davidminh0111 wrote:

Hello xfrac, from my queue:
Sorry for late
Hey! Thanks for coming :3

[Collab Oni]
00:05:491: Change to k to fit the pitch
00:07:549: Delete this note since I didn't hear any background instrument. Then, move 00:07:891 to 00:07:720 Plays better imo'
Done but didn't move last note :')
00:33:434: Change to d to make the flow better
It's a clear high note ><
00:35:663: Should this be d? Since 00:36:691 has a lot of kkkk
Same reason as above :p
00:49:034: How about kkkkd?
I really like current dkkkd pattern, it's something different and kkkkd feels so louder
00:50:063 (79, 80): Add Finisher, background instrument is strong
The drum it's way the same as 00:51:434 (84,85) - so holding as smooth as I can. Saving finishers for stronger sounds
00:55:549: Change to d, low pitch
I like current effect it makes by finishing with the same note as 00:56:920 (113) -
01:11:491: Remove for consistency?
01:10:977 (206,207) - These notes make a great unity for the new section (also fit current pitches great)
01:13:549 (226, 227): Ctrl + G? Better flow
It follows melody nice and helps for consistency; I keep finishing patterns with k note :')
02:20:749 (347, 348): Ctrl + G? The melody's pitch is low in 02:20:749
Fixed on this and other parts ~
02:26:234: How about kk?
^ also consistency
02:40:634: At least remove this note, plays better imo, it looks weird if you put this note here because the pattern too long
I felt it nice when I tried your suggestion but I think it's neccesary since there's a clear sound that needs to be mapped ><
03:01:034: What's the point of the SV changes?
Emphasizing there comes a slow part :p
03:18:177: How about ddk?
Done for variation ~

I said no kudosu while placeholder but nvm xfrac :3

@here a star for mutual :3

yuzu__rinrin wrote:

hi! M4M req DM(discord)~ sorry late ;;
Don't worry :'3
good song =w=b
cute voice w

[xfrac part]

1. 00:31:549 (10,11) - ctrl+g
   high vocal point,
   follow please... ;;
   I think it's nice since 00:32:063 - emphasizes next kat better :')
   
2. 01:07:034 (176) - k
   The sound of the synth is high.
   117 drum sound also shines. :3
   Seems fine, fixed~
   
3. 02:20:577 (347,348,349) - d-d-k
   The pitch of vocal will also increase.
   And d will be appropriate to represent drum.
   Fixed it above :')
   
4. 02:50:920 (593) - k
   this drum sound dddk.
   But the next dddd can be used as it is to protect flow. :p
   I'd pref to stuck it a little simple. If I get other comment about it (it's the second) I'm gonna change maybe ~
   
5. 04:33:178 (475,476) - move to 04:33:263 -
   04:31:892 (465,466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474) - I want to keep this rhythm pattern.
   I think that the flow of play will also improve.
   Yeah helps at consistency and flow:D
   
6. 02:25:206 (383) - k
   start vocal.
   You can change it to k accordingly.
   Feels nice, fixed

good map, I think high quality map.
good luck~! ><

Zing wrote:

Mod from my queue. First time I've modded for a BN; I would appreciate it if you offered some feedback when you are done looking at it.
Hi! Thank you for coming! Don't worry about BN stuff xD everyone makes mistakes and suggestions are always welcome :')
For my mods, green text represents suggestions, yellow are concerns, and red are immediate action points.

COLLAB

SPOILER

When I show you note selections, each character represents a quarter beat.

OVERALL: Adding onto the storyboard who mapped what part would be most helpful as a modder, to see who was responsible for what without having to boss out as frequently.
After discussing with Vortex we decided it's not neccesary since we're only 2 mappers and part are easy to follow :')
00:48:862 (71,72,73,74,75,76) - d-kkkkd flows better compared to k-dkkkd like you have
Well on a first instance I made d dkkkd and I will be back to this
01:15:263 (238,239,240) - Following the last burst, ddk instead of kdk like you have.
Seems nicer
01:18:349 (262,263,264,265,266) - ddkdd instead of dkkdd
Fixed
01:21:263 (286,287,288) - Too many k's on the white and red ticks in a row for my taste. Would help to make this ddk instead of kdk like you have as well.
I like current kdk cause it emphasizes next stream nice
02:31:377 (436,437,438,439,440) - kdkkd instead of kdkkk like you have.
Nah, it follows nice the vocal already
04:25:548 (417,418,419,420,421,422,423) - Try dkkddkd instead of dkkdkkd like you have.
04:25:891 (421,422,423) - this kkd emphasises last don better imo
04:27:434 (434,439) - Try turning these into k's
They focuses the drum already fine :')

Overall - Not a lot I could come up with. But, you being a BN I expected as much.

