Sup dude late as usual
- 00:10:536 (8,9) - 00:09:188 (9) - feel you can make these consistent in the first half aswell, like one has 2 strong ticks and one only has the head as a strong tick, after from 00:07:839 (6,1) - you kinda emphasize the 2 strong ticks but before here its kinda different yet the music is still the same. You'd still have diversity just follows the music a bit more and makes it more intuitive to follow the rythm (stuff like 00:01:098 (8,9,10) - 00:02:446 (1) - what I'm talking about and a bit random lonely 00:03:963 (9) - thats only introduced 1 time for the intro)
- 00:05:480 (1,3) - avoid this overlap thingy
- 00:21:997 (6,7,8,9) - but what happened with the rhythm later on 00:24:862 (3,4) - , 00:27:558 (3,4) - etc goes on for while, basicly sliders starting on either almost nothing or very weak stuff and ending on really strong beats, would continue with your initial rhythm and maybe add some variants like control+g the rythm 3-4, only section that felt really off rhythm wise while playing
- 00:32:446 (1) - finish would be nice for the cymbals
- 00:38:851 (6,7) - 00:40:199 (6,7) - would make these still sliders, since you only have 1 major beat kicking in from the prev section so its not That different yet so going from prev section to full on jumps seems a bit too much since 00:39:525 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - all 1/2 jumps doesnt really represent the music imo since the 8combo is a lot more intenser then the prev 7 combo in the music
- 00:44:244 (6) - control J and adjust hte angle a bit to match 00:44:581 (1) - makes 00:44:075 (5,6,1) - flow a lot better imo
- 00:59:749 (2,3) - just personal preferece but you could make some intreseting flow here by individually control + g 00:59:749 (2,3) - to give it a bit more impact
- 01:00:929 (2,3,2,3) - can make this a perfect square since its pretty close to one anyway
- 01:02:446 (3,4,5,6,1,2) - bit like earlier control + g the rhythm here soudns a lot more matching the music since you do it a bit at 01:11:042 (5,6) - 01:11:042 (5,6) - aswell
- 01:17:615 (2) - why not 2 sliders here? sound basicly the same intensity as the next 2 on 100% and I feel it fits the section better
- 01:35:480 (4,5,1) - dunno why didnt go full sliders for the first 3 combos here, you kinda lose the noticable section switch at (1) here due to it bit same here 01:38:513 (1,2) - prob done for vocals but with the rythm your mianly following thats neglectible, would just stick to full circles and full slider combos for this since it makes more sense imo with how the music is since its basicly 4 paired equal beats per stanza so a 4/8 pattern fits best here
- 01:41:210 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - first combo 0.5ds instead? fits what your going for here better I think and liek you did at 04:27:053 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ish
- 01:42:558 (5) - NC
- 01:50:648 (1,2,3,4,5) - aaah nothing really wrong here but damn dude some gimmicky longer low sv sliders would've been awesome here since the prev section really buiild up to this :/ felt like this section and the one before at 01:37:165 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - played way too similar in terms off rythm and spacing even tho the song drasticly changes but yeah just pointing it out incase it gets brought up again
- 02:13:570 (1,2) - why not split up here alrdy? songs is alrdy that intense so the 1/4 sliders fit a lot better here imo
- 02:32:278 (1) - maybe shorten this by 1/4 and add anotehr 1/1 slider like 02:32:952 (2) - on the downbeat, that shred is a bit too powerfull to ignore imo bc the music changes sections here too
- 02:36:154 (4,1,2,3) - feel like you can impreove the flow here, why not try to make 123 clockwise pattern, like control + h them and adjust a bit plays a lot smoother imo with the rest of the section
- 02:53:598 (1,1,2) - aah make it a bit less linear here really doesnt play that well with the stop and go in a straight line
- 02:55:367 (1) - could also use a finish for the soft cymbals, also maybe lower volume a bit? 100% seems a bit to much
- 03:11:547 (1,2,3,4) - so close to Y axis symmetry mate just a few pixels to the right
- 03:18:289 (1) - just normal blanket wiht a bit of spacing here would look better imo
- 03:25:536 (3,4) - control + g rhythm so its in line with the rest, prev ones look good tho, a lot better then the similar section in the intro ish
49 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - - 04:29:749 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - aside from these jump this section is quite a biteasier due to the lack of all the hard jumps unlike the identical section at 03:51:154 (2) - 03:51:660 (3) - etc has a lot harder stuff 04:34:806 (3,4,1,2,3) - etc with the slider in there and not in the prev section makes this play a ton easier, would be good to have these sections more similar in intensity imo since its basicly the same in the music yet one is definitly a lot harder atm (I'd go add sliders in teh jumps in section 1 since the jump parts there feel a bit out of place since thers no real change of intensity or instruments from the rest of the section)
- 04:46:603 (3,4) - 04:47:952 (1) - consistent rhythm would be good here like you did for the similar stuff earlier
- 04:49:974 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - music getting more intenser and buildup yet this low ds and building down seems a bit counterintuitive to me, mayby try something like this instead?
- 05:05:985 (5) - stackign on the tail of 3 seems better here to me to keep the larger spacing and better lead into 05:06:154 (1) -