A guideline seems like the best approach. That way, it allows for circumstances like spread requirements (snow drive anyone?) or unique ideas (can do would be the easiest example) while also working against someone sticking 10 fairly identical insanes / extras on their set because all their friends asked to gd and they didn't want to refuse.
I still think that regulating this at the ranking criteria level is pretty stupid. If the concern is that big sets cause bn fatigue / yolo bubbling (which I disagree with anyway) then the limit should be placed on drain time in a set, not on the amount of diffs in a set. An eight diff 3 minute map has significantly more drain time (= more fatigue or whatever) than a 10 diff tv size set, but one of those is allowed and the other isn't.
Basically, if you guys (@oko/pishi/zexy/etc) insist on forcing this clearly unwanted proposal through, then making it a guideline is the best way to meet both goals - to stop massive sets which cause "modder fatigue" or whatever stupid thing you want to call it, while still allowing several unique interpretations of a song on one set.
I still think that regulating this at the ranking criteria level is pretty stupid. If the concern is that big sets cause bn fatigue / yolo bubbling (which I disagree with anyway) then the limit should be placed on drain time in a set, not on the amount of diffs in a set. An eight diff 3 minute map has significantly more drain time (= more fatigue or whatever) than a 10 diff tv size set, but one of those is allowed and the other isn't.
Basically, if you guys (@oko/pishi/zexy/etc) insist on forcing this clearly unwanted proposal through, then making it a guideline is the best way to meet both goals - to stop massive sets which cause "modder fatigue" or whatever stupid thing you want to call it, while still allowing several unique interpretations of a song on one set.