Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

DAOKO x Kenshi Yonezu - Uchiage Hanabi

posted
Total Posts
42
Monstrata
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
4,642 posts
Joined May 2013
Topic Starter
Monstrata
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on August 23, 2017 at 11:40:20 PM

Artist: DAOKO x Kenshi Yonezu
Title: Uchiage Hanabi
Source: 打ち上げ花火、下から見るか？横から見るか？
Tags: Shita kara Miru ka? Yoko kara Miru ka? Movie hachi ハチ summer shaft fireworks should we see it from the side or the bottom them
BPM: 96
Filesize: 32464kb
Play Time: 04:52
Difficulties Available:
  1. Pyrotechnic (4.63 stars, 790 notes)
Download: DAOKO x Kenshi Yonezu - Uchiage Hanabi
Download: DAOKO x Kenshi Yonezu - Uchiage Hanabi (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------


映画『打ち上げ花火、下から見るか？横から見るか？』主題歌
DAOKO × 米津玄師『打上花火』

Short version by alacat
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/651825
Last edited by Monstrata , edited 15 times in total.
alacat
osu! Alumni
3,872 posts
Joined May 2011
alacat
<3
DeletedUser_3638005
DeletedUser_3638005
Kalokairina Pyrotechnimata
SnowNiNo_
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
2,106 posts
Joined April 2013
SnowNiNo_
accepting gd xd?
oh and the bpm should be 96 i suppose
Eldergleam
Eldergleam
triggered to both artist
thanks Monsta ;)
Regou
1,916 posts
Joined July 2010
Regou
lovely song
Kyouren
5,582 posts
Joined October 2012
Kyouren
I want mapping this too!
Bariton
296 posts
Joined October 2012
Bariton
02:31:385 (4) - oops
Enon
2,690 posts
Joined November 2012
Enon
Awesome song.
Shii
379 posts
Joined October 2016
Shii
I know s you'll already know this but you need a full spread to get the right, right?
<5 minutes isn't approvable, and this song is 4:50~ feelsbadman.
Good luck anyways, might try and mod some time in the future
Stack
osu! Alumni
729 posts
Joined March 2015
Stack

ShiiTsuin wrote:

I know s you'll already know this but you need a full spread to get the right, right?
<5 minutes isn't approvable, and this song is 4:50~ feelsbadman.
Good luck anyways, might try and mod some time in the future
There is no problem, the map only counts drain time the until sliderhead of the the last object and that one is 10 sec long so the drain is actually 5:02
Jemzuu
Beatmap Nominator
600 posts
Joined February 2016
Jemzuu
aaaaaaa i love u monstrata for mapping this song <3333
Arrival
1,418 posts
Joined June 2012
Arrival
i have quite some doubts about your timing points variables at the end, i feel like most of them are simply too early

i'll see if i can provide something better soon
Monstrata
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
4,642 posts
Joined May 2013
Topic Starter
Monstrata
Feel free to just say what you think is early/late. I just timed it quickly for mapping purposes. If its really off I can retime it using wavelengths to get absolutely correct values.
timemon
Beatmap Nominator
1,305 posts
Joined November 2012
timemon
offset at 248192,312.5,4,2,2,80,1,1 (04:08:192 - ) should be 248200 or around that number, atm it is indeed early

and offset at 258182,312.5,4,2,2,80,1,1 (04:18:182 - )should be 258196 or around that number, atm it is also early

the red lines before seem to be fine
CookieBite
1,483 posts
Joined August 2014
CookieBite
hi from ur queue

[Pyrotechnic]
  1. 00:28:182 (1) - the flow here isn't smooth enough i think so i suggest rotate it clockwise 270 degree and ctrl+g it for better circular flow
  2. 00:51:307 (3,4,5) - the spacing here seems weird for me, not sure what you are emphasizing
  3. 01:48:494 (2) - ctrl+g for better circular flow as 01:48:182 (1) - is heading to the right direction

spent like 15 min try to give as many suggestions as possible but this map seems really solid enough so i can't do much sorry
Jennifer
349 posts
Joined July 2015
Jennifer
from your queue c:

[Pyrotechnic]
  1. 00:29:744 (4) - seems to not exactly play well, its going against the clockwise flow by a little more than what i consider comfortable, maybe ctrl+g unless you are intentionally doing it by that much?
  2. (nitpicking sorry)01:08:807 (2) - could you rotate it by 15 anti-clockwise so it forms a better shape visual with 01:08:182 (1) - ? youre gonna have to adjust notes after it though D:
  3. 03:28:494 (2) - ctrl+j maybe? i think it looks better (but you'd have to do so for 03:30:994 (2) - as well so maybe not)

    cute song as well uwu
The Ash Raichu
89 posts
Joined December 2015
The Ash Raichu
From your queue:

[Pyrotechnic:]

-00:16:932 (3,4,5,6) - These are stacked perfectly, and yet 01:25:682 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these aren't, yet are representing the same section of the song with similar intensity.
-04:52:724 (1) - Not that I don't love this, but I don't think the piano note is too quiet for most people to hear unless their volume is at max. For the effort it looks like that took, I honestly think this would be better as a circle.
Nokashi
Nokashi

Riven wrote:

Kalokairina Pyrotechnimata
Kalkililria Pryoitooildjiyjds
Ryuusei Aika
Elite Mapper
1,085 posts
Joined January 2016
Ryuusei Aika
m4m

diff name
02:32:869 (2,1) - this tiny overlap looks not quite well. try to avoid it?
04:11:317 (2,3,1) - try to use same ds? can keep your consistency

nice song
Ipas
806 posts
Joined September 2013
Ipas
Aw Mr. Monstrata made something new (I guess lol)
03:43:182 (1,2,4) -
Good luck!
Shunao
1,906 posts
Joined February 2016
Shunao
Heyo!~

the check!

