Enkrypton wrote:

From my queue. This song sounds familiar in many ways :thinking:

Normal

00:36:331 (6,2) - these 2 sliders follow the same rhythm, maybe make one a copy paste of other for consistency? fixed
00:49:808 (2) - i think angling the slider tail of this more down will have better aesthetics than the current 2 "almost parallel" sliders. fixed
00:53:929 (1,2,3,4,5) - most low SR Normals don't have SV changes
make 01:13:926 (3) - parallel to 01:12:286 (1) - and blanket 01:13:926 (3) - into 01:14:909 (4) - fixed
make 01:31:034 (4) - a copy paste of 00:18:998 (4) - cause its basically mapping the same rhythm fixed
I recommend copy pasting some sliders instead of creating new ones to keep consistency in your map.

Medium

since 00:21:831 (1,2) - are parallel, you should make 00:20:497 (4,5) - parallel too but keep the 00:21:164 (5,2) - overlap fixed
00:25:331 (3,4) - blanket this better fixed
from 00:27:331 - to 00:48:664 - theres a lot of note-able beats on red ticks, listen to the song at 25% speed. Don't just spam 1/4 sliders. It gets really apparent here 00:45:997 - to here 00:47:664 -
blanket 01:14:254 (6) - into 01:14:909 (1) - for better aesthetics
01:28:534 (2,4) - make one a copy paste of the other fixed
01:35:201 (4,5) - this design is really inconsistent with the rest of the map. try changing it fixed

Hard

maybe make 00:59:204 (1) - parallel to 00:58:874 (4) - for aesthetics fixed
01:14:254 (2) - NC here since 01:13:926 (1) - is mapped to the "yay" and 01:14:254 (2) - is mapped to vocals i've alternative
01:16:549 (2,3,4) - have more consistent rotation here fixed
This one is mapped pretty good.

I'm not exactly the best at modding high SR so don't take the mod if it seems wrong

Insane

00:16:999 (2,4) - blanket this i've alternative
00:35:831 (3) - change this slider to a ctrl + h version of this 00:35:331 (1) - for aesthetics fixed
make 00:59:863 (2) - a copy paste of 00:59:204 (1) - fixed

Insanity

00:20:497 (1) - remove the curve here since we have 00:24:497 (1) - w/o a curve at basically a reflecting location of the first fixed
00:57:226 (4,1) - blanket fixed

idk how to mod 5*+ properly lol. thats about it.

MyAngelMeinter wrote:

It's me

Normal

1. 00:18:998 (4) - A little higher ok
2. 00:34:664 (3) - Delete this and make longer next slider it would look unsuitable
3. 01:03:106 (2,3) - slider with arrow would sound better nope, this is better because there's a dominant '' yay '' sound on 3
4. 01:21:794 (6) - Same as 2 Same as 2
5. 00:29:164 (3,7) - 1/2 beat after fixed
6. 00:37:164 (6) - Same as 5 fixed
Note about 5 and 6: All times when is it 00:38:997 (2,3) - do same as 5 (or sometimes same as 2 when you no have empty space) fixed
7. 01:28:034 (6) - Shorter by 1/2 beat i follow the saxophone sound
8. 01:40:795 (2) - 2 arrows more? for what?

Medium

1. 00:01:177 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1) - A little unnecessary heee.. why?
I think Advanced is better name for this difficulty advanced means ''light hard'' and have a orange icon

Hard

1. 00:01:177 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I usually do not like maping "under the voice", but I like it very much
2. 00:51:292 (1,2,3) - Maybe some pattern from these sliders lay?
That looks a bit boring, maybe this? no, thx

Insane

1. 00:22:331 (2) - This is a bit weird i don't think so :/

2. 00:11:499 (1) - Sllider instead circle why
3. 00:39:497 (2,3) - First upper circle, after lower circle i've alternative

Instanty

I think nothing ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Extra

1. 00:04:886 (1) - You can do this slider better fixed
2.01:25:401 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Don't start new jump in same place when earlier is ended there but why? another diff has it

Rhapsody of the Lolicon

1. The best name for diff XD loli<3 x'D
2.Look on tips ( 01:07:040 (1,1) - this and more) fixed

Tips from me
Try to make more sliders like this
[normal sliders]

SPOILER

And Try to move away from this

[bad sliders]

SPOILER

I think it is all

[lucky:1337]Good luck [/lucky:1337]
I think i make good this images

Kuro Fuyusaki wrote:

Quick word #2

Hmm...

[Normal]

1. Ini Easy? kalau dilihat dari setup diffnya jadi "Easy"
2. you're devil, pure devil, genuine devil
3. inb4, quote dari guidelines, buat Easy buat Normal
4. hidupin selalu DS kecuali di situasi terntentu, lengkapnya (Juga berlaku untuk diff Easy)
5. Itu kalo DS diturunin bisa jadi diff "Easy" (tinggal sesuaiin yang masih banyak beat 1/2 nya). Kalau masih mau netep di "Normal" ramein lagi beatnya kalo dah diperbaiki DS nya sama saran naikin SV jadi 1 - 1.2

[Medium]

1. Naikin CS jadi 3 - 4 (atau sekitar itu), soalnya pola map rame kalau CS rada besar readingnya jadi lumayan susah
2. Untuk yang lain kurang lebih sarannya sama kayak Normal

Itu dulu dan.....no kds yet

1. 00:57:720 (4) - Not properly stacked , or are you purposely ?
2. 00:19:164 (1) - spacing at here is good or you can just Ctrl+G since it's have a loud sound

1. 01:02:450 (3,4,5,6) - why this pattern have a big spacing than this 01:05:073 (3,4,5,6) - , it have a same sound
2. 00:51:292 (1) - Bad flow i think , you can ctrl+g this 00:51:292 (1,2) - imo
3. 01:05:565 (6) - seem like this circle have a big space than this circle 01:02:942 (6) - which it have a same sound
4. 01:03:926 (4,5) - this spacing is kinda different with this 01:14:417 (4,5) -
5. 01:15:893 (5,6) - i don't see why this need to big space at here

1. 00:16:015 (1,2) - the space at here should be fine with a little spacing only , then you can make a big space at here 00:16:499 (3) - since it have a loud sound or you can just stack this 00:16:015 (1) - on the slider one and make this 00:16:499 (3) - a big space , you can make it like this 00:18:998 (5,1) -
2. 01:17:204 (5) - not properly stacked ? or purpose ? with this 01:16:221 (1,2) -

1. 00:18:998 (5,1) - this have a big space but this 00:16:176 (2,1) -

DarkFire wrote:

Ok, hello from my queue
I just mod 3 diff, cauze after watching Easy Normal and Hard there s too much little mistakes.

Easy

00:01:177 (1,2) - not the same sliders but sound is the same i think it's the same slider
00:06:338 (3) - NC fixed
00:08:918 (4) - NC the 2 previous slider have a 2 combo

00:14:080 (6) - NC fixed
00:19:331 - lost beat here and NC start from this beat. Some moments like that in the beginning
00:34:831 (3,1) - why overlap here, cause prev overlap is understable fixed
00:27:331 (1) - try not to lose the beats https://yadi.sk/i/9EoQRWQN3KdANo if i add more note will looks like normal diff
00:45:497 (3,1) - same overlap fixed
00:58:874 - lost beat fixed
00:53:929 (1,2,3,4) - NC on each fixed
00:59:204 (5) - NC fixed
01:04:417 (4) - NC
ok, so i think u understand me

Normal

00:53:929 (1,2,3,4) - NC on each
00:58:545 (5,2) - bad overlap fixed for 2 only
01:01:140 (4,1) - why not blanket with the end of (4) slider fixed
01:01:140 (4) - NC from this moment. and in the next moment like this too fixed
01:16:221 (4,1) - overlap, why not stack? fixed
01:29:534 (4,5) - make this triolet with reverse slider plz. it wiil be more readable
01:33:201 (5) - end of this slider here, on red tick. So u have some moment like this fixed

Hard

00:43:331 (1,2,3,4) - not the same space here
00:37:914 (8) - i think u should stack (8) with the next slider. I know that all your diff is very smooth but that would be more readable hard af
00:53:847 (3) - ^
00:53:600 (2,3,1) - here u use triple, its ok, BUT here 00:55:578 (2,3) - u dont. why? sound is the same the sound isn't same, even i don't hear any
00:56:896 (2,3) - ^

Some combo u pull so lonk time. So mb divide some long combo on 2 short

Well, next diffs is pretty nice, so trhe most problems in the first three diffs
GL with your set~~~

Toumoko wrote:

Dear Player ,
[Normal]

1. 00:57:720 (4) - Not properly stacked , or are you purposely ? yes
   
2. 00:19:164 (1) - spacing at here is good or you can just Ctrl+G since it's have a loud sound it would more hard for new player

[Insane]

1. 01:02:450 (3,4,5,6) - why this pattern have a big spacing than this 01:05:073 (3,4,5,6) - , it have a same sound fixed
2. 00:51:292 (1) - Bad flow i think , you can ctrl+g this 00:51:292 (1,2) - imo fixed
3. 01:05:565 (6) - seem like this circle have a big space than this circle 01:02:942 (6) - which it have a same sound fixed
4. 01:03:926 (4,5) - this spacing is kinda different with this 01:14:417 (4,5) -
5. 01:15:893 (5,6) - i don't see why this need to big space at here fixed

[Extra]

1. 00:16:015 (1,2) - the space at here should be fine with a little spacing only , then you can make a big space at here 00:16:499 (3) - since it have a loud sound or you can just stack this 00:16:015 (1) - on the slider one and make this 00:16:499 (3) - a big space , you can make it like this 00:18:998 (5,1) - fixed
2. 01:17:204 (5) - not properly stacked ? or purpose ? with this 01:16:221 (1,2) - fixed

[Rhapsody of the Lolicon]

1. 00:18:998 (5,1) - this have a big space but this 00:16:176 (2,1) - it's 1/4 beat, it will be hard if i make a big space

That's all from me
Good luck with the map set . I don't dare to say anything more in top diff ><

FiddleBlue wrote:

Hi from queue.

