Thread quality sure fluctates from high to low so hard and vice versa
Γ(0)/0silmarilen wrote:
Now what is (-1)! ?
silmarilen wrote:
Just because you're a 12 year old who doesn't understand something doesn't mean it should be locked.
silmarilen wrote:
Just because you're a 12 year old who doesn't understand something doesn't mean it should be locked.
A prime example of why 12 year olds don't have the dicks needed to be on the internet_SkyFall wrote:
Woah, that's kinda rude .
If you want to silence other peoples form of fun then they can be rude in its defense._SkyFall wrote:
Woah, that's kinda rude .
Oh come on, I was joking all the time.M3ATL0V3R wrote:
If you want to silence other peoples form of fun then they can be rude in its defense._SkyFall wrote:
Woah, that's kinda rude .
Don't request locking threads unless it is undoubtedly bad content.
A joke on our fun is like making fun of us having fun. Just don't. Nobody asked for it._SkyFall wrote:
Oh come on, I was joking all the time.
EDIT: I thought you got it. I'd never try to get a post locked unless, as you said, it was a really bad thread. But I didn't even read most of the posts here so I can't even know if this is a bad topic. But even without having to read all the posts I'm pretty sure this is a good topic, better than some others here in OT.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
death by mentionSerraionga wrote:
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
idk becuase you cant divide by 0_SkyFall wrote:
Why hasn't this topic been blocked yet.
abraker wrote:
death by mentionSerraionga wrote:
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
@Blitzfrog
And I agree with you.silmarilen wrote:
Locking threads because people are going off-topic is counter productive, you could just flood a thread with off-topic shit with a couple of friends to get it locked if you don't like it.
The people who are ruining the thread should be punished, not the ones who are using it for its original purpose.