Zing wrote:

Mod from my queue. First time I've modded for a BN; I would appreciate it if you offered some feedback when you are done looking at it.

For my mods, green text represents suggestions, yellow are concerns, and red are immediate action points.

COLLAB

SPOILER

When I show you note selections, each character represents a quarter beat.

01:41:834 (108,109,110,111,112) - The object placement here ignores the lyrics entirely, which seems to betray your normal style here. Try d-k-----k-k-d-k instead of d---k---k-k---k like you have. The transition to the synth which starts getting more intense is followed better currently imo.

04:47:149 (583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591) - Try kdkkddkdk instead of kdkkdkkdk like you have. that kkdkk gives some nice variation though :/

Overall - Not a lot I could come up with. But, you being a BN I expected as much.

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello, from M4M Queue.
o/ Juda

"xfrac"

[Oni]

1. 00:38:234 - remove? feels not good emphasized for next finish.
2. 00:41:149 - remove finish? there're not appearance as a big accent following the instrumental.
   done both
3. 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?
   
   • 00:54:863 (101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108) - →kdkdk-dkd , 00:56:577 (110,111,112,113,114,115) - ddk-kkd
   I would like to hold an extense from 00:56:577 (110,111,112) - so making a increase build up to 00:57:949 (116,118,119) - kdk / 00:58:634 (120,122,123) - kkd
4. 01:01:549 (136,137) - kd? to following the synthesizer pitch.(*-1)
   
5. 01:02:663 - recommend to remove, I think using the 5plet is early(*-2)
   
6. 01:07:891 (180,181,182,183,184) - change to (k-ddk)?
   
   
   • *-2 5plet seems early, over power imo.
     * pitch seems up, kat-begining flow seems not well followed the instrumental. """ Try to use don-begining flow *-3 """ .
   Yeah I can agree with you on these points, fixed~
7. 01:12:691 - d? kat seems too over.
   fixed
8. about01:15:263 (235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246) - ddk-k-kdddk-kkk
   
   1. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - change to(k-ddk), to refer there 01:15:091 (234,235) - (*-1) and, to make a consistent with 01:11:663 (207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216) - 3-1-5 plet flow.
      I think it's not neccesary to be consistent cause both patterns sound different (specially the electronic sound, that I'm following)
   2. 01:16:292 (244,245,246) - change to (d-k or k-k)? seems over plet 1/4 triple.
   Both sounds great, stucking at d k
9. 01:17:491 - d, kat seems too over.
10. 01:17:749 - same.
11. 01:18:177 - same.
12. 02:21:777 - d, kat seems too over.
    Applied these
13. 02:22:463 (361,362) - k-d? refer to there *-3
    I think it's mostly about variation so kdd sound really fine. Most important notes are kxd
14. 02:33:691 - move to 02:33:520 - ? it seems better for variation.
    Yup, I like variation
15. 02:26:235 (393) - d? linked with before kdddk (and, make a conistenc. 02:18:863 - 1st kiai flow kdkkd-kdkkddk)
    It's already a don D:
16. 02:28:206 - remove, 02:28:463 (409,410) - change to k-d?
    02:28:034 - removed this instead.
    
    • * 02:28:463 - seems better to same color for drums with 02:28:120 - , 02:28:291 - ,and seems better to different color for vocal with 02:28:634 - .
      *02:28:206 -feels over *-2
      I made other changes here, should be fine imo
17. 02:35:406 - not d?
    This is kat D:
18. 02:39:177 - remove , same as 2:28:206.
    Removed 02:39:006 - for consistency
19. 02:40:034 - k? to follow the vocal slar.
    Hmmm even both sounds good, kat here is great too
20. 02:40:377 - add, drums still sounds.
    True, added d
21. 02:40:634 - , 02:40:891 - , 02:43:291 (535,536) - , 02:43:806 - , should remove. Its too long as after kiai ._.
22. 02:51:606 - , 02:51:863 - same.
    I made other changes here, should be fine aswell
23. 02:55:377 - change to k? distortion guitar sounds cut up.
    Done
    03:01:034 (659,660,661,662,663,664,665,666,667,668) - seems weird the decreasing SV, Should keep 1.0.
    
