02:10:252 - to 02:14:377 - and 03:35:077 - to 03:38:377 - cover over 7 seconds FUCK i thought it was right guess not, i dont know what to do about that now, for now i removed the breaks but that seems a bit weird and mapping it is also not an option because its weirdly timed(the sounds are on 1/6th snap and mapping that would be really confusing)

Good luck! you'll need it oof

TheKingHenry wrote:

W8 hol' up why'd you do third 1/5 place at 03:24:877 - ? Okay, the beat from 03:25:177 - to ~03:25:477 - is about 1/5 (slightly slower; was done wiht 1/6 kickslider I think) and you could do the 1/5 there if you want (the beat from 03:25:477 - on though is 1/4 triple again so switch right back). Buuuuut the beat where you currently begin the 1/5 (03:24:877 - ) is proper 1/6 as you had mapped it so no need to change the snapping for that lol

Alexey11 wrote:

00:22:177 (1,5) - this sounds very similar. But 1 is circle , and 5 is 1/4 slider . Better to make it similar. cricle-cirlce or 1/4 slider 1/4 slider. fixed

00:24:727 (3) - make sliderend clickable https://i.imgur.com/Gq3FeIP.png . Actually white tick stronger than previous red tick here. ye i did this on purpose because the sound that its mapped to is very noticable, so if i have it 1 reverse back i think that the gab in between is too little to accurately hit the next circle and having the kickslider end on the blue tick doesnt sound good because it continues
00:27:727 (4) - ^ ^
00:53:227 (2) - ^ ^

00:36:727 (4) - stong sound, more emphasis should be fine tbh its a pretty calm section
00:45:127 (2) - deservers more emphasis too ^ ^

00:36:877 (5,6,7,8) - here u can make this 1/4 sliders pattern coz sounds here have potential for this. like https://i.imgur.com/ULuMyyH.png or smthng like that) its a calm section so i dont really want to do that
00:45:277 (3,4,5,6) - ^ same suggestion ^

01:29:752 (4,5,6,7) - this can have more ds coz drums really loud here not really much of a difference between the others in terms of loudness
01:22:177 (2,3,4,5) - drums volume extremely goes down here, 01:22:477 (4,5) - spacing seems really strong for this imo. like https://i.imgur.com/glGoKww.png transmits music better imo. mmh i think its fine like this

03:34:177 (1) - why buzz silder here? 03:38:377 (1) - , 03:42:577 (1) - , 03:50:977 (1) - , 03:46:777 (1) - etc. not buzz sliders. this is a pretty calm section so that is why they are just sliders instead of the 1/8 reverse, i emphasized them in a different way tho, they are spaced away from the streams, so because this is a whole different section from the rest i used a different idea here
03:54:202 (4,1) - . 03:53:902 (4,1) - i can understand why u make stream like this, it easy to recognize , but here 03:54:202 (4,1) - i can see a tini bit more ds, but here u use same direction and it's hard to recognize. Use your first idea here too for more impact. its like that because i differentiate the spacing of the streams with the different 1/4th sounds
03:47:377 - i think u can place a circle here. thats a really faint sound, imo its a bit pointless to map that

04:55:552 (1,2,1) - some diffenet stuff happening here. i'll try to explain. 04:54:952 (1) - this and 04:55:102 (2) - goes other directions, same stuff happpening here 04:55:252 (1,2) - , but here 04:55:402 (2,1) - drums goes the same direction and here 04:55:702 (2,1) - too. U can rework patterns here with this information or just keep your patterns for this sections it's good enough. ye i dont really wanbt to differentiate them too much otherwise its going to be a mess

Nice song
my map for m4m : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/739929

6 digit wrote:

Hi~ m4m from your queue
breakcore is life :>

My Love Is a Bulldozer~
00:12:577 (1,2,3) - would try to align the slider angle to be straight with the movement from 1 and 2 (or can just move it up a bit) looks and flows a bit better i never really had any problems with this
00:28:027 (5,7,2,4) - cool jump pattern but i would space these three out evenly. could look better when playing (kinda like how you did at 00:30:577 (1,2,3,4) - ) they are different sounds, listen to 00:28:477 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:30:577 (1,2,3,4) -
01:03:877 (3) - just a suggestion but making the first part of the slider straight would read pretty well coming from the previous two straight sliders. also for consistency with similar vocal stuff like 01:05:077 (1,2,3) - i didnt really like how that looked, so i made it a curve(it you straighen it you can see it finds with the other sliders)
01:14:527 (8,9,10) - feel that spacing on 10 is too big for a sound that doesn't grant that much intensity. something like http://puu.sh/zEONE/b617c2ce8d.jpg would help with increasing the emphasis on 01:15:577 (1) - and also keep the spacing consistent for 10 sure
01:20:977 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - NC's here get kinda weird with the pattern. would say to keep consistent NC's with the snares. also, 01:21:277 (1,2) - 's angle of movement feel's a bit awkward since the angle is really sharp coming from similar sounding 01:20:977 (1,2) - NC is fine and i never had any problems with that angle before
01:23:302 (4,5,6,7,8) - spacing a bit off. suggest making it continue to grow in spacing or keeping it at the same distance apart form one another o ye fixed the spacing a bit
01:24:577 (1,1) - i love how these sound with the claps. good stuff
01:32:302 - add a circle here similar to 01:32:527 (2,3) - . sound is mapped in the following section and adding it could prompt players in hitting the zigzag pattern correctly (see next point though) there is no sound on that tick only the extanded one from the slider before it
01:32:377 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - interesting pattern but i think removing the hit circles would play better. the sound is so low and the spacing is so far that it feels unnecessary to tap. the repeating sliders on their own work fine imo its still pretty audible if you leave them without a circle and it feels a bit empty
01:33:202 (1,2,4,5,1,2) - for this and similar areas, i would try to keep spacing more consistent with when the notes are hit. eg 4,5 looks like 1/2 timing since the previous 1,2 are spaced that way but are actually 1/4 instead. the song is really chaotic but gotta make it more intuitive for players to tap mmh i think its fine tbh, because (4) is a kickslider so i dont think it would make much of a difference
01:40:627 (8) - i would map this as a short slider. not really major though i dont really like how it sounds
01:42:127 (1,2,3) - spacing. both play as 1/2 hits so should be more even i feel again its a kickslider, your movement to it with enough speed that it will play like a 1/2 rhythm
01:44:002 (4,5) - spacing 4 away from 3 would be neat to put emphasis on the distorted snare would make it look a bit messy imo
01:44:977 (1,2) - could just extent 1 out to the end of 2. 2's not really mapping anything in the song there is some sort of drum beginning there and it would sound a bit weird without it
01:47:677 (3) - rotate a bit counter clockwise, feels a bit sharp compared to true changed
01:54:727 (1,2) - spacing this out a bit. 3/4 should be fine, i have these things later in the song aswell
02:01:777 (1) - nice hit sounds, matches well

02:06:052 - ok, as per request and the desc. I actually think areas such as these are ok to be left blank. It's consistent with 01:30:577 - . Also, since breakcore maps primarily map to general intro vocals and drum sounds, absence of these here sound like they should be blank. In addition, in terms of playability for breakcore in general, the song def needs a break time, so i feel these areas are the best sounding thing for that since there's nothing intense enough going on to grant an object to hit. (Just click the insert break time button tbh) i agree with the break stuff but i cant put a break time in it because of the drain time, it would go under 5 mins, the first 2 breaks of that section are alright just i think the third one is a bit long(the one that starts from here: 02:10:177 - )

02:23:227 (5,3) - i feel that representing the slider ends as circles or something to be hit would represent the sound better. repeating sliders could work too not really a great idea to put a circle on 1/8 tick, no way it would be predictable and can be accurately hit
02:25:327 (6) - rotate a bit counterclockwise, feels a bit sharp coming from a round stream is fine
03:13:627 (6,7,1,2) - general spacing should be smaller/more consistent ye
03:15:727 (5,5) - same as 02:23:227 (5,3) -
03:29:977 (1) - short slider i think would be better. looks like a sound should be on the end but there isnt one in the song did it for the extended sound
04:09:877 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - keep these going downward. hard to read already with stacks so don't need to switch, especially since the same sound all around are downward too changed it around a bit because there is a sound on the first note on them that i wanted to emphasize
04:47:602 (2,1) - rotate angle to be like 04:47:152 (1,2,1) - for consistency did something else but changed

great song! GL on ranking~