Gabe wrote:

:3c

1. 00:18:863 (18,19) - boring dkd chain.. and broken the linked with 00:21:777 (29,30,31,32) - kkdd.. should return the ddkk.
2. again, 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?　its not same sound from before ddk.
3. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - k-ddk? really werid rhythm there. I dont think its not worried.
4. 02:27:949 - k? 02:27:777 (404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - too much don there, flow seems very weird.
5. 03:04:463 - move the green to 03:03:777 - . the white bar seems weird because of be different speed.

1. 01:41:149 - add k, if you wont change the flow there. 01:41:491 (1,2,3,4,5) - .
2. 03:27:520 - remove ...or move to 03:29:234 - ? 5plet seems over power a bit.
3. 05:04:463 - should add k

JUDYDANNY wrote:

once again.

[Dark]

1. 01:41:149 - add k, if you wont change the flow there. 01:41:491 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Somehow I don't really think a k would fit there...
2. 03:27:520 - remove ...or move to 03:29:234 - ? 5plet seems over power a bit. Good point, fixed that
3. 05:04:463 - should add k Here's no distinctive sound for a k and i think leaving that last beat open sounds pretty good to finish the map with as introduces the echo nicely imo

JUDYDANNY wrote:

once again.
[xfrac]

1. 00:18:863 (18,19) - boring dkd chain.. and broken the linked with 00:21:777 (29,30,31,32) - kkdd.. should return the ddkk.
   ddkk sounds great, applied
2. again, 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?　its not same sound from before ddk.
   I think 00:56:920 (112,115) - are great emphasized at using kat on them and should be enough imo :p
3. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - k-ddk? really werid rhythm there. I dont think its not worried.
   Okay, fixing this time
4. 02:27:949 - k? 02:27:777 (404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - too much don there, flow seems very weird.
   Done
5. 03:04:463 - move the green to 03:03:777 - . the white bar seems weird because of be different speed.
   Fixed

Thank you juda . Also added 'Collab' to tags

JUDYDANNY wrote:

OK, ready go!
For saving, Rebubbled

Battle wrote:

Would you like to explain why it's YooSanHyakurei and not Yoohimemiya?

I didn't really see a source around here and I found http://shop.attackthemusic.com/album/frequency-blitz-2 as metadata so ya

Doyak wrote:

I still wonder if 'himmel' (lowercase 'h') is ever confirmed. All the references I could find use 'Himmel' (even on the fanzhen's post). The screenshot doesn't show if the artist was saying "the whole metadata is correct" or it's just about "Yoohimemiya" part.

As I could find on https://soundcloud.com/himmeltengoku he usses to refer himself (he uses himmel on every social network). Anyways I wrote him to confirm it.