1. Conviction (5.44 stars, 914 notes)
2. Easy (1.46 stars, 206 notes)
3. Hard (3.22 stars, 532 notes)
4. Insane (4.66 stars, 691 notes)
5. Normal (2.1 stars, 365 notes)

Left wrote:

opinion : coolest aki ever

Minorsonek wrote:

M4M
I've heard this song before.... rrtyui mapped it on jp mapping contest, yes i rly liked the kanau and kotori's entry w

Top diff

00:19:263 (6,3) - stack it properly
00:19:263 (6,5) - blanket they arent even visible each other on animation
00:18:573 (3) - i think you can move it up a bit, to form a blanket with sliderend + 00:18:918 (4) - and sliderhead with 00:19:091 (5) -
00:21:332 (3) - if you ctrl+g, triangle isnt perfect https://i.imgur.com/reZjzok.png maybe
00:28:746 (3) - you dont need to re-do this slidershape, just copy 00:13:056 (5) - and rotate for visual consistent they r far enuf and actually different part of the song lol
00:30:298 (1,3) - you can rearrange this sliders to form something like 00:24:780 (1,3) -, would look better
00:35:298 (3) - this sound is way weaker than 00:35:125 (1,2) - but also different than 00:35:470 (4,5,6) - so maybe 1/4 slider 00:35:211 (2) - and make it as sliderend? uh its still audible enough to keep it as circle
00:37:711 (2) - there is weird sound, but i think normal 1/4 rhythm will be better than 1/3 just like you did almost same sound here 00:38:229 (4,5,6) - did something different, i listened carefully with 25% playback rate and ye
01:11:505 (1,2) - blanket isnt perfect here not perfect but close enuf lul
01:32:194 (3,1) - ^ a
02:08:056 (3,1) - ^ b
02:12:539 (2,4) - stack
02:18:401 (4,3) - stack (4) at the slider body
02:14:953 (3) - 02:20:470 (3) - again, copy 00:13:056 (5) handmade ftw
02:31:677 (6) - ctrl+g for better flow (02:30:470 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - every slider here goes up) 02:31:677 (6) - is kind of weak and i like my current trick for confusing ppl :^(
03:40:815 (1) - not a big fan of this shape source : dimension W

Insane

00:05:987 (2,3,4,5,6) - flow is meh here, especially if compared to next section
00:55:729 - 00:56:246 - two sounds skipped, i suggest 00:55:643 (5,5) - 1/4 sliders here therefore change pattern a bit those 2 is really weak compared to others so i can safely skip it to not overdone as lower diff. I changed the flow anyways
01:04:263 (3) - 01:09:780 (3) - here you've mapped this sound by red anchor slider, but here 01:15:298 (3) - this exact sound is noticeably longer, and you didnt change anything didn't extend as it's awkward to see 2 extended in a row and looks lame lol, but I moved the anchor for more noticeable changes
01:26:160 (3,3) - maybe blanket? they arent visible each other lul
01:45:125 (2,3,4) - no reason to triple here vocals are worth here enuf to triple it
01:51:505 (4) - NC (as you did 00:34:263 (1) - , or remove NC there)
02:46:677 (2) - NC (as you did 00:34:263 (1) - , or remove NC there)
03:07:711 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - same as before same

Pretty good map, really well made, adding to favs, good luck!

Pachiru wrote:

i really like the concept of the kiai, it makes it more creative, and not boring so good luck, and good job!

NeilPerry wrote:

Yoyo!

General: add in tags something. about genre and some additional things about source. ye

Conviction:
01:37:022 (3) - move it on x:29 y:229 for more neat. If i catch ur idea right ye
01:50:815 (3) - i guess moments like this should be emphazed with nc lol. rly hard sv gap forgot w
02:56:160 (2,1) - avoid this micro overlap xd fixed xd

lol sorry for nazi. it looks like ready. owo

Insane:
03:01:332 (2) - ok nazi blanket suqad right here. put it on x:247 y:363 will be more even at better overlap with this 03:01:849 (1) - lol i think its fine ;3
00:54:953 (1) - 03:07:367 (1) - dont rly understand of NC using here stream note count getting decreased, 00:51:160 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - is 8, 00:53:918 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - is 6 and finally that single 00:54:953 (1) - is 4, same applies to other related parts
03:19:780 (5,4) - should be stacked? oh my god
03:34:780 (4,5,6) - dont rly looks neat to overlap this with sldierend of 03:35:298 (1) - . just wanna suggest try this https://puu.sh/xQDtr/b88c3d77ee.jpg sure

ya same looks like ready

Hard:
perfect

Normal:
02:23:918 (5) - place nc? for be consistence with this 02:57:022 (1) - ? i prefer keeping measurement consistency in regardless of intensity change, also that's different idea lol
03:08:746 - useless greenline uwu
03:30:125 (5) - same about nc ^

Easy:
00:44:608 - useless greenline uwu
01:26:332 (4) - this slider starts from nothing. I dunno how to resolve this problem cuz previously you did rythm variation maybe fixed
02:43:573 (4) - ya same ye
02:45:470 (1) - is this spinner lenght rankable for easy? yes iirc


Okay im done. Set looks really ready. Best of luck with it. Sorry for nazi stuff mostly.

