1. The Throne Of Immortality (6,85 stars, 2343 notes)

MrKOSIEJ wrote:

Rank plz

1. 00:01:979 - 00:02:122 - there are supposed to be some notes, you're mapped only a half of a drum roll which starts from here 00:01:907 (3) - , and these gaps seems very empty and weird
2. 00:11:479 (3,4,5) - 4-5 jump seems weird on the background of constant intensity of music
3. 00:12:907 (2,3,4,5) - ^ something similar
4. 00:14:479 - the whole part after this (between your blue bookmarks) seems like a bunch of random circles and sliders that doesn't follow to anything. I mean, I can see your attempts to representing some sounds in the music, but... You can copypaste this part to other song with same bpm and it will fit xD This part lacks expressiveness
5. 00:22:765 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - there is nothing to represent as a stream. The guitar plays a different thing. After all, the whole stream is just... a random stream, that looks good, but ignored music almost at all
6. 00:24:550 (2,3,4) - mapped to nothing
7. 00:24:765 (1,2,3,1,2) - 00:27:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - compare these. First one is a 3* stuff, the second is... yeah. But there's no such a giant difference in the intensity of the music. Obly a bit. So what do I think: buff slider part, or nerf jumps
8. 00:59:407 (2) - no drums yet
9. 00:59:979 (2,3,4) - mapped to nothing
10. 01:02:621 (3) - SV is turtle as hell. After a deathstream transition to that slow sliders seems really weird. Especially this thing 01:03:479 (2,2) - 3* part in the middle of the hell. The whole part with blast-beat seems very weird imo: random stream for no reason... (yes sure, it kinda supports the effect from the vocals but the next parts are 3-4* stuff, on the background of the same blast-beat and about same intensity)
11. 01:20:193 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - random stream, that is kinda mapped to the drums, but in fact - no - it doesn't supports the dynamics of it, at all... just a stream cuz why not
12. 01:26:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - what even is that?:) There's no drum roll at all. 01:26:479 (2,3,1) - here it is! Drums are only on these notes 01:26:764 (1,3,5) -
13. 01:33:621 (2) - NC to at least somehow indicate on a transition to another SV. thb, this acceleration seems really weird, but ok whatever...
14. 01:54:407 (4,8) - mapped to nothing
15. 02:06:264 (2,4,6) - ^
16. 02:21:621 (3,4,5) - why? I don't hear anything really imressive there. The highest and the strongest pitch is there 02:21:335 (1) - . Pitch and intensity goes down in this part 02:21:621 (3,4,5) - so, no reason for such a big jump
17. There's an example: 02:23:050 (3,1) - just look at this vocal part 02:23:335 (1) - the pitch is pretty high and sharp, so this 02:23:050 (3,1) - supposed to be a huge jump. But its not. Instead of this, you've made some jumps here 02:23:621 (2,1,2,3) - in a descending part...
18. 02:55:978 (2,6) - nothing here. Drums in this part aren't drum roll
19. Just look at the contrast again 03:05:049 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - against the 03:08:478 (1,2,3) - 7 star part against the 3 star part, in the riff with about same intensity. Something should be buffed or nerfed for sure
20. 03:40:763 (13) - feels really empty, cuz blast-beat is still going on. What about at least a reverse-slider?
21. 04:13:905 (1,2) - I think it could be a bigger jump cuz of strong sound on 2
22. 04:30:248 (1,2,3,4) - visual spacing is really bad. Stacking in sliders is good, but just look at this "pattern" separately... I believe, you can find better solution
23. 04:30:648 - Imo kiai should start here. Previous part is very quiet in volume, and just a transition by itself
24. 04:50:848 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - and 04:51:648 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - has literally the same intensity in music, but VERY different in play... pretty weird imo
25. 05:59:333 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - what? why?:) random jumps our from nowhere. for no reason. you've made the biggest jumps on the lowest pitch
26. 06:03:548 (2,4) - mapped to nothing
27. Speaking about that 06:03:333 (4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - IMO the whole stream is just a random thing with random DS that doesn't support the real tune of the drums... 06:03:762 (1) - drum roll starts from here and has decreasing sound, which means DS should start from high and go down. You've made it conversely. Even the vocal part goes down
28. 06:49:476 (1,2,1,2) - missed alot in between

Dammond wrote:

MrKOSIEJ wrote:

Rank plz

Ok let's build on this phrase.
I'll be pretty picky and nazi just as I usually do

