hello
there is still quite some room for improvement before it gets ranked imo.
[insane]
00:01:127 (2) - even though it's 1/1, having this big jump in calm part feels a bit odd. you'd be better off making it a smaller spacing since the song here is very calm
00:04:770 (4,5,1) - this is weird. you've switched instruments (to vocals from piano) but the slider is supposed to be in the same pattern as the piano 3/4 stuff?
additionally, having the first note of a fairly loud piano triple be unclickable is kinda meh imo. you'd be better off making it a 3/4 slider then a triple, or a bunch of circles, then you can play all 3 piano notes properly.
additionally can you line up 4 5 1 lmao
00:07:127 (1,2,3,1) - this is also strange, you use 3 different rhythms for 1/1 vocals, creating odd rhythm gaps that vary despite the song being the exact same... and aside from that, the sliders don't really work together well. what i mean, is that 00:07:127 (1,2) - looks kinda disconnected to me. making a pattern out of all 3 would look a bit better / more organized imo.
00:13:341 (5) - this should be on the blue tick before, the double rhythm is much much much more obvious in the song than whatever this red tick is on
00:14:841 (4) - same here, clear note on the blue ticks that just get completely ignored
00:26:412 (2,4,5) - doesn't ctrl g make more sense for what the vocals are doing?
00:28:341 (3,4) - why u have vocal on slider end and click on something random then another vocal on slider end?
if it's to follow that background instrument, you should put slider at 00:26:627 (3) - 00:29:412 (1,2) - etc to follow it for the entire section
00:31:127 (1,2,3) - 3/4 rhythm in the piano here is the most clear, you should map that like you did at 00:05:412 (1,2,3) - anyway
00:35:627 (3) - this extended slider is not good imo. the vocal ends on the red tick, and there is a guitar thing that you were skipping vocal rhythm to follow at the white tick too.
basically this entire section the rhythm is kinda jumbled between what youre trying to follow lol
00:39:698 (1,2,3,4) - uhh why not sliders here since there's literally nothing on the red ticks?
00:41:198 - vocal start is completely skipped? you should map it
you put an offbeat vocal slider at 00:41:627 - but then didnt map the stronger, also offbeat vocal following it at 00:42:055 (3) - with a slider?
00:43:341 (2,3) - more 3/4 that is completely ignored
01:01:984 (1,2,3,4) - dude... this is really clear 3/4 rhythm, but you mapped it all as 1/2. this makes no sense.
01:03:591 - a triple here going into the finish would make more sense
01:04:127 (2,3,4) - having all these vocals with emphasis on slider ends is also kinda sad =(
01:10:555 (1) - it has a finish right? so it should have some kind of spacing emphasis imo.
01:12:912 (4,5,6) - why is this spacing so high when only 01:12:912 (4) - has the stronger vocal? the pattern should be readjusted where 4 has higher spacing than surrounding stuff
01:16:984 (8) - rip offbeat vocal
[karen]
00:23:627 - might wanna follow this piano? since doing the same rhythm as the rest even though the piano come in loudly is weird
00:56:198 (7,8) - tbh, the vocal on the white tick sounds very strong... pretty sad to see a slider end there
01:02:198 (2,3,4) - this should be double right?
anyway yeah the top diff needs work...
[]
unrelated but shouldnt the preferred romanization be touyama nao (thats what i always see on #highlight when someone ranks a touyama nao song lol)
there is still quite some room for improvement before it gets ranked imo.
[insane]
00:01:127 (2) - even though it's 1/1, having this big jump in calm part feels a bit odd. you'd be better off making it a smaller spacing since the song here is very calm
00:04:770 (4,5,1) - this is weird. you've switched instruments (to vocals from piano) but the slider is supposed to be in the same pattern as the piano 3/4 stuff?
additionally, having the first note of a fairly loud piano triple be unclickable is kinda meh imo. you'd be better off making it a 3/4 slider then a triple, or a bunch of circles, then you can play all 3 piano notes properly.
additionally can you line up 4 5 1 lmao
00:07:127 (1,2,3,1) - this is also strange, you use 3 different rhythms for 1/1 vocals, creating odd rhythm gaps that vary despite the song being the exact same... and aside from that, the sliders don't really work together well. what i mean, is that 00:07:127 (1,2) - looks kinda disconnected to me. making a pattern out of all 3 would look a bit better / more organized imo.
00:13:341 (5) - this should be on the blue tick before, the double rhythm is much much much more obvious in the song than whatever this red tick is on
00:14:841 (4) - same here, clear note on the blue ticks that just get completely ignored
00:26:412 (2,4,5) - doesn't ctrl g make more sense for what the vocals are doing?
00:28:341 (3,4) - why u have vocal on slider end and click on something random then another vocal on slider end?
if it's to follow that background instrument, you should put slider at 00:26:627 (3) - 00:29:412 (1,2) - etc to follow it for the entire section
00:31:127 (1,2,3) - 3/4 rhythm in the piano here is the most clear, you should map that like you did at 00:05:412 (1,2,3) - anyway
00:35:627 (3) - this extended slider is not good imo. the vocal ends on the red tick, and there is a guitar thing that you were skipping vocal rhythm to follow at the white tick too.
basically this entire section the rhythm is kinda jumbled between what youre trying to follow lol
00:39:698 (1,2,3,4) - uhh why not sliders here since there's literally nothing on the red ticks?
00:41:198 - vocal start is completely skipped? you should map it
you put an offbeat vocal slider at 00:41:627 - but then didnt map the stronger, also offbeat vocal following it at 00:42:055 (3) - with a slider?
00:43:341 (2,3) - more 3/4 that is completely ignored
01:01:984 (1,2,3,4) - dude... this is really clear 3/4 rhythm, but you mapped it all as 1/2. this makes no sense.
01:03:591 - a triple here going into the finish would make more sense
01:04:127 (2,3,4) - having all these vocals with emphasis on slider ends is also kinda sad =(
01:10:555 (1) - it has a finish right? so it should have some kind of spacing emphasis imo.
01:12:912 (4,5,6) - why is this spacing so high when only 01:12:912 (4) - has the stronger vocal? the pattern should be readjusted where 4 has higher spacing than surrounding stuff
01:16:984 (8) - rip offbeat vocal
[karen]
00:23:627 - might wanna follow this piano? since doing the same rhythm as the rest even though the piano come in loudly is weird
00:56:198 (7,8) - tbh, the vocal on the white tick sounds very strong... pretty sad to see a slider end there
01:02:198 (2,3,4) - this should be double right?
anyway yeah the top diff needs work...
[]
unrelated but shouldnt the preferred romanization be touyama nao (thats what i always see on #highlight when someone ranks a touyama nao song lol)