General

1. Can't you make the Artist column in Japanese characters instead, as most of them are Romanized so they should be put in the Romanized artist. okay

Easy

1. 00:50:633 (2) - Perhaps instead of this you can add a 1 and 1/2 slider from 00:50:468 - to emphasize the vocal rather than a circle emphasizing a random sound. ''Note density should consist of mostly 1/1, 2/1, or slower rhythms.'' -std mapping guidelines-
2. 01:14:254 (3) - I think a full beat slider suits this better to differentiate between 01:14:254 (3) - and 01:13:598 (2) - . Plus, the vocal is kinda strong here.fixed
3. 01:16:876 (3) - Instead of just a circle, how about putting a full beat circle on 01:16:549 - and a circle on 01:17:204 - to emphasize those "hai". it will be hard to play
4. 01:22:450 - A circle here perhaps, as you emphasize the same sound on 01:23:762 (2) - so it's a bit weird to ignore this. fixed
5. 01:29:701 (2,3) - Instead of this, how about a circle on 01:29:868 - and 01:30:201 - , and a full beat slider on 01:30:534 - to emphasize the particular instrument (idk what it's called).i'll not put any 1/2 beat on easy diff, thx

Hard

1. 00:53:600 (2,3,1) - Perhaps align the first slider, circle, and the slider head of the third in a straight line instead. fixed
2. 00:58:215 (2) - Why don't you make this the same as 00:58:874 (4) - instead? fixed
3. 01:27:701 (2) - Perhaps reverse this slider to make 01:27:368 (1,2) - more different than 01:25:401 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - If I change it to reverse, it will contradict with next slider 1

Insane

1. 00:01:015 - Why don't you add a circle here. fixed
2. 00:47:497 (2,3,4) - I think this triangle pattern should be the same spacing. fixed
3. 01:00:852 (4) - A change in slider velocity here, maybe slower, as it has different sound than 01:00:523 (3) - . Since both are quite similar with being the same slider shape. ok, change to x0.8
4. 01:01:140 (1) - I think making this part as a stream is better as in this part it's like a build-up for the upcoming intense section/kiai part. So by putting a stream here it's like giving the players hint of the upcoming part. Also because it's an insane difficulty. Xd fixed
5. 01:03:926 (4) - Space this from the circle before as they are not similar so it's weird to stack them, and since you spaced 1/2 circles especially when the vocals are strong. fixed
6. 01:14:417 (4) - ^ ^
7. 01:11:876 (5,6) - Same as before. But since it's a bit different, perhaps the spacing can be closer. fixed
8. 01:13:926 (2) - Perhaps you can place this on the middle of 01:13:270 (5,6) - which is on 212|262. fixed
9. 01:14:909 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - For this part, maybe change it to this: https://i.gyazo.com/ff5e026a245a557878c ... 0960fc.png, as then you can use the spaced 1/2 snapped circles to emphasize the sounds with the vocals. feel weird to play
10. 01:34:368 (2) - You could underlap the slider head on 01:33:034 (2) - . but why?
11. 01:37:845 (1) - Perhaps make this slider similar to 01:36:534 (1) - as it's the same sound. fixed

Insanity

1. 00:01:015 - A circle here. fixed
2. 00:17:832 (1) - Since this is an NC and different sound than 00:17:499 (4) - , I think it should be spaced more from the last one. fixed
3. 00:52:775 (2,2) - Fix stack ok
4. 00:56:402 (1) - Make this as a 1/2 slider instead fixed, move 00:56:896 (2,3,4) - behind by half a beat, and add a circle here. I think it suits this part better. why..
5. 01:03:434 (2) - Make the flow of this slider to the circle in a straight line. fixed
6. 01:03:762 (3) - Just me being picky, but perhaps place this circle in the middle of 01:02:778 (5,6) - . Which is 184|276. but the distance will...
7. 01:15:729 (4,6,1) - I think it's better if the slider joins the line made by the two circles. Coordinates is 224|152. fixed
8. 01:18:680 (1,2) - Fix circular shape-ish (idk) as it's more to an oval than a circle. fixed
9. 01:24:417 (3,4,5,6) - I think these should be 1/2 sliders instead to emphasize the vocals that the next one has. i can't, cause 01:23:106 (2,3,4,5) - snapped by 1/2 circle

Extra

1. 00:01:015 - Circle here. fixed
2. 00:39:164 (1,2) - I think the flow here should be straight. fixed
3. 00:48:331 (7,8) - I think these should be closer as the spacing is similar to 00:47:997 (5,6) - . Players might think this is a 1/2 gap instead of 1/4. fixed
4. 00:56:402 (1) - Make this as a 1/2 slider instead, move 00:56:896 (2,3,4) - behind by half a beat, and add a circle here. I think it suits this part better. fixed
5. 01:00:852 (2) - I think a 1/4 slider here emphasize this better. agree
6. 01:06:057 (3,4,5) - I think these should be spaced the same as it's the same sound. fixed
7. 01:07:532 (3) - I think it's better if this is placed in the middle of the line made by 01:07:860 (5,6) - . fixed
   
8. 01:16:221 (1,2,5) - Fix stack fixed

Rhapsody of the Lolicon

1. Nice diff name. *laugh in pedophile*
2. 00:01:015 - Circle here fixed
3. 00:15:047 (7) - Align this with 00:14:241 (2,3,5) - . It looks weird since it's near them but not with them. fixed
4. 00:17:832 (1,4) - Fix stack fixed
5. 00:28:997 (3,5,7) - I think you can apply a straight placement here. fixed
6. 00:41:831 (1,2,3,4) - I think it's better if the spacing increase from each circle/slider. spaced is already gud
7. 00:46:331 (2,1,3) - Fix stack i can't stack 3 directly hory shet

Overall, it's an enjoyable mapset. Hoping to see this rank.
Selamat Berjuang!

FiddleBlue wrote:

1. Can't you make the Artist column in Japanese characters instead, as most of them are Romanized so they should be put in the Romanized artist.

AchsanLovers wrote:

FiddleBlue wrote:

1. Can't you make the Artist column in Japanese characters instead, as most of them are Romanized so they should be put in the Romanized artist.

so maybe the metadata should be...

Artist : 高橋李依, 小澤亜李, Rhodanthe☆, 七森中☆ごらく部 & Petit Rabbit's
Romanised Artist : Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Gorakubu & Petit Rabbit's


just fix that artist, romanised already good..

Celektus wrote:

[Overal]

1. the new standard for BG size is 1920x1080px so you might wanna get some more high res pictures or up scale your current ones
   
   

2. osu! Ranking Criteria wrote:

   1. Avoid using combo colors, slider borders or hitcircleoverlays with ~50 luminosity or lower. Dark colors like these impact readability of approach circles with low background dim and the other elements partially give up their functions as borders.

   osu! Ranking Criteria wrote:

   1. Avoid using combo colors with ~220 luminosity or higher during kiai times. They create bright pulses which can be unpleasant to the eyes.

   Some of your colors might be too bright or too dark. You can easily change this by adjusting this number

fixed

[Easy]

1. I would cut down your NC usage here by half 00:32:664 - so you don't get 3 note combos constantly fixed
   
   
2. you might wanna add finishes here 00:55:101 (1,1) - cause it seems like they're missing. This repeats in other diffs in this part, so look out for it fixed
   
   
3. really nitpicky but this might be hard to read for Easy players 00:59:222 (1) - and also a curve out of a straight line like this isn't really appealing. I would suggest something more like this I placed a circle at the end so it's still in the right position for DS... also the slider kinda looks like a gardening tool... like the shovel from the grill in the back. >.< fixed
   
   
4. the Clap sound here seems unintentional 01:12:286 (1) - fixed

[Normal]

1. I would change this to 2 sliders 00:04:241 (2,3) - then move 3 one red tick back. That way 3 is still a clicked Vocal agree
   
   
2. the reverse here is kinda blocked 00:57:738 (1,1) - it's not unrankable I think, but if you can try and make it not overlapped at all, might make it just a tad more readable. fixed
   
   
3. this rhythm is actually wrong... or at least over/undermapped 00:59:222 (1,2,3) - it's more like this imo. It seems like you did this in every diff so I'm pointing it out in case you don't intend to actually over/undermap that... I also think it works on a Normal as players effectively only click the downbeats. fixed
   
   
4. this is the first 1/2 stack in the map 01:21:631 (3,4) - which is inconsistent with how you previously represented 1/2 and also a possible reading difficulty for players of this level. fixed
   
   

   osu! Ranking Criteria wrote:

   1. Stacks are acceptable, but avoid switching between 1/1 and 1/2 stacks repeatedly. This may cause reading issues for new players, since two different rhythms are visually the same.

   this quote doesn't really go into detail and it only mentioned switching between 1/1 and 1/2 though if you do this stuff make sure it's not 2/3 into the map. The same goes for every following 1/2 stack.

