hi hi m4m
Wind
Extra
Insane
Didnt find anything much on the Hard except I don't like how it looks :v Just use more 1/4s and space 01:24:835 (1,2,3,4,5) - more from each other cuz timeline gaps still play a role in Hards.
Good luck~
Wind
•00:01:706 (3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2) - sounds like the drums get gradually lower on intensity, would be pretty cool to do the same via spacing
•00:04:974 - missed a sound
•00:05:058 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - stream could use some rising spacing to reflect the song imo, and to make it more fun :v
•00:06:399 (5,6,7) - you did spacing emphasis here correctly, you should do it on other jumps as well: 00:07:740 (3,4,5) - 00:09:081 (4,5,6) - 00:13:103 (3,4,5) - etc. generally just look out for derps in emphasis
•00:14:109 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - uh why exactly does this go from small spacing to fullscreen? nothing in the music supports a gradual rise in spacing, so you should keep it around the same instead of ppmapping
•00:28:690 (2,3,4) - another emphasis problem
•00:42:433 (4) - no sound :v
•00:59:528 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - I see there's slight emphasis here but it's way too slight imo, make it apparent in both visuals and gameplay, which sound is louder or more instense
•01:03:382 - no distinct sound on here, I don't really see why you wouldnt just start the slider at 01:03:215 - and end it at 01:03:550 -
•01:10:086 (1) - I think something like this would leave a much cooler effect
•01:12:600 (1,2,3,4,5) - what exactly are you following here? no drums or sounds distinct enough for the jumps, so a rhythm like this to follow the vocals that stand out above the rest would be better
•01:14:779 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - so much you could do with this stream to make it represent the music better and play more fun instead of the boring simple curve: For example, 01:15:030 (6) - has no sound so you could make 01:14:947 (5) - a kickslider leading to a stream with lower spacing cuz quieter drums play starting 01:15:114 - . be creative and emphasize the music properly pls
•01:19:639 - missed a pretty distinct sound here
•01:20:477 (8) - try to make this a single circle and stack it with 01:20:645 (1) - , would leave a cool effect as well as emphasize the music stopping and resuming again via movement
•01:24:667 (7,1,2,3,4,5) - all of these are the same sounds, don't get why they're completely different spacing..
•00:04:974 - missed a sound
•00:05:058 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - stream could use some rising spacing to reflect the song imo, and to make it more fun :v
•00:06:399 (5,6,7) - you did spacing emphasis here correctly, you should do it on other jumps as well: 00:07:740 (3,4,5) - 00:09:081 (4,5,6) - 00:13:103 (3,4,5) - etc. generally just look out for derps in emphasis
•00:14:109 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - uh why exactly does this go from small spacing to fullscreen? nothing in the music supports a gradual rise in spacing, so you should keep it around the same instead of ppmapping
•00:28:690 (2,3,4) - another emphasis problem
•00:42:433 (4) - no sound :v
•00:59:528 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - I see there's slight emphasis here but it's way too slight imo, make it apparent in both visuals and gameplay, which sound is louder or more instense
•01:03:382 - no distinct sound on here, I don't really see why you wouldnt just start the slider at 01:03:215 - and end it at 01:03:550 -
•01:10:086 (1) - I think something like this would leave a much cooler effect
•01:12:600 (1,2,3,4,5) - what exactly are you following here? no drums or sounds distinct enough for the jumps, so a rhythm like this to follow the vocals that stand out above the rest would be better
•01:14:779 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - so much you could do with this stream to make it represent the music better and play more fun instead of the boring simple curve: For example, 01:15:030 (6) - has no sound so you could make 01:14:947 (5) - a kickslider leading to a stream with lower spacing cuz quieter drums play starting 01:15:114 - . be creative and emphasize the music properly pls
•01:19:639 - missed a pretty distinct sound here
•01:20:477 (8) - try to make this a single circle and stack it with 01:20:645 (1) - , would leave a cool effect as well as emphasize the music stopping and resuming again via movement
•01:24:667 (7,1,2,3,4,5) - all of these are the same sounds, don't get why they're completely different spacing..
