Gabe wrote:

hi! from #modreqs
!! I thought that channel was just for spam your map :3 thank you for coming
Collab Oni

*The difficulty name is not bad, but it would be really nice if you'd change it for something that would follow the theme of the song and the song's title. I'd suggest maybe "Celestial" or "Angelic", since the "Seraphim" is a celestial creature from the #bible.
I was thinking about that. Gotta need to discuss with Vortex. Just stucked at it cause I don't want to rest credits to him xD

1. 00:07:891 (6) - Shouldn't this note be moved to 00:07:549 - if you would follow 00:04:806 (3) - ?
   I would pref to move 00:07:720 - according to your same reason :p
2. 00:19:549 (22,23) - In my opinion, I'd rather switch these two notes as the note (23) should be more high pitched than (22) and if you switch both of them, the note (23) will follow these two notes: 00:20:406 (26,27) -, which both lands on red ticks.
   Yeah sounds pretty great, fixed~
3. 00:33:434 (14) - I suggest you to change this note for a don instead, as it would follow your consistency starting at the note 00:27:434 (1) -
   I think 00:33:434 (14) - makes already a good difference between 00:32:920 - and 00:33:949 - pitches. If I make id D d d it will get strange and wont follow pitches that good :c
4. 02:22:463 (359) - I'd suggest you to replace this don for a kat to emphasize the vocals which you were following with the previous kats.
   Applied
5. 02:24:006 (372) - At this point, I feel like there is a lack of intonation. In the song, we can totally hear a drum sound that is similar to where a 'finisher' would be. In this case, I suggest you to add a finish hitsound to this note to emphasize the sound coming from this part.
6. 02:29:491 (417) - Similar to what I said on 02:24:006 (372) -, there is a loud sound here as well. To keep the consistency from my previous suggestion, I'm suggesting you to add a finish hitsound to this note too. Also, I'd recommend you to delete this note (02:29:577 (418) - ) to make sure the note (417) is greatly emphasized.
   I can agree somehow with your suggestion, but I think using only one big note in the Kiai makes it looks weird. I think it's not neccesary and should be good like it is :3. Also I think it gives more liberty to make other patterns than a single note on these :p (variation stuff)
7. 02:42:349 (527,528,529) - I believe you should follow the same idea as 02:40:806 (515,516,517,518) - , but having the last kat moved further away. In
   this case, take these notes and reverse them with CTRL+G, making it kdd instead. It will also give more intonation with the guitar to these notes: 02:42:691 (530,531,532,533) -
   I only applied 02:42:691 (531,532) - ctrl+g on these cause I think current breaks are nice :p

Great map! :3c
ty :3

Gabe wrote:

:3c

1. 00:18:863 (18,19) - boring dkd chain.. and broken the linked with 00:21:777 (29,30,31,32) - kkdd.. should return the ddkk.
2. again, 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?　its not same sound from before ddk.
3. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - k-ddk? really werid rhythm there. I dont think its not worried.
4. 02:27:949 - k? 02:27:777 (404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - too much don there, flow seems very weird.
5. 03:04:463 - move the green to 03:03:777 - . the white bar seems weird because of be different speed.

1. 01:41:149 - add k, if you wont change the flow there. 01:41:491 (1,2,3,4,5) - .
2. 03:27:520 - remove ...or move to 03:29:234 - ? 5plet seems over power a bit.
3. 05:04:463 - should add k

JUDYDANNY wrote:

once again.

[Dark]

1. 01:41:149 - add k, if you wont change the flow there. 01:41:491 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Somehow I don't really think a k would fit there...
2. 03:27:520 - remove ...or move to 03:29:234 - ? 5plet seems over power a bit. Good point, fixed that
3. 05:04:463 - should add k Here's no distinctive sound for a k and i think leaving that last beat open sounds pretty good to finish the map with as introduces the echo nicely imo

JUDYDANNY wrote:

once again.
[xfrac]

1. 00:18:863 (18,19) - boring dkd chain.. and broken the linked with 00:21:777 (29,30,31,32) - kkdd.. should return the ddkk.
   ddkk sounds great, applied
2. again, 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?　its not same sound from before ddk.
   I think 00:56:920 (112,115) - are great emphasized at using kat on them and should be enough imo :p
3. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - k-ddk? really werid rhythm there. I dont think its not worried.
   Okay, fixing this time
4. 02:27:949 - k? 02:27:777 (404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - too much don there, flow seems very weird.
   Done
5. 03:04:463 - move the green to 03:03:777 - . the white bar seems weird because of be different speed.
   Fixed

Thank you juda . Also added 'Collab' to tags

JUDYDANNY wrote:

OK, ready go!
For saving, Rebubbled

Battle wrote:

Would you like to explain why it's YooSanHyakurei and not Yoohimemiya?

I didn't really see a source around here and I found http://shop.attackthemusic.com/album/frequency-blitz-2 as metadata so ya

Doyak wrote:

I still wonder if 'himmel' (lowercase 'h') is ever confirmed. All the references I could find use 'Himmel' (even on the fanzhen's post). The screenshot doesn't show if the artist was saying "the whole metadata is correct" or it's just about "Yoohimemiya" part.

As I could find on https://soundcloud.com/himmeltengoku he usses to refer himself (he uses himmel on every social network). Anyways I wrote him to confirm it.