[Hard]

1. same as mentioned in he normal at this point 00:04:241 (2,3) - but not for hard
   
   
2. the stacking here like I talked about in the Normal might be ok here 00:01:014 (1,1) - s it's literally the start of the song though If you don't use it as consistent concept try and only make weird stuff with it on Insanes or switch around all the time on Hard maps. In this diff you seems to have a concept for your 1/2 stacking, but just be aware of it in future maps as the way you stack kinda makes 1/4 hard to read here for example 00:37:664 (7,8,1) -
   
   
3. you might wanna only use only 1 reverse here 01:01:140 (5,6) - especially since you have not really any extended sliders in the map. Same here 01:11:958 (6) - and in other places too from here onward If I only use 1 reverse slider it will be less uncomfortable to play

[Insane]

1. you skipped the Guitar here for the Vocals 00:03:112 - yet you didn't make this just a single slider 00:04:886 (5,1) - I think choosing either and not both would be better. Or at least using the same rhythm as 00:02:951 (3) - and then mapping the guitar afterwards. All just a bunch of suggestions fixed for alll higher diff
   
   
2. why is this jump bigger than the rest? 00:07:951 (6,7) - I assume someone told you to ctrl + G it since you have probably very uncomfortable straining movement here in and out of the slider. Consider ctrl +Ging it for more comfortable movement and "correct" spacing emphasis... if you want that jump size tho maybe make still less uncomfortable. fixed
   
   
3. like in the previous diff add some buffer here 00:13:757 (1,2) - especially since the jump into 2 is the same spacing as you 1/2 that comes up even though 1 into 2 is a 1/4th jump. i've alternative
   
   
4. blanket could be better 00:16:499 (1,2) - like this the distance between Head, end and slider body should all be consistently the same... might wanna re check your blankets I won't point any more out. fixed
   
   
5. I think this jump 00:20:164 (4,1) - should be as big if not bigger than these 00:18:164 (2,3) - 00:18:998 (4,1) - because of the finish hitsound on it.
   
   like this one 00:21:497 (4,1) - if not you should nerf all the other jumps fixed
   
   
6. this jump should be bigger because of the "yay" 01:03:106 (1,2) - and slider leniency from 1 fixed
   
   
7. the song kinda has less intensity here 01:28:534 (2,3) - so you might wanna quickly lower the rhythm density by making this into a stack or removing 3. I also can barely hear the sound on 3 so I wouldn't map it. You might wanna extend 3 and overlap it's slider end with the slider end from 01:27:701 (3) - fixed

might finish the other diffs tomorrow, but I kinda don't have time right now. In case I just don't mod the just wanna say gl with the set.

1. Fix blankets 00:21:831 (1,2) - and 00:22:331 (2,4) -
2. Spacing between 00:47:997 (5,6) - is higher than 00:48:331 (6,1) - but the gap is the same - 1/4. If you fix this you can avoid making 00:49:332 (3) - this circle that close to 00:48:673 (1) -
3. 00:58:892 (5,1) - the same thing here.
4. 00:59:881 (1,2) - You can make blanket here (from sliderend 01:00:541 (2) - and 00:59:881 (1) - )
5. 01:06:057 (3,4) - Improve blanket here as you did 01:06:057 (2,3) -
6. 01:11:631 (4) - I suggest you to convert it to 2 circles - there is important sound on sliderend - imo shall be clickable. Try placing circle on 01:11:631 - where 01:12:614 (2) - this slider ends and add circle 01:11:794 - on stacked notes
7. 01:16:877 (3,4) - Blanket
8. 01:22:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The same thing as above
9. I would make sliders on 01:23:106 - 01:24:417 - and replace 01:24:090 (2) - with circles to follow this vocal 'ha-ha-ha'

1. 00:16:499 (1,2) - Fix blanket here
2. 00:21:831 (1,3) - I guess you wanted to make it round-shaped. If you place circle 00:22:247 - like this
   
   (not permamently ofc!) blanketing this circle with 00:21:831 (1) - you can fix slider 00:22:331 (3) - to make it more round and then delete extra circle
3. 01:26:057 (2,2,2) - Why you decrase spacing on ma-da ma-da? Make it the same

Lince Cosmico wrote:

Hallo, i'll be modding Rhapsody of the Lolicon (wtf edgy diffname l0l)

Rhapsody of the Lolicon

Is it actually allowed to use different combo colours on each diff?
anyway let's start:
• 00:02:306 (5) - What do you think about moving this to x:224 y:11? It would be exactly between 00:01:660 (3,4) - so the visual impact would be a lot better
Also i would add NC here (since the pattern itself sounds different than 00:01:177 (1,2,3,4) - , and not differencing them would be dissapointing)
• 00:03:435 (8,2) - Move the 8 a bit to the bottomleft so the blanket with the 2 will be fiixed.. OR move this whole pattern 00:03:757 (1,2) - a bit to the top-right (i feel like this second one is the best option because 00:03:435 (8,1) - this patern wouldnt be that closed)
• 00:05:370 (1) - Is the NC really neccesary?
If you wanna do it cuz the differences on their rhythms at least add one more here 00:05:693 (3) -
• 00:07:628 (1,2,1,2,3) - Same
• 00:10:209 (5) - Adding NC for the same reason than 00:02:306 (5) -
• 00:15:047 (7,1) - Switch NC's? Having a new combo on 00:15:693 (1) - feels kinda dissapointing
• 00:17:499 (4,1) - I think that you should separate this two a bit since i guess you dont want an overlap there xD
• 00:24:164 (5) - Move this to x:213 y:298, again, the visual impact would be a lot better imo
00:24:331 (6) - This one is a bit different, you could actually move it to x:424 y:259 but the spacing would be a lot on 00:24:331 (6,1) - , but i think that you should care too much about that spacing, since the sound on that slider1 is actually pretty high enough to space it a lot
• 00:25:331 (4) - Adding NC for emphasis wouldnt be really bad
• 00:28:997 (3) - Moving this to x:277 y:340 would make a cool overlap with 00:28:164 (4) - with also avoiding a too high spacing
• 00:29:497 (5) - x:271 y:242 a e s t h e t i c s
• 00:31:497 (2) - You have two options here: moving it a bit to the topleft to make a clear overlap, or stack it with 00:30:331 (2) - , Right now that circle is in a weird position, not enough to call it overlap but nor stack, so look at it
• 00:35:664 (2) - You could move this circle a bit to the left so it would fit the followpoint between 00:35:331 (1,2) - (basically being linear)
• 00:37:497 (5) - What about moving this to x:196 y:315 to make a cool overlap with 00:36:331 (5) - ?
• 00:41:831 (1,2,3) - The spacing on this pattern is just..... huh not really good, maybe because the second circle feels that it have to be more spaced instead of the third one
• 00:44:164 (4) - Again, move this to x:312 y:97 so it would be exactly between slider2 and slider1's sliderend
• 00:47:164 (1,3) - I'd prefer a stack here instead of an overlap this time, it feels pretty good for a stack, dont it?
• 00:49:826 (1) - This note position is clearly the weirdest i saw on this map (it doesnt mean its bad but the cursor movement is .. weird)
Try this
( without NC so you can see the followpoint )
• 00:57:574 (5) - Reduce the spacing ghere just a bit so it can overlap correctly with 00:56:914 (2) -
• 00:58:068 (2) - Move this a bit to down, its actually not fitting the slider shape
• 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - HOLY DIDNT EXPECT THIS LMAO
• 01:00:129 (5,6,1) - Fix the stack on the middle of this 3 sliders
• 01:00:870 (2) - Move this a bit to the left, its actually too close to the slider1
• 01:01:035 (3,4,5,6,7) - this is just not right... you know why
01:01:221 - Try deleting this one and stacking this two 01:01:035 (3,4) - (like if it were a double) ... its the only suggestion that's on my mind right now to fix that since this 01:01:140 - and this 01:01:221 - aren't really hearable at all enough to makee a stream there
• 01:21:139 (5) - Move this to x:295 y:357 , same thing about visual impact, right now its too close to 01:20:483 (2) - and its weird to see
• 01:21:631 (2) - Same here, You can do an overlap with 01:20:647 (3) - here by moving it to x:334 y:202
• 01:40:303 (1) - This one isnt that relevant, but moving it to x:339 y:38 would make it be exactly between 01:39:074 (7,8) -

Im not trying to being nazi but its just that i want to improve this map's aesthetics and visuals so dont take me wrong xD

Since it took me a lot and the mod is actually good enough, i wont mod the other one (or at least not today) call me back or poke me in discord if you still have any concern about my mod: Lince#8723

Blan_C wrote:

Hello, NM from queue
Insanity

1. Fix blankets 00:21:831 (1,2) - and 00:22:331 (2,4) - fixed
2. Spacing between 00:47:997 (5,6) - is higher than 00:48:331 (6,1) - but the gap is the same - 1/4. If you fix this you can avoid making 00:49:332 (3) - this circle that close to 00:48:673 (1) - if i balance the spacing between 6,1 as same with 5,6 it will be hard to play even though the gap is same
3. 00:58:892 (5,1) - the same thing here. ^
4. 00:59:881 (1,2) - You can make blanket here (from sliderend 01:00:541 (2) - and 00:59:881 (1) - ) fixed
5. 01:06:057 (3,4) - Improve blanket here as you did 01:06:057 (2,3) - fixed
6. 01:11:631 (4) - I suggest you to convert it to 2 circles - there is important sound on sliderend - imo shall be clickable. this isn't important sound '-' Try placing circle on 01:11:631 - where 01:12:614 (2) - this slider ends and add circle 01:11:794 - on stacked notes
7. 01:16:877 (3,4) - Blanket fixed
8. 01:22:122 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The same thing as above
9. I would make sliders on 01:23:106 - 01:24:417 - and replace 01:24:090 (2) - with circles to follow this vocal 'ha-ha-ha' okay but there's no vocal ha-ha-ha lul

Insane

1. 00:16:499 (1,2) - Fix blanket here fixed
2. 00:21:831 (1,3) - I guess you wanted to make it round-shaped. If you place circle 00:22:247 - like this fixed
   
   (not permamently ofc!) blanketing this circle with 00:21:831 (1) - you can fix slider 00:22:331 (3) - to make it more round and then delete extra circle fixed
3. 01:26:057 (2,2,2) - Why you decrase spacing on ma-da ma-da? Make it the same

GL!