Extra
•00:04:555 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I dont think this works well since the first 3 land on different sounds than the second 3. use some variety according to how the music changes
•Why not make 00:07:740 (1,2,3) - 00:08:913 (3,4,5,6) - the same as 00:06:399 (1,2,3) - in terms of spacing? emphasis should be kept consistent with the same sound sets
•00:11:762 (1,2,3) - ^this just does the exact opposite of what spacing emphasis should be :<
•00:33:047 (4,5,6,7) - listen to the drums closely, it's actually this rhythm
•00:36:231 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I get the voice gets intense and it works well for build-up, but relative to 00:37:405 (1,2,3,1) - I'd say they should be like half the spacing of the bigger triangle
•00:44:779 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - seeing as you map to the vocals intensity here, 00:44:947 (2,3) - shouldnt be bigger than 00:45:449 (5,6) - imo
•00:47:964 (3,4,1) - why not just do something like you did here 00:34:556 (2,3,4,5,6) - that was pretty cool compared to just the sliders
•00:59:192 (3,1) - swap NC
•00:59:863 (3,1,3,1) - ^
•01:09:248 (1) - no sound here, would work better if you made 01:09:081 (3) - a 1/2 slider and started the burst from 01:09:332 -
•01:09:919 (3,4,1) - try something like this, looks and feels way better imo
•01:24:835 (1,1,2,1,2) - same sounds yet different spacing why :<
•Why not make 00:07:740 (1,2,3) - 00:08:913 (3,4,5,6) - the same as 00:06:399 (1,2,3) - in terms of spacing? emphasis should be kept consistent with the same sound sets
•00:11:762 (1,2,3) - ^this just does the exact opposite of what spacing emphasis should be :<
•00:33:047 (4,5,6,7) - listen to the drums closely, it's actually this rhythm
•00:36:231 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I get the voice gets intense and it works well for build-up, but relative to 00:37:405 (1,2,3,1) - I'd say they should be like half the spacing of the bigger triangle
•00:44:779 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - seeing as you map to the vocals intensity here, 00:44:947 (2,3) - shouldnt be bigger than 00:45:449 (5,6) - imo
•00:47:964 (3,4,1) - why not just do something like you did here 00:34:556 (2,3,4,5,6) - that was pretty cool compared to just the sliders
•00:59:192 (3,1) - swap NC
•00:59:863 (3,1,3,1) - ^
•01:09:248 (1) - no sound here, would work better if you made 01:09:081 (3) - a 1/2 slider and started the burst from 01:09:332 -
•01:09:919 (3,4,1) - try something like this, looks and feels way better imo
•01:24:835 (1,1,2,1,2) - same sounds yet different spacing why :<
Insane
•the SV seems to be too fast with the spacing imo. doesnt flow good nor does it look good
•00:04:555 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I dont think this works well since the first 3 land on different sounds than the second 3. use some variety according to how the music changes
•00:09:248 (5) - strong sound on slidertail, pretty uncomfy
•00:10:421 (3,4,5) - spacing of this should be the same as 00:06:399 (3,4,5) - . Same sounds, same intensity -> same kind of spacing emphasis
•00:11:762 (3,4,5) - ^
•00:33:215 (4,5,6) - should be this rhythm instead, listen closely to the drums
•00:36:902 (2,3) - would be cool to move (3) like this imo
•00:56:343 (1) - no need for NC
•00:59:528 (2,3,4) - pretty much reversed spacing emphasis :<
•01:00:198 (5,6,1) - while there's none here
•01:00:868 (2,3,4) - and reversed again.. work on that pls, the problem appears all over the kiai. listen to the actual song to know which sounds are stronger, then space those more from the weaker sounds
•00:04:555 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I dont think this works well since the first 3 land on different sounds than the second 3. use some variety according to how the music changes
•00:09:248 (5) - strong sound on slidertail, pretty uncomfy
•00:10:421 (3,4,5) - spacing of this should be the same as 00:06:399 (3,4,5) - . Same sounds, same intensity -> same kind of spacing emphasis
•00:11:762 (3,4,5) - ^
•00:33:215 (4,5,6) - should be this rhythm instead, listen closely to the drums
•00:36:902 (2,3) - would be cool to move (3) like this imo
•00:56:343 (1) - no need for NC
•00:59:528 (2,3,4) - pretty much reversed spacing emphasis :<
•01:00:198 (5,6,1) - while there's none here
•01:00:868 (2,3,4) - and reversed again.. work on that pls, the problem appears all over the kiai. listen to the actual song to know which sounds are stronger, then space those more from the weaker sounds
Didnt find anything much on the Hard except I don't like how it looks :v Just use more 1/4s and space 01:24:835 (1,2,3,4,5) - more from each other cuz timeline gaps still play a role in Hards.
Good luck~