Mod will contain some of my own impressions about mapped parts. I'll be very honest, so hopefully you'll not take it to heart

1. 00:01:979 - 00:02:122 - there are supposed to be some notes, you're mapped only a half of a drum roll which starts from here 00:01:907 (3) - , and these gaps seems very empty and weird it's so minar and irrelevant. Try to understand what i was aiming for. The notes you picked are irrelevant because i mapped the strong sounds 00:01:622 (1,3) - and 00:02:193 (5) - this one was dragged, so mapped as a stream.
2. 00:11:479 (3,4,5) - 4-5 jump seems weird on the background of constant intensity of music sliders represent change, stronger sound,
   circles are used to fill the space
3. 00:12:907 (2,3,4,5) - ^ something similar the same thing
4. 00:14:479 - the whole part after this (between your blue bookmarks) seems like a bunch of random circles and sliders that doesn't follow to anything. I mean, I can see your attempts to representing some sounds in the music, but... You can copypaste this part to other song with same bpm and it will fit xD This part lacks expressiveness it's not bad, it's just generic. With lack of ideas i thing it's pretty accurate way to map this part :v
5. 00:22:765 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - there is nothing to represent as a stream. The guitar plays a different thing. After all, the whole stream is just... a random stream, that looks good, but ignored music almost at all 00:23:193 - this is where drums start, the previous stram part is to represent the dragged sound
6. 00:24:550 (2,3,4) - mapped to nothingREEEEEEEEE
7. 00:24:765 (1,2,3,1,2) - 00:27:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - compare these. First one is a 3* stuff, the second is... yeah. But there's no such a giant difference in the intensity of the music. Obly a bit. So what do I think: buff slider part, or nerf jumps the 3* stuff is a calm whether before epic storm of jumps expressing the end of and intro. No giant gain in music, but, it's interesting i'll think about buffing sliders
8. 00:59:407 (2) - no drums yet i made the stream longer so it could start on downbeat therefore making it much better to play. It's much more consistent that way
9. 00:59:979 (2,3,4) - mapped to nothing REEEEEEEEE
10. 01:02:621 (3) - SV is turtle as hell. After a deathstream transition to that slow sliders seems really weird. Especially this thing 01:03:479 (2,2) - 3* part in the middle of the hell. The whole part with blast-beat seems very weird imo: random stream for no reason... (yes sure, it kinda supports the effect from the vocals but the next parts are 3-4* stuff, on the background of the same blast-beat and about same intensity) a lil brake from jumping,
    fits the song. 01:05:621 (1,2,1,2) - dis part is the same so it's consistent. Doesn't feel weird to me
11. 01:20:193 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - random stream, that is kinda mapped to the drums, but in fact - no - it doesn't supports the dynamics of it, at all... just a stream cuz why not 01:20:479 - start of a dragged sound, dynamics up. 5 circles before that is a lead to stream, quite usefull in expression of dragged sounds.
12. 01:26:764 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - what even is that?:) There's no drum roll at all. 01:26:479 (2,3,1) - here it is! Drums are only on these notes 01:26:764 (1,3,5) - vaild point
13. 01:33:621 (2) - NC to at least somehow indicate on a transition to another SV. thb, this acceleration seems really weird, but ok whatever... k
14. 01:54:407 (4,8) - mapped to nothing 01:54:192 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - vocal
15. 02:06:264 (2,4,6) - ^ same
16. 02:21:621 (3,4,5) - why? I don't hear anything really imressive there. The highest and the strongest pitch is there 02:21:335 (1) - . Pitch and intensity goes down in this part 02:21:621 (3,4,5) - so, no reason for such a big jump aesthetics, but i'll think about it
17. There's an example: 02:23:050 (3,1) - just look at this vocal part 02:23:335 (1) - the pitch is pretty high and sharp, so this 02:23:050 (3,1) - supposed to be a huge jump. But its not. Instead of this, you've made some jumps here 02:23:621 (2,1,2,3) - in a descending part... element of surprise xd. We'll see
18. 02:55:978 (2,6) - nothing here. Drums in this part aren't drum roll k fixed
19. Just look at the contrast again 03:05:049 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - against the 03:08:478 (1,2,3) - 7 star part against the 3 star part, in the riff with about same intensity. Something should be buffed or nerfed for sure yeah, no.
20. 03:40:763 (13) - feels really empty, cuz blast-beat is still going on. What about at least a reverse-slider? nah, normal slider represents the vocal pretty nicely
21. 04:13:905 (1,2) - I think it could be a bigger jump cuz of strong sound on 2 it was much smaller xd. I already made it as large as ia could to make it looking nice
22. 04:30:248 (1,2,3,4) - visual spacing is really bad. Stacking in sliders is good, but just look at this "pattern" separately... I believe, you can find better solution what, it looks beautiful
23. 04:30:648 - Imo kiai should start here. Previous part is very quiet in volume, and just a transition by itself ok, aggreed
24. 04:50:848 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - and 04:51:648 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - has literally the same intensity in music, but VERY different in play... pretty weird imo disaggreed
25. 05:59:333 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - what? why?:) random jumps our from nowhere. for no reason. you've made the biggest jumps on the lowest pitch reverse intesity technique
26. 06:03:548 (2,4) - mapped to nothing ok, fine
27. Speaking about that 06:03:333 (4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - IMO the whole stream is just a random thing with random DS that doesn't support the real tune of the drums... 06:03:762 (1) - drum roll starts from here and has decreasing sound, which means DS should start from high and go down. You've made it conversely. Even the vocal part goes down ye fixed above, partially at least xd
28. 06:49:476 (1,2,1,2) - missed alot in between yeah, no.