RevengeZ wrote:

Posting for Lince:
DO NOT GIVE KDS TO THIS POST

Lince Cosmico wrote:

Hallo, i'll be modding Rhapsody of the Lolicon (wtf edgy diffname l0l)

Rhapsody of the Lolicon

Is it actually allowed to use different combo colours on each diff? I think so, because there is no rule about it
anyway let's start:
• 00:02:306 (5) - What do you think about moving this to x:224 y:11? It would be exactly between 00:01:660 (3,4) - so the visual impact would be a lot better fixed
Also i would add NC here (since the pattern itself sounds different than 00:01:177 (1,2,3,4) - , and not differencing them would be dissapointing) fixed
• 00:03:435 (8,2) - Move the 8 a bit to the bottomleft so the blanket with the 2 will be fiixed.. fixed OR move this whole pattern 00:03:757 (1,2) - a bit to the top-right (i feel like this second one is the best option because 00:03:435 (8,1) - this patern wouldnt be that closed)
• 00:05:370 (1) - Is the NC really neccesary?
If you wanna do it cuz the differences on their rhythms at least add one more here 00:05:693 (3) - fixed
• 00:07:628 (1,2,1,2,3) - Same fixed
• 00:10:209 (5) - Adding NC for the same reason than 00:02:306 (5) - it's already NC
• 00:15:047 (7,1) - Switch NC's? Having a new combo on 00:15:693 (1) - feels kinda dissapointing
• 00:17:499 (4,1) - I think that you should separate this two a bit since i guess you dont want an overlap there xD fixed
• 00:24:164 (5) - Move this to x:213 y:298, again, the visual impact would be a lot better imo fixed
00:24:331 (6) - This one is a bit different, you could actually move it to x:424 y:259 but the spacing would be a lot on 00:24:331 (6,1) - , but i think that you should care too much about that spacing, since the sound on that slider1 is actually pretty high enough to space it a lot
• 00:25:331 (4) - Adding NC for emphasis wouldnt be really bad
• 00:28:997 (3) - Moving this to x:277 y:340 would make a cool overlap with 00:28:164 (4) - with also avoiding a too high spacing it will a little weird
• 00:29:497 (5) - x:271 y:242 a e s t h e t i c s i'll placed it a bit to bottom

• 00:31:497 (2) - You have two options here: moving it a bit to the topleft to make a clear overlap, or stack it with 00:30:331 (2) - , Right now that circle is in a weird position, not enough to call it overlap but nor stack, so look at it fixed
• 00:35:664 (2) - You could move this circle a bit to the left so it would fit the followpoint between 00:35:331 (1,2) - (basically being linear) fixed
• 00:37:497 (5) - What about moving this to x:196 y:315 to make a cool overlap with 00:36:331 (5) - ? fixed
• 00:41:831 (1,2,3) - The spacing on this pattern is just..... huh not really good, maybe because the second circle feels that it have to be more spaced instead of the third one
• 00:44:164 (4) - Again, move this to x:312 y:97 so it would be exactly between slider2 and slider1's sliderend fixed
• 00:47:164 (1,3) - I'd prefer a stack here instead of an overlap this time, it feels pretty good for a stack, dont it? fixed
• 00:49:826 (1) - This note position is clearly the weirdest i saw on this map (it doesnt mean its bad but the cursor movement is .. weird) i don't think there's anything weird about that
Try this
( without NC so you can see the followpoint )
• 00:57:574 (5) - Reduce the spacing ghere just a bit so it can overlap correctly with 00:56:914 (2) - i'll just stack the 2,5 and triple
• 00:58:068 (2) - Move this a bit to down, its actually not fitting the slider shape ^
• 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - HOLY DIDNT EXPECT THIS LMAO
• 01:00:129 (5,6,1) - Fix the stack on the middle of this 3 sliders this already stacked the stack already gud
• 01:00:870 (2) - Move this a bit to the left, its actually too close to the slider1 but not too close to end of slider1
• 01:01:035 (3,4,5,6,7) - this is just not right... you know why Why? The distance should be like that because of the rhythm difference
01:01:221 - Try deleting this one and stacking this two 01:01:035 (3,4) - (like if it were a double) ... its the only suggestion that's on my mind right now to fix that since this 01:01:140 - and this 01:01:221 - aren't really hearable at all enough to makee a stream there it will look even more weird
• 01:21:139 (5) - Move this to x:295 y:357 , same thing about visual impact, right now its too close to 01:20:483 (2) - and its weird to see fixed
• 01:21:631 (2) - Same here, You can do an overlap with 01:20:647 (3) - here by moving it to x:334 y:202 i've alternative
• 01:40:303 (1) - This one isnt that relevant, but moving it to x:339 y:38 would make it be exactly between 01:39:074 (7,8) - fixed

Im not trying to being nazi but its just that i want to improve this map's aesthetics and visuals so dont take me wrong xD

Since it took me a lot and the mod is actually good enough, i wont mod the other one (or at least not today) call me back or poke me in discord if you still have any concern about my mod: Lince#8723

General
Take out the character names from the tags, I don't feel like it's needed. Leave the other tags in tho.
You only need the 1117 offset timing point, take out the 531 offset one
I only denoted reoccurring problems once, remember to look out for them in the rest of the difficulty

Easy
00:03:757 (2,1) What is this overlap
00:25:664 (5) No sharp angles in a song like this, this song has no rhythms that suggest a sharp angle
00:26:997 (6,1) don't stack notes in an easy diff
00:59:222 (1) wtf is this slider shape

Normal
Lower the distance snap to 1, 1.3 isn't good for a normal at this BPM
1/6?
01:21:631 (3,4,5) This feels awkward in my opinion, Make a new combo and change the objects you use

Hard
00:37:664 (7,8,1) this is really awkward, remove the slider and make a 3 note stacked stream into the second slider
0:01:140 (5,6) take out the kick and make a stream, streams are ok in hard diffs
01:08:188 (1,2) I think this is a bad overlap

Insane
00:13:757 (1) KICK TO STREAM
00:25:331 (1,2,1) one combo pls( and make 00:25:831 (2) a start of a combo)
01:25:893 (1,2) separate the origin of each jump
01:27:701 (3,1) No overlap pls
01:40:795 (1,2,3) make this a larger jump to add emphasis to the fact that the represented noises are louder than the where previously

Insanity
You only need one insane diff
The overlaps feel messy and this diff doesn't flow well
00:47:997 You and your kicks oml

Insanity
00:14:241 (2,3,4,5) keep the jumps equally spaced as there is no crescendo
00:36:497 (1,4) do the messy overlaps end
00:58:563 (1,2) NO KICKS I'M SO HAPPY
01:01:795 (1) this is a weird slider
01:04:417(1) adjust the slider above to one like this bc they represent the same noise
01:25:401 (1,2) make this a star

Rhapsody of the lolicon
Nice diff name
this diff feels like PP spam
00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) keep this as one combo

Mentai wrote:

from my queue

i wanna look at ur lower diffs because no one does that ever

Easy

nice, some quality of life things are needed though

00:21:664 (1) - why arent these the same slider body ? xd 00:24:331 (4) - fixed

00:26:997 (6) - stacking in easy is not a good thing to do normally, players are new to the game, and are trying to figure out that distance between objects = distance between them musically. id reccomend fully ds'ing these, yes sometimes it looks ugly, but thats the price you pay for easy or normal diffs fixed

00:45:497 (3,1) - u broke .8x ds here, pls fix changing ds in a normal is a big no no

01:13:598 (2,4) - i think u have a lot of room to work with where you can make this overlap not happen

Normal

00:01:660 (2,3) - this is stuff u really shouldnt be doing, this is some crazy flow break AND it doesnt look good. in normal, still use slider flow like u would in easy, nothing needs to be too confusing like this really fixed

00:04:886 (3) - this slider would make more sense if it landed on the white tick, musically fixed

00:17:499 (3,4) - changing ds in a normal is a big no no fixed

00:20:497 (4) - missed opportunity to make this a curved slider and blanket this 00:20:164 (3) - ;\ fixed

00:48:673 (1) - this probably needs to be angled down more and the curve made more lenient to look like a nicer blanket fixed

00:51:969 (2,3) - another one of those flow breaks that u should just never do in ur beginner diffs. because even i, the 18k player, clicked the sliderend instead of the notehead. pls make it fit with ur slider flow fixed

00:55:101 (1,1) - the blanket between these sliderends are off slightly fixed

00:57:738 (1) - 1.2x ds?

00:59:222 (1,2,3) - what happened to ds here, seems all wonky fixed

01:02:614 (3,4) - same thing from before, except you jump a to almost 2.0x ds here. normal cant do ds changes, very minor ones (like the 1.2x i mentioned) are readable for most, but stuff like this is just not for normal diffs. as ugly as the word is, its simply unrankable fixed

the diff is really cramped and doesnt look great, luckily it plays well in flow for the most part (other than the really weird stuff you decided to do with the ds and stuff)

this one needs work!

Hard

00:04:241 (2) - can u make this slider a blanket that makes a nicer blanket with the next slider, its kinda in the awkward middle ground rn fixed
00:18:998 (7,2) - at this level of difficulty, u can make minor changes in ds to avoid these aesthetically displeasing overlaps fixed

00:48:331 (7) - move this to the left to dodge this overlap fixed

00:58:563 (3,1) - can u make these parallel (or the same angle), this stuff looks really disorganized because of that (you do this in other places to, but this is the most glaring so far) fixed

01:06:713 (4,4) - id manipulate this combo so you could stack these in the same position. fixed same here 01:02:778 (4,3) - it will be wrong distance between 2 and 3 & overlap between 1 and next combo 1 , you could be using more advanced placement in these sections

really my biggest complaint for this diff is how i feel like im going in a circle in the middle of the playing field so much, there isnt much linear movement to make things more interesting. sure it flows WELL, but to me, its just a bit boring

look into places you could use more advanced placements for stacking objects!

dont neglect your lower diffs, they are the bread and butter to your future mapping technique. ton of respect for making the entire set though, keep going!

ahsoka08 wrote:

NM from my queue!

