1. Easy (1.41 stars, 86 notes)
2. Expert (5.19 stars, 354 notes)
3. Hard (2.87 stars, 226 notes)
4. Insane (3.96 stars, 330 notes)
5. Normal (1.95 stars, 162 notes)

Mir wrote:

thing

[Easy]

only comment i have is careful with stacking, dunno how viable that is considering this is your lowest diff. If I were you I'd save stacking stuff for Normal rather than Easy I disagree on a fundamental level. There is a rule about 1/1 gaps being stacked and I follow that rule, so I think what I have works as of right now.

[Normal]
- 00:21:024 (1,2) - not when you introduced 00:20:167 (3,4) - stacks already, it's too complex for a new player to distinguish between the two probably. if in doubt get a testplay but i don't think this is safe when you use so many different stacks of different snapping including 1/1 00:25:953 (3,4) - 00:27:881 (1,2) - 3/2 and 00:20:167 (3,4) - 1/2 Yeah I think this is a good point to bring up, though for now I don't want to change it because I don't think its much of an issue. I referred to the guideline on Normal difficulties and it said avoid switching between 1/2 and 1/1 stacks repeatedly, which I think I avoided quite well, especially since that was reffering more towards 180 bpm songs and this one is 140. It would be nice to have more opinions on this though seeing readability is a touchy subject for lower difficulties.
- 01:01:524 (3,4,5,1) - hngg it's kinda bordering on hard-level rhythm. i can understand 3 in a row but 4 is pushing it. something like 00:28:953 (3,4) - might work just not as simplified, maybe circle + 1/2 slider or something I would normally agree with you, though this isn't the lowest difficulty in the set, also like I said in the previous point, I don't think its that stressful because of the bpm. Also since its stacked the player can focus on clicking more than moving

idk nothing else to say

[Hard]
- 00:09:667 - could add a circle here since while it's not as strong a vocal it's still noticeable as the "shi" of "shite" and you did this on the insane I'm pretty sure I've skipped other sounds also to try lower rhythm density since its an easier diff and I want this section to be noticeably easier than stronger sections
- 00:39:239 (4) - why suddenly simplify the vocals here? you did way more complex stuff like 00:35:703 (4,5) - before so this kinda doesn't make sense to me because I'm bad and didn't hear this while mapping LOL
- 00:55:203 (4,1,2) - i don't think this is very readable for a hard. despite being consistent it's a fairly hard rhythm to execute with the spacing you provide maybe extend the slider to 3/4 instead? i can't really comment on how to change the rest of them if you agree with me (which you won't) but yea I already worked on this sections stacking as a whole, which is why I tried to make most if not all of the 1/4 NOT stacked, which was my attempt to address this kind of thing already.

[Insane]
- 00:01:953 (5,1) - 00:03:667 (5,1) - different vocals on the latter that could be represented with a triple instead // 00:07:096 (8,1) - actually what I did was make the first one just a circle (i thought there was a vocal there LOL) im so bad at japanese
- 00:03:881 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - uhhh what is this supposed to be a pattern of? idk what that means, but this is supposed to reflect what I did in the extra

nothing

[Expert]
- 00:56:381 (2) - is overmapped so maybe make 00:56:167 (1) - a reverse? I think this is a filler rhythm cuz the ride cymbal hit lol. Ironic coming from me lol

fuck you i'm useless

Aeril wrote:

expert

00:10:203 (1) - i swear this starts on the 1/3 tick before it lo (same in insane/hard) I think a lot of the vocals are snapped all messed up,
I need to check with someone else who says simplifying it like I did works bc gg vocals
00:31:953 (3,4,1) - is the spacing split up here cause different words or other reason It's based on relative strength, so the psuedo stack goes down in pitch and isn't emphasized well in the music, and then 1 is emphasized in the music so there is spacing there.
THIS IS SO GOOOOOOOOD HOLY SHSahIT I LOVE U BOR
00:57:881 (1,2,3,4,5) - kinda odd u dont space here even though you do it every where else singer does a much more staccato feel right here so I stopped movement
doesnt seem to be much difference in the pre-kiai build up and the chorus other than sv, idk maybe reduce spacing a bit there in the pre-kiai the sections are different in composition, one with strong vocals and sparing usage of drum/guitar for larger hits, so the focus is much more on what the vocals are doing, and complimenting those big hits at the same time, whereas the kiai is much more fluid with usage of vocals drums and guitar and so its mapped more fluidly (if that makes sense lol)

insane

00:26:596 (2,3) - maybe stack slider end of 2 (somehow) on start of 3 cause it kinda leads into it and dying down good idea lol
01:25:310 (7) - NC cause its a stack now instead of not? lol
i think this one is better mapped than expert but expert is so matching to the feel of the song hoyl

hard

00:20:596 (6,1) - maybe reduce spacing here and add in 2nd repeat on slider cause gritar spacing change would make no difference or be counter intuitive to what a hard diff should be like
01:11:596 (4,5) - personally would split this into 1/4 repeat slider 3/4 slider I have no clue what you are trying to say but I like my rhythm here

normal

00:03:881 (1) - in recent times ive been very much in love with weird sliders,,,,,, tthis is too much for me lol this slider is normal
00:48:453 (1,2) - this part is literally the hard just less spacing lol, maybe turn these into 1/2 sliders? then it would be basically same as easy

easy

maybe change tick rate to 2 because of the 01:05:596 (1) - bouncing sliders like these and 00:49:096 (2) - sounds a bit more fitting in this part its not needed

Naotoshi wrote:

[expert]
put edgy fma diffname plz expert is for noobz

00:10:203 (1) - wtf is this normal whistle isn't that the strongest vocal in the intro? if not I can change ;w;

00:18:881 (6,7) - why not continute the back and forth? fix good point

00:19:953 (5) - didn't see a reason for kickslider instead of triple here I was trying to increase difficulty slowly via movement and clicking because clicking is hard ;w;

00:35:917 (6) - weird circle here, it isnt on a vocal? why not 1/4 slider n 5 instead idk japanese, I thought it was a syllable (?) pls help

00:54:881 (6,7) - same kickslider vs triple thing same

00:56:167 (1,2) - ctrl g rhythm makes more sense on vocals? gg

[insane]
01:09:239 (2) - dont really hear a distinct vocal on 2 tbh, why not extend 1? did same in expert, thought was syllable

[hard]
00:50:810 (3) - the stupid dinging sound you followed in the previous measure isnt here on the head, do something else please.. it is there.

01:07:524 (2) - dont think you need to or should simplify this. why not 2 clicks?there wasn't a filler sound to filler rhythm to with the slider end ;w;
[normal]
00:16:524 (2,3) - this rhythm is kinda eh cuz the guitar you were following ends up unmapped and some random drum stuff is instead. how about 2 1/2 sliders? was following drums with also bounce should I do something else ?

[easy]
00:21:024 (1,2) - i think these jumps are too big. like yea they're ds'd but theyre still quite big and require a lot more precision than normal in this diff level. think you should decrease the spacing to like .75 or something this is untrue, the player will fly over to the next note as fast as they can and because of the long 5/2 gap they have enough recovery time from that "jump" they make to be precise for this section.

00:39:453 (2) - i think noobs will go straight to 3 cuz itss closer than 2, kinda misleading here its cutting it close for sure, but I slightly changed the slider shape of (1) to make it a bit easier for newbie players.

ok i (probably) wont recheck for a while thooo

_83 wrote:

Naotoshi wrote:

00:35:917 (6) - weird circle here, it isnt on a vocal? why not 1/4 slider n 5 instead idk japanese, I thought it was a syllable (?) pls help

Sinnoh wrote:

00:35:917 (6) - "Ano koro mitai ni tte", no vocal here
don't kudosu

Lasse wrote:

00:20:381 - clap here too and 00:20:703 (8) - should be soft clap for snare and not drum I thought this was cooler effect since there is more of a progression pitch wise (kind of colors drums something )

x
00:19:953 (5) - why not 2 circles when the other drum patterns that are mixing different drums were clickable was trying to create a progression of difficulty via movement + rhythm between 00:19:310 (1,2,3) - 00:19:953 (5,6) - and 00:20:596 (7,8,9) -

Sotarks wrote:

last diff

00:05:167 - to 00:07:096 - here, i understand you map for vocals but why skip this part, while playing it feels so empty and frustrating to not play this part since there's like guitar and piano sounds here. because if I'm mapping just the vocals it would be contradictory to map things that are not vocals

00:09:239 - i'd prefer this section to be clickable rather than be on a slider reverse for more emphasis on the vocals here. I wouldn't prefer it to be clickable because its weaker than the part getting clicked.

00:14:810 - can you add a circle here, feels so weird to start hitting a stream on a blue tic. learn how to play then.

00:20:060 (6) - this can be clickable for the clap sound here. explained twice in previous mod replies read those then reply to that.

00:22:739 (1) - damn that overlap is wew not unrankable.

00:25:524 (4) - can you unstack it and and maybe like ctrl g ctrl h and space it ? why would I change something just randomly??

00:29:810 (2) - 1/2 slider + circle would be much more appropriate I thought you said I was mapping vocals. can you not tell I'm mapping vocals here too? look at 00:28:953 (3) - there are two vocals here should I just make all of these clickable as well?

00:35:917 (6,7) - damn whats with your overlap man, just clean this up. I don't see the issue with my overlap. why don't you say it instead of asking me pointless questions about something that isn't unrankable that you just personally dislike visually.

00:39:453 (6,1) - and 00:41:167 (5,1) - has same spacing but not same rhythm please avoid missreading stuff like that, and space stuff that should be spaced to avoid confusion gameplay like this. I usually avoid misreading stuff like this. most people do. you should consider that for yourself.

00:48:453 (1,4,5) - whats the logic here with your 1/4 sliders, i can understand using them for 00:48:453 (1) - kicks like this even tho there's no sound on 1/4, but it's a good alternative to give variance vocal/instrument, but why using kicksliders randomly for vocals like 00:48:881 (4,5,5) - this, it's random and has no reason to be there. it applies for the rest of that section 1/4 sliders are used on vocals that last more than a 1/4 beat apart.

00:57:881 (1,2,3,4) - sudently you stack here, for what reason? since you have jump streams allother the place the vocal sounds are much more staccato so these are stacked.

01:01:417 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - that flow is SO DAMN sharp dude, did u even try to play this? try and make the zigzag more flowy and smoother to hit, this actually is so unconfortable to hit what does flow mean. who cares if it is uncomfortable for YOU. this is comfortable for ME that's why its like this.

01:03:239 (2) - pls make the end of this clickable for the clap man not every sound has to be clickable.
01:16:953 (2) - ^

01:11:810 (4) - you're skipping a clap here, please make it clickable. I'm skipping it because there is a sound that I'm actively mapping to doing something that requires me to skip over this sound to map it.

01:25:310 (1,2,3) - there's hundred options where to place this but no, you'll place this to overlap it badly xd nice overlaps goodly to me.