I had much more things to say, but it would be just a repetition of what I've already said. Hope for your own work with the rest (;

IMO, the biggest problem of the map is alternation between 3* and 7* stuff in parts with same intensity. You should reconsider this. i love that alternation.

My resume: random jumps, partially random streams, music in the last place. (I'm just trying to be honest, don't take offence please ) It needs tons of work, or even remapping of parts, if you REALLY aiming for rank. Tons of mods as well, which, I'm afraid, you'll mark with huge amount of red text as you like to do, because of "my style" well.. it is my style xd. Some things just seem perfectly fine. or smth (I believe, my mod is xd).
Your aesthetics are pretty good, you come up with some fresh and interesting ideas, but the rest of style still needs to be significantly improved in the way of understanding music and representation of it.

That's it for now

Beafowl wrote:

Hi, mod because why not

1. You should change the preview point, it seems a little bit odd with it being in the beginning (I thought about 05:36:048 - or 05:54:333 ) changed to 04:30:648 -
2. 00:01:622 (1,2,3,4,5) - This pattern is kinda random, but you could do the following so it looks more structured: http://puu.sh/vozbp/9f0ed000f5.jpg
   If you apply this change you have to move the slider at the beginning so it stacks again with the circles. oh yeah, seems nice,
3. 00:04:479 (2,3,4,5) - Same situation, the structure can be improved here. 00:04:479 (2) can be exactly between 00:04:907 (5) and 00:04:765 (4) .
   You can also make a right angle in 00:04:479 (2,3,5) . Example: http://puu.sh/voAMa/ede0de8a26.jpg indeed, the angle is fine tho, imo
4. 00:05:050 (1,2,3) - This can be a perfect triangle, as well as 00:06:193 (2,3,4) . There might be more of those so watch out k
5. 00:12:479 (3) - The slider shape should be changed similar to 00:11:907 (1,2) - so it fits better in good point
6. 00:25:336 (3) - ^ doesn't fit here tho
7. 00:29:122 (1) - Spinner should end at 00:32:193 because there should be some space between 00:32:479 (1) and 00:29:122 (1) there's anough space
8. 00:33:336 (5) - This slider does not fit since it doesnt seem to belong to any pattern. I would to something like this so it becomes involved with
   other notes: http://puu.sh/vweLv/120b397940.jpg 00:32:621 (2,5) - it's a blanket, made it better tho
9. 00:41:764 (2,3,4) - This pattern has a triangular form, but the circles aren't shaping a perfect triangle, it should look like this: http://puu.sh/vweWK/9184794230.jpg 2 stacks and a blanket, i call it fair xd
   I know, your intention here was to make the sliders stack with 00:41:050 (2) , but it looked pretty painful when seeing the pattern not being perfect. it's perfect nuff for me
10. 00:43:193 (3,4,5,6,1) - Those notes could look better if you would line up the circles perfectly: http://puu.sh/vwf54/1a09dcdb9b.jpg true
11. 00:45:050 (1,2) - Both sliders should have the same shape so they are recognizable, like you did in 00:45:621 (3,4) yes
12. 00:45:621 (3,4) - More distance between those notes. You did it before and this part is emphasized yes indeed

This is not the whole mod, I was just too lazy to continue xd but what I can say is that the choice of rhythm is pretty good, the map has just a lack of structure and the correct use of spacing.