General
Take out the character names from the tags, I don't feel like it's needed. Leave the other tags in tho.
You only need the 1117 offset timing point, take out the 531 offset one fixed
I only denoted reoccurring problems once, remember to look out for them in the rest of the difficulty

Easy
00:03:757 (2,1) What is this overlap fixed
00:25:664 (5) No sharp angles in a song like this, this song has no rhythms that suggest a sharp angle fixed
00:26:997 (6,1) don't stack notes in an easy diff fixed
00:59:222 (1) wtf is this slider shape i dun think this is a problem

Normal
Lower the distance snap to 1, 1.3 isn't good for a normal at this BPM Ranking Criteria : Overall
Overall rules and guidelines apply to every kind of osu! difficulty. Rhythm related guidelines apply to approximately 180 BPM maps. If your song is drastically faster or slower, some variables might be different. Apply reasonable judgement in these cases.
Guidelines :
- When distance snap is used, try to keep it between 0.8x and 1.3x. Values too much higher or lower may make the difference between slider velocity and spacing counterintuitive. A higher distance snap can be used to avoid overlapping, but the slider velocity should be increased if you find yourself doing this often.
1/6?
01:21:631 (3,4,5) This feels awkward in my opinion, Make a new combo and change the objects you use fixed

Hard
00:37:664 (7,8,1) this is really awkward, remove the slider and make a 3 note stacked stream into the second slider fixed
0:01:140 (5,6) take out the kick and make a stream, streams are ok in hard diffs which the timing of this? i can't click it
01:08:188 (1,2) I think this is a bad overlap hmm

Insane
00:13:757 (1) KICK TO STREAM fixed
00:25:331 (1,2,1) one combo pls( and make 00:25:831 (2) a start of a combo) fixed
01:25:893 (1,2) separate the origin of each jump but why?
01:27:701 (3,1) No overlap pls i think this isn't a bad overlap
01:40:795 (1,2,3) make this a larger jump to add emphasis to the fact that the represented noises are louder than the where previously fixed

Insanity
You only need one insane diff the star rate between insane and extra is too high
The overlaps feel messy and this diff doesn't flow well
00:47:997 You and your kicks oml ???

Insanity did you mean Extra?
00:14:241 (2,3,4,5) keep the jumps equally spaced as there is no crescendo There's a drum sound that can be made emphasis, therefore I made a large distance
00:36:497 (1,4) do the messy overlaps end i think this already gud
00:58:563 (1,2) NO KICKS I'M SO HAPPY
01:01:795 (1) this is a weird slider
01:04:417(1) adjust the slider above to one like this bc they represent the same noise this isn't extend slider like above
01:25:401 (1,2) make this a star fixed

Rhapsody of the lolicon
Nice diff name wwwwwww
this diff feels like PP spam
00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) keep this as one combo i'll use new combo for double

I feel that you can push this too rank if get enough mods. Good Luck
Also, always request that all of your diffs be modded.

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

yee kudos

aaaa

14:27 -NanoRIPE-: halo
14:27 -NanoRIPE-: ada waktu?
14:28 Nevertary: iya
14:28 -NanoRIPE-: ok
14:33 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1344100 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Easy]]
14:33 -NanoRIPE-: check aimod dulu
14:34 Nevertary: oh iya ini distance nya..
14:34 -NanoRIPE-: yaa
14:36 -NanoRIPE-: jujur easymu ini bikin gw bingung
14:37 Nevertary: duh ini dibenerin yg satu,  problem distance yg lainnya malah muncul...
14:38 -NanoRIPE-: kwkwkw
14:38 -NanoRIPE-: 00:52:629 (5) - ini di reverse aja biar lebih mudah rhythmnya
14:40 Nevertary: sip udh
14:40 -NanoRIPE-: 00:53:947 (1,1,1) - nih slider lebih baik di akhiri di white tick aja biar kena drumnya
14:41 Nevertary: done
14:41 -NanoRIPE-: oh iya btw disitu knp slider velocitynya di bedain?
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: ada yg 0,85 ada yg 0,90
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: kan disitu beat musicnya sama aja
14:42 -NanoRIPE-: nggk ada bedanya
14:42 Nevertary: eh iya kebawa dari diff diatasnya wkk
14:43 -NanoRIPE-: gw pikir itu juga unrankable deh karena kebanyakan pakai variasi slider velocity
14:43 -NanoRIPE-: nanti newbie player yg main easy diff kebingungan imo
14:44 -NanoRIPE-: 01:06:385 (6) - mungkin ini bisa jadi 1/1 slider disini,karena di 01:06:713 - suara "Hai Hai"nya kenceng 
14:44 -NanoRIPE-: 01:16:876 (6) - ^
14:45 Nevertary: done..
14:45 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1343513 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Normal]]
14:46 -NanoRIPE-: baru mulai dah ada overlap di 00:01:660 (2,3) -
14:46 -NanoRIPE-: kalau overlapnya terstrukture/rapi mah gpp tapi ini jelek banget overlap imo 
14:47 Nevertary: ok, fixed
14:48 -NanoRIPE-: 00:09:564 (2) - mungkin disini circle aja (2 circle di white tick) biar ada space antara object (2,3) - karena kalau rhythmnya terlalu rapat agak susah di handle utk normal player
14:49 -NanoRIPE-: 00:16:015 - disini boleh pasang 1/2 slider karna normal diff (utk nge emphasis ke drumnya)
14:50 -NanoRIPE-: 00:52:629 (3,4) - absolutely unrankable karena nggk ikuti Distance snape
14:52 Nevertary: bingung nyimpen yg 4 ini dimana...
14:52 -NanoRIPE-: tuh circle 4 seharusnya di atasnya slider 3 bukan di bawahnya
14:52 -NanoRIPE-: kalau kamu taruh di bawah nggk konek flownya
14:53 -NanoRIPE-: 00:53:947 (1,1,1) - same as easy,di akhiri di white tick aja biar kena drumnya'
14:53 -NanoRIPE-: 00:59:881 (2) - turunin di bawah dikit biar enak flownya antara (1,2,3) -
14:54 -NanoRIPE-: 01:21:631 (3,4) - sama dgn yg tadi
14:55 -NanoRIPE-: tanyakan kalau ada yg kamu nggk ngerti
14:56 Nevertary: done~
14:56 -NanoRIPE-: udh semua?
14:57 Nevertary: yudh
14:57 Nevertary: *udh
14:58 -NanoRIPE-: 00:06:338 (1,2,3) - ini knp di deketin spacingnya? player nanti bakal missreading loh
14:58 Nevertary: btw klo yg 00:55:101 (1,1) - slide end nya harus ada di white tick juga gak?
14:59 -NanoRIPE-: eh btw tuh mod utk hard
14:59 -NanoRIPE-: iya
14:59 *-NanoRIPE- is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1325701 Takahashi Rie, Ozawa Ari, Rhodanthe*, Nanamori-chu*Goraku-bu & Petit Rabbit's - Lolis Short Medley [Hard]]
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: 00:06:338 (1,2,3) - ini spacingnya di ksh sama kayak yg di 00:18:498 (6,7,8) -
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: pokoknya jgn overlap kayak gitu
15:01 -NanoRIPE-: 00:23:664 (5,6) - unstack aja karna beatnya kuat di slider (6) -
15:02 Nevertary: tapi yg awal lagu kan lebih slow gimana gitu, emg space nya harus sama kyk 6,7,8 ya..
15:02 -NanoRIPE-: biar slow tapi kalau spacing harus ksh konsistent
15:03 -NanoRIPE-: kalau masuk di slow part kan tinggal main di rhythm aja,rhythmnya di ksh mudah aja
15:04 -NanoRIPE-: 00:25:331 (3,4,5) - ini spacingnya nggk seimbang atau cuma gw aja ya
15:04 -NanoRIPE-: 00:27:831 (2,3,4,5,6) - sama dgn sebelumnya
15:06 -NanoRIPE-: hmm itu aja utk hard
15:06 -NanoRIPE-: udh nice kok
15:06 Nevertary: hmm oke thx
15:07 -NanoRIPE-: ada pertanyaan?
15:07 -NanoRIPE-: sama2
15:08 Nevertary: post aja mod irc ini di thread mapnya om..
15:08 -NanoRIPE-: nggk usah
15:08 -NanoRIPE-: males
15:08 Nevertary: owh yaudh mksih
15:09 -NanoRIPE-: pokoknya yg di hard itu kamu perbaiki itu spacing yg saya bilang tadi ~ 
15:09 Nevertary: hmm oke
15:10 -NanoRIPE-: karena main problemnya disitu
15:12 -NanoRIPE-: di hard kalau ada slow part atau bagian yg slow tinggal atur/main di rhythm atau slider velocity,kalau spacing jgn kamu kecilin kayak tadi itu karena player bisa missreading (nanti player kira itu 1/4 rhythm padahal itu 1/2 rhythm)
15:12 Nevertary: sip om
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: sorry kalau penjelasannya agak rumit
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: jgn panggil saya om lah
15:13 -NanoRIPE-: msh anak2 saya
15:14 Nevertary: hmm iya sry deh hmm.. gan
15:14 -NanoRIPE-: ok 
15:14 -NanoRIPE-: nah gitu
15:15 -NanoRIPE-: hmm post di thread aja ya (sebenarnya butuh kudos.tadi sok2 elit aja saia hehe)

- Rain - wrote:

NM from my queue

mod

Rapsody of a Lolicon

1. AR 9.5 i feel is a little too high considering this is below 200 bpm, perhaps something like 9.2 would be better this diff contained high jump, i think it might be more hard to read if i decrease the AR
2. 00:08:918 (1,2,3,4) - Not really a fan of this pattern, i feel its flow is a little off as well as the blankets are basically non existant and look a little weird fixed
3. 00:16:015 (1) - in my opinon doesnt need to be new combo'd fixed
4. 00:17:999 - Is this red line really needed? it changes the offset by 1 ms fixed
5. 00:23:497 (2,5) - I feel these notes are a little too close to each other fixed
6. 00:27:164 (6) - Should use a sharp angle here to continue the flow http://puu.sh/wBWO3/0063515165.png keeping similar angles while maintaining emphasis in the reducing tone fixed
7. 00:28:164 (4) - and 00:28:997 (3) - not a very nice looking overlap imo fixed
8. 00:37:997 (1) - Tilt this a few degrees, right now it looks a little off as a perfect horizontal slider fixed
9. You use these wide angles for example at 00:27:164 (6) - 00:47:497 (2,3,4) - 00:49:002 (2,3,4) - 00:50:156 (2,3,4) - Here too the same pattern but comfortable enough when I play it. and while i was playing it, it was a little awkward, using sharper angles imo would play a lot better, this is throughout the whole map, not just this section.
10. 00:37:164 (4) - You are mapping to the vocals so why not make this a 1/1 slider, there isnt a strong sound on the white tick that would be lost if you did so and you could still keep 00:37:664 (6) - placement as the flow would be very similar but the strong sound But a strong sound is on the red tick, so if I make a 1/1 slider it will skip it
11. 00:56:914 (2,5) - Another overlap, keep an eye out for these, while they might not be noticable in editor, they are a little more noticable ingame fixed
12. 00:59:469 (2) - Going over the stream with the slider body isnt something i'd do as it doesnt look very good imo, perhaps tilt a few degrees and it might still be fine But it will make its slide shape doesn't match the next curve slider
13. 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Feels Very cramped in my opinion
14. 01:11:876 (6,7,8,9,10) - Stream shape seems a little off, could be a little more refinedfixed
    
    Pretty solid

Extra

1. 00:14:886 (6) - Might just look better if you stacked this on the end of the burst due to your currently overlap feels like its trying to decide if it wants to overlap or not fixed
2. 00:15:047 (7) - place this on 00:16:015 (1) - to play better due to the player not needing to move his hand for no reason fixed
3. 00:47:997 (5,6,7,8,1) - These are a little close, could space them out to look a little less cramped fixed
4. 00:59:222 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This looks much less cramped than the rapsody, much better fixed
   Some angles could be looked at too, pretty solid as well

Insanity

1. 00:01:177 (1,3,4) - Not sure why these are straight when nearly everything else in the section have an angle tilt i think this isn't a problem
2. 00:39:831 (4,5,6) - Maybe use a sharp angle, since you are trying to create a traiangle, wide angles into triangles generally dont play very well and i would advise against it, this occurs a few times in this section fixed
3. 00:47:997 (5,6) - these ignore the snares and the hitsounding + this rhythm choice sounds weird to me
4. 01:11:631 (4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - To me this looks really odd, I would suggest perhaps not having a slider into it but it still works as is
   Seems good. fixed

Insane

1. 00:26:497 (3) - While playing, this felt a little too close to 00:25:831 (1) - and looked awkward fixed
2. 00:52:299 (4,1,2) - Since the angles before this are all sharp, using a wide angle flowing into a sharp triangle is really awkward so i would suggest continuing using the sharp angles to make it feel less awkward. fixed
3. 01:27:368 (1,2,3) - Since everything before is sharp angles, this feels uncomfortable due having a suddent change from what was before.fixed

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi :3

[Easy]
Ctrl+a and 2 times "Q" and you can check Distance Snap
00:01:177 (1,2) do slightly are close
00:11:499 (2,1) make them a little further, they are close when i check the distance map, there's no problem with it..
00:25:664 to 00:36:997 due to the fact that you decided to diversify here, you get a bunch of errors with a range between sliders and circles, for example: 00:26:997 (6,1) you overlapped this very are close + 00:27:331 (1,2,3) you have the difference in range between the circles and sliders as I wrote above Because 6 and 1 are 1/1 snap, while 1, 2, and 3 are 2/1 snap
00:40:331 (3,1) - 00:42:997 (3,1) the same error range overlap Please check the distance map on the aimod and see if there is a problem here
00:45:497 (3,1) it's far ^
00:47:664 (3) start slider move left for better flow fixed
00:47:664 (3,1,2) it's are close same as 40:331
00:52:629 (5,1) you might think that such a distance is normal, but they are too far because the beginner will have to quickly move the cursor to the next slider fixed + 00:53:947 (1,1,1,1) not matched for range sliders same as 40:331
00:57:738 (1,2,1,2) this do be far fixed
01:03:806 (3,4) - 01:05:773 (5,6) - 01:07:084 (1,2) do far same as 40:331
01:12:330 (1,2,3) like above - do far same as 40:331
01:14:298 (3,4) do are close + 4,5,6 do far same as 40:331
01:16:920 (6,1) far, do are close fixed
01:22:494 (5) move slightly down for distance fixed
01:25:445 (3,4,5) slightly different range ....

[Normal]
like for Easy (Distance Snap)
00:05:693 (4,1) i think flow this sliders can be good fixed
00:10:854 (5) you can remove this slider and his start put circle and on 00:11:176 put slider to 00:11:499 I think this matches with the proportion of the song
00:23:831 (5,6) i think you can change on this (but can leave) fixed
00:39:164 (3) - 00:41:831 (3) you can shortened this sliders to prev red tick and on white tick put circle to better fit to the words
00:47:831 (4,5) can ctrl+g i think better fit wth.. *god left
01:27:420 to 01:36:586 it seems to me that the sounds for this section don't fit very well, can change them? what doesn't fit?

[Hard]
00:13:435 put circle for start voice? ???
00:20:164 (3) i think end slider can move right so distance between this and the next slider because of the loud sound was visible fixed
00:32:664 (1) maybe remove reverse and on next white and red ticks put circle + 00:33:497 (2,3) remove and change on slider?
00:36:331 (3,4) you can do far and 4,5 do are close to celebrate loud sounds but the sound on 3,4 is more lower than 4,5
00:46:997 (3,4) do slightly far fixed
00:47:831 (6) I think that this slider is not very well suited for vocals, maybe a bit change? should i replace it with 1/2?
01:15:445 (2,3) it seems to me that they can ctrl+g to better fit to the words it will hard to read, since this isn't insane
01:27:420 to 01:36:586 it seems to me that the sounds for this section don't fit very well, can change them? i think this gud enough

[Insane]
00:10:693 (2) it's not good flow and place for circle, maybe move to x 259 y:83? fixed
00:19:997 (3) move to x:86 y:168 for flow? fixed

[Insanity]
00:25:331 (4) may be further from the next and previous circles, so it was more like *when i do not know as it correctly is called, but I think that is correct* tick the "correct action"? hmm gud idea

Good luck

Aeril wrote:

easy

this is definitely a thing...
one thing i definitely notice right off the bat is that distance snap doesnt seemed to be used very well like
00:25:664 (5,6,1) - here it you shouldnt have such a difference in distance. easy players need that time distance equality given by distance snapping everything to understand the rhythm better. also changing the slider velocity is highly discouraged
i would also suggest raising the distance snap distance as all of these overlaps are kinda ehh and make reading harder
also 00:25:664 (5,6,1) - having variable spacing like this should only really be used on spacings higher than 2 white beats
t/517731 read up on this for more in depth things all distance problem fixed

other things about rhythm mostly is like 00:17:665 (2,3,4,5) - what is this following
you should probably try to follow a specific instrument other than the drum. the constant every other beat rhythm doesnt make sense to the rest of the music.
something like this https://puu.sh/wDTHv/b10f51e602.png imo makes more sense as it just follows the horn in the song

the rhythm in the kiai is good though

normal

00:14:080 (1,2) - you shouldnt vary slider velocity this much on a normal. around .2x of variation is like the max id say is good for a normal fixed
00:58:563 (2,1,2,3) - you need to follow time distance equality in this lower difficulty. having such differences in spacing is confusing for lower level players. fixed
01:00:541 (3,1,1) - i also really do not agree with nc usage like this, it just feels excessive in a lower difficulty. Personally i would just stick to ncing every big white tick or every other big white tick.
rhythm is good

hard

00:01:177 (1) - can u like remove the nc here lo fixed
00:05:047 (3,4) - this stack feels unnecessary fixed
00:20:497 (4,5,6,7) - things like this look messy as the slider shapes dont have any relation to eachother as the straights have different angles even though they look to be trying to be parallel
00:34:497 (6,7) - why is there a jump here? fixed
00:45:997 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this looks especially messy since in one combo the distance snap changes so much. too much variation looks like lazy mapping rather than following the music if executed badly. i would suggest keeping 2 values of ds, one for normal spacing and one for bigger spacing and jumps of the such on the emphasized parts. fixed

these lower diffs all seem to have the same problems.
for now just going to check the top difficulty.

rhapsody of the lolicon

00:05:047 (1,2,1,2) - why are these ncd like this? if you're following the guitar, these are all the same note. I'll use circle for guitar sound and slider for vocal
also 00:10:209 (1,2,3,4) - these visuals are quite messy just using random angles like this
00:33:332 (3,4,5,1) - why do you use such large spacing for a calmer part of the song?
spacing emphasis just doesnt really work using large spacing and even larger spacing.
01:09:707 (1,2,3,4,5) - you also switch flow halfway through here for seemingly no reason as in the first 3 notes it looks like it all follows clockwise rotation but since the 1/4 slider is so shorts, its more of a (forward through the slider, back to the next slider, forward again to the next slider, up the body, down to the bottom of the screen, and then clockwise jumps) its just, messy and hard to play with seemingly no reason for the song to call for it.

this needs alot of work to be up to ranking standards, the ideas are there they just arent executed well in the top diff and in the lower diffs, you just dont really know how it seems. look at the proposed ranking criteria page i sent you as it sets guidelines to make good lower difficulties.

aigoh wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue

• 
  [General]

1. The vivid combo colors like the ones I circled don’t fit with the rest.
2. Good mapset, but the easy difficulty needs most improvement in rhythm
3. 00:17:998 –white tick should start from here, so consider adding another red line. wut difficult is this?
   
