yuzu__rinrin
yuzu__rinrin wrote:
hi~ Taiko M4M
[general]
Artist --> 辻横由佳 (Romanised Artist : Yuka Tsujiyoko) Done, thanks.
Widescreen Support remove check please. (Kantan,Futsuu,Muzukashii) Done.
[Kantan]
good map. :3[Futsuu]
- 00:43:423 (53) - k...? Done.
- 00:15:696 (2) - k Done.
- 00:16:150 (3,4) - ctrl+g Done.
- 00:17:059 (5,6,7) - dkk? Done.
- 00:37:514 (2) - k Done.
- 00:37:968 (3,4) - ctrl+g Done.
- 00:38:877 (5,6,7) - dkk Done.
[Oni]good luck ! :3
- 00:17:400 (80) - k Done.
- 00:39:218 (187) - ^ same Done.
Thanks for the mod !
snowball112
snowball112 wrote:
Heya, random modGeneral
- You may want to turn down the volume just a bit for the after the kiai times, this is relatively quiet in comparison, I suggest you add timing points at 00:22:514 and 00:44:332 with 40-50% or so. I agree, but i just made it end at 00:26:150 (123) - as it gets louder again here.
- I think it sounds much better if you end the map with a finish at 00:51:150. If you map on 00:51:605 as well it implies that you're following the rhythym that starts here, which is not the case. Okay, wasn't sure when i should end it.
Oni
You have a few 1/4 which don't really have 1/4 in the music to support them, for example 00:08:309 and 00:10:127 and 00:11:946 as the instrument only lands on 1/2. If you listen closely, the 1/4 drum in the music is 1/1 later, namely on 00:08:764 etc. I think it would sound and look better if you:I think something like this would feel more intuitive for playing the 1/4 in this part. This applies to the second kiai as well, where I think you should remove the second triplet in patterns like 00:31:036 as well. You're probably going for variety, but I think it would be perfectly fine if you do have more of a repetition, this is a loop after all and you have variety with the other parts like that from 00:15:241. I totaly agree with you and i applied all the changes, really nice suggestion here.
- Move 00:08:309 to 00:08:764 and change 00:08:650 to d and 00:09:105 to k, would give nice emphasis of the lower sound on 00:09:332. Similarly applies to the pattern starting at 00:13:423.
- Move 00:10:127 to 00:10:582 and try something like k_k_d_dkd_k_d for this pattern. I think d would sound nice for the lower sounds of 00:10:241 and 00:10:696 in comparison to the previous pattern.
- Move 00:13:764 to 00:14:218 and try something like d_d_k_kkd_k_d here, it would be good if you have k on both 00:14:105 and 00:13:877 for the strong instrument sounds.
- I think you could try 00:00:923 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) as kkd_k_ddk, I think the sound of 00:00:923 is closer to 00:00:696, so these could both be k, and would also work well with the drum beat on 00:00:923. Also, the sound within 00:01:605 (6,7,8) appears to go up towards the last note, so I think k would work well on the last note here. Done.
- How about 00:02:286 d or removing this note completely or ctrl+g with 00:02:741? I think it would sound nice if you have a k on 00:02:741 instead for the high pitch and strong instrument, you could also consider making both of 00:02:741 (12,13) k and 00:03:196 d for the instrument sounds here. Done
- Shouldn't 00:06:377 (30,31,32,33) be something like kkd_d? The 1/2 starting from 00:06:150 would sound much better as d_k_d_d_k as you have a strong sound on 00:06:377 that would work well as k, followed by two lower ones on 00:06:605 (32,33) which would sound better as d. Done
- 00:04:332 k? Sound is fairly strong, also for contrast to the sound on 00:03:877. Done
- I think you should remove 00:05:355 as there is no 1/4 sound here. You could also try moving this note to 00:05:582 to 00:05:582 and changing both this one and 00:05:468 to d. Done, I like more the moving suggestion.
- You could make 00:16:150 (72,73,74,75) d kkd, I think this would be nicer as the instrument sound on 00:16:605 is fairly low. Done
- 00:17:400 k and 00:17:855 k and 00:18:309 d? The sound in the first two triples goes up before going lower again on the third. Done
- 00:19:332 d and 00:20:241 k and 00:21:832 d? I think this would work well for the instruments.Done
- I think 00:27:968 would work better as d for structure, and similar sound to 00:27:741. I made something a bit different here.
- You could ctrl+g 00:22:741 (108,109) and also 00:24:105 (115,116). I think dkd at the beginning would fit better with the drums, and 00:24:105 (115,116,117,118) kdkd would give a nice emphasis to the sounds of 00:24:332 (116,117,118) in my opinion. Done
Futsuu
- 00:00:696 (1,2,4) would sound much better as k d d I think, you could also move 00:02:059 to 00:02:968 and change to k, I think k d dkd would work better instead of d kdk d in this case. Done.
- 00:05:241 (7,8,9) would also sound better as dkd imo. 00:05:696 (8) - Sound low to me, i prefer kdk.
- 00:10:468 d, would be nice for a d ddk k kdd structure here, also having kkd in this part feels a bit strong considering the instrument sound is fairly low. You could also make 00:13:877 (25,26,27) kkd or so to emphasize the stronger sound of this 3-note compared to 00:10:241 (17,18,19). Changed 00:10:468 to d, but 00:13:877 (25,26,27) i changed it kdk, that sounds better to me.
- 00:15:241 (28,1,2,3) dkd k would fit the instruments better, you have a higher drum sound on 00:15:468 and instrument on 00:16:150. the 3 notes have almost the same sound, so i think keeping kkk is better.
- I think you should remove 00:17:286 and change 00:17:514 to k, the rhythym here feels poorly represented by a 1/2 pattern I think, it would be much nicer to have emphasis of 00:17:514 (7,8) by having them as 1/1 k. Done.
- 00:18:877 (10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) kkd k d dkd would fit much better, the first two notes are relatively strong, 00:19:786 has a different sound and a 1/1 kdkd structure would be nice for the first part. And 00:20:696 (15,16,17) just sounds much nicer as dkd because the stronger sound is on the middle note. Done.
- Both of 00:23:423 (21,23) would fit better to the low instrument as d. Done.
Kantan
- I think it would sound much better if you change 00:08:877 (9,10,11,12) to k ddd, the instrument sound in the 3-note pattern is fairly low. Done.
- k on 00:13:423 feels a bit strong imo, I suggest you try d here.Done.
- 00:16:150 (19,20) ctrl+g, the long sound on 00:17:059 is low, the high does not start until 1/2 later so k does not feel nice here I think.Done.
- You could move 00:18:423 to 00:19:332 and change to k, the instrument is much stronger here, maybe even make the three notes here k for simplicity.
- The sound on 00:23:423 is really low, d would fit much better. Done.
- 00:27:968 would be good for overall structure here, to have ddd kkk in this calm part. Done.
Good luck
Thanks a lot for the random mod !