Poke me in-game so I can continue with the mod lol ok, i will , very nice mod so far lol

Thanks for the mod !

F R E E D O M wrote:

RANK PLS

• 
  [diff]

1. First impression is the map needs to be more organised.
   
   - Inconsistent spacing within a pattern (like 00:43:764 (1,2,3) - this) happens too often; to list a few more: 00:51:764 (1,2,3) - 00:57:479 (1,2,3,4) - 01:09:479 (3,4) - 01:23:764 (1,2,3) - ...
   
   - Slider curves and red node positions vary way too much, giving too many different slidershapes which should really be more standard. Examples: 00:46:336 (2,3,4) -; 00:48:907 (3) - vs 00:47:764 (3) - vs 01:02:621 (3) - vs 01:04:907 (3) - 01:54:764 (1,4) -
   
   - Overlaps are not equals and kinda messy: 01:29:907 (1,2,3) -; 01:38:478 (1,2,3) -; 02:28:192 (1,1) -; 03:23:906 (1,1) - (you don't want to overlap things without making it a distinct pattern)
   
   - Angles: you really want to limit the amount of the angles you use. This is just part of being organised. Just for example like 01:12:479 (1,2,3,4) - rotate it 40° so it doesn't look tilted; 01:02:621 (3) - too tilted; 00:45:050 (1,1,2,3) - same; 01:24:050 (2,3) - angles too different, use a cleaner angle like 01:10:050 (1,2,3) -, also the fact that the sliders are so far apart it's less recognisable as a pattern; 03:24:477 (1,2) - too tilted ... Try to organise the object placement based on angles, it helps a lot of the cleanliness of your map. Then to break these rules you only use to them to emphasise things that really stand out.
   
   
2. Overmapped stuff happens quite often, turn off your hitsound volume and try to check them up if they rhythmically makes sense with the song. Examples of overmapped objects: 00:22:765 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - ; 00:24:550 (2,3,4) - ; 00:27:122 (2,4) - (no 1/4 beats); 02:06:264 (2,4,6) - same ; 02:39:335 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - the guitar isn't spamming 1/4 here, give it a listen and try to be more precise on the rhythm here ; 06:03:762 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this is actually 1/3; 06:08:905 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - only 1/2 rhythm here
   
   
3. Sections need to be more distinctive of each other: 01:02:193 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - not sure why you changed to 1/2 here while 1/4s are really prominent, then it couldn't be as distinctive as it could be compared to 1/2 rhythm section like this 01:09:050 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - ; 01:59:335 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - biggest offender probably this vs. 02:03:907 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - , which do you think requires the rhythm to be denser?
   
   
   Rhythm and accentuation is generally fine, aesthetics/overall patterning needs more attention

Sliproads wrote:

As requested

The Seat Of Immortality


00:06:765 (1,2,3) - Centring the anchor on these (and the other sliders around this section) would look better imo. fixed, maybe
00:10:193 (1,2,3) - Adding a curve to these wouldn't do any harm and would look great, like these 00:13:622 (1,2,3) - . k done
00:34:121 (8,1) - Why is there an increase of spacing when the pitch lowers? I'd make the spacing smaller on this part. Something like this would be better. nope, cuz lower pitch doesn't always make a less intense part.
00:35:907 (1) - ^ same with this stream. Maybe I'm interpreting the song wrong tho. maybe i'm just a rebel
00:44:621 (4) - I like the shape, but it seems out of place in this section. reshaped a bit
00:59:907 (1) - Because of the high pitched vocals I'd make this stream a lot more spaced. I can see why you made this with low spacing but the vocals definitely override the instrumentals in this part so I think it's better off with more spacing. nah
01:00:836 (14,4) - Pls align k
01:01:907 (13,1) - Make 13 0.6 or 0.7 sv and keep 1 at 1.0 - then align them like this. i don't like it,
but i changed the sv
01:13:050 (3,4) - Should look like this. fixed in a better way
01:21:621 (1,2,3) - Nice. ty
01:27:336 (1) - I think the looping part is ugly since it's so small, either make it bigger so there's a gap inside it or remove it completely. aww ;( my heart cry, that was my beauty part. But ok........ i'll change it. I still cri/
01:29:907 (1,2) - Not a fan of how these overlap. WELl too bad, cuz i'm not gonna change it.
01:35:907 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I love this. me too xd
01:44:193 (2,3,4) - I'd space this more, or make it completely stacked - just think it looks better. k
01:52:478 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - The repetition of this pattern doesn't work too well here as the song isn't repeating, pls fix. What. It is repeating.
whatyou talkin' bout.
01:57:050 (1) - Again make the loop bigger or remove it - you don't have to do this though it's just my opinion. i tweaked it a lil bit
02:35:050 (2) - This stream could do with more spacing and more direction changes. Right now it plays like all the other streams in the map but the song is vastly different and has more energy. Same with the other guitar stream shortly after. yeah, maybe. But i would require too much remapping, and it plays really well rn, so leaving it.
02:45:621 (3,1) - You've done this a few times already but I think when big sliders overlap like this it looks ugly. I like the shape of this though 02:46:192 (1) - . changed a bit
02:48:406 (5,1) - Reduce spacing between these. yeah, no
03:28:763 (2,3) - Spacing is waaaay to close between these. High pitched vocals indicate the spacing should be much higher i don't give a flying fuck about pitch if the song doesn't support large spacing that much
03:44:477 (1) - This would look better placed under the slider, like this. well, i disaggree
05:09:248 (1,2,1,2) - Curving or anchoring these sliders would look so much better. Some other places in the section like this too. For example: 05:00:448 (1,2,3,4) - . Spacing seems fine in this section for the most part. no change, i use all kind of sliders for variety, there's a pattern in that,
soo, yeah.
05:32:333 (2,3) - Ugly transition from slider 2 to 3. This looks nicer. If you do that, re-position 05:33:476 (4) - so it is blanketed by slider 3.
06:20:905 (1) - Space this more. Should be more spaced than 06:20:619 (1,2,3,4) - or equal imo.
06:22:619 (1,2) - Centre the anchors more on these I think they look ugly as they are. yeah, not gonna happen. I love them as they are rn.
06:59:476 (4,1) - These would be better further apart; it would suit the strong beat on 1 a lot better. nah, song is too calm for larger spacing

Overall, the map flows well and structure is okay, just reshape some sliders as some are quite ugly. Work on spacing in the places I pointed out, that seems to be the main issue with the map. Not gonna lie though the map is really fun to play.

Another thing - the difficulty name could be better. "Seat" isn't much of an interesting / imaginative word. The Throne of Immortality sounds a lot better in my opinion so consider changing it to that or something similar.changed to "throne" xd

Good luck with the map : )

much thanks for the mod, man

1. So basicly pay attention to snares and cymbals for the main point, you kinda want to give feedback that represents the music since otherwise theres no point in providing feedback, snare = clap, cymbals = finish comes a bit down to that simplefied
   main thing about lesser cymbals and bigger00:03:336 (1) - 00:04:193 (1) - first one is noticable weaker, second one is alot stronger so put a finish on the second one and if you go for the optional lesser finish then put that one there 00:29:050 (1) - here another good example of end of section strong finish put that stuff on there
2. 00:17:907 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - since the song uses quite a lot of strong cymbals you might want to avoid finish spams tho so here for example only put finishes on the 1st and 3rd downbeat, you can hear in the music that basicly follows a 2 stanza main rhythm like you can hear that 00:17:907 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - vs 00:19:622 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4) vs - 00:21:336 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4) - is all connected in the music so putting a finish only on the start of that stuff would be best so yeah thats basicly the main point about finishes, try to hear the cymbals but avoid finish spam at your own judgement. Like in the intro just a finish on the first note and start back at 00:04:193 (1) - is good otherwise 00:03:336 (1) - is a bit spammy If the cymbals suddenly get a lot quicker after eachoter in the music => add some more to represent that
3. claps and main feedback: so basicly you just kinda whislese every strong sound atm which doesnt really represnt the music since you basicly ignore all claps/toms etc, take this section for instance 00:00:765 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - and just listen to the instruments a bit compare tail of 00:00:765 (1) - 00:01:622 (1,2) - 00:01:907 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - (whats with ignoring the drum btw sounds bit odd) so basicly you got a strong finish with a tom ish sound at 00:00:765 (1) - 00:01:622 (1,2) - tho snares here and a lesser finish on 00:01:622 (1) - and 00:01:907 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - 8 normal drum stuff thats kinda (2-2) (2-2) so hitsound wise first one could be Whisle + finish, for the snares 00:01:622 (1,2) - two claps on that with a standard drum whisle on the first one, 00:01:907 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - here you can use drum hitnormals if you want but then it has to be consistent throughout the diff so yeah your choice
   