   [Easy]
4. 1.0x DS and 0.9 or 1.0 SV seems to work better for readability and organization fixed
5. SV needs to be consistent, and you need to calculate what SV it is whenever the bpm changes
   For example…(SV1)(BPM1) = (SV2)(BPM2) Then solve for whichever SV it is
6. 00:11:499 (3,4) – swap NC fixed
7. 00:29:997 (1,3) - swap NC fixed
8. Ahh you need to do NC every 16 white beats! Fixing the rhythm should help too. fixed
9. 00:18:998 (4) –feels awkward to hit because there is a stronger sound at 00:19:164 –
10. 00:16:499 –to 00:26:664 -: I think you should follow trumpet sounds. For example, start slider at 00:16:499 – and end at 00:17:331 -; start slider 00:17:831 – and end at 00:18:498 -.
11. 00:55:101 (1) - 00:57:738 (1) - take out NC fixed
    
    [Normal]
12. 01:00:541 (3) – move to 436,216? already fixed b4 your mod
    
    [Hard]
13. 01:18:068 (2,3) –too close hmm i don't think so
    
    [Extra]
14. 00:56:420 (1,2) – ctrl G for rhythm? You did use a slider at 00:56:585 - in the next difficulty. It doesn’t really sound good to hear a cymbal at slider tail. fixed
15. 01:12:658 (2) – Bring down the slider tail a little? Angle-wise, it looks unfitting with 01:12:330 (1) – I noticed it during testplay. fixed
16. 01:15:937 (6,1,2) – stack doesn’t look good. fixed Move 01:16:265 (1,2) – to 235,183? no...
    
    [Rhapsody of the Lolicon]
17. 00:15:047 (7,1) – too close compared to the rest of the 1/1 spacing fixed
18. 00:56:585 (1,2,3,4,5) – I think 00:56:585 (1) – needs more spacing emphasis than 00:57:244 (4) –. I see you made an emphasis at 00:57:738 (1) – how about ctrl+g ?
19. 01:08:232 (1) – You could make this slider neater, imo. It doesn’t fit with the rest of your neat sliders.

Good luck!

Saltssaumure wrote:

Hi from Salt's mod queue

Turns out I can pass 5.7* now, so I'll mod all diffs, though with less detail on Extra and Rhapsody.

[Easy]
00:11:499 (1) - This slider shape will be confusing for new players, best to not use any overlap.
00:15:370 - Changing slider speed on Easy difficulty is not advised, especially here where you introduce a new slider type (reversing slider). Either don't change slider speed, or put the change at an easier slider.
00:24:331 (4,5) - Would look better if it was symmetrical.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this to the right so it is offset from the next slider. i can't cuz i use distance snap
00:57:738 (4) - Get this slider to bend right in the middle
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanket here.
01:24:134 (2) - Get this slider to bend on a slider tick.
01:36:586 - Spinner here. . next to 01: 39: 372 - here's another object, so I guess it's too hard spinner for a beginner since this isn't song's end
01:40:847 (2) - Using a slider reduces the number of active notes. It would be better to just to have two circles. i've alternative

[Normal]
The background has a lot of red and splatter patterns, kinda looks like blood imo...
Normal diff must be distance snapped for the most part, and no spacing changes for no reason. Please check the spacing because it seems to vary a lot even in the same combo.
00:25:331 (3) - Rotate this slider counter-clockwise some, it feels very rigid.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this slider down so it is offset from the previous slider

like this

00:51:310 (1,2) - These are two strong notes, put them not in a straight line to add emphasis.
00:52:629 (3,4,5) - Confusing for new players to read.
01:13:642 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3.
01:14:298 (1,1) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
01:16:265 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3. it'll be overlap with the next 1
01:22:494 (5,1,2) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
01:25:609 (2,3,4) - These are mapping similar sounds, use the same shape and put them in a pattern. it'll look a little weird if i change 4 into curved slider like 2 and 3
01:36:586 - Spinner here. same as easy
01:40:847 (1) - This would feel better as circles, as each note has equal emphasis.

[Hard]
00:06:338 (1,2,3) - Spacing here feels too small. Smaller spacing is ok, but this looks like 1/4 spacing. rly? but the 1/4 spacing look like 00:53:618 (2,3,1) -
00:08:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Angles in this section are a bit random.
00:21:831 (1,2) - Is there a reason for these sliders to overlap? If it'sn't overlap then the spaces will be too far
00:37:997 (1,2) - Blanket shape isn't quite right.
00:47:164 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here is uneven.
01:36:586 - Why not put some spinner here instead? It will help to prevent a stagnant leaderboard. uncomfortable to make an spinner

[Insane]
The dark purple combo colour is too dark to read on high background dim. Avoid using combo colors, slider borders or hitcircleoverlays with ~50 luminosity or lower. Dark colors like these impact readability of approach circles with low background dim and the other elements partially give up their functions as borders.
Avoid using combo colors with ~220 luminosity or higher during kiai times. They create bright pulses which can be unpleasant to the eyes.
the combo colors aren't <50 luminosity or >220 luminosity
00:01:499 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line
00:07:951 (6,7,8) - Move 6 down a little so it is the same distance away from 7 and 8. nope, for emphasize
00:18:498 (3,4,1) - Jump distance and angle seems too much for the music, place 4 so it is blanketed by 3.
00:24:997 (2,3,1,2,3) - Could make these into a pattern for easier reading.
00:39:164 (1,2,3,4) - Make these into a square shape.
00:43:997 (3,4,5) - Make these into an equilateral triangle.
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Square.
01:01:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - 5 isn't stacked properly, place it underneath 1-4.
01:07:084 (1,2,3,4,5) - Many changes in direction in this section emphasises notes that don't need emphasis. ....

[Insanity]
The dark blue and dark purple combo colours are hard to read with 100% background dim, because the other combo colours are light colours. same as insane
00:04:080 (2,3,1) - 2 and head of 1 are too close together, looks strange.
00:25:164 (3,4,5) - Large distance between 3 and 4 makes sense, but having the same distance between 4 and 5 doesn't work because 5 is a weak note.
00:30:497 (3,4,1) - The pattern of increasing angle is cool, make 3 point upwards though so it flows better.
00:38:331 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line.
00:39:497 (2,3,4,5) - Would look neater in as an equilateral triangle.
00:43:997 (3,4,5,1) - ^
00:45:164 (3,4,5,1) - Put 5 on the head of 1 instead, it would read better. But that will make it overlap, while overall the song is not like that
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Would look neater as a square.
00:56:749 (2,3,4,5) - Triangle, and put 5 in line with 2 and 4

like this

01:02:166 (2,3) - This angle is neither narrow nor wide, it feels strange to play.
01:06:101 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:07:412 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
01:16:593 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:21:675 (2,3,4,5) - Make into triangle.
01:25:445 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Try to keep the angle and distance of jumps here the same, or have a specific pattern.
01:27:084 (2,1,2,3) - Make into triangle.
01:29:586 (2,3,4) - Make the distance between sliders here the same, it will show the pattern more clearly.
01:40:191 (4,5,6) - Triangle
01:40:847 (1,2,3) - ^

[Extra]
The dark blue combo colour problem, same as in Insanity diff. same as insanity
00:36:498 (1,2,3,4) - It would look neater as an equilateral triangle, and wouldn't make much difference to gameplay to change it.
01:01:027 (3) - No sound here.
01:04:461 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Would look neater as a perfect star shape.
01:07:412 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanketing here?
01:12:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - Jump angles here are unintuitive, especially going from 3 to 4. I think having 4 closer to the centre of the map would make more sense, as then the angles would slowly increase between jumps instead of being random.

like this

01:17:576 (1,2) - Would look and read better if stacked. this is a 1/4 snap, i think it will hard to read if stacked

01:21:838 (3) - Move to the right a little to make it line up with 1 and 2.

like this

01:27:753 (3,4) - There's no overlap between slider end and start on a 1/4 rhythm. You've used overlap for every other 1/4 rhythm, change this. But if this doesn't overlap it will be more hard to play
01:29:086 (2,3,4,5) - these jump angles are way too small
01:29:920 (1,2,3) - These sliders would be more logical in a triangle shape.
01:37:569 (5,6,1) - Spacing change here places far too much emphasis on 1.
01:38:389 (2,3,4) - Would be more comfortable if these were curved. i've alternative
01:40:519 (2,1) - Although having a stack matches the pattern earlier in the song, it doesn't fit the song here as the notes following 1 are not stronger than 1. Make a jump between these two notes to give equal emphasis to all notes.

[Rhapsody]
00:26:832 (4,5,6) - Should be longer distance between 5 and 6, shorter distance between 4 and 5. 6 is an important note while 5 is less important.
00:31:165 (1,2,3) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
00:34:498 (3,4,5) - ^
01:01:027 (4) - There's no sound here
01:01:513 (9,1) - Uncomfortable flow for no reason? this is in accordance with the form of stream
01:04:953 (3,4,5,6,7) - Would look better as a perfect star shape
01:06:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Gap between 1 and 2 should increase for every combo to match song. but the vocal has a same sound
01:15:445 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - Star shape, same as above. 3 and start of 1 can also be in the same place.
01:16:593 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Increasing jump distance for every combo, same as above. same as above
01:31:753 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle, same as above.
01:35:919 (4,5,6) - ^ i don't think so..
01:37:897 (1,2,3,4) - 4 could be moved up to follow the rotation more smoothly.

