Shiirn wrote:
hi just some stuff you might wanna glance at before qualification
- 03:05:927 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - I do take issue with these rhythms, it really feels like it should be clicks on 03:05:927 - and 03:06:013 - , in other words, three 1/4 sliders on blue ticks, with the two later ones being curved. This also allows the patterns to skip the extremely awkward and unusual filler object at 03:06:527 (1) - , so they can have self-contained, repeating patterns. This is probably the worst section in the entire map because of this weird choice that doesn't really follow the rhythm the music provides. For that pattern we take a loooot of time and tried a tons of different rhythms... also that one was the best of them so far, I perfectly know what you want to do but I prefer not changing it !
- 03:23:155 (8,2) - these just feel really weird and pointlessly offbeat after you do 03:22:470 (2,3) - normally. The rhythm's already got it's quirks, don't make up more for the player to follow >_- mhmmm, Interesting but I really like this pattern and also the rhythm, but yeah thats true its a bit weird, but thats not a really bad thing too.. looks good to me
- 03:46:898 (3) - This totally ends on the red tick just fine. And there's no real reason to end it earlier to sync with the music, there's no rapid fadeout or cutout to signify that it's okay. I can tell it's an on-purpose choice, but in this particular case it's just pointlessly quirky. I don't think it's on red tick but also its not on 1/6 imo, that looks on 1/8 tbh, gonna need a real confirm on that for sure
- 03:57:413 (1) - it also means this should start on the blue tick. I can tell you want them to be slightly early to sync the hitsounds, but it's just awkward to hit now. These are rather minor, however. tl;dr i disagree with these snaps Ok its starting on blue tick maybe but It's not ending on a 1/4 rhythm so thats a bit awkward too, I think we really need a good timer for that part
- 05:22:555 (1,2,3,4) - I get the whole 1/4 net thing but i really feel like a 3/4 here would really fit the intensity over time. just me tho, just me. Interesting proposition but tbh I like the actual one and I don't really want to change it cause the emphasis is pretty good with it
- 05:28:041 (1) - yes just like he does here! ^ I've done that on this pattern cause the music feels really different to the rest of the part !
Don't be dissuaded by the massive wall - almost all of these points are minor and can be changed without a bubble pop, or with an easy re-bubble. Better now than during qualified, eh? Yeah when I've seen that for the first time I was like "omg no drama please" but thats fine, this mod is really nice and helping a lot, thanks for your contribution shiirn !
Also, I'll never understand why mappers often put silly new combos on blue ticks before the actual structure change in the map. It's not quirky, it's just messy. e_e But this map is so heavily built around that silly choice that I'm not going to completely overhaul it, just point out the ones that are really egregious and actively detract from the map rather than just look slightly weird.
Sharu
- 00:20:670 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - Should really be more consistent about what you're whistling or not - they're really inconsistent here. Removing the whistle on the end of 00:21:355 (1) - and adding one to 00:23:070 (3) - would help, for starters. You'd need to modify the future repeat as well if you do that.
- 00:45:870 (1) - Missing thump, methinks, same with 00:51:355 (1) - . You might here a slight change in volume but the structure is identical, anyway.
- 01:39:870 (1,2) - my gut tells me to swap these ncs
- 01:47:413 (1,2,3) - I feel like all of these streams would benefit with a new combo on the 3, on the white tick, to help smooth the transition from a pre-roll triple into the full roll stream of notes. You've already got that emphasis just from the change in shape and momentum, but the new combo is too early to really synchronize with that. (I am aware that there are piano lead-in tones on 1 and 2, but the entire structure of the song is based on this transition, after the transition measure at 01:56:155 (7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,1,2) - , the piano lead-in tones are much more powerful and thus are no longer lead-in, if you catch my drift)
- 01:50:327 (3) - ^ etc you get my point, even if its super long-winded for just a "swap ncs"
- 03:20:070 (1,2) - more nc swaps pls
- 05:06:013 (1,2) - nc swap pls
- 05:12:955 (1,2,1,2) - should really remove nc on second 1,2, it's a 4-note pattern and 4-note shaped pattern at that
(No, I didn't deny everything ! just removed the fixed issues !)