4. artificial hitsouding: So you kinda made an artifical hitsound pattern with the current whisle which could work but the mistakes are usually less noticable like don't forget to add other stuff to it too like if you got a stronger finish for example. Also watch out for this stuff00:04:193 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - currently really bad feedback with your artificial since 00:05:336 (3) - should also be whishled from what your following to make sense feedback wise, but then your rhythm is kinda messy again since it should be more along the line of 00:06:765 (1,2,3,1) - for the feedback to make sense. 00:11:907 (1,2,3,1) - here for example your rhytm is good aswell and you do hs all 4 of them so bit of rhythm and hs error there
5. 00:22:765 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - here optional but you could add different toms hs if you wanna go all the way. Could also make the spacing here different to differentiate it a bit more with the intensity of the toms like first 4 smaller spacing would fit nicely.
6. 00:23:193 (3,7,3) - problem with this kinda song is that its basicly a snare spam song like here, so you can go full starchild and add claps every 1/1 like on these reds or leave the middle one out, stuff like 00:27:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can hear the snares gets more intenser and more common so could add more claps on these where you hear the sounds to represent that since its also represented with rythm and spacing aswell atm.

deadpon3 wrote:

cze ziomek moduje mapke ~~

ten trudniejszy diff:

00:00:765 (1,2,1,2,3) - szczerze to ten początek można estetyczniej zrobić, ten slider co jest teraz średnio się prezentuje z kółkiem zaraz po nim, podkreśl tą krótką przerwę zanim zaczyna się sekwencja jumpów, według mnie dobrze współgra tutaj taki pattern

o taki

i ułóż sobie go jak chcesz, myślę że ten sliderek by pasował nawet bardziej gdyby był wyżej, dodatkowo polecam sestackować koniec tego sliderka z 00:01:622 (1) - k

00:13:336 (5,1) - taki prosty flow tutaj nie pasuje, no i niepotrzebnie zmniejszasz w tej sytuacji DS, natomiast jeżeli ułożysz coś takiego

dawd

to przejście z 00:13:193 (4) - do 00:13:336 (5) - będzie lepiej wyglądać, no i naprawi się sprawa dystansu z 00:13:622 (1) - k

00:17:050 (1,2,3,1) - trochę spieprzony gimmick, niech sliderki poruszają się w obydwu osiach, coś takiego:

robiłem na oko dude

i ten kąt pochylenia byś zmienił bo zbyt ostry, dziwnie wygląda

takie coś jest zajebiste

fixed

00:22:193 (1,2) - ten brejk nie jest ani trochę podkreślany, slider jest ułożony strasznie losowo i szczerze to taki pattern kółko i slider trochę średnio, może taki sliderek do niebieskiego ticku i zaraz potem od białego slider 1/2?

coś takiego

fixed

No i wtedy może taki pattern z nieco poprawionym też jak chcesz direct flowem ze slidera 1/2 do streama

lecim

00:58:336 (4,5) - zmień kształt tego sliderka, no i trochę spamujesz tym samym flowem, proponuję coś takiego

w

haan, but maybe, but naah, zobaczymy xd

dobra to chyba tyle do pierwszej minuty, gl ziomuś dziena dziena

KorwiN wrote:

Reply time Start 6:00
Elówa
00:01:907 (3) - Od tąd rozpocznij stream
00:18:765 (1,2,3,1) - Staraj się nie powtarzać za często tego samego ...
01:19:336 (1,2) - DS ? 01:19:907 (1,2) - ?
01:25:764 (4) - nie pasuje szczerze :/
02:14:192 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Dziwne jakieś jumpy :/
02:19:050 (2,3,4,5) - podobne jumpy
02:52:192 (1,2,3) - tak jakoś :/ ...
04:30:248 (1,2,3,4) - ciężko się w to wbić :/
04:42:648 (1,2,3,4) - up^
05:32:333 (2,3) - wszystkie przy sobie i nagle jeden odchodzi ? < kudo tylko za to
Kurwa no no no <3 To jest zajebiste kuźwa <3 mapka Idealna tyle ile wycisnąłem to wycisnąłem Ale kurwa to musi być Rank <3

// KorwiN