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[lolicon]
00:07:951 (1,1) - delete NC i'll use nc for every guitar sound
00:33:164 - can be clickable since this part has strong vocal. uncomfortable to play compared with the rest of song
00:39:165 (1,4) - this overlap looks messy, could you avoid it? fixed
00:41:832 (1,2,3) - flow looks little bit weird fixed
01:08:232 (1,2) - looks hard to read, ....

GL

Nevertary wrote:

Saltssaumure wrote:

SPOILER

Hi from Salt's mod queue

Turns out I can pass 5.7* now, so I'll mod all diffs, though with less detail on Extra and Rhapsody.

[Easy]

SPOILER

00:11:499 (1) - This slider shape will be confusing for new players, best to not use any overlap.
00:15:370 - Changing slider speed on Easy difficulty is not advised, especially here where you introduce a new slider type (reversing slider). Either don't change slider speed, or put the change at an easier slider.
00:24:331 (4,5) - Would look better if it was symmetrical.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this to the right so it is offset from the next slider. i can't cuz i use distance snap
00:57:738 (4) - Get this slider to bend right in the middle
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanket here.
01:24:134 (2) - Get this slider to bend on a slider tick.

01:36:586 - Spinner here. . next to 01: 39: 372 - here's another object, so I guess it's too hard spinner for a beginner since this isn't song's end
At Easy diff, minimum spinner length is 4 beats, and minimum time after spinner is 4 beats. There's enough time for a spinner here.

SPOILER

01:40:847 (2) - Using a slider reduces the number of active notes. It would be better to just to have two circles. i've alternative

[Normal]

SPOILER

The background has a lot of red and splatter patterns, kinda looks like blood imo...
Normal diff must be distance snapped for the most part, and no spacing changes for no reason. Please check the spacing because it seems to vary a lot even in the same combo.
00:25:331 (3) - Rotate this slider counter-clockwise some, it feels very rigid.
00:26:997 (6) - Move this slider down so it is offset from the previous slider

like this

00:51:310 (1,2) - These are two strong notes, put them not in a straight line to add emphasis.
00:52:629 (3,4,5) - Confusing for new players to read.
01:13:642 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3.

01:14:298 (1,1) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
It's still possible, if you rotate repeating slider 1, like this:

01:16:265 (4) - Move this up so it follows the pattern made by 2 and 3. it'll be overlap with the next 1
Like this, there is no overlap:

01:22:494 (5,1,2) - Blanketing? i use distance snap, i can't move it to make blanket
Same again here, you don't need to move the slider head at all, just change the curve on the slider body:

SPOILER

01:25:609 (2,3,4) - These are mapping similar sounds, use the same shape and put them in a pattern. it'll look a little weird if i change 4 into curved slider like 2 and 3

01:36:586 - Spinner here. same as easy
At Normal diff, a spinner only needs to last 3 beats and have 2 beats afterwards, so there is definitely enough time to spin here.

SPOILER

01:40:847 (1) - This would feel better as circles, as each note has equal emphasis.

[Hard]
00:06:338 (1,2,3) - Spacing here feels too small. Smaller spacing is ok, but this looks like 1/4 spacing. rly? but the 1/4 spacing look like 00:53:618 (2,3,1) -
Sorry, I was looking at the previous 1/2 spaced object before this one. Correct mod:
00:04:241 (2,3) - Spacing here is too large, compared to other 1/2 beat spacing.

SPOILER

00:08:918 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Angles in this section are a bit random.

00:21:831 (1,2) - Is there a reason for these sliders to overlap? If it'sn't overlap then the spaces will be too far
Makes sense, it would be good to make sure the overlap doesn't look accidental. Change to something like this, with better aesthetics and flow:

SPOILER

00:37:997 (1,2) - Blanket shape isn't quite right.
00:47:164 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here is uneven.
01:36:586 - Why not put some spinner here instead? It will help to prevent a stagnant leaderboard. uncomfortable to make an spinner

[Insane]
The dark purple combo colour is too dark to read on high background dim. Avoid using combo colors, slider borders or hitcircleoverlays with ~50 luminosity or lower. Dark colors like these impact readability of approach circles with low background dim and the other elements partially give up their functions as borders.
Avoid using combo colors with ~220 luminosity or higher during kiai times. They create bright pulses which can be unpleasant to the eyes.
the combo colors aren't <50 luminosity or >220 luminosity
If all of the combo colours were quite dark, this would not be a problem, as your eyes would adjust. However, the blue combo colour before purple is 120 luminosity, making it hard to see the 64 luminosity purple afterwards as the eyes are used to seeing brighter colours.

SPOILER

00:01:499 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line
00:07:951 (6,7,8) - Move 6 down a little so it is the same distance away from 7 and 8. nope, for emphasize
00:18:498 (3,4,1) - Jump distance and angle seems too much for the music, place 4 so it is blanketed by 3.
00:24:997 (2,3,1,2,3) - Could make these into a pattern for easier reading.
00:39:164 (1,2,3,4) - Make these into a square shape.
00:43:997 (3,4,5) - Make these into an equilateral triangle.
00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Square.
01:01:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - 5 isn't stacked properly, place it underneath 1-4.
01:07:084 (1,2,3,4,5) - Many changes in direction in this section emphasises notes that don't need emphasis. ....

[Insanity]
The dark blue and dark purple combo colours are hard to read with 100% background dim, because the other combo colours are light colours. same as insane
See above comment about too much contrast between combo colour luminosity.

SPOILER

00:04:080 (2,3,1) - 2 and head of 1 are too close together, looks strange.
00:25:164 (3,4,5) - Large distance between 3 and 4 makes sense, but having the same distance between 4 and 5 doesn't work because 5 is a weak note.
00:30:497 (3,4,1) - The pattern of increasing angle is cool, make 3 point upwards though so it flows better.
00:38:331 (2,3) - Not quite in a straight line.
00:39:497 (2,3,4,5) - Would look neater in as an equilateral triangle.
00:43:997 (3,4,5,1) - ^

00:45:164 (3,4,5,1) - Put 5 on the head of 1 instead, it would read better. But that will make it overlap, while overall the song is not like that
The position of 5 right now isn't good for reading. What you said about overlap makes sense, so maybe this design will be more effective:
(Yellow 1 is parallel with yellow 3.)

SPOILER

00:55:925 (3,4,5,1) - Would look neater as a square.
00:56:749 (2,3,4,5) - Triangle, and put 5 in line with 2 and 4

like this

01:02:166 (2,3) - This angle is neither narrow nor wide, it feels strange to play.
01:06:101 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:07:412 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
01:16:593 (2,3,4) - Make these exactly the same curve.
01:21:675 (2,3,4,5) - Make into triangle.
01:25:445 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Try to keep the angle and distance of jumps here the same, or have a specific pattern.
01:27:084 (2,1,2,3) - Make into triangle.
01:29:586 (2,3,4) - Make the distance between sliders here the same, it will show the pattern more clearly.
01:40:191 (4,5,6) - Triangle
01:40:847 (1,2,3) - ^

[Extra]
The dark blue combo colour problem, same as in Insanity diff. same as insanity
See above comment about too much contrast between combo colour luminosity.

SPOILER

00:36:498 (1,2,3,4) - It would look neater as an equilateral triangle, and wouldn't make much difference to gameplay to change it.
01:01:027 (3) - No sound here.
01:04:461 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Would look neater as a perfect star shape.
01:07:412 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^
01:12:330 (1,2) - Blanketing here?
01:12:658 (2,3,4,5,6) - Jump angles here are unintuitive, especially going from 3 to 4. I think having 4 closer to the centre of the map would make more sense, as then the angles would slowly increase between jumps instead of being random.

like this

01:17:576 (1,2) - Would look and read better if stacked. this is a 1/4 snap, i think it will hard to read if stacked

01:21:838 (3) - Move to the right a little to make it line up with 1 and 2.

like this

01:27:753 (3,4) - There's no overlap between slider end and start on a 1/4 rhythm. You've used overlap for every other 1/4 rhythm, change this. But if this doesn't overlap it will be more hard to play
I'm saying there needs to be more overlap here, so that the slider end of 3 and the slider start of 4 are overlapping.
01:20:199 (1,2) - A good example here, you have a small overlap between slider end of 1 and circle 2, because it is 1/4 rhythm.

SPOILER

01:29:086 (2,3,4,5) - these jump angles are way too small
01:29:920 (1,2,3) - These sliders would be more logical in a triangle shape.
01:37:569 (5,6,1) - Spacing change here places far too much emphasis on 1.
01:38:389 (2,3,4) - Would be more comfortable if these were curved. i've alternative
01:40:519 (2,1) - Although having a stack matches the pattern earlier in the song, it doesn't fit the song here as the notes following 1 are not stronger than 1. Make a jump between these two notes to give equal emphasis to all notes.

[Rhapsody]

SPOILER

00:26:832 (4,5,6) - Should be longer distance between 5 and 6, shorter distance between 4 and 5. 6 is an important note while 5 is less important.
00:31:165 (1,2,3) - Tiny angle here looks untidy, either increase it or remove it.
00:34:498 (3,4,5) - ^
01:01:027 (4) - There's no sound here

01:01:513 (8,1) - Uncomfortable flow for no reason? this is in accordance with the form of stream
Right now, moving from 8 to 1 isn't a smooth curve, and is two separate movements which feels uncomfortable.
It would be more comfortable like this:

SPOILER

01:04:953 (3,4,5,6,7) - Would look better as a perfect star shape.
01:06:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Gap between 1 and 2 should increase for every combo to match song. but the vocal has a same sound
01:15:445 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - Star shape, same as above. 3 and start of 1 can also be in the same place.
01:16:593 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Increasing jump distance for every combo, same as above. same as above
01:31:753 (2,3,4) - Tiny angle, same as above.
01:35:919 (4,5,6) - ^ i don't think so..
01:37:897 (1,2,3,4) - 4 could be moved up to follow the rotation more smoothly.

no reply = fixed

thanks salts
np!