I have 16,457 without taiko. I think I'm at like 1k taiko so rip just need 600 more if I ever want to play it haha never
N0thingSpecial wrote:
go back to stepmania
Runa isn't on this list as they fail the 2nd requirement of having at least 10% of their total PP in each mode (they barely have any in CTB).tkdLolly wrote:
Where is Runa
The 10% requirement is quite arbitrary, but I guess is reasonable if you really want 'all modes' players, also to take out a bunch of mania players... but they are bound to have an advantage.Edgar_Figaro wrote:
Runa isn't on this list as they fail the 2nd requirement of having at least 10% of their total PP in each mode (they barely have any in CTB).tkdLolly wrote:
Where is Runa
While yes I do know that PP isn't equal across modes, playerbase across modes is also not equal so neither really works well. There are far more standard players than Taiko or CTB. Also the DT change to Mania did really throw the entire cumulative rankings on dawnglare Osu completely out of whack. Partially why I decided to create this list as currently the #1 on DawnGlare is Jakads who has more than 28K PP in Mania, same goes for a large number of the top 100 on dawnglare who are just high ranked mania players.
>getting so angry you become a d6-d7 playerYuudachi-kun wrote:
N0thingSpecial wrote:
go back to stepmania
shame would like to talkYuudachi-kun wrote:
Getting mad at stepmania is for bad people.
Getting mad is one of the most unproductive and worst things you can do in regards to enjoy game. It's bad.Unmei Muma wrote:
shame would like to talkYuudachi-kun wrote:
Getting mad at stepmania is for bad people.
yay I'm gifted (´・ω・`)Endaris wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to look at the playtime per gamemode?
I mean you should know very well that getting to 2000pp in Taiko is more or less gifted and there's at least one person on your list that has less than 50h playtime in Taiko but still makes your arbitrary 10% cut.
F1r3tar wrote:
Respect to anyone with 2k+ pp on every mode.
Plan on updating it again in first week of June. Glad to see there are people who like this alternative ranking list.Jaye wrote:
F1r3tar wrote:
Respect to anyone with 2k+ pp on every mode.P.S. please update
the deviation part is trying to objectively scale players to filter out people who aren't actually all-modes players.mulraf wrote:
what's the deviation part? oO
i'm surprised juankristal didn't make it on the list, he's not only good at cursing but also at playing
hiF1r3tar wrote:
Respect to anyone with 2k+ pp on every mode.
You need to refresh your ranking in Mania and CTB though or next update will kill your STDEV.Don Omar wrote:
hiF1r3tar wrote:
Respect to anyone with 2k+ pp on every mode.
Whoops, thanks for catching that. Yeah usually I catch re-names by clicking the link after posting the top 50 and then eliminate people who have no user found as it was probably a rename of someone on the list. Apparently with in regards to Trent there is another user with Trent in the name that it linked me to so I didn't catch this renameMelt3dCheeze wrote:
fyi Trent and qebrus same person, just a rename.
Another one sandsyk0 renamed to "its over" pretty sureEdgar_Figaro wrote:
Whoops, thanks for catching that. Yeah usually I catch re-names by clicking the link after posting the top 50 and then eliminate people who have no user found as it was probably a rename of someone on the list. Apparently with in regards to Trent there is another user with Trent in the name that it linked me to so I didn't catch this renameMelt3dCheeze wrote:
fyi Trent and qebrus same person, just a rename.
Yeah Dawnglare Osu not working is why I haven't updated this list. I could use OsuDaily but the issue with that website is that a player has to be asked to be tracked by OsuDaily or someone else has to request them, so the list might not reflect the true top 50 all-mode players.enjoyit1025 wrote:
Name Changed:
10.Xcstasy => --------------
26.milr_ => [ White Music ]
Wrong Data(?):
23.Riley
47.SanyaLitvyak
And Why DawnGlare osu! didn't work now (´_ゝ`)?
I haven't updated it since July due to Dawnglare Osu being down. I am using sample deviationYuudachi-kun wrote:
According to my calculations I should be 18429 on your list
Also are you using sample or population standard deviation
The reason I use sample and not population is due to the way the numbers work out. Using 2* sample deviation a player that has 0PP in 3 modes and all their PP in a single mode is equal to exactly 0 per the calculation. Based on the feature request for cumulative ranking many people were opposed to having a "bad rank" on their profile simply cause they only played 1 gamemode. So by using sample instead of population it would mean that only players who played 2+ gamemodes would ever have a cumulative ranking.Yuudachi-kun wrote:
Why are you using sample when there are only four modes thus that is a population because you have all 4 numbers?
Also oops I did (std dev /2) because I misread
Yup congratulations. Your actually in 8th place with just a raw add of PP but the 7 people above you all have much much higher standard deviation so after calculation you jump ahead of them.[Sunshine] wrote:
Am I #1? wtf?????????????????
is that higher or lower then you were expecting?[ White Music ] wrote:
I'm #14 WTFFFFFFFFFFFFF ?????????????????????????