Ok, i wanted to write this mod yesterday, but when i write last diff i refreshed the pafe, so, i m dumb.))) So i try to copy my mind... again.....
Well, mostly its a good set, but some shortcomings with flow.
Ok, good luck with that
Asuka_-'s Easy
Distance snap is good, but try to reduce starrating below 1.5*
00:21:354 (1,2,3) - mb it should be done like a triangle
00:25:027 - u can start one more spinner from here
01:12:835 (3) - NC
01:14:132 (4) - NC
01:18:835 (3,1) - Ugly
01:36:997 (4,1) - ^
01:40:889 (2,1) - bad overlap
01:44:781 (4,1) - ok, all this forms are ugly, cauze all my is pretty good, smooth.
01:55:808 (4,5) - mb NC on this 2 notes
00:21:354 (1,2,3) - mb it should be done like a triangle
00:25:027 - u can start one more spinner from here
01:12:835 (3) - NC
01:14:132 (4) - NC
01:18:835 (3,1) - Ugly
01:36:997 (4,1) - ^
01:40:889 (2,1) - bad overlap
01:44:781 (4,1) - ok, all this forms are ugly, cauze all my is pretty good, smooth.
01:55:808 (4,5) - mb NC on this 2 notes
Asuka_-'s Normal
00:16:020 (1,3) - not the same sliders, but sound is the same. Mb some smooth form here
00:25:027 - again spinner
00:32:619 (5) - NC
00:32:781 (1) - delete NC, i know what u mean here, but there is not a good place for NC, all this moments
01:14:132 (4) - NC
01:15:429 (1) - delete NC
01:46:727 (5) - NC
01:51:916 (5) - NC
Ok, all this diff is so precipitous. try to make it mor smooth. In a flow i mean
00:25:027 - again spinner
00:32:619 (5) - NC
00:32:781 (1) - delete NC, i know what u mean here, but there is not a good place for NC, all this moments
01:14:132 (4) - NC
01:15:429 (1) - delete NC
01:46:727 (5) - NC
01:51:916 (5) - NC
Ok, all this diff is so precipitous. try to make it mor smooth. In a flow i mean
Hard
00:14:020 (3) - more turn it. 4-5'
00:15:687 (4) - NC
00:16:020 (1) - delete NC, in all this moments
00:35:862 (2,3) - ugly
01:25:646 (4,1,2) - too qudratish, u know...
01:31:808 (3,4,5,1) - bad flow
01:32:781 (2,1) - only one overlap like that. Or all map should have this type of overlap, or non.
01:48:024 (1,2,4,5,1,2) - ok, one more, but its wierd, really...
00:15:687 (4) - NC
00:16:020 (1) - delete NC, in all this moments
00:35:862 (2,3) - ugly
01:25:646 (4,1,2) - too qudratish, u know...
01:31:808 (3,4,5,1) - bad flow
01:32:781 (2,1) - only one overlap like that. Or all map should have this type of overlap, or non.
01:48:024 (1,2,4,5,1,2) - ok, one more, but its wierd, really...
Light Insane
00:08:020 (1) - turn it on a some angle
00:14:020 (3) - bad bad bad wave. First - Its vertical. Bad decision. Second - nonsimmetric. Read on the wedsite how to designe it.
00:15:687 (4,1) - NC and delete NC the same like in the prev.
00:22:364 (1) - bad wave #2
00:41:051 (2,3,4) - bad flow. straight line
00:42:835 (4,5,1,2,3) - bad flow. Try (5) swap with (1) and (2) stack with (4)
00:44:781 (2,3) - you have many sliders without an any angle. not a good. try to turn on 4-6'. its more readable
00:51:916 (2,3,4,5,1) - not the same spacing between stream and slider like in the stream.
00:53:375 (1,2) - why not blanket?
01:14:619 (2,3) - square. nah
01:25:970 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - dat flow
01:40:159 (10,1) - again, spacing
01:41:375 (1,2) - why not blanket ? [2]
01:42:186 (1) - turn it on 45' clockwise
01:55:321 (2) - same^
dat flow man, dat flow
00:14:020 (3) - bad bad bad wave. First - Its vertical. Bad decision. Second - nonsimmetric. Read on the wedsite how to designe it.
00:15:687 (4,1) - NC and delete NC the same like in the prev.
00:22:364 (1) - bad wave #2
00:41:051 (2,3,4) - bad flow. straight line
00:42:835 (4,5,1,2,3) - bad flow. Try (5) swap with (1) and (2) stack with (4)
00:44:781 (2,3) - you have many sliders without an any angle. not a good. try to turn on 4-6'. its more readable
00:51:916 (2,3,4,5,1) - not the same spacing between stream and slider like in the stream.
00:53:375 (1,2) - why not blanket?
01:14:619 (2,3) - square. nah
01:25:970 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - dat flow
01:40:159 (10,1) - again, spacing
01:41:375 (1,2) - why not blanket ? [2]
01:42:186 (1) - turn it on 45' clockwise
01:55:321 (2) - same^
dat flow man, dat flow
Insane
00:09:354 (4) - turn it some angle, ok, no more inscription like this, u know...
00:25:027 (1) - this wave are better, but not so good
01:06:348 (5,4) - not a good overlap, cauze u are not following by the form of pattern
01:40:564 (2,5) - same^, but this acceptable more or less
actually this diff is very similar with the prev, and retained the same shortcomings
00:25:027 (1) - this wave are better, but not so good
01:06:348 (5,4) - not a good overlap, cauze u are not following by the form of pattern
01:40:564 (2,5) - same^, but this acceptable more or less
actually this diff is very similar with the prev, and retained the same shortcomings
Well, mostly its a good set, but some shortcomings with flow.
Ok, good luck with that