    • 1.0→0.9 from 03:02:406 - , 0.9→0.8 from 03:04:463 - seems better.
      Second comment about it, changing them :p
24. About 04:30:863 - , 04:41:834 - , 04:42:520 - ,and 04:52:806 - , k plays better as personal opinion.
    I like the current drum-follow effect, they're not common patterns so I like them :3

That's all for now!
Try to collect more +2~3mods. I'll be back after that.
Good luck~(¦3[___]

1. 00:07:891 (6) - Shouldn't this note be moved to 00:07:549 - if you would follow 00:04:806 (3) - ?
2. 00:19:549 (22,23) - In my opinion, I'd rather switch these two notes as the note (23) should be more high pitched than (22) and if you switch both of them, the note (23) will follow these two notes: 00:20:406 (26,27) -, which both lands on red ticks.
3. 00:33:434 (14) - I suggest you to change this note for a don instead, as it would follow your consistency starting at the note 00:27:434 (1) -
4. 02:22:463 (359) - I'd suggest you to replace this don for a kat to emphasize the vocals which you were following with the previous kats.
5. 02:24:006 (372) - At this point, I feel like there is a lack of intonation. In the song, we can totally hear a drum sound that is similar to where a 'finisher' would be. In this case, I suggest you to add a finish hitsound to this note to emphasize the sound coming from this part.
6. 02:29:491 (417) - Similar to what I said on 02:24:006 (372) -, there is a loud sound here as well. To keep the consistency from my previous suggestion, I'm suggesting you to add a finish hitsound to this note too. Also, I'd recommend you to delete this note (02:29:577 (418) - ) to make sure the note (417) is greatly emphasized.
7. 02:42:349 (527,528,529) - I believe you should follow the same idea as 02:40:806 (515,516,517,518) - , but having the last kat moved further away. In this case, take these notes and reverse them with CTRL+G, making it kdd instead. It will also give more intonation with the guitar to these notes: 02:42:691 (530,531,532,533) -
8. 03:58:291 (229) - This note should be the prolongation of the previous note, which means it would be better if you'd change this note for a kat instead, as it will follow the same 'intonation', if we can say.
9. 04:53:491 (634) - Looking back at 04:42:520 (548) - , you don't have a kat note and surprisingly, you were following the sounds which you greatly emphasized with 04:41:149 (541,542,543,544,545,546,547) - and 04:52:120 (627,628,629,630,631,632,633) - . If we compare both notes now, one has a simple don, while the other has a kat with a finish hitsound. In this case, to make sure you're keeping a nice consistency, I'd suggest you change the kat from the second note for a don. I would also recommend you to KEEP the finish hitsound of the second note as well, as there is a sound which you can emphasize the finish with, which there is nothing to emphasize on the first note.

Gabe wrote:

hi! from #modreqs
!! I thought that channel was just for spam your map :3 thank you for coming
Collab Oni

*The difficulty name is not bad, but it would be really nice if you'd change it for something that would follow the theme of the song and the song's title. I'd suggest maybe "Celestial" or "Angelic", since the "Seraphim" is a celestial creature from the #bible.
I was thinking about that. Gotta need to discuss with Vortex. Just stucked at it cause I don't want to rest credits to him xD

1. 00:07:891 (6) - Shouldn't this note be moved to 00:07:549 - if you would follow 00:04:806 (3) - ?
   I would pref to move 00:07:720 - according to your same reason :p
2. 00:19:549 (22,23) - In my opinion, I'd rather switch these two notes as the note (23) should be more high pitched than (22) and if you switch both of them, the note (23) will follow these two notes: 00:20:406 (26,27) -, which both lands on red ticks.
   Yeah sounds pretty great, fixed~
3. 00:33:434 (14) - I suggest you to change this note for a don instead, as it would follow your consistency starting at the note 00:27:434 (1) -
   I think 00:33:434 (14) - makes already a good difference between 00:32:920 - and 00:33:949 - pitches. If I make id D d d it will get strange and wont follow pitches that good :c
4. 02:22:463 (359) - I'd suggest you to replace this don for a kat to emphasize the vocals which you were following with the previous kats.
   Applied
5. 02:24:006 (372) - At this point, I feel like there is a lack of intonation. In the song, we can totally hear a drum sound that is similar to where a 'finisher' would be. In this case, I suggest you to add a finish hitsound to this note to emphasize the sound coming from this part.
6. 02:29:491 (417) - Similar to what I said on 02:24:006 (372) -, there is a loud sound here as well. To keep the consistency from my previous suggestion, I'm suggesting you to add a finish hitsound to this note too. Also, I'd recommend you to delete this note (02:29:577 (418) - ) to make sure the note (417) is greatly emphasized.
   I can agree somehow with your suggestion, but I think using only one big note in the Kiai makes it looks weird. I think it's not neccesary and should be good like it is :3. Also I think it gives more liberty to make other patterns than a single note on these :p (variation stuff)
7. 02:42:349 (527,528,529) - I believe you should follow the same idea as 02:40:806 (515,516,517,518) - , but having the last kat moved further away. In
   this case, take these notes and reverse them with CTRL+G, making it kdd instead. It will also give more intonation with the guitar to these notes: 02:42:691 (530,531,532,533) -
   I only applied 02:42:691 (531,532) - ctrl+g on these cause I think current breaks are nice :p

Great map! :3c
ty :3

Gabe wrote:

:3c

1. 00:18:863 (18,19) - boring dkd chain.. and broken the linked with 00:21:777 (29,30,31,32) - kkdd.. should return the ddkk.
2. again, 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?　its not same sound from before ddk.
3. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - k-ddk? really werid rhythm there. I dont think its not worried.
4. 02:27:949 - k? 02:27:777 (404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - too much don there, flow seems very weird.
5. 03:04:463 - move the green to 03:03:777 - . the white bar seems weird because of be different speed.

1. 01:41:149 - add k, if you wont change the flow there. 01:41:491 (1,2,3,4,5) - .
2. 03:27:520 - remove ...or move to 03:29:234 - ? 5plet seems over power a bit.
3. 05:04:463 - should add k

JUDYDANNY wrote:

once again.

[Dark]

1. 01:41:149 - add k, if you wont change the flow there. 01:41:491 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Somehow I don't really think a k would fit there...
2. 03:27:520 - remove ...or move to 03:29:234 - ? 5plet seems over power a bit. Good point, fixed that
3. 05:04:463 - should add k Here's no distinctive sound for a k and i think leaving that last beat open sounds pretty good to finish the map with as introduces the echo nicely imo

JUDYDANNY wrote:

once again.
[xfrac]

1. 00:18:863 (18,19) - boring dkd chain.. and broken the linked with 00:21:777 (29,30,31,32) - kkdd.. should return the ddkk.
   ddkk sounds great, applied
2. again, 00:57:263 (113,114,115) - kkd?　its not same sound from before ddk.
   I think 00:56:920 (112,115) - are great emphasized at using kat on them and should be enough imo :p
3. 01:15:263 (235,236,237,238) - k-ddk? really werid rhythm there. I dont think its not worried.
   Okay, fixing this time
4. 02:27:949 - k? 02:27:777 (404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - too much don there, flow seems very weird.
   Done
5. 03:04:463 - move the green to 03:03:777 - . the white bar seems weird because of be different speed.
   Fixed

Thank you juda . Also added 'Collab' to tags

JUDYDANNY wrote:

OK, ready go!
For saving, Rebubbled

Battle wrote:

Would you like to explain why it's YooSanHyakurei and not Yoohimemiya?

I didn't really see a source around here and I found http://shop.attackthemusic.com/album/frequency-blitz-2 as metadata so ya

Doyak wrote:

I still wonder if 'himmel' (lowercase 'h') is ever confirmed. All the references I could find use 'Himmel' (even on the fanzhen's post). The screenshot doesn't show if the artist was saying "the whole metadata is correct" or it's just about "Yoohimemiya" part.

As I could find on https://soundcloud.com/himmeltengoku he usses to refer himself (he uses himmel on every social network). Anyways I wrote him to confirm it.