Scaltinof wrote:

[Conviction]
00:22:022 (1,2,1,2,1,1) - ここスライダーが裏拍取ってて少し変則的な音取りに感じたから00:21:677 (4,5) - を普通に単発置いただけだとなんか違和感が感じる　こんな感じにして00:21:332 (3) - の終点に00:21:849 (4) - の単発置くのどう？NC間違えてたから見にくくなってたのかも、でもパターンに対しては個人的にリバースは避けたいっすね...

00:43:229 (1) - こ↑こ↓こっちの方が良いぞきっと これわざとです、 こーゆー仕組みになっとるゾ

01:40:470 (1,2,1,2,1) - これは鬼畜　(褒め言葉)　ｵｫﾝ
02:22:711 (1) - これ02:21:505 (1) - の反転だけで良いと思う お、おう
03:14:263 (3) - ちょっと遠すぎ・・・？03:13:229 (2) - にスタックでも良いと思う　もしくはスライダーの向き逆にするとかがいいかな
全体的通してなんだけどキックスライダーの向きが鬼畜すぎるなぁってstackまではしてないけど少し近付けました
一番キツいって感じたのが03:13:573 (4,1,2,3) - 100出させたいなら問題はない(?)って思うけどne
03:13:918 (1) - を反転するだけでも大分やりやすさが変わってきそう　pp激マズ譜面作るの難しいよお( ´•̥̥̥ω•̥̥̥`)


なんか硬い文になってすみません許してください！なんでもしますから！ん？今なんでもするって

1. 00:11:505 (1,2,3,4) - perhaps make some kind of progression here? cause intensity of the song is raising, having similar space between these objects feels pretty underwhelming
2. 00:14:953 (5,1) - 02:38:401 (3,1) - would be better imo if this thing was symmetrical (like this i guess)
3. 00:27:884 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - this flow is a bit unexpected cause 4-1-2 has wide angle, try ctrl+g on 00:28:401 (1,2) -
4. 00:33:573 (1,1) - nazi but you could make it neater (second slider's tail lower)
5. 00:36:332 (3,1) - this transition may be a bit confusing and cause sliderbreaks. i personally didn't have trouble testplaying (probably because i alternate such stuff), but still consider it (in this 02:48:746 (1,2) - place you care about that)
6. 00:37:367 (1) - more emphasize (spacing) to downbeat?
7. 00:53:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 03:06:332 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - the only reason i hear for this thing to be a jumpstream is a vocal. but considering this logic, 00:54:436 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 5-6 should be separeted and nced
8. 00:56:332 (1) - nazi again, but would be neater if node in the middle would be a bit lower
9. 01:21:505 (1) - does this thing really need to be bezier? i mean its too similar to regular circular slider visually. kind of same 01:39:263 (1) - but there it looks like it should be more curved
10. 01:42:022 (1,2,3) - i think with this rhythm vocal would be emphasized better (better than emphasizing boring snare imo, vocal here is a bit chaotic and distorted, affecting rhythm as well, i think it should be represented)
11. 01:43:229 (3) - how about making this 1/2 and placing a note on blue tick? cause vocal
12. 01:47:453 (4) - make this 1/12 reverse lmao
13. 01:50:125 (3,4,5,1,2,1) - not sure about this rhythm, perhaps make it closer to the vocal
14. 02:31:677 (6,1) - parallel?
15. 02:45:470 (1) - hm? you made 1/6 for previous similar instance (same for insane diff)
16. 02:56:677 (1) - make tail curved, not straight?
17. 02:56:677 (1,1) - transition between this objects may be unexpected, perhaps treat slider as extended one and place circle very close to its tail
18. 03:01:849 (1) - perhaps make this thing reverse, cause its same note as 03:00:815 (1) -, fits well imo

1. 00:31:332 (4,5) - align? or some other kind of connection, cause now they look kinda random imo
2. 00:39:780 (1,1) - i personally think that such things look better when you do it like this, but its up to you i guess
3. 00:44:263 (1) - this node a but upper to make curve look better
4. 00:51:849 (1) - 03:04:263 (1) - i don't think this nc much needed
5. 00:54:263 (5,1,2,1) - 03:06:677 (5,1,2,1) - for some reason thins thing was quite difficult to read, perhaps try toying with nc, or object placement, for example try put nc on 5 and 2 and delete 2 others
6. 01:32:022 (4,5) - align?
7. 01:39:780 (2,3,4) - use sharp flow?
8. 02:10:815 (4,1) - point 4 towards 1