  • Pyrotechnic
  1. 00:41:619 (3,5) - not really stacking
  2. 01:32:557 (3,4) - ^
  3. 01:41:932 (1,2) - make them similar
  4. 01:45:057 (4,5) - ^
  5. 01:58:338 (2,3) - imperfect stack on the tails
  6. 01:54:432 - why do you jump this strong sound? you need to map it because 01:54:744 - this is the same sound and you mapped it. same sound here too 01:50:057 (4,5) - here too lul 01:59:275 (1,2,3,4)
  7. 02:25:682 (1,3) - not really stacking on the tails
  8. 02:31:307 (3,1) - imperfect stack lol
  9. 02:43:494 (1,2) - ^
  10. 02:44:744 (1,2) - ^
  11. 03:10:057 (4,1) - ^
  12. 03:44:432 - you jumped a cymbal sound :/
  13. 03:47:244 (3,2) - not very stacking
  14. 04:43:182 (1,2) - ^
gl!~
Monstrata
Elite Mapper: Aspirant
4,642 posts
Joined May 2013
Topic Starter
Monstrata

CookieBite wrote:

hi from ur queue

[Pyrotechnic]
  1. 00:28:182 (1) - the flow here isn't smooth enough i think so i suggest rotate it clockwise 270 degree and ctrl+g it for better circular flow changed it
  2. 00:51:307 (3,4,5) - the spacing here seems weird for me, not sure what you are emphasizing Emphasizing the drum
  3. 01:48:494 (2) - ctrl+g for better circular flow as 01:48:182 (1) - is heading to the right direction I like the flowbreak here.

spent like 15 min try to give as many suggestions as possible but this map seems really solid enough so i can't do much sorry

timemon wrote:

offset at 248192,312.5,4,2,2,80,1,1 (04:08:192 - ) should be 248200 or around that number, atm it is indeed early

and offset at 258182,312.5,4,2,2,80,1,1 (04:18:182 - )should be 258196 or around that number, atm it is also early

the red lines before seem to be fine
Fixed them both.

Jennglebells wrote:

from your queue c:

[Pyrotechnic]
  1. 00:29:744 (4) - seems to not exactly play well, its going against the clockwise flow by a little more than what i consider comfortable, maybe ctrl+g unless you are intentionally doing it by that much? Was intentional fore mphasis.
  2. (nitpicking sorry)01:08:807 (2) - could you rotate it by 15 anti-clockwise so it forms a better shape visual with 01:08:182 (1) - ? youre gonna have to adjust notes after it though D: Good point, fixed.
  3. 03:28:494 (2) - ctrl+j maybe? i think it looks better (but you'd have to do so for 03:30:994 (2) - as well so maybe not) Prefer current yea xP

    cute song as well uwu

The Ash Raichu wrote:

From your queue:

[Pyrotechnic:]

-00:16:932 (3,4,5,6) - These are stacked perfectly, and yet 01:25:682 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these aren't, yet are representing the same section of the song with similar intensity. Different interpretations.
-04:52:724 (1) - Not that I don't love this, but I don't think the piano note is too quiet for most people to hear unless their volume is at max. For the effort it looks like that took, I honestly think this would be better as a circle. Changed the timing yea. and changed mp3

Ryuusei Aika wrote:

m4m

diff name
02:32:869 (2,1) - this tiny overlap looks not quite well. try to avoid it? Ew, i didnt even notice this. yea fixed
04:11:317 (2,3,1) - try to use same ds? can keep your consistency the jump is for emphasis.

nice song

ShogunMoon wrote:

Heyo!~

the check!

  • Pyrotechnic
  1. 00:41:619 (3,5) - not really stacking
  2. 01:32:557 (3,4) - ^
  3. 01:41:932 (1,2) - make them similar
  4. 01:45:057 (4,5) - ^
  5. 01:58:338 (2,3) - imperfect stack on the tails
  6. 01:54:432 - why do you jump this strong sound? you need to map it because 01:54:744 - this is the same sound and you mapped it. same sound here too 01:50:057 (4,5) - here too lul 01:59:275 (1,2,3,4) On the second I want to emphasize piano so thats why its different.
  7. 02:25:682 (1,3) - not really stacking on the tails
  8. 02:31:307 (3,1) - imperfect stack lol
  9. 02:43:494 (1,2) - ^
  10. 02:44:744 (1,2) - ^
  11. 03:10:057 (4,1) - ^
  12. 03:44:432 - you jumped a cymbal sound :/ It doesn't fit the rhythm i've been following all through here so its awkward to just map it randomly
  13. 03:47:244 (3,2) - not very stacking
  14. 04:43:182 (1,2) - ^
Fixed all stacks!

gl!~
Thanks for the mods everyone!
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 42