hi! i have some concerns about your low diffs!
let me know when you've responded and fixed the easy - normal spread issue so i can remove this pop.
[normal]
00:05:073 (3) - this is unrankable.
00:09:721 (2) - the rhythm here is poor, you could do something like http://puu.sh/vNvfT/f102d7d2a0.jpg to put clicks on all the vocals.
01:08:664 (1,2,3) - this kind of back and forth movement is very difficult for a beginner and should be avoided. please change it to something more comfortable.
[easy]
the spread gap between easy and normal is too big. normal uses extended 1/2 rhythms, occasionally with multiple circles in a row. most gaps in rhythm are 1/2 long.
easy uses mostly 2/1 rhythms and has exclusively 1/1 gaps. the easy is therefore too easy compared to the normal, and you should adjust it as such.
00:05:073 (3) - this is unrankable.
Note density should consist of mostly 1/1, occasional 1/2, or slower rhythms.regardless of what you say to the contrary, this is 1/4 snap and is therefore breaking a ranking criteria guideline.
00:09:721 (2) - the rhythm here is poor, you could do something like http://puu.sh/vNvfT/f102d7d2a0.jpg to put clicks on all the vocals.
01:08:664 (1,2,3) - this kind of back and forth movement is very difficult for a beginner and should be avoided. please change it to something more comfortable.
[easy]
the spread gap between easy and normal is too big. normal uses extended 1/2 rhythms, occasionally with multiple circles in a row. most gaps in rhythm are 1/2 long.
easy uses mostly 2/1 rhythms and has exclusively 1/1 gaps. the easy is therefore too easy compared to the normal, and you should adjust it as such.
Human error is allowed! do you know?the point of the modding process is to fix the errors that you clearly made, not to acknowledge and then ignore them.
let me know when you've responded and fixed the easy - normal spread issue so i can remove this pop.