macron kits are pretty nice
As long as its not puma lulMadvillain wrote:
macron kits are pretty nice
my uncle joe saw anti-overfishing regulations get set in place by law one time so that sort of deflates your argument that you can privately protect the environment (which largely takes place on gov't-owned land)B1rd wrote:
I was just at a private conservation ground that gets about 1.6 million dollars of income from private donors from this state alone. Sort of deflates the argument that it's impossible to protect the environment without the government.
Wow did the government really set rules about what you can do on its land? Obviously if that land were privately owned the owners would let anyone come and fish until there was nothing left, because people don't care about their property or its value (only the government does).DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
my uncle joe saw anti-overfishing regulations get set in place by law one time so that sort of deflates your argument that you can privately protect the environment (which largely takes place on gov't-owned land)
B1rd has said in the past that he would absolutely support having everything, including Police and Fire Departments, being privately owned.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Would you also support a privately-owned and paid for police force? Fire department? Other community services like those?
cuz fuck leftistsEndaris wrote:
How can we improve capitalism without exposing ourselves as filthy leftists?
Endaris wrote:
How can we improve capitalism without exposing ourselves as filthy leftists?
Argumentum ad populum.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
I just think you put far too much faith in private ownership to be SIGNIFICANTLY better than government ownership. In some ways it can be better, in some ways worse, most people understand and agree with that concept. Where do you get the idea that privatised ownership of resources would be so *significantly* better?
Would you also support a privately-owned and paid for police force? Fire department? Other community services like those?
and the three above you are also cancerMahogany wrote:
right is cancer
Nevermind the fact that actually reforming these prisoners would actively damage their income. It's in their best interest to have as many prisoners as possible, so you bet they're going to do all they can to keep prisoners from reintegration into society, and try all they can to keep them locked up as long as possible.Railey2 wrote:
Clearly they don't, because its not as profitable as say.. to just make a deal with a company from the outside and let people work for below min wage in prison - without any focus on improving their situation.
Only you would link this in response to "Most people can see that there are pros and cons" lolB1rd wrote:
Argumentum ad populum.
I think I'm gonna be sickDaddyCoolVipper wrote:
okay I'm definitely gonna be sickZain Sugieres wrote:
How about we talk about Ajit Pai and the net neutrality stuff in the US right now
You can confirm it for yourself by clicking the link provided in it and seeing the massive list of bot comments, yesRoseusJaeger wrote:
is that article even reliable?
But it does sound plausible.
Your morbid attachment to B1rd is hilariousMahogany wrote:
B1rd has said in the past that he would absolutely support having everything, including Police and Fire Departments, being privately owned.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Would you also support a privately-owned and paid for police force? Fire department? Other community services like those?
Having the military privately owned without a government backed military would be a disaster.Mahogany wrote:
B1rd has said in the past that he would absolutely support having everything, including Police and Fire Departments, being privately owned.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Would you also support a privately-owned and paid for police force? Fire department? Other community services like those?
I love these. The recurring taco truck is honestly the best.DaddyCoolVipper wrote: